Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Astrophotography and Sketching >> Beginning and Intermediate Imaging

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)
Jarrod
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 01/20/13

Loc: SE USA
Imaging with the Celestron AVX?
      #5949633 - 07/01/13 01:08 PM

I've had my eye on the AVX since it came out. I'm thinking of getting this mount while it's on sale.

What would be a good scope to pair with this mount, to do mainly deep space imaging with a DSLR?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
CounterWeight
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 10/05/08

Loc: Palo alto, CA.
Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: Jarrod]
      #5949688 - 07/01/13 01:35 PM

just wanted to ask a question back. DSO include both in our galaxy and outside it. In our galaxy are the beautiful nebula(HII regions, emission, reflection), clusters, asterisms. Outside it are the other galaxies and galaxy groups. So when you say DSO it still requires a bit more thinking.

Deciding on a scope best for the objects considered I just want to recommend the two parameters to consider are 'fast' focal ratio, and 'flat'. Scope sometime are one without the other, and getting the 'flat' part requires another piece of the puzzle.

That said - there's learning to image , and my standard recommendation is a short fast widefield refractor (with a field flattener) and any/all adaptors, rings, extender tubes. That and an autoguider like the Orion miniguider/SSAG using PHD software.

Edited by CounterWeight (07/01/13 01:36 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jarrod
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 01/20/13

Loc: SE USA
Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: CounterWeight]
      #5949714 - 07/01/13 01:46 PM

Quote:

just wanted to ask a question back. DSO include both in our galaxy and outside it. In our galaxy are the beautiful nebula(HII regions, emission, reflection), clusters, asterisms. Outside it are the other galaxies and galaxy groups. So when you say DSO it still requires a bit more thinking.





Well, both but I do understand that different FOV requirements require different scopes (or significant cropping, and thus lower resolution). If I had to prioritize, I'd say that other galaxies > local DSOs. For larger DSO's maybe I could just throw my camera on the mount with the 70-200 f/4 lens. With the 1.4x telextender I can get 280mm at f/5.6. Not sure how that compares to a widefield refractor - but I guess that lens *is* a widefield refractor

Edited by Jarrod (07/01/13 02:10 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Madratter
Postmaster


Reged: 01/14/13

Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: Jarrod]
      #5949797 - 07/01/13 02:29 PM

In my opinion, the AVX is decidely non-optimum for galaxy imaging. I did this with the CG-5 and although the AVX is somewhat better, it still does not have roller bearings in the declination axis.

That makes guiding at longer focal lengths problematic unless your polar alignment is very good (which is what I did with the CG-5).

I got an Atlas and the difference is large. However, if portability is a concern, an Atlas is portable only in the loosest sense.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
cn register 5
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 12/26/12

Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: Madratter]
      #5949932 - 07/01/13 03:46 PM

Condemning a mount, untried, because of some prejudice about its construction with experience of what it can do seems deeply irrational to me.

The reality, from someone who has used it, is that the AVX guides excellently, far better than the CG-5. The improvements that Celestron have made allow this.

The largest mount I've used is a 6" F/9 RC with a ST80 piggybacked as a guider, total weight 25lbs.

Chris


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jeff2011
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 01/01/13

Loc: Sugar Land, TX
Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: Madratter]
      #5949936 - 07/01/13 03:47 PM

I can add to what the Madratter is saying in that I encounter a lot of problems during guiding with the declination. I finally had to resort to finding which way it was drifting in Dec and set PHD to send commands only in the opposite direction. This helped a lot, but I agree that this mount is not optimal for longer focal length scopes.

I don't know how the Orion Sirius mount stacks up, if you are looking for a more portable mount. Perhaps someone with experience with this mount can comment.

Edit:
I agree that this mount is not optimal for a beginner with longer focal length scopes.


Edited by Jeff2011 (07/01/13 04:14 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
WarmWeatherGuy
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 08/27/11

Loc: Orlando, FL 28° N, 81° W
Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: Jarrod]
      #5949964 - 07/01/13 04:01 PM

Quote:

I've had my eye on the AVX since it came out. I'm thinking of getting this mount while it's on sale.

What would be a good scope to pair with this mount, to do mainly deep space imaging with a DSLR?




The AT72ED. You might want to also get a field flattener after you get some experience taking and processing the images.

https://www.astronomics.com/astro-tech-at72ed-72mm-refractor-telescope-black_...

Here is a picture I took with that scope.

http://www.astrobin.com/25052/

The scope is relatively small and light, fast (f/6), and has a wide field of view (focal length = 432mm). These things make it easy to get great pictures. There are many targets that require such a scope so it is not like training wheels where you discard them when you're done. This will be a scope you will want to keep even after you decide to use longer lenses.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
CounterWeight
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 10/05/08

Loc: Palo alto, CA.
Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: WarmWeatherGuy]
      #5949967 - 07/01/13 04:03 PM

Steve that is a great point. I remember something though about was it the 72 that had no accommodation for a finder / miniguider out of the box? If I am incorrect please let me know. There are many 80mm scopes that do.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jeff2011
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 01/01/13

Loc: Sugar Land, TX
Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: CounterWeight]
      #5949978 - 07/01/13 04:09 PM Attachment (23 downloads)

Jim,

You are correct. I added a synta/orion style finder mount from Scope Stuff to my AT72ED.

The iphone pic is a little fuzzy, but here is my setup with the 72. The mini came with a finder mount, but the Scope Stuff one fit better.

Also, I had some issues with some focuser droop, so I added a 2" extender so that I don't have to draw the focuser back that far.


Edited by Jeff2011 (07/01/13 05:30 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
WarmWeatherGuy
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 08/27/11

Loc: Orlando, FL 28° N, 81° W
Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: CounterWeight]
      #5949983 - 07/01/13 04:11 PM

Quote:

Steve that is a great point. I remember something though about was it the 72 that had no accommodation for a finder / miniguider out of the box? If I am incorrect please let me know. There are many 80mm scopes that do.




Yes, that is true, and it is certainly an obstacle to overcome. I use a side-by-side system and hadn't thought of that. Thanks for reminding us.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Madratter
Postmaster


Reged: 01/14/13

Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: cn register 5]
      #5950027 - 07/01/13 04:54 PM

Quote:

Condemning a mount, untried, because of some prejudice about its construction with experience of what it can do seems deeply irrational to me.

The reality, from someone who has used it, is that the AVX guides excellently, far better than the CG-5. The improvements that Celestron have made allow this.

The largest mount I've used is a 6" F/9 RC with a ST80 piggybacked as a guider, total weight 25lbs.

Chris




I guess I'm going to have to stick with that irrational label. For what it is worth, I have read considerably about the mount including posts by you before coming to this conclusion.

At the end of day, however, it is just an opinion.

EDIT: I'll add that I read the AVX mount threads with a great deal of interest since I wanted to get something that was better suited for imaging than my CG-5. I ended up buying the Atlas despite the fact it meant a much bigger outlay in money. And the money certainly was a consideration. So in this particular case, my opinion, although apparently irrational, did directly influence my own behavior. In other words, I put my additional money where my mouth is.

Edited by Madratter (07/01/13 06:00 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
JoseBorrero
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 09/04/09

Loc: Puerto Rico Island
Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: Jeff2011]
      #5950222 - 07/01/13 07:31 PM

Look great! just need to survive dew
Quote:

Jim,

You are correct. I added a synta/orion style finder mount from Scope Stuff to my AT72ED.

The iphone pic is a little fuzzy, but here is my setup with the 72. The mini came with a finder mount, but the Scope Stuff one fit better.

Also, I had some issues with some focuser droop, so I added a 2" extender so that I don't have to draw the focuser back that far.





Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jeff2011
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 01/01/13

Loc: Sugar Land, TX
Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: JoseBorrero]
      #5950625 - 07/02/13 12:21 AM

Two other accessories I forgot to mention. A 7 inch vixen dovetail bar and a 7.5 lb counter weight. The dovetail bar provided for better balancing, and the 11 lb weight that came with the mount was too heavy for this configuration. I got the 7.5 lb weight from Orion.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jarrod
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 01/20/13

Loc: SE USA
Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: cn register 5]
      #5951054 - 07/02/13 10:22 AM

Quote:


The largest mount I've used is a 6" F/9 RC with a ST80 piggybacked as a guider, total weight 25lbs.




The two recs I got here so far (AT6RC and AT72ED) were the two I was looking at. I guess I'm on the right track. Didn't find too many posts on the RC, though... Maybe I was looking in the wrong place? Where do those users hang out? Or is it not very popular because it is so specialized?

Edited by Jarrod (07/02/13 10:28 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jarrod
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 01/20/13

Loc: SE USA
Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: Madratter]
      #5951069 - 07/02/13 10:27 AM

We all know there are bigger, better mounts for more money. I asked a specific question and I'd love to hear (and see images) from people who already use the AVX for astrophotography.

Not going to spend 3x for an Atlas.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Madratter
Postmaster


Reged: 01/14/13

Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: Jarrod]
      #5951089 - 07/02/13 10:43 AM

That is of course your choice. But my comments were and are directed at the question you asked. Specifically, the mount will be a good match for the AT72ED. However, in my opinion, it is not a good match for galaxies and it is not a good match for an AT6RC at F/9.

If you ask for advice, don't shoot people when they give it to you, whether it is what you want to hear or not.

You can go to the Mount forum today and read a message from someone who has this mount that wishes it had roller bearings on the declination axis. I'll save you the effort of finding it. See the post by ETXuser here:

http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/5945171/page...

In addition, with the AT6RC you are going to be pushing the weight. Although the mount is rated for 30 pounds, the rule of thumb is those weights are for visual use. For imaging the rule is you normally chop it in half. Once you add in the other equipment like cameras, etc., you will probably be well over the 15 pounds that would be half.

That is not to say it can't be made to work. Specifically, any wonkiness (technical term) in the declination axis can always get fixed with better polar alignment. But in my opinion, you are setting yourself up for some grief, especially if you tear down and setup every night.

EDIT: As for images, see this link for various examples on Astrobin:

http://www.astrobin.com/gear/11578/celestron-advanced-vx/

Edited by Madratter (07/02/13 11:01 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jeff2011
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 01/01/13

Loc: Sugar Land, TX
Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: Madratter]
      #5951158 - 07/02/13 11:23 AM

At a focal length of 430mm the AT72ED is meant for wider angle shots like nebulas. To get good nebulas, you will need a modded DSLR or a CCD.

I originally had plans to get an AT6RC. At 13 lbs plus accessories the mount should be able to handle the weight just fine assuming you go with the mini guide scope option. The problem I have with that scope is its slow speed at F9. Since this scope has been out of stock it has given me time to think and I have now ordered an AT6IN (Imaging Newt). At F4 it is very fast. Coma comes into play, but I already have a baader coma corrector. The focal length is still short at 610mm, but I think this scope is a good compromise. Last I looked Astronomics still has these in stock and at a price less than what I paid for my guide camera. As an initial learning scope the AT72ED is the way to go. Plus I use my AT72ED as a grab and go and at my clubs outreach events. It is a good all around scope.

The Dec problem with the AVX that Madratter talks about is a real issue that I have encountered. I have been able to mitigate this by configuring PHD only to send guide commands in the direction opposite of the drift. Before I did this the Dec swung wildly. When switching directions in Dec the mount took so long to react that it messed up PHD.

All of the following images were taken with my AVX mount. I am just a beginner, so take that into consideration.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/jeff-guck-in-die-luft/sets/72157633228178182/


Edited by Jeff2011 (07/02/13 11:40 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Holltim4103
member
*****

Reged: 02/25/13

Loc: Plattsburgh, NY
Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: Jeff2011]
      #5951247 - 07/02/13 12:10 PM

I absolutely love my AVX mount. I primarily use an Orion 8 inch Newtonian F3.9 with a Canon XSI (450D - not modified). It is a heavy setup however I can regularly get 180 second unguided subs with a good polar alignment. (I use BYEOS to get a precise polar alignment with the ASPA in the hand controller) I can image galaxies but I especially love imaging nebulas with this setup. I also have an Orion PIAG but haven't used it much because I find it more of a pain to use as I am still learning how to use it.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
John Miele
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 05/29/05

Loc: North Alabama
Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: Jarrod]
      #5951396 - 07/02/13 01:58 PM

Quote:

Quote:


The largest mount I've used is a 6" F/9 RC with a ST80 piggybacked as a guider, total weight 25lbs.




The two recs I got here so far (AT6RC and AT72ED) were the two I was looking at. I guess I'm on the right track. Didn't find too many posts on the RC, though... Maybe I was looking in the wrong place? Where do those users hang out? Or is it not very popular because it is so specialized?




Hmmm...as other have noted, these are two VERY different scopes for VERY different types of imaging goals. As a beginner I'd get the AT72 and then later compliment it with the AT6 after you know what you are doing and have vetted out your mount and guiding skills...John


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
WarmWeatherGuy
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 08/27/11

Loc: Orlando, FL 28° N, 81° W
Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: Jeff2011]
      #5951485 - 07/02/13 03:06 PM Attachment (9 downloads)

Quote:

Jim,

You are correct. I added a synta/orion style finder mount from Scope Stuff to my AT72ED.

The iphone pic is a little fuzzy, but here is my setup with the 72. The mini came with a finder mount, but the Scope Stuff one fit better.

Also, I had some issues with some focuser droop, so I added a 2" extender so that I don't have to draw the focuser back that far.





How did you attach the guider to the OTA? On my AT72ED there is only a single, very tiny, screw which looks like it is meant to hold the telescope together, not to attach something to it with.

If it is from ScopeStuff could you provide a link?

Thanks.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jarrod
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 01/20/13

Loc: SE USA
Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: Madratter]
      #5951515 - 07/02/13 03:19 PM

Quote:

If you ask for advice, don't shoot people when they give it to you, whether it is what you want to hear or not.




I do appreciate the advice about imaging galaxies. However, I've seen what I consider good results coming from even the older CG5 mount.

Case in point:

http://www.astrobin.com/42164/

Look familiar? Perhaps over time my tastes would change and I'd wish for a better mount. Probably. Isn't that how it works?

Quote:

You can go to the Mount forum today and read a message from someone who has this mount that wishes it had roller bearings on the declination axis. I'll save you the effort of finding it. See the post by ETXuser here:




And I wish the Atlas cost half as much, weighed half as much, and still had the same performance

At some point, there has to be a compromise - everything is a compromise. Mine was that I wouldn't pay more than $800 for a mount that could do "respectable" AP.

I was wrong about the Atlas costing >$2k (must have been thinking of the new EQ/AltAz combo). In reality, it is "only" twice the price of the AVX. That's actually not as bad as I was thinking. But still, I could have the AVX, the AT72ED *and* the AT6RC (or a C6, which I've been waiting for someone to mention) for the price of an Atlas. If I get good at drift aligning with the AVX, I believe I could get good results even with longer focal lengths. Am I wrong?

Edited by Jarrod (07/02/13 03:40 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jeff2011
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 01/01/13

Loc: Sugar Land, TX
Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: WarmWeatherGuy]
      #5951519 - 07/02/13 03:20 PM



http://www.scopestuff.com/ss_rdpb.htm

Edit(It was RDPT an M6 screw). Yes there is only one hole. The screw is a 6mm, so it is fairly strong. The screw that comes with it was a bit long, but you can cut it or get another screw from a home improvement store. The pamplet that came with the scope (if you bought it new), shows where a finder can be mounted. There are two places you can mount it. One on the tube where I mounted it and one on the part that rotates the focuser, just behind where I mounted it.

Edited by Jeff2011 (07/02/13 03:29 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
WarmWeatherGuy
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 08/27/11

Loc: Orlando, FL 28° N, 81° W
Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: Jeff2011]
      #5951546 - 07/02/13 03:36 PM

Quote:

http://www.scopestuff.com/ss_rdpb.htm

Edit(It was RDPT an M6 screw). Yes there is only one hole. The screw is a 6mm, so it is fairly strong. The screw that comes with it was a bit long, but you can cut it or get another screw from a home improvement store. The pamphlet that came with the scope (if you bought it new), shows where a finder can be mounted. There are two places you can mount it. One on the tube where I mounted it and one on the part that rotates the focuser, just behind where I mounted it.




Wow, that's great. You have a complete auto-guiding system without breaking the bank.

I guess I should have looked at the manual.

https://www.astronomics.com/documents/astro%20tech/astro-tech%20at72ed%20manu...

It says those holes are for mounting stuff.

Thanks for the link to ScopeStuff, and for the picture of your gear. A picture IS worth 1,000 words.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Madratter
Postmaster


Reged: 01/14/13

Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: Jarrod]
      #5951604 - 07/02/13 03:56 PM

Quote:

If I get good at drift aligning with the AVX, I believe I could get good results even with longer focal lengths. Am I wrong?




If you have an observatory, you absolutely can using drift aligning to take the declination out of the issue to some level of tolerance.

Alternatively, you might find that all star polar align will get you close enough for some equipment.

I found my CG-5 would start to give somewhat useable results if I was within a minute or two of the pole. The AVX probably can do somewhat better than that.

For example, I was able to get 10m guided Ha at 2x2 binning with my Celestron C8 and f/6.3 focal reducer at 1260mm.

Here is an example: http://www.astrobin.com/38233/0/?mod=none

However, it is also correct to say that I struggled with this equipment and lost more frames than I liked because of it. Part of that was declination issues, part of that was due to too much weight on the mount (which would be an issue with the AVX too), part of it was periodic error being somewhat irregular, part of it was wind gusts, part of it was vibration damping.

What I can say for sure is that when I went to the Atlas, my pictures instantly improved. I'm sure I would have seen "some" improvement with the AVX. But at the end of the day, after reading a boatload on the new mount, I decided the Atlas was the way for me to go.

On the other hand, if I was imaging with a 72 ED, I'm positive the CG-5 (let alone an AVX) would have been more than good enough for it.

And the Atlas is certainly not a grab and go mount, at least for me. I wouldn't even consider it without an observatory.

Also, you might want to consider the iOptron Z mount. I'm hearing good things about it and the cost is only slightly higher than the AVX. There is a ton of info on it over in the mount forum.

Edited by Madratter (07/02/13 04:04 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jeff2011
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 01/01/13

Loc: Sugar Land, TX
Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: WarmWeatherGuy]
      #5951607 - 07/02/13 03:57 PM

Steve,

Glad to help. Makes me feel good to be able to help out after all the great help I have received from this forum.

While you are ording from ScopeStuff, you might want to pickup one if these if you don't already have one. Remember the focuser droop I spoke about. This adapter seems to solve that.

http://www.scopestuff.com/ss_eet2.htm

The #ET35 is all you should need.

Disclaimer: I am not affiliated with ScopeStuff. I just think they have great stuff!

Edited by Jeff2011 (07/02/13 03:58 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jarrod
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 01/20/13

Loc: SE USA
Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: Madratter]
      #5951645 - 07/02/13 04:13 PM

Quote:

What I can say for sure is that when I went to the Atlas, my pictures instantly improved. I'm sure I would have seen "some" improvement with the AVX. But at the end of the day, after reading a boatload on the new mount, I decided the Atlas was the way for me to go.




Your situation is very different from mine. I don't have an observatory, and I don't have another EQ mount. You wanted to upgrade from the CG-5 and I can see why spending $800 for a marginal upgrade to the AVX probably would not have been a good investment for you.

But I have nothing. Therefore I argue that spending $800 (currently $720) to get an AVX is infinity times better than my current situation.

Maybe the simplest answer is for me to give up on my desire to photograph galaxies if it isn't within my budget.

Edited by Jarrod (07/02/13 04:14 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Madratter
Postmaster


Reged: 01/14/13

Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: Jarrod]
      #5951767 - 07/02/13 05:16 PM

What I would say, Jarrod, is that to some degree your budget requirements vary in terms of how patient you are.

I was able to image galaxies with the CG-5. Take a look at my gallery. And I'm sure the situation is better with the AVX. And again, look at the gallery of AVX images I sent you earlier.

But I did have to throw out a fair number of frames, and I did need to spend the time to polar align carefully. That will cost you time every time you go out without an observatory.

But it is doable. So the question is how patient are you willing to be?

Galaxies are not the easiest target, but the big bright ones aren't the hardest target either.

And I don't want to come off as selling myself as an expert on this stuff either. I am very much a beginner. I have dabbled with this in the past but only within the last 6 or seven months did I start taking this seriously.

The normal advice around here is to start with a short focal length refractor. I didn't go that route myself although I think it is excellent advice. If shooting galaxies is your deal, then shooting nebula might not do much for you.

I will tell you one big advantage of galaxies is that you don't need to mod your camera to shoot them.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
cn register 5
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 12/26/12

Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: Madratter]
      #5951870 - 07/02/13 06:33 PM

Most of my imaging with the AVX has been with an 80mm ED scope (a Celestron Oynx) for imaging with a ST80 on a home made side by side mount for guiding. By the time the cameras, focuser and filter wheel have been added this lot comes to about 18 lbs.

I've never bothered with any of the precise balancing, levelling or polar aligning that so many people seem to think is essential.
My process is:
Put mount down on the patio with the legs more or less where they went last time.
Do a 2+3 alignment.
Do an ASPA
Train PHD.
Start imaging.

It's possible that this casualness helps because the mount seems to behave better if it isn't precisely balanced or polar aligned.

I apply PEC if I remember.

The combination of a fairly short focal length refractor and some sort of guider - and a lot of people use finder based guiders - seems to work very well for learning about astro imaging.

One useful source of information and images is the CelestronVX Yahoo group http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/celestronVX/

The people there are friendly, helpful and enthusiastic but not evangelists.

Chris


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
terry59
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 07/18/11

Loc: Colorado, USA
Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: cn register 5]
      #5951881 - 07/02/13 06:38 PM

Quote:



I've never bothered with any of the precise balancing, levelling or polar aligning that so many people seem to think is essential.
My process is:
Put mount down on the patio with the legs more or less where they went last time.
Do a 2+3 alignment.
Do an ASPA
Train PHD.
Start imaging.

It's possible that this casualness helps because the mount seems to behave better if it isn't precisely balanced or polar aligned.

I apply PEC if I remember.

Chris




Chris - Could you show something of your work please?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
cn register 5
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 12/26/12

Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: terry59]
      #5951923 - 07/02/13 07:13 PM

There's a horsehead/flame of mine somewhere on the massive AVX thread in the Mounts section. That's quite nice. Multiple 5 minute exposures with a Ha filter.

I've had very little time when it's been clear and I've been able to get outside with the scope. At the present in the UK it barely gets dark.

And I'm very reluctant to post anything on CN because of the overwhelmingly negative nature of most of the comments about any images, especially ones used to evaluate mounts.

My M51 rgb image which is the only image I've got with my 6" RC has no flats and as a result has a massive brown doughnut, dust circles and all sorts of artifacts. In fact, looking at it again, it may not have darks either.

Chris


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
WarmWeatherGuy
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 08/27/11

Loc: Orlando, FL 28° N, 81° W
Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: cn register 5]
      #5951964 - 07/02/13 07:38 PM

Quote:

There's a horsehead/flame of mine somewhere on the massive AVX thread in the Mounts section. That's quite nice. Multiple 5 minute exposures with a Ha filter.

Chris




Found it click here.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jeff2011
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 01/01/13

Loc: Sugar Land, TX
Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: cn register 5]
      #5952016 - 07/02/13 08:13 PM

Quote:

And I'm very reluctant to post anything on CN because of the overwhelmingly negative nature of most of the comments about any images, especially ones used to evaluate mounts.




Chris,

I have not found this to be the case. Most comments to my images and those of others have been constructive and encouraging in this forum.

I do enjoy an intense intellectual discussion like that has occurred in this post and I think that adds great value. If everyone agreed with everyone else, this site would be rather boring. Overall I think most people are civil and respectful to each other on this site even though opinions may be strong.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Madratter
Postmaster


Reged: 01/14/13

Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: cn register 5]
      #5952036 - 07/02/13 08:23 PM

Quote:

There's a horsehead/flame of mine somewhere on the massive AVX thread in the Mounts section. That's quite nice. Multiple 5 minute exposures with a Ha filter.

I've had very little time when it's been clear and I've been able to get outside with the scope. At the present in the UK it barely gets dark.

And I'm very reluctant to post anything on CN because of the overwhelmingly negative nature of most of the comments about any images, especially ones used to evaluate mounts.

My M51 rgb image which is the only image I've got with my 6" RC has no flats and as a result has a massive brown doughnut, dust circles and all sorts of artifacts. In fact, looking at it again, it may not have darks either.

Chris




Your Horsehead is quite nice.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
CounterWeight
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 10/05/08

Loc: Palo alto, CA.
Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: WarmWeatherGuy]
      #5952041 - 07/02/13 08:26 PM

I hope I'm not a part of that 'negative press'. I usually say that images are a poor measure of visual performance, worst of all for someone who has never used a scope - but that is not mount stuff IMO.

In the end, mounts, scopes guiders - my take on it is to think 'system'. As for the mounts contribution, it only needs to work in a way that gets you round stars - hopefully reliably, or at least in some ratio you feel justified for the $$ spent. The rest of making a good image, exposure time, calibration and processing and post processing is a different matter.

It's the tip of an iceberg, but IMO the significant part in weighing options with respect to the rest of a system. What is the 'budget breaker in it all' is buying something over again, though the used gear market is always active and you can recoup some at least.

As to the significance of auto-guiding/tracking it can help make a workable system better, but it has it's limitations.

IMO this level of imaging, the market is increasing options and iOptron seems pretty dedicated at making an impact, and mini-guiders are now here to stay. great news for us

When thinking about budget I think it's good to look for images like you want and look at the gear used to get it. Throw out the high and the low and in the middle is maybe a reasonable case.

I've been thinking about your mention of starting with two scopes and one for each type object and on the surface it is sound (within all the caveats that you're not expecting too much). Shopping the 'used' market will extend your astroca$h. You don't 'need' both scopes to get started. I think learning just one, and really learning that one could keep you busy for a good while depending on how much clear sky time and other free time for the processing of your data.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
cn register 5
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 12/26/12

Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: CounterWeight]
      #5952498 - 07/03/13 03:46 AM Attachment (40 downloads)

I should have mentioned that I used two 80mm scopes because I had them - and the cameras. If I was starting from scratch I would be looking at the finder-guider type of solution.

Let's see what people think, here's M51 - I think. It's a series of 2 minute exposures using RGB filters. Atik383L+ binned 2x2.

I've had to reduce the size from 1600 by 1200 to 800 by 600 to get the size down to what CN wants.

My concern about posting this was the pasting that Jason Ware got over some images with the LX850 he posted.

Chris


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
CounterWeight
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 10/05/08

Loc: Palo alto, CA.
Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: cn register 5]
      #5952519 - 07/03/13 04:38 AM

Oh... yeah... well that is another story isn't it

As far a judging the mount in this image - Stars look good here - detail and definition looks good in the galaxy - looks to me like the mount is doing it's job here.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
dr.whoModerator
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 01/05/12

Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: Jeff2011]
      #5966722 - 07/12/13 01:36 AM

My two cents since I own two of the mounts and stepped down from a CGEM to the AVX because imaging with the bigger mount was no longer fun and the hobby is supposed to be fun... I have two of them by the way because once an imaging run starts I need something else to do while I wait. This way I have the Tak or 800 Edge doing its thing and I can view with the other or with the 1100.

It is a very capable mount for its price point. I call it the CGEM Lite in that it has all the great features of the CGEM at half the cost and half the weight. However you do pay a price in what it will hold. It will handle my 11" Edge without breaking a sweat for visual but going over an 8" SCT and you are looking for trouble in terms of frustration due to overloading the mount weight wise for AP. Same will apply with a big Newt.

If you are comfortable with a Newt in terms of collimation and want a good multi purpose scope (visual and AP) take a hard look at the David Levy Comet Hunter by Explore Scientific. It will handle imaging out of the case with little modification (I would replace the carry handle with a 7" Vixen rail so you can munt a guide cam easier) and it is $1,000 US. It's a fast scope with good aperture and will get you nebulae as well as galaxies.

If you are not familiar with Newts or are not comfortable with collimation )it is easier than people think) then start with an 80-90mm APO refractor like the Explore Scientific or the Stellarvue. The value add for the ES is again it is ready to image out of the case with extension tubes rotating focuser etc.

Once you have climbed the learning curve with the APO take a look at an SCT like the Edge 800 for the deep work on smaller fainter targets. With a focal reducer you will sit at f/7 1400mm and then natively at f/10 2032mm to go really deep on objects.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
frito
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 10/05/12

Loc: Fremont, CA
Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: dr.who]
      #5966933 - 07/12/13 08:17 AM

I agree with everyone else, get a short FL APO/Semi-APO refractor to start off with, you can even get going without an autoguider at first as they are very forgiving compared to longer and larger focal length scopes when it comes to imaging. i'm currently getting 2 min subs outta my CG-5 with a 388mm 66mm refactor unguided, more than enough exposure time to get your feet wet and learn a ton about imaging before you spend big bucks on more equipment.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DaemonGPF
Redonkulous
*****

Reged: 03/22/08

Loc: Aurora Colorado
Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: cn register 5]
      #5966993 - 07/12/13 09:04 AM

Quote:

Most of my imaging with the AVX has been with an 80mm ED scope (a Celestron Oynx) for imaging with a ST80 on a home made side by side mount for guiding. By the time the cameras, focuser and filter wheel have been added this lot comes to about 18 lbs.

I've never bothered with any of the precise balancing, levelling or polar aligning that so many people seem to think is essential.
My process is:
Put mount down on the patio with the legs more or less where they went last time.
Do a 2+3 alignment.
Do an ASPA
Train PHD.
Start imaging.

It's possible that this casualness helps because the mount seems to behave better if it isn't precisely balanced or polar aligned.

I apply PEC if I remember.

The combination of a fairly short focal length refractor and some sort of guider - and a lot of people use finder based guiders - seems to work very well for learning about astro imaging.

One useful source of information and images is the CelestronVX Yahoo group http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/celestronVX/

The people there are friendly, helpful and enthusiastic but not evangelists.

Chris




Proper balance is not perfect balance on these mounts. You want a very slight bias on these mounts to preload the spur gears a bit.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jeff2011
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 01/01/13

Loc: Sugar Land, TX
Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: DaemonGPF]
      #5967437 - 07/12/13 01:36 PM

Quote:

Proper balance is not perfect balance on these mounts. You want a very slight bias on these mounts to preload the spur gears a bit.




When I setup, I try to balance the RA axis with more weight to the east side based on the orientation of where the scope will be during imaging. For me it is hard to judge just how much. The other night I was imaging M8 and it crossed the meridian. The AVX mount won't do a meridian swap until it reaches a number of degrees past the meridian so I just let it keep imaging for a while longer. After it past meridian my PHD RMS when from 0.23 to 0.19. I thought it would have been worse. I was surprised.

For Dec, I just try to get a good balance while the scope is positioned to the approximate orientation it will be in when imaging. The Dec adjustments during guiding is no longer an issue for me. I just setup PHD to only send adjustments in one direction which for me is generally north. I first turn off guiding commands to see which way it drifts and then set it accordingly and turn the guiding commands back on. I may have to also crank up the Max Dec setting a while until the backlash is resolved and then I set Max Dec back down again. The ASPA seems to get me a very good polar align, but off just enough to cause a little bit of drift which actually helps with the guiding in one direction method.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mpgxsvcd
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 12/21/11

Loc: Raleigh, North Carolina
Re: Imaging with the Celestron AVX? new [Re: Jeff2011]
      #5967488 - 07/12/13 02:11 PM

A refractor is definitely the safest bet. However, I still use a Newtonian with my CG-5 because it offers the best bang for your buck. If the CG-5 can handle the weight of the Newt then the AVX should be able to as well.

8" F4.0 800mm Newt $499.00
http://www.optcorp.com/ao-at8in-8inch-f-4-imaging-newtonian-optical-tube.html

I also would consider getting this RC(ritchey-chretien) if I was going to buy another scope.

OPT 8" F8.0 1600mm RC $899.95
http://www.optcorp.com/opt-8in-f8-rc-metal-ritchey-chretien-ota.html

I would definitely get the field flattener/coma corrector for the Newtonian. That is an extra $100-$200. The RC is advertised as not requiring one.

Edited by mpgxsvcd (07/12/13 02:12 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)


Extra information
19 registered and 18 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  nitegeezer, WOBentley, dr.who, rflinn68 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 2180

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics