Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Classic Telescopes

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | (show all)
trainsktg
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 08/23/05

Loc: Pacific Northwest
Re: Use of vintage eyepiece sun filters... Why not? new [Re: DAVIDG]
      #4612919 - 05/31/11 12:47 PM Attachment (75 downloads)

Quote:


If you want the best in white light solar observing, you build an instrument designed exactly for it. Here is a picture of my 4.25" f/10 Solar Newt, which uses uncoated optics and a built in Herschel Wedge.
- Dave




Ah...another solar newt!

Keith


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jon Marinello
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 09/21/10

Loc: Santa Barbara, CA
Re: Use of vintage eyepiece sun filters... Why not? new [Re: BigC]
      #4612924 - 05/31/11 12:50 PM

Not the first time I have pushed things too far!

I'm going to set up the 60mm again today and run some further tests with additional sun filters I have.

I will report back the results.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
wfj
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 01/10/08

Loc: California, Santa Cruz County
Re: Use of vintage eyepiece sun filters... Why not? new [Re: Jon Marinello]
      #4613228 - 05/31/11 03:20 PM

Jon, if you have a digital thermometer, you might instrument the filter to see just how hot it is getting. It might surprise us all how hot this really gets.

The reason its breaking the filter is that the thermal load is too high and the heat has nowhere to go, so it builds.

Also, the glass starts out cold, so there's likely thermal shock that's occurring.

Neither of which occurs in a full aperture situation.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Carl Kolchak
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 08/02/06

Loc: Northeast, Florida
Re: Use of vintage eyepiece sun filters... Why not? new [Re: wfj]
      #4613264 - 05/31/11 03:43 PM

Hi Jon

This is a good question and thanks for asking it. I do have a followup to it.

DISCLAIMER: I do not use or advocate the use of these older sun filters:

When these filters were new, '50s, '60s, '70s, and etc. were there a lot of failures? Are there a bunch of budding amateur astronomers from this era with damaged eye/eyes? Is it because of the age these filters become dangerous? Or is the warning that accompanies every post regarding these sun filters stated because folks may use the filter with larger scopes, (like Jon did) and discover that the filter will fail?

peace & clear skies,


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bonco
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 04/17/06

Loc: Florida
Re: Use of vintage eyepiece sun filters... Why not? new [Re: Carl Kolchak]
      #4613390 - 05/31/11 04:38 PM

Maybe it goes without saying but full aperture astro mylar filters are easy to mount and cheap. I have a more expensive 4 inch hard filter from One Thousand Oaks. Works great but is much more expensive than their mylar sheets.
My filter delivers a natural looking yellow solar disk however I think the mylars deliver a blue disk. Bill


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Don W
demi-god
*****

Reged: 05/19/03

Loc: Wisconsin, USA
Re: Use of vintage eyepiece sun filters... Why not? new [Re: Bonco]
      #4613449 - 05/31/11 05:10 PM

One of the big problem with these filters is that when you attempt to focus them the filter goes through the point of focus before the point of focus is reached in the eyepiece. When this happens, the focused heat of the sun is on the filter and the intense heat can make them crack or even burst.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DAVIDG
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 12/02/04

Loc: Hockessin, De
Re: Use of vintage eyepiece sun filters... Why not? new [Re: Don W]
      #4613514 - 05/31/11 05:53 PM

One of the reasons why these filter crack from the heat is that they are usually held too tight in the cell so the difference in the expansion of the glass vs the metal that is causing the failure. The usual mode of failure is that you have been observing the Sun for a number of minutes or longer and that is when they crack. Having a solar filter mounted in a black cell is also not the greatest piece of optical engineering.
If you run the experiments be sure to run one were the filter is mounted on the end of the diagonal. Also measure were the focal plane is in relationship to the end of the eyepiece you use. With many of the simple eyepiece designs that came with vintage 60mm refractors, the longer the focal length of the eyepiece, the far the focal plane of the scope was from the end of the eyepiece when it is in focus. That put the filter in position in the optical path were the energy was spread out. The shorter focal length eyepiece come to focus were the focal plane of the scope is very close to the end of the eyepiece, putting the focused image of the Sun on the filter.
I'm wondering if the cause of failure of these filters is that one first was observing the Sun with low powered eyepiece and then wanted to take a closer look at a Sunspot and switch to higher magnification and that put the filter in position were the Sun was focused on the filter.

- Dave


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Joe Cepleur
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 03/18/10

Loc: Dark North Woods
Re: Use of vintage eyepiece sun filters... Why not? new [Re: BigC]
      #4614071 - 05/31/11 11:44 PM

Quote:

The little Sun filter was designed for use with a 60mm objective (or smaller) and you overloaded it with the light from a 100mm objective!Seriously ,it was subjected to 2/3rds more heat ;there really is a lot of energy in sunlight.




Not 2/3 more, but nearly three times as much, because heat is proportional to the area of the objective.

60mm => 30mm radius; 30^2 = 900 square mm area

100mm => 50mm radius; 50^2 = 2500 square mm area

100mm objective has ~ 2.8 times the area of a 60mm objective


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
MacScope
sage
*****

Reged: 12/18/04

Loc: Western Pennsylvania USA
Re: Use of vintage eyepiece sun filters... Why not? new [Re: DAVIDG]
      #4614093 - 05/31/11 11:54 PM

I used one of my vintage sun filters this past evening close to sunset with a 20mm Huygens eye piece in my 60mm Celestron/Vixen Cometron 910mm focal length. Nice view, green, did not view for long. Wish I could find a Swift or Tasco Herschel wedge but they are not easy to find.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Joe Cepleur
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 03/18/10

Loc: Dark North Woods
Re: Use of vintage eyepiece sun filters... Why not? new [Re: MacScope]
      #4614156 - 06/01/11 12:43 AM

Quote:

I used one of my vintage sun filters this past evening close to sunset with a 20mm Huygens eye piece in my 60mm Celestron/Vixen Cometron 910mm focal length. Nice view, green, did not view for long.




Seems a shame to risk blindness when safe solar filters covering the entire objective are readily available, but none of us can tell others what to do. I am sure we are all glad that you enjoyed a fine view and came to no harm. Still, such good fortune does not change the thrust of this thread, nor our responsibility to educate the pubic on the safe use of classic telescopes.

Many people used this type of solar filter back in the day. Had it been 100% dangerous 100% of the time, no one would have used it. The problem is analogous to wearing seat belts. People will say, "No need; I'm not going far." Looking simply at the facts, the equations of kinetic energy have no factor representing the total time or total distance traveled prior to the crash. Only the velocity at impact matters, with consequences that may be severe. In the case of this old style of solar filter, blind is blind, regardless of how many successful viewings one has had in the past, or how fine or long the view immediately prior.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rich (RLTYS)Moderator
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 12/18/04

Loc: New York (Long Island)
Re: Use of vintage eyepiece sun filters... Why not? new [Re: Jon Marinello]
      #4614363 - 06/01/11 06:18 AM

Quote:

Not the first time I have pushed things too far!

I'm going to set up the 60mm again today and run some further tests with additional sun filters I have.

I will report back the results.




I hope the filters you are testing are NOT the old fashion dark filters. You were lucky the first time, you may not be so lucky the next time.

Rich (RLTYS)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Joe Cepleur
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 03/18/10

Loc: Dark North Woods
Re: Use of vintage eyepiece sun filters... Why not? new [Re: Rich (RLTYS)]
      #4614445 - 06/01/11 07:48 AM

If Jon tests his remaining solar filters without looking through them, he may gather interesting historical data, or even open a niche field of solar photography through sacrificial cameras. I support his experiment, with the caveat that we would be responsible to convey that no readers should misinterpret the result. Suppose he showed that, over so many hours, these filters placed at the diagonal of a 60mm scope did not break, whereas one already broke promptly when screwed to the eyepiece of a 100mm scope. Given the stakes of instant blindness, the inherently flawed engineering of placing the filter after the objective, and the uncertain quality of all such antique filters of this type, it would still be unsafe to use them, and irresponsible for this forum to condone their use with live human eyes.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jon Marinello
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 09/21/10

Loc: Santa Barbara, CA
Re: Use of vintage eyepiece sun filters... Why not? new [Re: Rich (RLTYS)]
      #4614531 - 06/01/11 08:59 AM

Yes they are the old fashioned ones. But I won't be looking through them. This will just be a test to see how long they will go before breaking. I won't look through them.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jon Marinello
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 09/21/10

Loc: Santa Barbara, CA
Re: Use of vintage eyepiece sun filters... Why not? new [Re: Joe Cepleur]
      #4614532 - 06/01/11 09:00 AM

Agreed Joe.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Preston Smith
The Travel Scope Guy
*****

Reged: 04/24/05

Loc: Eureka, Pa
Re: Use of vintage eyepiece sun filters... Why not? new [Re: Jon Marinello]
      #4614558 - 06/01/11 09:26 AM

Hmmm,

DAVIDG made a very good point (as always) that the sun filters did not have thermal expansion capabilites.

What if:

A Ramsden eyepiece had an old solar filter mounted between the two elements of the eyepiece? And mounted in a manner to allow for some thermal expansion? And only used on a 60mm scope?

The filter would not be near the focal point.

Do any of you have reports of the lenses in your old eyepieces cracking from solar observing? I know that more complex eyepiece can be damaged but I have never heard of the two lens eyepieces (Ramsdens, Huygens) being damaged.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DAVIDG
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 12/02/04

Loc: Hockessin, De
Re: Use of vintage eyepiece sun filters... Why not? [Re: Preston Smith]
      #4614645 - 06/01/11 10:36 AM

Eye damage is serious stuff. I've been an amateur astronomer for over 30 years and have been observing the Sun all that time. I have had a filter crack on me while I was observing the Sun and looking into the eyepiece when was I kid. Since then I have had my eye examined many times and told the Doctors what had happened and they could find nothing wrong with my eye. I did not have any lose of vision or any problem after the filter cracked. I'm still lucky to have 20/20 vision in both eyes, today.
Maybe I got real lucky but over years I have read that when these filters crack one is going to suffer instant blindness. While this is very serious, I would like to know if anyone has FIRST hand knowledge of eye damage caused by one of these filters cracking. I know that people have suffered eye damage from looking at eclipses but that is different. I do scientific research for a living and I like to see the data and seperate the facts from the fiction.
On a side note I have seen full aperture solar filter fall off telescopes and have seen the wind blow them loose so one needs to be sure that they are mounted very well. I have witness first hand when a full aperture filter came loose and it wasn't more then 3 seconds later, smoke was coming out of the telescope and a few months ago there was a newspaper article I read were a telescope was left unattended during the day and caused a deck to catch fire.

While I am not defending the use of these screw on type filters, if they crack, your letting light in thru the crack vs if you loose a full aperture filter you have much more energy at the eyepiece.
This is why I built a telescope designed for white-light solar obsevering, with many built in safety features. If any part fails, it fails safe and no image can be formed at the eyepiece.

All the Best,
- Dave


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jon Marinello
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 09/21/10

Loc: Santa Barbara, CA
Re: Use of vintage eyepiece sun filters... Why not? [Re: DAVIDG]
      #4614656 - 06/01/11 10:41 AM

Hi Dave,

I would like to hear more about the design of the telescope you built for white-light solar obsevering, with all the built-in safety features. Can you show us pictures with lots of close ups of the features along with a detailed description? I might want to build one. Perhaps this is already documented and in that case can you just point us to that?

Thanks,

jon


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mikey cee
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/18/07

Loc: bellevue ne.
Re: Use of vintage eyepiece sun filters... Why not? [Re: Jon Marinello]
      #4614677 - 06/01/11 10:58 AM

Well I have one solar filter maybe two but they are so hard to find for me that I will never abuse them. Between people tossing them and Jon destroying them I'll soon have a true and valuable collection!! Mike

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
trainsktg
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 08/23/05

Loc: Pacific Northwest
Re: Use of vintage eyepiece sun filters... Why not? [Re: Jon Marinello]
      #4614778 - 06/01/11 11:52 AM

Quote:

Hi Dave,

I would like to hear more about the design of the telescope you built for white-light solar obsevring, with all the built-in safety features. Can you show us pictures with lots of close ups of the features along with a detailed description? I might want to build one. Perhaps this is already documented and in that case can you just point us to that?

Thanks,

jon




Jon,

There is a decent tutorial on how to design a dedicated solar scope on pages 43 and 44 of Sam Brown's 'All About Telescopes'. It isn't a step by step tutorial, as you will need to use the various tables to calculate the strength of the image based on the type of telescope you are designing, and then the appropriate filtration or attenuation to knock the image down to safe levels. I have yet to run across another book anywhere that discusses the construction of a dedicated white light reflector. Mine is a 4.25" f13.

Keith


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DAVIDG
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 12/02/04

Loc: Hockessin, De
Re: Use of vintage eyepiece sun filters... Why not? [Re: Jon Marinello]
      #4614789 - 06/01/11 12:00 PM Attachment (76 downloads)

Quote:

Hi Dave,

I would like to hear more about the design of the telescope you built for white-light solar obsevering, with all the built-in safety features. Can you show us pictures with lots of close ups of the features along with a detailed description? I might want to build one. Perhaps this is already documented and in that case can you just point us to that?

Thanks,

jon




Jon,
You can find a couple of write ups of different solar instruments I have made over the years including my white-light solar newtonian here http://www.considine.net/dgroski/
It's a 4.25" f/10 newtonian with the primary and secondary that are uncoated. Only 5% of the light is reflected off of the primary and then 5% of that off the secondary. The light then goes to a Herschel wedge that can be rotated. So none of the surfaces ever seen concentrated solar energy. Heating and distortion of any of the optical surfaces does not occur. Since the light coming off the secondary is polarized, by rotating the Herschel wedge I can cross polarize the light and tune the brightness of the image to fit the sky conditions and magnification used. The Herschel wedge is held in place by a screw so it's not easily removed. If anything of the optical parts should fall out or some how fail no light can reach the eyepiece. If some how some one would remove the Herschel wedge and look into the 'scope they would see light that was reduced in intensity by 0.0025. The reflection off of glass or water is brighter.
The optics are held in an oversized cardboard tube and the mirror cell has a fan on the back. It allows air flow but no light from the outside to get in. The result is a very high contrast image. When the sky is clear, the area around the Sun is ink black. The grandulation on the surface of the Sun are almost always visible and Sun spots show amazing detail.
I designed this 'scope to be used at public outreach events since I know it's safe. One would have to work very hard to hurt themselves observing with it. I don't have to worry about a filter failing, a coated developing pin holes or having a kid pull a full aperture filter off the 'scope or the cap off a finderscope and looking in when I turn my back for a second.
Here is a picture of my homemade Herschel wedge. The wedge itself was sold by Edmund. This one was chipped along the edges and ground it into an ellipse. It's mounted in a PVC pipe Tee. The assembly rotates and in the picture the eyepiece is at 90 degree to the tube and in that position the images is it's dimmest because of cross polarization. When the eyepiece is parallel to the tube the image is at it's brightest.

- Dave


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | (show all)


Extra information
12 registered and 18 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Rich (RLTYS), Brian Risley 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 34552

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics