Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Mounts

Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)
Trebor777
Hazy
*****

Reged: 01/04/08

Loc: Connecticut - U.S.
Atlas EQ-G Tracking Question
      #3027004 - 04/06/09 02:45 AM

When I put in my 12.5mm illuminated recticle EP and put Saturn in the middle square and line up the lines so they're parralell with the rings, Saturn drifts to the left (RA) and within 30-45 seconds is totally outside of the square, but still in the lines. Are my RA gears misaligned? Or is it as simple as not being exactly Polar aligned.

Oh yeah, I started with a 3 star align; Sirius, Mirfak & Arcturus. My Goto's were almost spot on and I thought I had Polar alignment pretty good. I did perform the Hypertune and have put all new bearings in the mount. The RA is a little tight when I turn it. - And no, it's not because I tightened the collar that holds the RA tapered bearing in place too tight. The RA ring gear was a *BLEEP* to get back into the RA housing - but I figured this didn't mean too much because the RA is supposed to be totally tightened when tracking/observing/using the mount. But the one issue I have with the RA being tight is balancing the OTA and counterweights.

I'm hopeing it's as simple as a bad polar alignment...

It's not bad for visual observing, but when I start astrophotography it'll be an issue...

Thanx in advance.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rmollise
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 07/06/07

Re: Atlas EQ-G Tracking Question new [Re: Trebor777]
      #3027216 - 04/06/09 08:28 AM

Quote:


It's not bad for visual observing, but when I start astrophotography it'll be an issue...

Thanx in advance.




Yes, poor polar alignment can cause RA drift...but...that tightness in RA (with the lock off) doesn't sound good to me.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Trebor777
Hazy
*****

Reged: 01/04/08

Loc: Connecticut - U.S.
Re: Atlas EQ-G Tracking Question new [Re: rmollise]
      #3027704 - 04/06/09 12:52 PM

Quote:

Quote:


It's not bad for visual observing, but when I start astrophotography it'll be an issue...

Thanx in advance.




Yes, poor polar alignment can cause RA drift...but...that tightness in RA (with the lock off) doesn't sound good to me.




Well, could that tightness be causing theh RA drift? That's my main concern.

The RA is locked when using the mount, so "I figured" (meaning, I might be wrong) that wasn't the issue with it being tight.

The gears sound great (alot better then before I hypertuned it). The GoTo's are spot on. And I haven't had an alignment failure. There's only a RA drift.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Mert
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 08/31/05

Loc: Spain, Pamplona
Re: Atlas EQ-G Tracking Question new [Re: Trebor777]
      #3027768 - 04/06/09 01:20 PM

Which version of stepper controller do you have
in your mount?
You can check this by starting EQMOD and copying
the text from the message center.
I seem to remember that if you have version 1.06 you
must put the ra-drift compensation ( right hand
side of the main menu ) to 3.

Edit: Oops, I simply asumed you are using EQMOD, but you
didn't state that!

Hope that helps you,

Edited by Mert (04/06/09 01:22 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rmollise
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 07/06/07

Re: Atlas EQ-G Tracking Question new [Re: Trebor777]
      #3027789 - 04/06/09 01:33 PM

Quote:



Well, could that tightness be causing theh RA drift? That's my main concern.

The RA is locked when using the mount, so "I figured" (meaning, I might be wrong) that wasn't the issue with it being tight.

The gears sound great (alot better then before I hypertuned it). The GoTo's are spot on. And I haven't had an alignment failure. There's only a RA drift.




Maybe. Tighten up your polar alignment, and, as has already been said, if you're using a mount with the affect MCB version and are using EQMOD, you need to set drift compensation to "3."



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Trebor777
Hazy
*****

Reged: 01/04/08

Loc: Connecticut - U.S.
Re: Atlas EQ-G Tracking Question new [Re: Mert]
      #3027829 - 04/06/09 02:02 PM

I am not using EQMOD - but I should be...lol. I've downloaded the ASCOM drivers and all that fun stuff, I've just been to lazy to mess with it. Plus, I don't have a CCD camera right now so I haven't been taking out my laptop with me when I observe. Is the EQMOD easy to set up?

And knowing that I haven't been using EQMOD, does this mean that the ra drift compensation is correct? Or is that something that can only be set w/ EQMOD?

My other option is to order a new RA housing from orion - but I don't want to do that. The gears and bearings are fine.

When I originally put everything back together, I was almost finished and then I noticed that I had the RA setting circle upside down. So, I went to pull the whole thing out of the RA housing. When I did I guess I wasn't exaclt straight and the ring gear got stuck at a little angle and I had to, kinda muscle it out. I'm thinking I might have made the edge of the inside of the RA housing a little off = making the RA tight and not totally flush.

But, it's not horrible. It's not super tight. The mount works, sounds better and everything is on target.

Would you guys suggest that I take it apart and have a look-see inside the RA housing also? Maybe put a little more lube on the ring gear then I already did?

I've rebuilt 3 Atlas EQ-G's and of course mine is the one with the issue. Murphy's Law. Though the issue coudl jsut be polar alignment and I'm worried about nothing.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Mert
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 08/31/05

Loc: Spain, Pamplona
Re: Atlas EQ-G Tracking Question new [Re: Trebor777]
      #3027904 - 04/06/09 02:32 PM

Ok, if you've got a simple webcam, why don't you
just hook that up to some of your OTA's and run
PErecorder for some 5 cycles.
Then post or even better, upload your results to the
temp folder on the eqmod group.
Maybe we can see if there's something odd in your mount.
To me right now it simply sounds like a not too
well done polar alignment.

Just my


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Trebor777
Hazy
*****

Reged: 01/04/08

Loc: Connecticut - U.S.
Re: Atlas EQ-G Tracking Question new [Re: Mert]
      #3027918 - 04/06/09 02:37 PM

Wanna know what I just realized? I never made sure my polar scope was aligned in the RA shaft after putting everything back together.

So, I'm thinking I'm polar aligned, but I'm not cause the mount is pointing somewhere different then where the polar scope is.... Doh!!!

But I still don't like the tightness. It makes it harder to balance.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Mert
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 08/31/05

Loc: Spain, Pamplona
Re: Atlas EQ-G Tracking Question new [Re: Trebor777]
      #3027942 - 04/06/09 02:50 PM

Oh yes, that will make a lot of difference!
Well done!

Enjoy!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrbarnett
Eyepiece Hooligan
*****

Reged: 02/28/06

Loc: Petaluma, CA
Re: Atlas EQ-G Tracking Question new [Re: Mert]
      #3028024 - 04/06/09 03:33 PM

Hmm...for visual use I find the polar scope to be nearly irrelevant. In fact, you can get good results removing the polar scope and sighting through the empty bore hole. I've never bothered to align my polar scope and find that centerig Polaris plus a two star alignment keep GOTO slews in the field of a medium power eyepiece pretty much all night.

Go ahead and align your polar scope, but if that doesn't fix matters, suspect something amiss with the RA rebuild.

Regards,

Jim


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Trebor777
Hazy
*****

Reged: 01/04/08

Loc: Connecticut - U.S.
Re: Atlas EQ-G Tracking Question new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #3030819 - 04/07/09 09:32 PM

Quote:

Hmm...for visual use I find the polar scope to be nearly irrelevant. In fact, you can get good results removing the polar scope and sighting through the empty bore hole. I've never bothered to align my polar scope and find that centerig Polaris plus a two star alignment keep GOTO slews in the field of a medium power eyepiece pretty much all night.

Go ahead and align your polar scope, but if that doesn't fix matters, suspect something amiss with the RA rebuild.





Visual is fine. GoTo's are right on.

There was just a little RA drift. Which when doing astrophotography will not be very good.

Polar aligning takes me less the 2 minutes, so it's not a bother at all. I just wasn't "actually" polar aligned...which I realized after I posted here.

Plus when I wasn't using the cross hairs I didn't even notice the RA drift. I'm willing to bet once I align the polar scope that RA drift disappears. I'll let people know...

Oh yeah, I'm picking up a CGE on Thursday!!! Got to move from a 40# capacity up to a 65# capacity.

Notice of Edit: edited language - this is a family friendly board. CH

Edited by Charlie Hein (04/07/09 10:53 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rmollise
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 07/06/07

Re: Atlas EQ-G Tracking Question new [Re: Trebor777]
      #3031539 - 04/08/09 08:11 AM

Quote:

I am not using EQMOD - but I should be...lol. I've downloaded the ASCOM drivers and all that fun stuff, I've just been to lazy to mess with it. Plus, I don't have a CCD camera right now so I haven't been taking out my laptop with me when I observe. Is the EQMOD easy to set up?

And knowing that I haven't been using EQMOD, does this mean that the ra drift compensation is correct? Or is that something that can only be set w/ EQMOD?




Yes, but this is only a problem when using EQMOD, and only for some versions of the MC board...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Trebor777
Hazy
*****

Reged: 01/04/08

Loc: Connecticut - U.S.
Re: Atlas EQ-G Tracking Question new [Re: rmollise]
      #3077657 - 04/30/09 06:53 PM

OK, I finally got around to getting back inside the Atlas to see why the RA was so tight (unlocked) when I turned it.

I took the RA apart adjusted the worm gear a little, made sure all the bearings/spacers where fully in place. Everything checked out and spun freely. So, I put everything back together - No more tightness in the RA!!!

But wait, now when the RA is loose, I can't lock the RA. I have the bolt in place correctly, with the brass pad. So, I did a little adjustment and then I got it to work and the RA locked....BUT...now the RA is stiff again when I turn it (unlocked).

So, I can have a nice smooth turning RA, but it wont lock - or I have an RA that will lock, but it's stiff.

Any ideas???? I was just in my shop in the basement for an hour adjusting the screws and bolts on the RA and got tired, so I found my oild thread. Hopefully someone has some ideas as to why I can't have both a free turning RA and have it locked???

The mount works when it's stiff, but I'm trying to get this Atlas ready to sell and while the RA works it's a bit stiff and I want to have it spin freely like it should.

Thanx in advance...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DugDog
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 12/19/07

Loc: Temecula, Ca. USA
Re: Atlas EQ-G Tracking Question new [Re: Trebor777]
      #3078211 - 05/01/09 12:11 AM

Hi Randy,

To address polar alignment...
I use "Polarfinder Scope" by Jason Dale.

If you have never used this software program, it instantly shows you where polaris should be at the exact moment in time. I don't go anywhere with out it.

I have no suggestions for your Atlas tear down.

DD


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Trebor777
Hazy
*****

Reged: 01/04/08

Loc: Connecticut - U.S.
Re: Atlas EQ-G Tracking Question new [Re: DugDog]
      #3078306 - 05/01/09 01:42 AM

Polar alignment is fine. I'm just having issues with the RA lock.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Time on my hands
sage


Reged: 07/07/06

Loc: Central Oregon
Re: Atlas EQ-G Tracking Question new [Re: Trebor777]
      #3078379 - 05/01/09 03:16 AM

Randy, I have been on the verge of rebuilding my Atlas all winter but something else always seems to get in line before it. However, I believe that there is a "felt" pad between the brass ring gear and the brass locking "bolt" that locks the axis in place. Brass on brass would not provide enough friction. I do not know what the pad is actually made of but it will look and feel something like felt. It may have come loose during reassembly and jammed up the works making it stiff then fell out when you reassembled it leaving the brass on brass situation you now seem to have.

EDIT: P.S. I have also seen pads made of a hard plastic pellet. I do not know what the Atlas actually uses but there is something in there.

Edited by Time on my hands (05/01/09 03:19 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Trebor777
Hazy
*****

Reged: 01/04/08

Loc: Connecticut - U.S.
Re: Atlas EQ-G Tracking Question new [Re: Time on my hands]
      #3078401 - 05/01/09 03:53 AM

Quote:

Randy, I have been on the verge of rebuilding my Atlas all winter but something else always seems to get in line before it. However, I believe that there is a "felt" pad between the brass ring gear and the brass locking "bolt" that locks the axis in place. Brass on brass would not provide enough friction. I do not know what the pad is actually made of but it will look and feel something like felt. It may have come loose during reassembly and jammed up the works making it stiff then fell out when you reassembled it leaving the brass on brass situation you now seem to have.

EDIT: P.S. I have also seen pads made of a hard plastic pellet. I do not know what the Atlas actually uses but there is something in there.




I've taken apart and rebuilt and/or regreased 3 Atlas's. None had felt. All 3 were brass pad pressing against the brass ring gear. It's Murphy's Law, because the other ones I worked on weren't mine and I had zero hic-ups. Then I get to my own, and of course there's a hic-up.

I gotta mess around with getting the alignment right tomorrow. Something's off, I just can't figure out what. It's strange that I can have the RA free spining but not be able to lock it, but then I can adjust the RA so it locks, but it's somewhat stiff.

Thanx for the response....

Edited by Trebor777 (05/01/09 03:54 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Time on my hands
sage


Reged: 07/07/06

Loc: Central Oregon
Re: Atlas EQ-G Tracking Question new [Re: Trebor777]
      #3079313 - 05/01/09 03:53 PM

Randy,
The brass surprises me but it would explain why the locks have an all or nothing kind of feel. Also, since my RA is also stiff (Part of why I want to rebuild.) the solution to this riddle is of great interest to me. There is a member of CN that I have not seen in this thread that could know the answer, however, and you might send him a PM. His screen name is "Strgazr27". Please do not forget to let us know the answer if he knows it.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DugDog
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 12/19/07

Loc: Temecula, Ca. USA
Re: Atlas EQ-G Tracking Question new [Re: Trebor777]
      #3079319 - 05/01/09 03:55 PM

Randy,

I have never rebuilt the mount before, however, I did find this link with a complete tear down:
http://www.beevo.com/rework.htm

Lots of cool photos of tear down, and reassembly. Maybe there is a photo of step you are over looking.

Worth a look?


DD


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Trebor777
Hazy
*****

Reged: 01/04/08

Loc: Connecticut - U.S.
Re: Atlas EQ-G Tracking Question new [Re: Time on my hands]
      #3079466 - 05/01/09 05:03 PM

Quote:

Randy,
The brass surprises me but it would explain why the locks have an all or nothing kind of feel. Also, since my RA is also stiff (Part of why I want to rebuild.) the solution to this riddle is of great interest to me. There is a member of CN that I have not seen in this thread that could know the answer, however, and you might send him a PM. His screen name is "Strgazr27". Please do not forget to let us know the answer if he knows it.




The reason for your RA being a little tight is probably the piece that the polar alignment scope screws into. If you unscrew the polar alignment scope, and then unscrew the 3 screws holding the cicle (with arrow) and take the piece off, you'll notice 4 tiny set screws - if you loosen those a bit, you can turn the black ring (which holds the bottom tapered RA bearing in place)counter clockwise just a little, and the retighten the 4 set screws and put everything back on.

EDIT: that black ring is usually REALLY TIGHT. I had to use big pliers and a rag to get it loose. But it's usually the reason for the RA being tight - just not in my instance.

Check here for images of what I'm talking about. Steps 15-18. It's actually Bobby's rebuild page.

Stargazer27 - Bobby, actually has my SN10 right now. He's finishing up a carbon fiber tube for it. I sent him a PM if he has any clues as to my issue. After dinner, I'm gonna run downstairs and work on it a bit more.

Edited by Trebor777 (05/01/09 05:10 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)


Extra information
20 registered and 35 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Bowmoreman, bilgebay, iceblaze 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 1608

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics