Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Mounts

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)
nobbygon
super member


Reged: 03/20/09

Loc: Australia
Fork vs. German
      #3107987 - 05/16/09 06:07 AM

Hi,
I've been looking for a new scope for some time now and ive decided to go with a Meade LX200-ACF(either 8" or 10").

However, im not sure how to mount it. Should i go with the forks + wedge or go down the German equatorial path instead?

Has anyone made this decision before? What are you thoughts???? Please help.

P.s. The scope will be used for astrophotography.
Cheers, Angus


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Luigi
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 07/03/07

Loc: MA
Re: Fork vs. German new [Re: nobbygon]
      #3108028 - 05/16/09 07:25 AM

>>>Has anyone made this decision before?<<<

Nope. You're the very first.

Forks are great for viewing ergonomics when used in alt-az (they still track objects fine). If you want an equatorial mount for AP, the majority will recommend a suitably stout GEM.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Chris Curran
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 06/14/05

Loc: Brandon, FL
Re: Fork vs. German new [Re: Luigi]
      #3108054 - 05/16/09 07:48 AM

Quote:

If you want an equatorial mount for AP, the majority will recommend a suitably stout GEM.




Yup. The 3 secrets to successful imaging are 1) the mount, 2) the mount and 3) the mount.

Just like space and money, you can never have too much mount.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
LLEEGE
True Blue
*****

Reged: 03/03/05

Loc: Cloud-chester,NY
Re: Fork vs. German new [Re: nobbygon]
      #3108592 - 05/16/09 12:57 PM

Quote:


P.s. The scope will be used for astrophotography.
Cheers, Angus


Fork mounts have a few advantages over a GEM for imaging. The most important being you can image through the meridian without the need to do a meridian "flip". OK. So, that's the only real advantage I can think of. A GEM will be more versatile in that you can use several different OTA's. Easier polar alignment. Easier to balance without the cost of buying additional systems. No need to buy an expensive wedge. No worries that your imaging equipment will swing through the forks. No worries about the forks flexing at lower latitudes.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Chris Curran
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 06/14/05

Loc: Brandon, FL
Re: Fork vs. German new [Re: LLEEGE]
      #3109658 - 05/17/09 12:00 AM

Quote:

The most important being you can image through the meridian without the need to do a meridian "flip".




Actually... Both my Tak EM-200 and AP 1200 image right though the meridian without any flipping. I almost always cross the meridian while imaging - that's where the good stuff is!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrcrillyAdministrator
Refractor wienie no more
*****

Reged: 04/30/03

Loc: NE Ohio
Re: Fork vs. German new [Re: Chris Curran]
      #3109669 - 05/17/09 12:05 AM

Quote:

Quote:

The most important being you can image through the meridian without the need to do a meridian "flip".




Actually... Both my Tak EM-200 and AP 1200 image right though the meridian without any flipping. I almost always cross the meridian while imaging - that's where the good stuff is!




But you can't go horizon-to-horizon. It doesn't matter whether you flip an hour before or an hour after meridian - you still flip at some point.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Chris Curran
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 06/14/05

Loc: Brandon, FL
Re: Fork vs. German new [Re: jrcrilly]
      #3109696 - 05/17/09 12:27 AM

Quote:

But you can't go horizon-to-horizon. It doesn't matter whether you flip an hour before or an hour after meridian - you still flip at some point.




??? Of course you can. I've done it - sometimes because I fell asleep "at the wheel".

I don't know why everyone seems think you have to flip in the middle of an imaging run. Just not so... at least not with Tak and AP GEM's. If my cables where long enough, those mounts would do 360's.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jimmy2K63
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 04/26/09

Loc: Milky Way, Spiral Arm, G2 Star...
Re: Fork vs. German new [Re: jrcrilly]
      #3109701 - 05/17/09 12:35 AM

Years ago I had this debate with our club when we talked about mounting our 16 inch cass/newtonian. I wanted it on a fork.

Go away from this hobby for 10 years and the first thing you hear is - if you want to do astrophotgraphy you need a GEM. That is NOT true. I had some punk at OPT tell me that NOTHING but a GEM would do for astrophotography. I hung up and vowed never to buy from these guys.

Tell that to Mt. Palomar. The 200 inch is on a horseshoe which is essentially a fork mount. Last I checked, their images are fine. The fork eliminates the big ugly knee rattling counterweights and shafts found on a large GEM in a public observatory. It puts the weight over the pier instead of turning the pier into some huge bending moment piece of I beam.

I have a GEM. I'd prefer to have a fork, especially when crossing the meridian, and especially with a newtonian. Your eyepiece is always where you can access it without doing contortions. For real astrophotography, reality is that you are doing it on the meridian for optimal results. I can cross the meridian with my GEM, but the eyepiece/camera gets in some hairy spots too.

You can keep your forks short with proper counterweights. You can build a simple polar alignment device with cradles for the polar shaft to aid in "rough" polar alignment. For accurate observatory quality polar alignment you can use the declination drift method.

And the first time you lock up the observatory and forget to turn off the drive with that GEM, guess what you find first thing in the morning?

I tolerate my GEM but I consider it inferior to a well designed fork mount. You asked for opinions.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrcrillyAdministrator
Refractor wienie no more
*****

Reged: 04/30/03

Loc: NE Ohio
Re: Fork vs. German new [Re: Chris Curran]
      #3109710 - 05/17/09 12:49 AM

Quote:

Quote:

But you can't go horizon-to-horizon. It doesn't matter whether you flip an hour before or an hour after meridian - you still flip at some point.




??? Of course you can. I've done it - sometimes because I fell asleep "at the wheel".

I don't know why everyone seems think you have to flip in the middle of an imaging run. Just not so... at least not with Tak and AP GEM's. If my cables where long enough, those mounts would do 360's.




OK. I take it back. What I should have said is that I can't go horizon to horizon. As you mention, my Tak NJP doesn't know any better, and would cheerfully try - but it wouldn't do any good. I don't set up outside, so if the OTA is below the mount I'll be shooting images of the West wall long before I reach the horizon. At least, I would if I had installed cables sufficiently long to permit that kind of rotation, which I haven't. Frankly, I'm accustomed to using mounts that know better than to permit something like that to happen. The lack of safety provisions on the Tak is hardly a selling point. I put up with this lack because I like the mount otherwise.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
nobbygon
super member


Reged: 03/20/09

Loc: Australia
Re: Fork vs. German new [Re: jrcrilly]
      #3109735 - 05/17/09 01:07 AM

Thanks for all your input everyone. haha good arguments from both sides. Im still not 100% sure which way to go still.

Im probably swinging towards the fork mount for its ease of use.

A hypothetical question; If I were to buy a 10" SCT would a EQ6 PRO be able to take the weight or would I have to go someting bigger ans better??

Cheers, Angus


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
nik hodges
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 04/20/07

Loc: UK
Re: Fork vs. German new [Re: nobbygon]
      #3109913 - 05/17/09 04:53 AM

i think there is nothing wrong with forks as a design infact as stated above they have advantages and many big instruments use a fork design, the problem is i guess we are not talking about professional instruments but amateur telescopes with fork designs ie goto SCTs and these are a different kettle of fish typically been under engineered and not particularly rigid especially up on a wedge. It is possible to get very nice images with these as many people have shown especially with shorter focal lengths piggy backed to the main telescope or with other aids such as adaptive optics but overall i think for "amateur" imaging rigs GEMs seem to have numerous advantages as already stated in this thread and thus tend to dominate amongst "serious" amateur imagers (ie tak/AP/Paramount etc) althought there are some interesting new designs around e.g. Chronos mounts and i think RCOS supply a professional quality fork mount for use with large RC instruments

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Chris Curran
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 06/14/05

Loc: Brandon, FL
Re: Fork vs. German new [Re: nik hodges]
      #3110049 - 05/17/09 08:26 AM

John,

the lack of safety provisions on the Tak is hardly a selling point.

I don't consider it a "lack of safety provision" - I consider it a feature. Different strokes....

Please understand that my comments are in reference to the functionality of a GEM. They are NOT a comparison of Fork vs GEM. Quite frankly, I don't think the Fork vs GEM debate is a fair comparison. I don't know of anyone making fork mounts that are of the same quality as the top GEM vendors (Tak, AP, Paramount, etc).

You do not need a GEM for successful imaging - you need a very high quality mount of exceptional build. Right now, the only real offerings available to the amateur are GEM's. I'm quite certain that if someone started making/selling a fork mount that was of the same quality as a Tak, AP or Paramount there would be no "debate".


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jimmy2K63
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 04/26/09

Loc: Milky Way, Spiral Arm, G2 Star...
Re: Fork vs. German new [Re: Chris Curran]
      #3110226 - 05/17/09 10:07 AM

Quote:


Please understand that my comments are in reference to the functionality of a GEM. They are NOT a comparison of Fork vs GEM. Quite frankly, I don't think the Fork vs GEM debate is a fair comparison. I don't know of anyone making fork mounts that are of the same quality as the top GEM vendors (Tak, AP, Paramount, etc).

You do not need a GEM for successful imaging - you need a very high quality mount of exceptional build. Right now, the only real offerings available to the amateur are GEM's. I'm quite certain that if someone started making/selling a fork mount that was of the same quality as a Tak, AP or Paramount there would be no "debate".




Maybe I can shed some light on this a bit. Back in the 70's when I started into this hobby this was not even a debate. Most people were making their own mounts, in fact it was not unusual for a serious amateur to own a lathe at home. The equipment market wasn't this massive mess of Walmart style gadget-mania we see today. You generally could not even purchase a mount like you can today - you had to buy the whole unit with the OTA. The Orange tube Celestron's 14's all had fork mounts, but one complaint among owners was flexure in the forks - it was a heavy tube assembly.

Sometime in the 80's/90.s Celestron came out with their C8 on a GEM. It has evolved to the point today that the largest majority of mounts are GEM's. I was surprised to pick up a catalog and literally witness the demise of the fork and many other quality mount designs. The half-fork designs of today with GoTo Alt-Az mounts cannot be compared to these CGEM's, they are made to be CHEAP not useful. Even the move to GEM's was down purely for economic reasons.

The key to any mount is the proper intersection of the RA and DEC axis - it MUST be a precise 90 degrees. When you add flexure into this, that changes. My Astrola mount has some pretty decent machining in it, 1.5 inch shafts, roller bearings, good clutches, etc. They may make mounts like that today but even the Atlas made by Orion looks pathetic next to it and I wonder how stable it can really be when it is mounted on a tripod with legs and not a pier.

I love a well engineered hand made fork mount with a nice 12 inch Byer's drive on it. It keeps the shafts short to avoid flexure you can build the wedge from plate steel, and you can use heavy plate beams for the forks, properly support the OTA on 2 beams and couple that up with some rock solid bearings on pillow blocks. :-)

One thing that has not changed though is that anyone serious about wanting to love their instruments quickly realizes that the mount makes all the difference between a high power terrestrial telephoto and a serious astronomical instrument.

Someday, not in this forum, we can have a debate about this whole progression to "needing" an APO for "serious" imaging as well. Today it's all nothing but a money racket and the "serious" amateurs are the ones who know how to cash a check. :-)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Luigi
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 07/03/07

Loc: MA
Re: Fork vs. German new [Re: Jimmy2K63]
      #3110267 - 05/17/09 10:36 AM

>>>The equipment market wasn't this massive mess of Walmart style gadget-mania we see today.<<<

I like that! Spoken like a true curmudgeonly luddite, just like me.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Chris Curran
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 06/14/05

Loc: Brandon, FL
Re: Fork vs. German new [Re: Jimmy2K63]
      #3110593 - 05/17/09 01:52 PM

Quote:

Back in the 70's when I started into this hobby this was not even a debate.




Yes, but back in the 60's I.... I forget. Having been in this "hobby" for almost 40 years, there's not much I haven't seen.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jimmy2K63
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 04/26/09

Loc: Milky Way, Spiral Arm, G2 Star...
Re: Fork vs. German new [Re: Chris Curran]
      #3110783 - 05/17/09 03:41 PM

Hope I don't dig a hole here Chris, but.....

You have a $10,000 mount. That hardly qualifies on the same level as your typical amateur commercial grade equipment. Having said that, it's beautiful. I always thought that when white paint became the norm and equipment looked like it belonged in a medical lab instead of a farmers field it made it look nice on the outside. I'd be ashmaed if it wasn't perfect. I wish the links on your website weren't broken, I'd love to see the rest of your equipment.

Yet I would not be afraid to put it up against a well built homemade fork mount, similar desgned wedge low mounted with pillow block bearings, a Byers drive, and machined mating surfaces like we used to build. You could still build one for about a tenth of the cost that photographically would reveal the same results. You could have 2 inch shafts and where the mating surfaces of the fork met the shaft the collar would be precise. You could build a perfect fork (or even cast your own), use pillow blocks for the dec axis, and shim underneath with thin sheets to bring it to trueness. A Byers on that baby and it would track like a dream.

The mass of the mount is not always a good indicator of its build. The mass of a GEM is dictated by the mass of the OTA and the appropriate counterweight, or that dec shaft would "resonate" like an old plucked guitar string - thus heavy shafts. As far as damping vibration, that comes down to the clutches on the drive more than the mass of the mount. One good thing is when you hit it in the dark, it doesn't yield, just breaks a toe. :-)

Still I bow down to you oldtimer :-) Nice stuff.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
gavinm
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 08/26/05

Loc: Auckland New Zealand
Re: Fork vs. German new [Re: Chris Curran]
      #3111017 - 05/17/09 06:23 PM

Quote:

Quote:

But you can't go horizon-to-horizon. It doesn't matter whether you flip an hour before or an hour after meridian - you still flip at some point.




??? Of course you can. I've done it - sometimes because I fell asleep "at the wheel".

I don't know why everyone seems think you have to flip in the middle of an imaging run. Just not so... at least not with Tak and AP GEM's. If my cables where long enough, those mounts would do 360's.




Seriously??? I am looking for a high spec robotic-ish mount that doesn't need flips. Ive basically ruled out the Paramount. MI-500 or 750 fork (with TCS) is coming close, but if the AP1200 can actually do this..... Ive never heard this extreme before.. crikey

BTW the flips stuff up my photometry

Edited by gavinm (05/17/09 06:34 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
LLEEGE
True Blue
*****

Reged: 03/03/05

Loc: Cloud-chester,NY
Re: Fork vs. German new [Re: gavinm]
      #3111056 - 05/17/09 06:52 PM

It depends on what area of the sky you are imaging. The nice thing about the AP mounts is you can "back" the scope over the meridian (putting the OTA on the "wrong" side of the mount) using the meridian delay feature. Typically, if your object is in the east, your OTA is on the west side of the mount. You can tell the AP mounts (and now the CGEM and CGEPro) to put the OTA on the east side of the mount while aiming at an east target. This will extend your imaging session through the meridian. You need to be careful that your OTA will not run into the pier. The new AP Command Center will help prevent this with some of its new features. But, even if you have the OTA on the correct side of the mount, it will still image past the meridian as there are no hard stops. It will just keep on going until there is a collision. If your clutches are set properly, this will have little consequence as the clutches will just slip. So again, this must be done with caution. Depending on the length of the OTA and where you are aiming, this may or may not be an issue. This is true of the Tak mounts as well. Using these mounts will greatly lessen or eliminate the need to do a flip. One just needs to be cautious.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
gavinm
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 08/26/05

Loc: Auckland New Zealand
Re: Fork vs. German new [Re: LLEEGE]
      #3111206 - 05/17/09 08:25 PM

Im not worried about the pier.. there are ways around that.. I just assumed the bearings might not be up to being inverted etc.. interesting

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
LLEEGE
True Blue
*****

Reged: 03/03/05

Loc: Cloud-chester,NY
Re: Fork vs. German new [Re: gavinm]
      #3111286 - 05/17/09 09:16 PM

Nope. They could care less.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)


Extra information
28 registered and 22 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Bowmoreman, bilgebay, iceblaze 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 1543

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics