Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Classic Telescopes

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)
mooNSpy250
member


Reged: 12/24/11

Loc: Colorado
Why do we like classics??
      #6341973 - 01/28/14 10:01 PM

After now spending some quality time on CN, I thought I would offer my thoughts about classic scopes; who buys them, and why some people find it odd the money some of us are willing to pay for them.

Many people appreciate the classics over technology. The argument may be; why would you buy an old telescope over a new telescope with all of the technological advances today?
I would answer; even though there has been huge technological advances over the decades in optics (mainly manufacturing) , that does not mean that the full advancements are always present in every new telescope, especially in lower end new scopes. Craftsmanship and materials that are often present in many of the classic telescopes are just not found in new telescope (of similar price point).

I have posted this because I am still surprised of the great value many classic telescopes offer for the price, and I often see posts from people surprised how much people may pay for them.

Recently I have paid what many may consider “top dollar” for several classic telescopes (no one has commented directly to me about paying too much; that is not what is behind this post), and have really sat down and analyzed what “value” relative to price that they really are. I just cant figure out how the “other than classic lovers” don’t see this value..

Example: I picked up an Edmonds 4001 fork mount 8”, near mint condition, circa 1980 telescope recently. The thing is cast aluminum, built like a tank, clock drive that works quite well, optics that are superb.. for about the same price you will have to pay for a new 8” Dob ( particle board construction, no drive etc).. I am not bashing them, I had a Z10 at one time and loved it..

I can give similar examples for my RV6, my C8, and my Sears 76/1200 #4…

I just don’t understand why others don’t see this???

Now that I think about it; I will now shut up as not to alert others to the value of these scopes.

Lets keep them all to ourselves shall we…


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
starman876
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 04/28/08

Loc: VA
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: mooNSpy250]
      #6342017 - 01/28/14 10:28 PM

Too late, you just spilled the beans. I will be on the look out for these classic bargains.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Datapanic
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 10/17/09

Loc: Tucson, Arizona
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: starman876]
      #6342153 - 01/29/14 12:02 AM Attachment (15 downloads)

Because it's not what you have, it's how you use it.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rcwolpert
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 08/13/12

Loc: San Jose, CA
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: Datapanic]
      #6342163 - 01/29/14 12:11 AM

Wow! Nice pic! I've seen Saturn like that one night last year with my C11 and Pentax 5mm XO eyepiece - couldn't stop looking. What Classic did you use for this pic?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Joe Cepleur
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 03/18/10

Loc: Dark North Woods
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: Datapanic]
      #6342164 - 01/29/14 12:11 AM

Quote:

Because it's not what you have, it's how you use it.




That is one of the crazy best pictures of Saturn I've ever seen, or will ever be seen.

There is a difference in usage of classic scopes. Classicists like using their mechanical mounts and their own knowledge to find objects. Hard to do that with the ^v<> buttons on an electric paddle controller, let alone with a computerized mount!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
amicus sidera
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 10/14/11

Loc: East of the Sun, West of the M...
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: mooNSpy250]
      #6342175 - 01/29/14 12:34 AM

Quote:


I just don’t understand why others don’t see this???





Good question, Bob.

I think that there are a lot of things at play here:

Many might not have confidence in their ability to repair or maintain an older instrument;

...unlike many of us here, the average amateur who sees an older classic for sale might have little knowledge of the particular scope and thus avoid purchase for fear of ending up with a "white elephant";

...and, in the case of far too many amateurs, if a telescope doesn't come equipped with a USB port and go-to, it won't even be considered for potential purchase.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Datapanic
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 10/17/09

Loc: Tucson, Arizona
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: amicus sidera]
      #6342222 - 01/29/14 01:20 AM

Bob - the image was taken with a webcam through the Horsetrail Cave.

Joe - all my scopes have dual axis drive control and a hand controller, but the box was built in the early 80's. No goto or RS-232 ports for any of them, just On/Off

I'm almost done restoring the RV-6 and I hope to do some imaging with it this weekend since I don't recall ever seeing any such stuff here in the classics through that kind of scope. The RV-6 gets a lot of good press and I hope to verify that!

Why do I like classics? - it's simple, I'm comfortable with using them. That may be something unusual for me since I'm also on the high end of Information Technology, truth is that I like to hold on to the foundation that defines this hobby from the time I first got into it all. My best analogy is to imagine yourself on any kind of boat, going with the flow, down a river - except for staying afloat, it's not the boat that matters, it's what you see along the way


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
A6Q6
professor emeritus


Reged: 05/31/11

Loc: Stroudsburg,Pa,U.S.A
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: mooNSpy250]
      #6342233 - 01/29/14 01:38 AM Attachment (10 downloads)

"I just don’t understand why others don’t see this???" Well Bob some of us had 60mm refractors etc when we were kids. Some held on to them, some sold them and never looked back. some are trying to get back the telescope of their youth. Some of us couldn't afford anything at all but wanted a Questar , Unitron or Cave etc and can afford them now. I'm having a blast with a classic orange tube C5 that I found for $100 at a pawn shop. If I had know the optics were as good as they are, I would have been willing to pay a whole lot more. Here it is with some of the accessories I got for Christmas.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jon Isaacs
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 06/16/04

Loc: San Diego and Boulevard, CA
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: mooNSpy250]
      #6342343 - 01/29/14 04:03 AM

Quote:

I can give similar examples for my RV6, my C8, and my Sears 76/1200 #4…

I just don’t understand why others don’t see this???




Myself, I am interested in classic scopes as tools for observing. I like simple equipment and in general classic scopes are simple and at one time I had quite a number of classic scopes, small refractors, 60mm-80mm, larger Newtonians, until recently I had both an RV-6 and a 12.5 inch Meade "Research Grade."

However, what I noticed was that those scopes were just not getting much use. It is true that many modern scopes are more complicated than the classics, it is also true that there are modern scopes that excel at being simple and in this they are even better than the classics and better suited for observing the way I like to observe. These modern scopes are more compact, more ergonomic, the mounts are solid and free from vibration, easier to transport, they were getting the vast majority of my observing time.

So, when I recognized that my classics were not getting the use they deserved, I decided it was time to find them new homes that would provide them with the caring and use they deserved. So these days, I am really down to two classics, a pair of the 60mm x 800mm Asahi-Pentax's. This scope is somewhat different than most 60mm scopes of their vintage, they have a full size drawtube so a 1.25 inch visual back is possible. The mount is very robust, no vibration here even at the highest magnifications and they have that clever shift into gear slow motion controls..

If and when "classic" Dobsonians on the Obsession model are considered true classic scopes, if and when TeleVue refractors that trace their lineage back to the Genesis and MPT are considered classic scopes, then I will be doing the vast majority of observing with classic scopes..

Jon


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bomber Bob
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/09/13

Loc: The Deep South, USA
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: Jon Isaacs]
      #6342499 - 01/29/14 07:29 AM

Why do I like classics??

Ditto Jon.

Quality, craftsmanship, & simplicity. And, nostalgia. These vintage scopes are so easy to use - once you learn the strengths, weaknesses, and quirks of each. I'm limiting my collection to 3, so that they get equal time outdoors. The 60mm Monolux is very light and easy to set up, so it'll be my Travel Scope. The heavier Sears 76mm with pier will be my Home Scope. My planned 100mm will be my Mars & Saturn Scope. However, if the Sears performs well on those two planets, my collection may stop at just two.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bomber Bob
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/09/13

Loc: The Deep South, USA
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: Bomber Bob]
      #6342505 - 01/29/14 07:35 AM

But, I don't fault people who prefer new & modern scopes to vintage ones. I'm a shade tree auto mechanic with a workshop, and I actually enjoy restoring old scopes to like-new condition. But many of the young folks I know have no interest in handiwork.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
wargrafix
sage


Reged: 04/10/13

Loc: Trinidad
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: Bomber Bob]
      #6342520 - 01/29/14 07:49 AM

After pondering i remember that the build quality stands the test of time and can exist far longer if given the right treatment.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
terraclarke
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 05/29/12

Loc: Just South of the Mason-Dixon ...
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: Bomber Bob]
      #6342600 - 01/29/14 09:14 AM

Quote:

Why do I like classics?

Quality, craftsmanship, & simplicity. And, nostalgia.




Moreover, I feel that I am much more one with the sky, using traditional, non computerized, no-go systems. I feel that there is a zen to being a visual observer with a traditional refractor that affords me an experience like no other. I love knowing the sky and navigating my way to an object using time-tested means.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
starman876
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 04/28/08

Loc: VA
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: terraclarke]
      #6342635 - 01/29/14 09:30 AM

I like classics a bit too much as many might have noticed However, there is also a thrill in being lazy and pushing a few buttons and seeing that allusive object centered in the eyepiece. The build quality of some of these scopes is outstanding. When I have to take a scope out for viewing a piece at a time I know someone designed this scientific instrument for serious observing. The Celestron 10 is one of these instruments, the Cave telescopes and Unitrons, all were built to provide pure enjoyment at the eyepiece. The list goes on for serious scientific instruments. However, let's keep this secret in this forum. If too many people find out we would not be able to post pictures of our favorite finds. Already on Ebay you can see that people are reading this forum because the price of these classics keeps going up. I hope it is not us driving the price up.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jim Curry
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 10/29/07

Loc: STL
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: starman876]
      #6342654 - 01/29/14 09:40 AM

It's probably about two dozen of us here driving the pricing through talk and purchases. :>)

Jim


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bomber Bob
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/09/13

Loc: The Deep South, USA
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: Jim Curry]
      #6342860 - 01/29/14 11:15 AM

"I feel that I am much more one with the sky, using traditional, non computerized, no-go systems."

Even if I had a go-to system, I wouldn't use it. Not to be recalcitrant, but because I learned to star-hop, and that seems more natural - doesn't require a computer.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bomber Bob
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/09/13

Loc: The Deep South, USA
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: Bomber Bob]
      #6342870 - 01/29/14 11:18 AM

"let's keep this secret in this forum"

Uh... Too Late!!

In researching the Sears 6336 / Tasco 15TE, almost all of the links pointed back to this forum! Google cache has betrayed us!!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bomber Bob
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/09/13

Loc: The Deep South, USA
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: Bomber Bob]
      #6342880 - 01/29/14 11:23 AM

"I hope it is not us driving the price up."

Well, if you take the original MSRP for a 50-year old scope, and adjust it for inflation, there are still good deals to be had; but there are some smart sellers who take advantage of our posts - maybe we should get a percentage??


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Joe Cepleur
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 03/18/10

Loc: Dark North Woods
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: terraclarke]
      #6342939 - 01/29/14 11:56 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Why do I like classics?

Quality, craftsmanship, & simplicity. And, nostalgia.




Moreover, I feel that I am much more one with the sky, using traditional, non computerized, no-go systems. I feel that there is a zen to being a visual observer with a traditional refractor that affords me an experience like no other. I love knowing the sky and navigating my way to an object using time-tested means.




Terra is particularly articulate about this, but I suspect this sentiment drives many of us. Certainly me!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Joe Cepleur
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 03/18/10

Loc: Dark North Woods
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: Datapanic]
      #6342961 - 01/29/14 12:05 PM

The manual controls of classic scopes allow quick use, and are an important part of the pleasure.

Quote:

Joe - all my scopes have dual axis drive control and a hand controller, but the box was built in the early 80's. No goto or RS-232 ports for any of them, just On/Off




I was not clear, sorry. I was thinking of a member of my club who has a 6" Celestron Schmidt-Cass on a one-armed-bandit, Go-To mount. Trouble is, there are no clutches to allow the scope to be rotated manually. Since the Go-To does not work, the options are to lift and turn the entire tripod to change azimuth, followed by using the button on the hand paddle to change altitude; or, to use the buttons in both directions. It's as time-consuming and tedious. When Dec and RA motors are accessories for super-fine-tuning the pointing without shaking the mount, they are wonderful tools. The trouble comes when a scope can not be pointed manually, so it must rely on those buttons and motors. Those scopes are a pain, and don't get used.

What a trade-off! If Go-To does not work and there are no clutches, the scope is tedious, and does not get used. If Go-To works, the astronomy is removed from the astronomy, so using it becomes boring, and the scope is no longer used!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
starman876
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 04/28/08

Loc: VA
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: Joe Cepleur]
      #6343008 - 01/29/14 12:24 PM

Not all Go to scopes work like that Joe. Just those one arm bandits that Celestron and Meade sell. Most decent go to mounts have cluthces that allow one to push the scope if needed. There are many nights I do not use the Go TO feature of the CGE or the Losamandy and I just push the scope where I want to look. However, it sure is nice to have those motors on both axis when you want to keep an object centered when that polar alignement was not done when you set the mount up. The GO TO feature of these mounts have allowed me to see more of the universe in one night then I have ever done before in many nights of star hopping.It is simply amazing. If you have never tried it you are in for a real treat.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
turk123
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/09/10

Loc: N.E. Ohio
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: starman876]
      #6343347 - 01/29/14 03:08 PM Attachment (8 downloads)

Quote:

Not all Go to scopes work like that Joe. Just those one arm bandits that Celestron and Meade sell. Most decent go to mounts have cluthces that allow one to push the scope if needed. There are many nights I do not use the Go TO feature of the CGE or the Losamandy and I just push the scope where I want to look. However, it sure is nice to have those motors on both axis when you want to keep an object centered when that polar alignement was not done when you set the mount up. The GO TO feature of these mounts have allowed me to see more of the universe in one night then I have ever done before in many nights of star hopping.It is simply amazing. If you have never tried it you are in for a real treat.




I somewhat agree, but here is an example of my modern rig (i've added more to it since this picture was taken). It takes about 2 1/2 hours to setup and align. It's for astrophotography and it's pretty state of the art. If I had an observatory, I guess I would enjoy it more. I do love just rolling out the Cave and start observing in 2 minutes. And the biggest kick I get, is actually seeing the image in the eyepiece not on the screen of my laptop.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
starman876
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 04/28/08

Loc: VA
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: turk123]
      #6343438 - 01/29/14 03:38 PM

I see you labeled everything so you would not forget what it is. An important thing at our age

that is a beautiful set up

that is a very large wave runner board behind the scope


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
A6Q6
professor emeritus


Reged: 05/31/11

Loc: Stroudsburg,Pa,U.S.A
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: turk123]
      #6343463 - 01/29/14 03:47 PM

Nice setup, I'm saving that Image in my Celestron section.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bomber Bob
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/09/13

Loc: The Deep South, USA
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: turk123]
      #6343476 - 01/29/14 03:51 PM

"the biggest kick I get, is actually seeing the image in the eyepiece not on the screen of my laptop"

Same here, which is why I don't spend much time on astrophotograhy. I'd rather be looking than pointing & clicking.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bierbelly
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/23/04

Loc: Sterling, VA
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: Bomber Bob]
      #6343592 - 01/29/14 04:33 PM

Cause we're old?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bomber Bob
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/09/13

Loc: The Deep South, USA
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: bierbelly]
      #6343604 - 01/29/14 04:38 PM

"Cause we're old?"

I prefer to say, "experienced."


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
vismundcygnus
super member


Reged: 11/04/13

Loc: Kentucky
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: Bomber Bob]
      #6343638 - 01/29/14 04:48 PM

I don't know a whole lot about all of the excellent classic scopes out there. I am fairly new to astronomy and still getting started. I bought a new scope for and enjoyed it, but I had problems with all the plastic on it, and it seemed to hinder the performance. While I was getting pretty great views, I wasn't happy with the way I interacted with the scope. It felt nice but cheap. I sent that back and ended up getting an old Tasco 6TE-5. I halved my aperture, but I really love that little scope. Everything is metal, including the focuser knobs. The tabletop stand is all metal. It is in excellent condition, even 50 years or so after it came out.

I guess the reason I like classic scopes is like my car. I had a 97 Saturn which I sold to buy a 91 Volvo 240 wagon. Most people don't get it.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
starman876
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 04/28/08

Loc: VA
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: vismundcygnus]
      #6343668 - 01/29/14 04:59 PM

oh oh back to cars again

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bomber Bob
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/09/13

Loc: The Deep South, USA
Re: Meade 4" f/15 new [Re: starman876]
      #6343696 - 01/29/14 05:11 PM Attachment (3 downloads)

Here's Bomber Bob's potential 3rd (and final - I mean it!) vintage refractor, a Meade 4" f/15 from the 1970's:

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bomber Bob
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/09/13

Loc: The Deep South, USA
Re: Meade 4" f/15 new [Re: Bomber Bob]
      #6343701 - 01/29/14 05:13 PM

I understand that Tom Colwell had one --> http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbarchive/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/1840944/page...

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mooNSpy250
member


Reged: 12/24/11

Loc: Colorado
Re: Meade 4" f/15 new [Re: Bomber Bob]
      #6343724 - 01/29/14 05:25 PM

Well,I think you all have answered my questions, and I too share many of these motivators to buy classics..

Thank you all


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bomber Bob
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/09/13

Loc: The Deep South, USA
Re: Cave 10" f/16 Classical Cassegrain new [Re: mooNSpy250]
      #6343830 - 01/29/14 06:09 PM Attachment (8 downloads)

With all the Cave threads on the forum, here's one that could tempt me:

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
akman1955
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 09/07/09

Loc: Alaska, USA
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: starman876]
      #6343992 - 01/29/14 07:57 PM

Quote:

oh oh back to cars again




Did someone mention CARS...beep beep


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bomber Bob
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/09/13

Loc: The Deep South, USA
Re: Meade 447 Circa 1978 new [Re: akman1955]
      #6344168 - 01/29/14 09:50 PM Attachment (5 downloads)

CN to the rescue! Didn't know the model number, but with a bit of help & searching, I found the 1978 Meade 447 - a Towa version of a Unitron original --> http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbarchive/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/1318629/page...

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
TexasSky
super member
*****

Reged: 05/03/12

Re: Meade 447 Circa 1978 new [Re: Bomber Bob]
      #6344204 - 01/29/14 10:17 PM

Wow.....awesome.....
Here's my 2 cents on why we like the classics.....for some of us it is because we can finally afford what we only dreamed of as a youth.....for some it is because they are just plain cool.....for some it is because we recognize the quality per dollar value.......for me, it's all the above!!
Newbie bob


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
starman876
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 04/28/08

Loc: VA
Re: Meade 447 Circa 1978 new [Re: Bomber Bob]
      #6344227 - 01/29/14 10:31 PM

that is an awesome scope.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Chuck HardsModerator
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 05/03/10

Loc: The Great Basin
Re: Meade 447 Circa 1978 new [Re: starman876]
      #6344751 - 01/30/14 09:24 AM

One reason I like the classics is that I can read the instruction manual without my eyes glazing over and dropping into a digital-jargon-induced coma.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
actionhac
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 08/09/08

Loc: Seattle
Re: Meade 447 Circa 1978 new [Re: Chuck Hards]
      #6344991 - 01/30/14 11:53 AM

I know what you mean Chuck. I used to think I could handle anything until I tried to turn on my Meade LX200 GPS UHTC 7"Mak Smartfart 2.0V.
I just want to unwind under the stars.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mooNSpy250
member


Reged: 12/24/11

Loc: Colorado
Re: Meade 447 Circa 1978 new [Re: actionhac]
      #6345635 - 01/30/14 05:15 PM

I agree with you Newbie bob, I guess there are several factors that drive us to the classics.. I think they are a great bargain if selective of condition, although some really like the restoration aspect of the classics I see..

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Dr Morbius
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 02/06/07

Loc: ManorvilleNY-but not for long
Re: Meade 447 Circa 1978 new [Re: mooNSpy250]
      #6345648 - 01/30/14 05:24 PM

Yup, still looking for a 10" to 15" Clark refractor that some college is going to scrap - you know there still are barn find Duesenbergs and Packards out there!

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
p jaeger
newbie


Reged: 01/13/14

Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: mooNSpy250]
      #6346527 - 01/31/14 05:34 AM

Because they are old, withstood the test of time, their design and performance. They never fail to impress and gain ones respect. In the case of my Criterion RV-6, it has the ingredients of a classic. From its ruggedness and simplicity of design to its precision setting circles and clockdrive (which btw still functions 40 years later). It never failed to perform. The range of materials used to produce the scope also demonstrates the thought that went into making it: cast aluminum, galvanized steel, machined steel and brass, Bakelite, and Pyrex. The pier and mount sat outside in both blistering 90-100+ heat and cold rain drenched winters for years covered by a canvas US mail bag. Both the scope and eyepieces survived being pointed at the sun and projecting its image during eclipses. Optics so good that some people asked to look down the tube to prove that I did not have a model or picture of Saturn hanging inside of it -LOL! At a cost of $215 in 1974, it could not be beat and it is still operational as I type. One of my nephews will probably inherit it.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rcwolpert
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 08/13/12

Loc: San Jose, CA
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: p jaeger]
      #6348147 - 01/31/14 09:58 PM

I miss my 1964 RV-6. I wish I never gave it away. Thanks for the description. Right on point.

- Bob


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Michael Rapp
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 04/27/04

Loc: Dickinson, TX
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: rcwolpert]
      #6350917 - 02/02/14 10:48 AM

Here is why I have an interest in classic scopes.

For me, it is not so much about the scopes but what those scopes represent. It is in large part about the cliched longing for a perceived simpler time, at least in amateur astronomy, that I did not get the chance to participate in. There were fewer options back then, so the siren song of constantly getting new/better stuff was quite a bit muted compared to now. People were more content with what they had and observed more intimately with it, it seems to me.

I'm highly romanticising here, but it seems in that age people were more involved with the object they were observing than the equipment being used to observe. Nowadays, it is all too easy to have the observing "aids" (gotos, DSCs, iPads, SkyFi, etc, computer charts...even Mallincams) automate oneself right out of the hobby.

Also, during that era, the sense of the unknown at large scales was still present on objects readily accessible to the amateur. Even as late as the mid-1950s, respected amateurs were still writing about the possibility of vegetation on the Moon.

My interest in classic scopes has actually intensified in the last few years for a curious reason. As I approach 40 (eee gads!) I realize I'm no longer in my twenties when I worked all the time. I need boundaries now between my work life and my hobbies or else I will burn out. As my work involves the highly intricate nature of computers, I'm seeking to make my hobbies less electrically-oriented. So, I think my recent searching for a 60mm refractor of that era is in part of my desire to connect with a time in which we didn't have IC circuits in every nearby physical object!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Joe Cepleur
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 03/18/10

Loc: Dark North Woods
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: Michael Rapp]
      #6351298 - 02/02/14 02:00 PM

Quote:

For me, it is not so much about the scopes but what those scopes represent. It is in large part about the cliched longing for a perceived simpler time, at least in amateur astronomy, that I did not get the chance to participate in. There were fewer options back then, so the siren song of constantly getting new/better stuff was quite a bit muted compared to now. People were more content with what they had and observed more intimately with it, it seems to me.




+1; spot-on!

My brother's master's thesis was about a leisure theorist (there are such folks!) who said that Americans used to be happy with being and doing, but had come to believe they would be happy with having. They thus worked all the time to become able to buy things, only to find that they tired themselves too much to enjoy using what they had bought.

A better image is a laudable goal, and a few scopes of different types may be necessary to see all the sights, but using whatever decent scopes one has is surely more realistic and rewarding that worrying forever about lacking the latest in an ever-evolving marketplace.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Geo31
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 01/28/13

Loc: Kingwood, TX
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: Joe Cepleur]
      #6352092 - 02/02/14 09:29 PM

Speaking only for me, it's not about simpler times, but simple, basic, instruments. Easy to use. No training wheels. If one has the knowledge, one can go anywhere in the sky, find almost anything with a basic scope and a finder.

I like simple, but well engineered and executed. THAT is what I like about classic scopes.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ziggy943
Post Laureate


Reged: 08/11/06

Loc: Utah
Re: Meade 447 Circa 1978 new [Re: Dr Morbius]
      #6352173 - 02/02/14 10:17 PM

Worked for me.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
TexasSky
super member
*****

Reged: 05/03/12

Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: Geo31]
      #6352217 - 02/02/14 10:42 PM

This might be obvious.....but a lot of the enjoyment I get is just in the hunt for them.....they are well built beauties.....and are in a way like classic cars, "not built like they used to be".......classic looks and materials....like chrome on a vintage beauty........we all know modern scopes in most cases are better optical performers....same as a modern car is a better driving vehicle.....but they don't turn heads and have the same admiration as a classic......and just offer a different type of satisfaction in ther use......
Bob


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Geo31
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 01/28/13

Loc: Kingwood, TX
Re: Why do we like classics?? new [Re: TexasSky]
      #6352228 - 02/02/14 10:49 PM

Uh oh.... Not that I (or others) disagree with you, but it seems cars are verboten on this forum (despite the obvious parallels).

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)


Extra information
17 registered and 27 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Rich (RLTYS), Brian Risley, Chuck Hards 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 1055

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics