Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Cats & Casses

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)
FishInPercolator
professor emeritus


Reged: 04/30/13

Loc: NYC
C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces
      #5867698 - 05/17/13 05:08 PM

I first had my eyes on the EdgeHD 800". My thoughts were given that I will be observing and periodically using it for video astronomy (mallincam) in the "big city", the enhanced optics and aperture would compensate for whatever light pollution there is. However, given that I will probably only see a handful of DSOs with it anyway, perhaps the C6, 6SE, or even the C5 spotter would be a greater advantage due to their portability (weights 5+ less than the EdgeHD 8") and cost savings.

I also had in mind to go all out Tele Vue for additional compensation.

However, with the 5" and 6" models, an Ethos providing the widest field of view will probably still show some coma if I am not mistaken. With the Edge this would not be an issue in theory.

So with the 6" models or less, I figure the Delos or Panoptic would be more suitable. However, in the event I do get something like the EdgeHD in the future, I would probably like to have the Ethos on hand.

Did I just answer my own question?

Thanks again for all of your help on my endeavor thus far.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Patrick
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 05/16/03

Loc: Franklin, Ohio
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: FishInPercolator]
      #5867846 - 05/17/13 05:59 PM

Quote:

Did I just answer my own question?




I don't think so. If and when you decide to get an Edge, then start thinking about eyepieces for that scope. I think your first inclination is right...C6 with Panoptics and Delos, or Plossls.

Regarding the Malincam and the C6's field of view...the Malincam sensor is very small so when you're using it your DSO will most likely be near the center of the field of view. At the center of the field of view there isn't a great deal of difference between the Edge scopes and standard scopes, so it shouldn't matter much.

I'm not sure any enhanced optic or aperture or better coatings can deal with the light pollution in NYC!

Also, regarding 2" eyepieces in the C5 and C6...you're not getting a great deal of benefit using them with either scope. The central baffle tube diameter on the C6 is 27mm (not sure about the C5), so any eyepiece that has a field stop diameter greater than 27mm will start vignetting. I used my 27mm Pan in my C6 all the time though. It has a 30mm field stop diameter, so I cheated a little. I was okay with it.

Patrick


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
FishInPercolator
professor emeritus


Reged: 04/30/13

Loc: NYC
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: Patrick]
      #5867879 - 05/17/13 06:22 PM

ok so in essence according to your link, the 24mm is the widest (lowest mag) I can go without any vignetting?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Geo.
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 10/01/08

Loc: Upstate NY
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: FishInPercolator]
      #5867881 - 05/17/13 06:23 PM

See: http://www.scopereviews.com/page1aa.html

For the price of an Ethos you can probably buy 2-3 used Naglers. The 21 and 17mm Ethos have 2" insertion barrels. The 21mm's field stop is 36.2mm. The 17's is 29.6. so the C6's baffle tube will limit the true FOV. The Ethos were designed with faster refractors and reflectors in mind.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
FishInPercolator
professor emeritus


Reged: 04/30/13

Loc: NYC
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: Geo.]
      #5867884 - 05/17/13 06:27 PM

Right. Even with Naglers though, the 82 deg AFOV will probably show a lot more coma on a C5 or C6 given they lack Edge optics... right? So something smaller like 50 thru 72 degrees would probably be more suitable... I think.

What's the field stop limit on a C5?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Patrick
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 05/16/03

Loc: Franklin, Ohio
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: FishInPercolator]
      #5868157 - 05/17/13 09:17 PM

Quote:

So something smaller like 50 thru 72 degrees would probably be more suitable... I think.




Yep...you got it. I don't know what the C5 baffle tube size is. Maybe someone else can help with that one.

Clear Skies,

Patrick


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Patrick
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 05/16/03

Loc: Franklin, Ohio
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: Patrick]
      #5868165 - 05/17/13 09:22 PM

According to THIS WEBSITE the C5 baffle tube size is 26mm. Sounds about right...

Patrick


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
FishInPercolator
professor emeritus


Reged: 04/30/13

Loc: NYC
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: Patrick]
      #5868340 - 05/17/13 10:42 PM

I've decided. C6 coming my way...

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Patrick
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 05/16/03

Loc: Franklin, Ohio
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: FishInPercolator]
      #5868401 - 05/17/13 11:11 PM

You will not be sorry! It's a very versatile scope.

Patrick


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
FishInPercolator
professor emeritus


Reged: 04/30/13

Loc: NYC
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: Patrick]
      #5869838 - 05/18/13 06:01 PM

Patrick, thanks for the support

I do have a question, are there any f/8 6" SCTs?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mclewis1
Thread Killer
*****

Reged: 02/25/06

Loc: New Brunswick, Canada
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: FishInPercolator]
      #5869998 - 05/18/13 07:32 PM

No, both the Meade and Celestron 6" SCTs are f10. The Meade f8 ACF SCTs start at 10".

There is a 6" f9 RC scope and an 8" f8 RC. The downside to the RCs is that they weigh a bit more than the equivalent SCTs and require some planning for back focus positions.

If you could handle a slightly heavier mount and tube one of the 8" f8 RC scopes with a .7 or .5x (f5.6 or f4) focal reducer and the Universe camera would make a very capable outreach setup.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
FishInPercolator
professor emeritus


Reged: 04/30/13

Loc: NYC
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: mclewis1]
      #5870003 - 05/18/13 07:34 PM

mind if I asked you to post a link?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
FishInPercolator
professor emeritus


Reged: 04/30/13

Loc: NYC
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: FishInPercolator]
      #5870011 - 05/18/13 07:42 PM

Ah nevermind, I found it...

Unfortunately it weights quite a bit for something I will be taking out onto the subway (worst case scenario, which will probably happen more often than not).

Hmm... it's unfortunate.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
FishInPercolator
professor emeritus


Reged: 04/30/13

Loc: NYC
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: FishInPercolator]
      #5870021 - 05/18/13 07:52 PM

I'm drooling over this one but it's unfortunately a little big and slightly out of my price range...

http://telescopes.toptenreviews.com/beginner-astrophotography-telescopes/astr...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
desertlens
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 12/06/10

Loc: 36N 105W
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepie new [Re: FishInPercolator]
      #5870047 - 05/18/13 08:07 PM

I think you'll be very happy with the C6. It's a lot of scope in a reasonably small package... maybe an inconspicuous tool bag or some such with room for a few eyepieces for the subway.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Patrick
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 05/16/03

Loc: Franklin, Ohio
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: FishInPercolator]
      #5870132 - 05/18/13 08:29 PM

Quote:


I do have a question, are there any f/8 6" SCTs?




You can get an f/6.3 focal reducer and add it to the back of the scope. That will make the C6 an f/6.3 scope with a focal length of about 960mm. It will also help flatten the field of view.

Out of curiosity, why is f/8 important to you?

Patrick


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Goodchild
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 12/31/08

Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: FishInPercolator]
      #5870190 - 05/18/13 08:44 PM

Quote:

I'm drooling over this one but it's unfortunately a little big and slightly out of my price range...

http://telescopes.toptenreviews.com/beginner-astrophotography-telescopes/astr...





Astronomics has this scope for $1395, or you can get the steel tubed version for $500 less and only two pounds more.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
FishInPercolator
professor emeritus


Reged: 04/30/13

Loc: NYC
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: Goodchild]
      #5870470 - 05/18/13 11:07 PM

Royce thanks for pointing that out, unfortunately I feel it's a tad heavy for my purposes.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Starhawk
Space Ranger
*****

Reged: 09/16/08

Loc: Tucson, Arizona
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: Goodchild]
      #5870572 - 05/19/13 12:28 AM

Did you already order it? The Nexstar SE mount is cute, but it never tracks correctly in mobile mode (it tracks via a triangle wave). And, you'll burn through a set of AAs in one evening.

So, if you start out with a little push mount, it will be light and easy to move, and you can look at what's working for a photography mount, and won't need lots of batteries.

-Rich


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
FishInPercolator
professor emeritus


Reged: 04/30/13

Loc: NYC
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: Starhawk]
      #5870642 - 05/19/13 01:39 AM

Nope, I'm debating now between a C6 and an Omni XLT 150.

I'm just about to go a little crazy. I have to make up my mind soon.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Starhawk
Space Ranger
*****

Reged: 09/16/08

Loc: Tucson, Arizona
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: FishInPercolator]
      #5870709 - 05/19/13 03:33 AM

An Omni XLT 150 is pretty big- 9.5 lbs heavier than a C5. On the bright side, when equipped with the old school drive, it runs for quite a while on a set of D cells.

Tell me this, would you feel comfortable toting a cello around NYC? Being a pedestrian stuck moving a heavy payload around the city isn't generally my idea of great fun. Of course, if your model was taxi-mobility, then this gets to be pretty forgiving, payload-wise. Not so much, wallet-wise.

How about this: mock up one of these scopes you are considering with a combination of cardboard boxes, bricks, and broomsticks, then go where you are thinking of observing from, and observe how it goes. The idea of doing this with cheap materials is if it's a total foob, you can jettison the mockup and just come home without the pressure of trying to recover over a thousand dollars worth of gear.

-Rich

Edited by Starhawk (05/19/13 03:37 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Starhawk
Space Ranger
*****

Reged: 09/16/08

Loc: Tucson, Arizona
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: Starhawk]
      #5870734 - 05/19/13 03:56 AM

Note- consider when people look at you with your odd looking mockup how you would feel when they were gazing at gleaming stainless steel legs and odd bags heaped with you.

-Rich


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
pjensen
super member


Reged: 04/08/12

Loc: Highland Village, Tx
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: Starhawk]
      #5870850 - 05/19/13 08:08 AM

Quote:

Tell me this, would you feel comfortable toting a cello around NYC? Being a pedestrian stuck moving a heavy payload around the city isn't generally my idea of great fun.




Great point.

One more consideration - it will take dozens of these trips to get used to the equipment. The first couple of times, you will find something not working right (aka: not understanding how it works). Or you will find you need this or that - a light, a chart, gps co-ordinates, a connector... Or just not knowing the star names (required for 2+4 star alignment). Or clouds will roll in.

Learning how to use this stuff and learning the sky takes time (and repeated attempts). I just can not imagine how hard this would be if I had use a subway (and hours of transit time) every time I wanted go out.

Perhaps taking a vacation for a week at a dark location might be a better option.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Patrick
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 05/16/03

Loc: Franklin, Ohio
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: FishInPercolator]
      #5871017 - 05/19/13 09:59 AM

Quote:

Nope, I'm debating now between a C6 and an Omni XLT 150.




It's nice to explore all the options. The C6 and Omni XLT 150 have the same aperture, but the 6" f/5 reflector is about twice as long as the C6. Just sayin'...

With an f/6.3 focal reducer, they're almost identical (750mm vs 960mm). The C6 can also be mounted on the CG4 mount if that's your concern. The C6 would also be easier to use on a GEM style mount than the Newt.

Patrick


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Geo.
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 10/01/08

Loc: Upstate NY
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: FishInPercolator]
      #5871957 - 05/19/13 04:53 PM

Quote:

Nope, I'm debating now between a C6 and an Omni XLT 150.




Pretty sure the optics are the same.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
FishInPercolator
professor emeritus


Reged: 04/30/13

Loc: NYC
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: Geo.]
      #5872308 - 05/19/13 07:46 PM

True but wouldn't the Newt provide more contrast and larger field of view (even though people have advised not to overwhelm myself with it)?

The 6" newt is 2.5 lbs heavier and 10.5 inches longer... the weight variance is nominal and due to its longer length, I would just have to position it vertically as opposed to horizontally in whatever large case I find for it...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
FishInPercolator
professor emeritus


Reged: 04/30/13

Loc: NYC
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: FishInPercolator]
      #5872310 - 05/19/13 07:47 PM

It also includes a 2" crayford focuser

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
azure1961p
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/17/09

Loc: USA
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: FishInPercolator]
      #5872778 - 05/19/13 11:03 PM

Fish,

Which one in the avatar is you and whose the other guy?

Pete


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
FishInPercolator
professor emeritus


Reged: 04/30/13

Loc: NYC
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: azure1961p]
      #5872785 - 05/19/13 11:08 PM

lol, actually, I was the one who took the photo

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
WesC
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 02/06/13

Loc: La Crescenta, CA
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: FishInPercolator]
      #5872871 - 05/19/13 11:57 PM

I still think you should go back to the refractor suggestions I made and seriously consider that approach. Its much lighter, and a lot easier to deal with.

Have you made it to a store yet?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
FishInPercolator
professor emeritus


Reged: 04/30/13

Loc: NYC
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: WesC]
      #5872881 - 05/20/13 12:07 AM

Hey Wes, yes I am certainly considering a refractor but as a second scope. Right now it's a toss between a C6 and the Omni 150 XLT Newtonian 6"... it's inexpensive and still portable, albeit a bit longer than the C6. I've made it to Adorama and they only had an EdgeHD 800 which I had asked them to ship from the warehouse. It's lovely but heavier/bulkier than the C6. The latter along with the 6" Newt are also significantly less expensive.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Patrick
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 05/16/03

Loc: Franklin, Ohio
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: FishInPercolator]
      #5872901 - 05/20/13 12:40 AM

My first scope was an 8" f/5 on a manual GEM. That scope nearly made me give up on astronomy. It's a pain in the neck using a Newt on a GEM mount, literally. You'll be rotating the tubes in the tube rings and/or have to look at your eyepiece upside down in certain parts of the sky. With the SCT all you rotate is the diagonal...much more convenient.

Contrast? Yeah, there's a bit of a difference...but you also have noticeable diffraction spikes with bright objects llke Jupiter, something you won't see in the SCT. Everything you can see in the Newt you can see in the SCT. There are only a very few objects that the 750mm Newt might get completely in the FOV that the 960mm C6 (operating with a focal reducer) might not be able, but the vast majority of objects will fit in both of the FOV's.. To be fair, at 1525mm native focal length, most deepsky objects look better in the C6 because they'll be bigger with the same eyepiece. It will take much shorter eyepieces to get any decent image scale from the Newt. Shorter eyepieces generally equate to shorter eye relief. I prefer to use longer focal length eyepieces and barlow if I have to.

My 2 cents...others may disagree...

Patrick

Edited by Patrick (05/20/13 12:45 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
FishInPercolator
professor emeritus


Reged: 04/30/13

Loc: NYC
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: Patrick]
      #5872909 - 05/20/13 12:44 AM

They are worthwhile points... I just think a faster scope like an f/5 will work best for both visual and imaging. I read about a bunch of problems bringing the C6 f/10 down with reducers for use with a CCD camera or DSLR. Unless I'm mistaken...

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Patrick
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 05/16/03

Loc: Franklin, Ohio
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: FishInPercolator]
      #5872917 - 05/20/13 12:51 AM

Quote:

I read about a bunch of problems bringing the C6 f/10 down with reducers for use with a CCD camera or DSLR. Unless I'm mistaken...




What kind of problems?

Okay, now you're throwing imaging into the mix? Does the imaging setup need to fit in your backpack too?

Go with a small 80mm refractor if you're going to image. The SCT will be easier to image with than the Newt, but an 80mm refractor will be better than either. I thought you cared more about visual, but if imaging is your end game, then go with the refractor.

Patrick


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Spacetravelerx
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 12/23/12

Loc: New Mexico
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: Patrick]
      #5872922 - 05/20/13 12:53 AM

I 110% agree with Patrick!

But you knew that fish...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
FishInPercolator
professor emeritus


Reged: 04/30/13

Loc: NYC
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: Spacetravelerx]
      #5872925 - 05/20/13 12:56 AM

I will probably end up getting a 6" Newt, a 6" SCT, and an 80mm refractor by the end of the year anyway... all portable solutions...

The Tak 102mm I need to save up for so that will take a bit more time...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Starhawk
Space Ranger
*****

Reged: 09/16/08

Loc: Tucson, Arizona
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: FishInPercolator]
      #5873019 - 05/20/13 02:29 AM

So, after posting on this a few times, I went out and did an experiment with a mobile rig to see what happened. The participants were a NexStar SLT mount (with the 4" OTA it came with removed), an 80 mm C80ED telescope (f/7.5 600 mm FL refractor with the same optics as the Orion ED80), and a C5 OTA.

I started out witht the 80mm on the mount, and at a total of about 17 lbs, it's pretty even to move, even though it isn't obvious how to pack a scope that long in a backpack. The mount has some bounce since even this relatively small scope has a bit of a moment of inertia, which small mounts have trouble with. The views were quite nice, and the moon was bright enough to look a bit like the last big city sky glow I got to endure. The view of the moon had great contrast, though the seeing didn't seem to want me to go over 100X. Likewise, Saturn didn't want to give up the Cassini division, although I have seen it in this telescope in the past. DSOs were quite difficult with the setting double cluster only seeming to be a few of the bright stars.

I then went on to the C5, which has sadly been wanting wear since the AP 130 EDFGT showed up in 2011. The C5 threw down a fantastic image on the moon which held up at twice the magnification I was able to use on the C80ED. We've been having a lot of wind, so there is a lot of dust in the air, but the C5's image still came through to make fuzzy details like some of the older rays on the moon fairly obvious. At over twice the magnification I had reached in the C80ED, Saturn showed the Cassini division, cloud stripes, and subtle color variations as well as three moons. Double Cluster was improved, but still, you really needed to have seen the object before to know what you were looking at since only the brighter stars came through. What was interesting was the mount was much more stable with the C5, even with the longer focal length effects, thanks to the small moment of inertia of such a stubby telescope. I finished the evening quite sure I could never part with that telescope.

With AA batteries and a basic assortment of eyepieces, this or something like the NexStar 5 SE would be around 25 lbs, and ideal for visual work.

Packing it up isn't trivial, but at least it is possible on a frame backpack, and with a bit of a stretch, I can probably see getting the NexStar 6 SE across the city as well (again, the issue isn't just weight- it is bulk, clumsiness, and fragility all tied together).

With that said, this evening reminded me of starting out thinking I could get really light mounts to cooperate for imaging with enough elbow grease and smarts. The sad truth is: They just don't. Whoever put the 5 SE together even had enough of a sense of humor to add a wedge into the tripod. In reality, it isn't going to be easy.

The only thing I have done for photographing DSOs which has ever approached being "Easy" has been moving a C11 to the boonies, setting it up with land-line power, hyperstar, a computer monitor, and about 200 lbs of gear total. What was easy about this, you ask? The images were shot at f/2 so a 30 second exposure could get to 22nd magnitude. That solves some heavy duty issues. Sure, refractors are really easy to get set up for photography. And if you have 70+ lbs. of mount on your side, they can even be guided through an image. Astrophotography is unforgiving, but when you have the right rig in the right place at the right time, those amazing images can come. But if anything isn't just so, the only comment back is, "Your stars aren't round."

If you can set photography on the back burner for a while, I anticipate you can make this work. If you want to do photography, there is an adapter for iphones to make getting a parfocal image easier to start out (you can actually do a lot with this).

-Rich

Edited by Starhawk (05/20/13 02:31 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
FishInPercolator
professor emeritus


Reged: 04/30/13

Loc: NYC
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: Starhawk]
      #5873026 - 05/20/13 02:42 AM

Thanks for the post, Rich. I've decided on two portable tubes - C6 f/10 or the 6" Omni XLT 150 reflector f/5. And with the ZEQ25 it'll be about 40ish pounds which I feel I'll comfortably lug around when not transporting via car. My concern is to successfully focal reduce the C6 f/10 as I have heard there are issues with that. I will most likely start off with a scope and then work my way toward an imaging system, but I figured it wouldn't hurt to do some preliminary research now so I can get a general idea of total costs and payload requirements.

Edited by FishInPercolator (05/20/13 02:46 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Starhawk
Space Ranger
*****

Reged: 09/16/08

Loc: Tucson, Arizona
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: FishInPercolator]
      #5873036 - 05/20/13 02:53 AM

I don't know that I would say reducing a C6 i especially problematic; its more that there are limits to what you can get in return. If you want to reduce a C6, you can get all the way down to f/1.9, since it has its own mini version of hyperstar (yes, it is cute). The real problem is no matter what you do, the best photography means a trip to the boonies. The broad spectrum lights people have started using have made filtering far less effective than it was 10 years ago. If you're in the city, get images of stuff in the solar system; there's still a lot to learn, but it's a lot more fun.

-Rich


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
FishInPercolator
professor emeritus


Reged: 04/30/13

Loc: NYC
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: Starhawk]
      #5873060 - 05/20/13 03:21 AM

Mini hyperstar? Do tell...

I think Jack at Mallincam said the problem I would have with the C6 is if I used it with the Universe, which has a larger chip and made for scopes w/2" focusers. So my thought was I could get a 2" focuser on the 6" Newt... It's not EdgeHD optics though so I not sure exactly how that plays out...

I plan to get images of solar system too... I cannot fathom neglecting our own moon.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
coutleef
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 02/21/08

Loc: Saint-Donat, Quebec, Canada
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: FishInPercolator]
      #5873311 - 05/20/13 09:27 AM

wow, CN members are doing a lot to help you i am impressed.

if that helps i was in your position several years ago. i needed a portable scope because of back probems. first had a 5 inch newt on a gem. i almost abandonned astronomy because of it (as mentionned by Patrick above) not comfortable positions for observing, difficulty to collimate ( i was unaware of CN then) but mainly, not that easy to transport.

sold it and got a 6 se and it was days and night. after two weeks, i traded it for a 8se and will keep that scope for life. if you are an experienced amateur you will notice the difference in contrast between a newt and a SCT. if not, you probably will not. for wider views on a 6se i would suggest a 9x50raci but i would not stress using a focal redicer but just use 68-72 degrees EPs. for a non motorized set up i use a ES twilight mount and it works well. Thermal equilibrium is fast with a 6 inch SCT.

having had both types of scopes i would go for the sct.

just a word of caution. difficult to rely on internal batteries for the se scopes as they oftwn result in power prolems rapidly. there are lightweigth solutions as could be discussed on the nexstar forum

just my experience and as always ymmv. and this comes from someone who has a SCT, newt (dob)and a refractor


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Patrick
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 05/16/03

Loc: Franklin, Ohio
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: FishInPercolator]
      #5873328 - 05/20/13 09:36 AM

Hyperstar for C6 . 290mm fl/ at f/1.9.

Since the camera sits over the front corrector plate, a round style ccd camera is almost essential. A DSLR will severely block the front aperture opening.


Quote:

So my thought was I could get a 2" focuser on the 6" Newt... It's not EdgeHD optics though so I not sure exactly how that plays out...






There's not a lot of gain going to a 2" focuser on a standard 6" Newt. The 6" f/5 Newt is optimized for a 1.25" focuser and the diagonal is sized accordingly. If you want to use a 6" Newt, you should be look specifically at Imaging Newts, like the AstroTech 6" f/4 Imaging Newt . It's already optimized with a 2" sized diagonal and focuser. You will need to add a Coma Corrector/Field Flattener with this scope because of the field curvature on the f/4 primary (as with any Newtonian below f/6.)

I've never used one of the Imaging Newts, but I've seen one up close and they're cute. At f/4, they're more portable than their longer brothers.

Patrick


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Starhawk
Space Ranger
*****

Reged: 09/16/08

Loc: Tucson, Arizona
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: FishInPercolator]
      #5873427 - 05/20/13 10:33 AM

Here is a link. You get an adapter with it, and they have one for a Mallincam:

http://starizona.com/acb/HyperStar-Lens---6-Celestron-P3032C773.aspx

You'll have to ask about provisions for narrowband filters. Of course, with or without one, you're assured of being able to shoot whatever the sky will allow.

I know earlier C6s always had to have their secondary adapted to a Fastar removable housing. Does anyone know if current ones come from the factory with them? If not, Starizona would know, and might have one with a removable secondary in stock. Alternatively, they'd be the best ones to install the secondary. The removable secondary housing lets the scope work as a regular C6, but the secondary has a bezel which unscrews to allow it to switch over to the camera staring at the primary mirror.

-Rich

Edited by Starhawk (05/20/13 10:42 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
FishInPercolator
professor emeritus


Reged: 04/30/13

Loc: NYC
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: Starhawk]
      #5873682 - 05/20/13 12:51 PM

Thanks guys...

How quick and simple is it to replace the corrector with this? I suppose I won't be doing much observation while in the midst of imaging with the hyperstar setups.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mclewis1
Thread Killer
*****

Reged: 02/25/06

Loc: New Brunswick, Canada
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: FishInPercolator]
      #5873924 - 05/20/13 03:01 PM

Hyperstar is a replacement for the secondary mirror in the middle of the corrector ... not the corrector itself. You don't go swapping it around all the time during an observing session. You set the scope up for Hyperstar imaging and use it like that for a while. In that mode the scope can no longer be used visually (you've removed the secondary mirror). With a C6 small diameter cameras are a must (Mallincam video, QHY8Pro, Starlight Xpress M25C or similarly sized cameras) ... DSLRs are not recommended at all with the C6 setup (but are ok with larger scope Hyperstar setups). Follow the link that Rich posted, there's a ton of Hyperstar info there.

A Hyperstar C6 is as Patrick indicated above a very wide field instrument. Traditional DSOs like most galaxies, planetary nebulae, and globular cluster are TINY at 290mm fl. Yes it's very very fast but that short focal length really restricts it's use. It's very good a large extended objects and these are generally not the objects you want to be imaging from a heavily light polluted urban area. Highly selective narrow band filters do help (for example an Ha filter for huge objects like the North American nebula).

While it's not particularly delicate you do need to be extra careful with a Hyperstar setup, it's not something you want kids or curious but clumsy adults poking around.

-----

I mentioned this before in one of the many other threads but I'll say it again, this time with more details and a bit more emphatically.

- Get the C6 ota and the small IOptron gem.
- Flexible dew shield for the C6.
- Anti vibration pads for the mount.
- Mallincam Xtreme camera and an MFR-5 focal reducer and the two spacers.
- Use a Windows or Mac OS laptop with good battery life and a USB frame grabber and a USB-serial rs232 adapter.
- A Jumpstart style 12v battery (10-20amp/hr capacity, from automotive or big box stores), and a 3:1 cigarette lighter style adapter (so you can power both the camera and the mount together off of the one battery ... this won't be needed if you have a battery with at least two cigarette lighter style outlets).
- A 6-10' S-Video cable.
- 2.1mm - cigarette lighter style DC power cable (RadioShack) ... to power the Mallincam off of the battery.
- Astronomic UHC, and Ha 12nm 1.25" filters.

- A plastic storage container for the ota, another for the mount head, and a third for all the accessories. You'll also need something to bundle up the tripod legs (there are zip up bags like this). A small folding chair would be very useful as well. You can setup the computer on top of the 3 storage boxes. Bring a blanket for under the scope, this makes it much easier to find anything you drop in the dark and prevents some things from breaking if you are setting up on asphalt/concrete.

Don't mess with iPAD controls, wireless gear, or the like, at least not initially. Get a simple, proven, bullet proof setup working before you consider anything else. You need ultra reliable gear if you're going to be running remotely. Use this setup for a while, get some experience (the most valuable accessory ever) and only then consider other options.

Edited by mclewis1 (05/20/13 03:04 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
FishInPercolator
professor emeritus


Reged: 04/30/13

Loc: NYC
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: mclewis1]
      #5873938 - 05/20/13 03:09 PM

Thanks! All understood and points well-taken. Now I await for a new credit card to be issued after my astoundingly unfortunate experience with Herb York over at Astromart.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
A. Viegas
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 03/05/12

Loc: New York City/ CT
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: FishInPercolator]
      #5874236 - 05/20/13 04:58 PM

I concur with Mark's comments above 110%. Forget the Universe, it will do you no good with a C6 and under NYC's light dome. The MCX smaller chip will work great with the C6. The ZEQ25 mount seems like a real winner and will provide you important future OTA upgrade capability. A jumpstart type battery is a good idea, but they are heavy. Think about how you will be transporting this on the subway. By itself it will weigh more than the OTA... I have heard good things about Starizona's little lithium battery product, not sure if it can be adapted to power more than just the scope, but worth taking a look... Starizona Battery

Good luck

Al


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Patrick
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 05/16/03

Loc: Franklin, Ohio
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: A. Viegas]
      #5874481 - 05/20/13 07:14 PM

Mark,

Great job of explanation there...excellent recommendation for the gear as well. I'm going to give a serious look at your camera recommendations. Nice detail! Do you have a Malincam?

IT Guy:

Listen to the man~

The C6 is the most versatile scope of the three or four you've looked at.

Patrick


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
FishInPercolator
professor emeritus


Reged: 04/30/13

Loc: NYC
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: Patrick]
      #5874487 - 05/20/13 07:18 PM

Yep, there have been quite a few of you I've been listening to who have been nothing less than helpful and generous with your time. I thank you all.

Looking forward to it.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Patrick
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 05/16/03

Loc: Franklin, Ohio
Re: C6 or 6SE? New York City dilemma re: TV eyepieces new [Re: FishInPercolator]
      #5874491 - 05/20/13 07:20 PM

Quote:

Now I await for a new credit card to be issued after my astoundingly unfortunate experience with Herb York over at Astromart.




Good old Herb...what a character... I've never purchased a single thing at Anecortes, well, just because...

Patrick


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)


Extra information
21 registered and 18 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  cbwerner, Starman27, kkokkolis 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 1235

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics