Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home page


Observing >> Double Star Observing

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)
Rogerio
super member


Reged: 09/01/07
Posts: 177
Loc: Soteropolis
Minimum Magnification to Split Antares
      #2441707 - 06/05/08 02:52 PM

Hi everybody!
I've read In many Brazilian foruns, that the minimum magnificatio to split Antares Is something about 180-200X.
Well... I like to challenge myself, trying to resolve doubles with low power mag.

I have the impression that I can see the Antares companion with 100X, In my 8'' F8 Dob. but my skepticism lead me to ask you: Am I crazy or does anyone else also can do this?

Clear skies

Rogerio


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
SaberScorpX
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 01/12/05
Posts: 4121
Loc: illinois, usa
Re: Minimum Magnification to Split Antares new [Re: Rogerio]
      #2442832 - 06/06/08 12:50 AM

Hi Rogerio.

Crazy is relative around here. However, you're not alone in reporting the split at ~100x.
Due to the primary's brightness and magnitude difference busting the pup is highly dependent on seeing conditions. Accordingly the frequency of lower power splits tends to increase as the observers latitude decreases, but this is not written in stone. Antares has been known to split at 100x one night but be impossible at any power the next.
When possible, I'd go along with 180-200x as a popular average.


SJS


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
RLTYSModerator
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 12/18/04
Posts: 1740
Loc: New York (Long Island)
Re: Minimum Magnification to Split Antares new [Re: Rogerio]
      #2443066 - 06/06/08 06:53 AM

Rogerio

I finally managed to split Antares with my 10" refl at 254x, last year. Maybe Antares can be resolved at lower powers, I was just happy to resolve Antares at all. It would also depend on where your observing from.

Clear Skies and Good Luck.
Rich (RLTYS)

--------------------
10" F4.8 Refl.
4" F5 Refr.
50mm F12 Refr. (Tasco #6TE-5)
12x63 and 10x50 Binoculars.

"I want to do more then just look."


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Catapoman
professor emeritus
*****

Reged: 06/06/03
Posts: 685
Loc: VA
Re: Minimum Magnification to Split Antares new [Re: RLTYS]
      #2443151 - 06/06/08 08:32 AM

As others have mentioned this split is seeing condition. Back in the Summer 2006 I was able to split it at 140x using my NX11GPS. With the right conditions I would be surprised to hear it was split at 100x.

--------------------
Pernel




Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ABC
sage


Reged: 10/22/06
Posts: 421
Loc: Heidelberg, Germany
Re: Minimum Magnification to Split Antares new [Re: Rogerio]
      #2443511 - 06/06/08 12:06 PM

Clean split last year with my 5" f/10 mak at 141x using Baader Genuine Ortho 9mm.
However, this was in South Portugal at latitude 37° north with best seeing (9-10/10). Under such conditions, a premium 6"-7" refractor or 8"-10" reflector may split Antares at 100x or even lower.
I was only two or three times successful here in Germany at latitude 49.5° north, at good seeing and using my superb 6" ED.
...location...location...location...

--------------------
Kind regards, Christian
Meade 178 ED
Meade 152 ED
Intes Micro Alter M500
Bresser 70/700 Achromat
CGE
EQ-6


Edited by ABC (06/06/08 12:07 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rogerio
super member


Reged: 09/01/07
Posts: 177
Loc: Soteropolis
Re: Minimum Magnification to Split Antares new [Re: ABC]
      #2444157 - 06/06/08 05:31 PM

Thank's for you all!! So, It's possible! Well, I live In alow latitude city, In fact, Antares culminates at 77 degrees of altitude in my site, but I've done It with the star in ~45 degrees. The scope: a 8'' nice ATM reflector, the EP a 16T5 Nagler. The wind here isn't the biggest problem... I'll continue to observe It at 100X., If I'm wrong, I tell you.

Clear skies

Rogerio


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Catapoman
professor emeritus
*****

Reged: 06/06/03
Posts: 685
Loc: VA
Re: Minimum Magnification to Split Antares new [Re: Rogerio]
      #2444339 - 06/06/08 07:11 PM

You at least have a great veiwing position. Here's another report from 2004 when I split Antares with a TMB 100f/8 apo.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bonco
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 04/17/06
Posts: 1979
Loc: Florida
Re: Minimum Magnification to Split Antares new [Re: Catapoman]
      #2444946 - 06/07/08 01:31 AM

14 July 07 My notes have me splitting Antares with my 3 inch Polarex at 250X. I've frequently had beautiful splits with my 4 inch, yet at times even my 10 inch won't show it. One of the most fickle doubles I know of. Seems conditions have to be just right. I can believe 100X in a 8 inch as I have notes indicating I possibly detected it at 133X with the 3 inch
Bill N.

--------------------
RV6
Meade 2045
6 inch f/4 RFT R. Fagin Optics
TV Genesis
2.4 inch Lafayette Equitorial
3 inch Polarex/Unitron Equitorial
10 inch Zhumell
PST 40mm Solar scope
4 inch F/15 Antares
2.4 inch Unitron Equitorial


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rogerio
super member


Reged: 09/01/07
Posts: 177
Loc: Soteropolis
Re: Minimum Magnification to Split Antares new [Re: Bonco]
      #2453442 - 06/11/08 09:42 AM

Hi everybody! Pernel, I read your report, and understand that my sky conditions are a little better than yours, to this star. That's because, with high powers, I can easily split Antares, observing the secondary all the time while It crosses the field.

Yesterday I had a good observation session, again i had the strong impression that i can split It with 100X... but i was realy impressed with the view with 480X (Radian 10mm GSO Barlow 3X). It looked like a blue-green planet around a orange star!!! The kind of image that I'll wont forget.

Clear skies

Rogerio


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Catapoman
professor emeritus
*****

Reged: 06/06/03
Posts: 685
Loc: VA
Re: Minimum Magnification to Split Antares new [Re: Rogerio]
      #2455661 - 06/12/08 09:22 AM

Rogerio,

Sounds like you had another great experience. Did you attempt to split at 100x during that viewing session?

--------------------
Pernel




Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rogerio
super member


Reged: 09/01/07
Posts: 177
Loc: Soteropolis
Re: Minimum Magnification to Split Antares new [Re: Catapoman]
      #2455809 - 06/12/08 10:36 AM

Pernel,
yes, I've attempted to split at 100X In every observation. Once again I could spot, not all the time, but with a combination of precise eye position and focus. It's difficult to me to explain, a sketch would be easier. But I'll try.

Antares enters the FOV at 11 o'clock, with the companion at ~8 o'clock, I can see It until It reaches the center of the FOV, from this position It becomes progressively hard to split, It's not visible at the lower edge.

the biggest problem is that I already know the companion position, wick can introduce a big bias In my perception! What I need Is another experienced double observer, to confirm this. I'll try my wife eyes ASAP, despite her astigmatism, she's a good observer.

By the way, I can easily split Antares with 133X (24Pan TV 2X Barlow), I think that's the best view. This fact lead me to want a 12-13mm EP

Rogerio


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Avatar
super member


Reged: 05/27/06
Posts: 154
Re: Minimum Magnification to Split Antares new [Re: Rogerio]
      #2456772 - 06/12/08 07:59 PM

I hope this report doesn't come off sounding crazy and sensational, but I definitely isolated the secondary of Antares three nights ago at 111x in a 4 inch achromat.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bonco
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 04/17/06
Posts: 1979
Loc: Florida
Re: Minimum Magnification to Split Antares new [Re: Avatar]
      #2456971 - 06/12/08 10:15 PM

I'll buy that Avatar...With steady skies, I've busted it clean and sweet with my 4 inch Genesis. Unfortunately my notes don't indicate the power used.
Bill N.

--------------------
RV6
Meade 2045
6 inch f/4 RFT R. Fagin Optics
TV Genesis
2.4 inch Lafayette Equitorial
3 inch Polarex/Unitron Equitorial
10 inch Zhumell
PST 40mm Solar scope
4 inch F/15 Antares
2.4 inch Unitron Equitorial


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
EdZModerator
Professor EdZ
*****

Reged: 02/15/02
Posts: 12565
Loc: Cumberland, R I , USA42N71.4W
Re: Minimum Magnification to Split Antares new [Re: Bonco]
      #2457506 - 06/13/08 08:36 AM

Reading some of these reports led me to spend the better part of last night on a few doubles. Once it came into view I trained my TV102 on Antares hoping for the best.

A bit earlier, with the TV102, I had a beautiful split of e Boo at several powers and at 100x could still see the secondary very clearly separated with a nice contrasting color. I also used a TMB80SS on e Boo and had beautiful splits at 156x and also at 100X.

Before Antares came into view, I set the TV102 upon lambda Oph (Mirfak). This was quite difficult. Attempting higher powers here showed a wavering image. 275x was useless. 220x was only slightly better. 176x was about the minimum power that allowed me to see that Marfik appeared with a some darkened space between, but the image never stood still enough for me to see the components separated. Marfik is about 1.45 arcseconds.

Finally Antares came into view. With the TV102, I used powers of 220x, 176x, 150x. Seeing at this much lower altitude in the sky was not nearly as good as it was higher up on e Boo or h Oph. At times image jumped around about 3-4 arcsec. For some good periods, I estimated image wavering about 2 arcsec. Unfortunately after about 1 1/2 hours of trying, I could not see the faint secondary. Even with some brief moments of decent seeing (<2"), nothing was to be seen.

I'll try again sometime.

edz

--------------------
Teach a kid something today. The feeling you'll get is one of life's greatest rewards.
member#21


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bonco
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 04/17/06
Posts: 1979
Loc: Florida
Re: Minimum Magnification to Split Antares new [Re: EdZ]
      #2458389 - 06/13/08 05:00 PM

edz...Nice try, You need to move down south.
Bill N. (Florida)

--------------------
RV6
Meade 2045
6 inch f/4 RFT R. Fagin Optics
TV Genesis
2.4 inch Lafayette Equitorial
3 inch Polarex/Unitron Equitorial
10 inch Zhumell
PST 40mm Solar scope
4 inch F/15 Antares
2.4 inch Unitron Equitorial


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Catapoman
professor emeritus
*****

Reged: 06/06/03
Posts: 685
Loc: VA
Re: Minimum Magnification to Split Antares new [Re: Rogerio]
      #2462956 - 06/16/08 09:02 AM

Quote:

yes, I've attempted to split at 100X In every observation. Once again I could spot, not all the time, but with a combination of precise eye position and focus.




Success is success! Maybe you'll get one of those excellent nights that give you a view across the entire fov.

--------------------
Pernel




Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Fiske
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 03/14/04
Posts: 2057
Loc: Missouri / United States
Re: Minimum Magnification to Split Antares new [Re: Catapoman]
      #2463339 - 06/16/08 12:48 PM

I'm a little worried about booing and hissing for mentioning this, but sometime back an observing buddy showed me a trick on splitting Antares -- use an OIII filter. The filter, which makes stars look greener, dims down the orange primary considerably more than the secondary, making this DS an easier to split. I haven't experimented with how low a magnification could be used in combination with an OIII, but I bet it would be down there...

--------------------

Fiske Miles
Nikon 8x42 LX / 12x50 SE Binos
Mini Borg 60ED, TV-101, AT80Ach, XT-8, C11/CI-700, 22-Inch Dob
Way too many Nagler eyepieces
http://www.fiskemiles.blogspot.com/
www.fiskemiles.com


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
RLTYSModerator
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 12/18/04
Posts: 1740
Loc: New York (Long Island)
Re: Minimum Magnification to Split Antares new [Re: Fiske]
      #2464787 - 06/17/08 06:38 AM

Fiske

You have to be very careful with an OIII filter. Too much of a chance of seeing false secondary images. I personally wouldn't recommend it.

Clear Skies.
Rich (RLTYS)

--------------------
10" F4.8 Refl.
4" F5 Refr.
50mm F12 Refr. (Tasco #6TE-5)
12x63 and 10x50 Binoculars.

"I want to do more then just look."


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Fiske
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 03/14/04
Posts: 2057
Loc: Missouri / United States
Re: Minimum Magnification to Split Antares new [Re: RLTYS]
      #2465418 - 06/17/08 12:48 PM

Rich:

You are RIGHT about that! I tried it last night when the full moon was almost on top of Antares and realized immediately it was a false secondary image. The technique does work well, though, under better viewing conditions.

--------------------

Fiske Miles
Nikon 8x42 LX / 12x50 SE Binos
Mini Borg 60ED, TV-101, AT80Ach, XT-8, C11/CI-700, 22-Inch Dob
Way too many Nagler eyepieces
http://www.fiskemiles.blogspot.com/
www.fiskemiles.com


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bonco
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 04/17/06
Posts: 1979
Loc: Florida
Re: Minimum Magnification to Split Antares new [Re: Fiske]
      #2466235 - 06/17/08 07:54 PM

I think this came up last year on this forum ...I tried it and got a false green star.
Bill N.

--------------------
RV6
Meade 2045
6 inch f/4 RFT R. Fagin Optics
TV Genesis
2.4 inch Lafayette Equitorial
3 inch Polarex/Unitron Equitorial
10 inch Zhumell
PST 40mm Solar scope
4 inch F/15 Antares
2.4 inch Unitron Equitorial


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)


Extra information
0 registered and 0 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  EdZ, RLTYS 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 1746

Jump to

Home



Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics