Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Mounts

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)
amys
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 06/12/06

Loc: Groton, CT
CGEM -- first impressions
      #4557565 - 05/02/11 05:05 PM

A fellow club member just got a new CGEM last week and I got to help him set it up and assist him in his first 2-star alignment. I have a CG-5, which I haven't used in a few years, so I was familiar with the basic desgin and the software.

I have to say that I was quite impressed with the mount. It's quiet, fast and our first 2-star align with only 1 calibration star produced very good go-tos. Right out of the box. Our polar alignment consisted of our setting the tripod down and eyeballing true north with my compass in my hand, offset for our declination. We did not go through the polar alignment routine. It's a good thing the mount is too heavy for me or I'd be tempted to sell my Vixen SXW and buy one.

It does have me seriously considering ordering the NexSXW board so that I can use the Celestron software and CG-5 hand controller with my Sphinx. While I really like the design of the Sphinx (the hardware is much more solid than the CG-5), the Celestron software is clearly superior.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BCB
Undercover Saboteur
*****

Reged: 11/24/03

Loc: Look over your shoulder
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: amys]
      #4557825 - 05/02/11 07:52 PM

Next go round, do a three star with one calibration star.. It'll work even better.. LOVE mine..

Three star removes cone error..


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
amys
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 06/12/06

Loc: Groton, CT
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: BCB]
      #4557876 - 05/02/11 08:24 PM

I'll remember that. And I'll pass it along to the owner.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
deepskyguy
member


Reged: 12/16/09

Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: amys]
      #4558206 - 05/02/11 11:46 PM

Sorry if this is common knowledge but how do you do 3 star alignment? I can only find info on 2 star plus calibration. I looked through the manual and couldn't find it...

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
clchildress
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 04/22/10

Loc: NW Georgia, USA
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: deepskyguy]
      #4558489 - 05/03/11 07:01 AM

I found that a two-star alignment with three calibration stars produced deadly accurate go-to performance for me. Glad you like the CGEM; I'm absolutely loving mine so far.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Javier
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 05/03/09

Loc: New Jersey
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: clchildress]
      #4558854 - 05/03/11 11:16 AM

I'm looking forward to buying one as well for my C6R.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
biggles
sage


Reged: 10/12/06

Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: Javier]
      #4559165 - 05/03/11 01:45 PM

Loved my MeadeLX90 10" so much I bought it a CGEM for it's birthday!!

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Helcarexe
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 12/24/10

Loc: Des Moines, Iowa
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: Javier]
      #4559212 - 05/03/11 02:07 PM

Quote:

I'm looking forward to buying one as well for my C6R.




+1 for a C6R also


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrbarnett
Eyepiece Hooligan
*****

Reged: 02/28/06

Loc: Petaluma, CA
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: amys]
      #4559430 - 05/03/11 03:43 PM

I had a chance to play with a CGEM at the last club star party. I fielded an Atlas. It was nice to see both mounts in action at the same time.

The CGEM is better finished, and much more ergonomic than the Atlas. It goes without saying that the Nexstar firmware is light years ahead of Synscan on the feature front. The CGEM also slews to targets MUCH faster than the Atlas (I'd estimate >2x the slew rate).

On the other hand, the CGEM is much noisier in operation than the CGEM, and the particular unit we were using suddenly bound up in its declination axis during the session. It had been "hypertuned" professionally, and I suspect something had been either meshed too tightly or left too loose. By the cold light of day the owner discovered that the declination worm adjustment screws were loose, and tightening them fixed the glitch. Whew!

My Atlas hasn't missed a day of school since I bought it many years ago.

I really liked the CGEM and if I was going to refresh my aging Atlas, I'd definitely consider it. My only misgiving is the less than stellar reliability reports and my own observed failure of the unit I had the opportunity to use.

Regards,

Jim


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
hfjacinto
I think he's got it!
*****

Reged: 01/12/09

Loc: Land of clouds and LP
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #4559450 - 05/03/11 03:53 PM

I have the CGEM and while the first one was defective the second has worked very well. I am even able to image with the 9.25 which in itself is a large feat considering with cameras, guide scope etc. I am pushing 35lbs.

Mark (BCB),

How do you do 3 star alingment?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BCB
Undercover Saboteur
*****

Reged: 11/24/03

Loc: Look over your shoulder
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: hfjacinto]
      #4559488 - 05/03/11 04:04 PM

It's been awhile since I've fired mine up.. I MAY be thinking of a two star plus calibration.. I wasn't 100% certain when i posted that.. With the weather we've gotten up her (as you well know Helder) I haven't had many opportunities to actually use the darn thing..

I CAN say adding more calibration stars does make the alignment deadly accurate.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
hfjacinto
I think he's got it!
*****

Reged: 01/12/09

Loc: Land of clouds and LP
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: BCB]
      #4559509 - 05/03/11 04:14 PM

I use 2 star alingment and 4 star calibration but thats becuase when imaging having the DSO in the center of FOV is much easier to image when you don't have an eyepiece to look through

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
amys
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 06/12/06

Loc: Groton, CT
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: hfjacinto]
      #4559733 - 05/03/11 05:59 PM

Quote:

I have the CGEM and while the first one was defective the second has worked very well.

Mark (BCB),




Mark:

What kind of issues did you have with the first one?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mistyridge
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 10/28/05

Loc: Loomis, CA
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: amys]
      #4559879 - 05/03/11 07:06 PM

I liked mine so much I am selling it to share the wealth.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BCB
Undercover Saboteur
*****

Reged: 11/24/03

Loc: Look over your shoulder
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: amys]
      #4560667 - 05/04/11 05:35 AM

Quote:

Quote:

I have the CGEM and while the first one was defective the second has worked very well.

Mark (BCB),




Mark:

What kind of issues did you have with the first one?




It was actually hfjacinto who posted that.. I was sitting here trying to figure out WHERE i put that in this post and had to re-read the whole thing to find it.

For me, the biggest thing that popped up was one error 17 that happened the second night i used it.. I was able to back out of it completely (undo key), and the mount kept the alignment and never skipped a beat.

I'm not completely sure, but I think he suffered from the dreaded error 17 issue as well..


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
amys
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 06/12/06

Loc: Groton, CT
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: BCB]
      #4560703 - 05/04/11 06:36 AM

Sorry 'bout that.

An issue developed the other night after I left where the mount stopped finding objects and responding to the directional arrows. They ultimately got it going again. I was just curious to know if there are certain common issues that tend to crop up with these mounts.

I didn't run into any problems at all using my CG-5 except for my bonehead tendency to hit the "enter" key instead of the "align" key while doing my alignment.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Swamp Fox
sage
*****

Reged: 12/26/06

Loc: South Carolina
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: amys]
      #4560748 - 05/04/11 07:35 AM

Another satisfied customer here! I have had my CGEM for less than 2 weeks and have used it 5 nights with both the 4” and 9-1/4”. So far using 2-star alignment +1 calibration star, it is dead on when moving from object to object.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bart
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 05/28/06

Loc: Somewhere near Charlottesville...
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: Swamp Fox]
      #4560825 - 05/04/11 08:52 AM

Which brings me to my conundrum. Should I upgrade to the CGEM DX or the Losmandy G11/G2? I'd save 1200 bucks going with the CGEM, but I'd gain 10 more pounds of weight capacity if I went with the G11. This is a Buridan's @ss dilemma for me.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
gdd
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 11/23/05

Loc: N Seattle suburb, WA
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: Bart]
      #4560875 - 05/04/11 09:25 AM

Quote:

Which brings me to my conundrum. Should I upgrade to the CGEM DX or the Losmandy G11/G2? I'd save 1200 bucks going with the CGEM, but I'd gain 10 more pounds of weight capacity if I went with the G11. This is a Buridan's @ss dilemma for me.





You would also gain more precision with the G11. How do you plan to use it? That would determine whether it is worth it to spend more.

Gale


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrcrillyAdministrator
Refractor wienie no more
*****

Reged: 04/30/03

Loc: NE Ohio
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: gdd]
      #4560887 - 05/04/11 09:30 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Which brings me to my conundrum. Should I upgrade to the CGEM DX or the Losmandy G11/G2? I'd save 1200 bucks going with the CGEM, but I'd gain 10 more pounds of weight capacity if I went with the G11. This is a Buridan's @ss dilemma for me.





You would also gain more precision with the G11. How do you plan to use it? That would determine whether it is worth it to spend more.

Gale




Yup. I'd rather image with the G11 but I'd prefer to carry a CGEM around for visual use in the field.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
hfjacinto
I think he's got it!
*****

Reged: 01/12/09

Loc: Land of clouds and LP
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: jrcrilly]
      #4560901 - 05/04/11 09:38 AM Attachment (37 downloads)

Amys,

The first CGEM I had the following issues:
1) Way too much slop, the mount would move an inch in alt and dec.
2) One of the screws was stripped on the housing
3) Part of the mount housing was cracked
4) Motor Fault errors.

The best I can tell was that the mount was dropped and something broke inside. As soon as I tried it the first time, I knew something was wrong. It would tick, tick, tick, tick while tracking. When I started looking at it, I saw the crack, the stripped broken screw and realized the mount was damaged. OPT took really good care of me, so if you buy from a good dealer, you should have no issues.

The second mount has worked well for almost a year and tracks very well.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Helcarexe
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 12/24/10

Loc: Des Moines, Iowa
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: hfjacinto]
      #4560908 - 05/04/11 09:43 AM

Nice image it does look like the mount is working, its good to hear that a dealer will take care of its customers.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
AntarcticDave
sage


Reged: 02/03/09

Loc: Denver, CO
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: Helcarexe]
      #4560933 - 05/04/11 10:00 AM

I have had mine for a bit over 2 years and it's still working just fine.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
EFT
Vendor - Deep Space Products
*****

Reged: 05/07/07

Loc: Phoenix, AZ
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #4560996 - 05/04/11 10:32 AM

Quote:

I had a chance to play with a CGEM at the last club star party. I fielded an Atlas. It was nice to see both mounts in action at the same time.

The CGEM is better finished, and much more ergonomic than the Atlas. It goes without saying that the Nexstar firmware is light years ahead of Synscan on the feature front. The CGEM also slews to targets MUCH faster than the Atlas (I'd estimate >2x the slew rate).

On the other hand, the CGEM is much noisier in operation than the CGEM, and the particular unit we were using suddenly bound up in its declination axis during the session. It had been "hypertuned" professionally, and I suspect something had been either meshed too tightly or left too loose. By the cold light of day the owner discovered that the declination worm adjustment screws were loose, and tightening them fixed the glitch. Whew!

My Atlas hasn't missed a day of school since I bought it many years ago.

I really liked the CGEM and if I was going to refresh my aging Atlas, I'd definitely consider it. My only misgiving is the less than stellar reliability reports and my own observed failure of the unit I had the opportunity to use.

Regards,

Jim




Just a note on this mount. If it is the mount I think it is, the owner got it second hand after the original owner had made some adjustments and apparently either left the bolts loose or they somehow got loose in shipment. They were not loose from the service on the mount and it was not a defect in the mount. This mount has also been shipped very long distances including to Canada and mounts that travel like that may frequently need fine adjustment afterwards to account for environmental changes, especially if the mount has been previously fine tuned to remove as much backlash as possible. Again, it is not a defect in these mounts, just a fact of life.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jmiele
Patron Saint?
*****

Reged: 12/04/10

Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: EFT]
      #4561102 - 05/04/11 11:40 AM

IMO, shipping mounts and telescope long distances is a fact of life. If manufaturers are making gear that cannot be shipped and still perform to a certain level, then that is a problem. Upon arrival, ANY of the gear from ANY maker, should perform to the documented spec. And it's NOT the carriers fault. We too often want to blame UPS and FEDEX. Poor design and packaging are the main reason things arrive out of spec. Can you ship Eggs via UPS.....? Sure you can, but not in the catron you buy at the supermarket. But as we learned in school, you can make a carton or package to support dropping the egg from the 2nd floor window without it breaking. Telescope and mount makers need to make gear and packaging the can live within the current delivery systems because we aren't going to pick everything up at the shop

3,4 maybe 5 cents

Joe


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jmiele
Patron Saint?
*****

Reged: 12/04/10

Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: jmiele]
      #4561117 - 05/04/11 11:46 AM

Just to add to that - Celestrons packaging is as BAD as it gets. They ship a $4500 C-14 in less than 100lb burst strength cardboard. They only support and protect the tube at the ends with foam. You can push the box with your hands until you hit the tube at the center. If you are to use the same box again to send to someone else it will fail. Then everyone is mad at UPS/FedEx when they won't pay a claim. Joe

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
EFT
Vendor - Deep Space Products
*****

Reged: 05/07/07

Loc: Phoenix, AZ
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: jmiele]
      #4561152 - 05/04/11 12:03 PM

Quote:

IMO, shipping mounts and telescope long distances is a fact of life. If manufaturers are making gear that cannot be shipped and still perform to a certain level, then that is a problem. Upon arrival, ANY of the gear from ANY maker, should perform to the documented spec. And it's NOT the carriers fault. We too often want to blame UPS and FEDEX. Poor design and packaging are the main reason things arrive out of spec. Can you ship Eggs via UPS.....? Sure you can, but not in the catron you buy at the supermarket. But as we learned in school, you can make a carton or package to support dropping the egg from the 2nd floor window without it breaking. Telescope and mount makers need to make gear and packaging the can live within the current delivery systems because we aren't going to pick everything up at the shop

3,4 maybe 5 cents

Joe




Joe,

You are generally correct and the CGEM in fact comes in a very good shipping box and packing. One of the best and far better than styrofoam packing. And for the most part, when a mount arrives it does work unless it has had very wrough treatment. I have yet to get a CGEM damaged in shipping. However, two things were different about this mount. First, it was not coming from the manufacturer or the dealer, it was coming from the original owner. Second, the mount had been previously adjusted to mesh the gears very tightly. That is not how they come from the manufacturer. In general, the adjustment of a mount from a manufacturer is loose enough to allow for shipment to different environments where the expansion and contraction of the different metals can affect the functioning of the mount. When you change those adjustments or have them changed in order to tighten up the mount you need to realize that fine readjustment may be necessary when it travels or is shipped long distances.

I am located in Phoenix, Arizona and I find that when I really tighten a mount up and then send to places with much different climates (like cold Canada or very humid Louisiana or Florida) a little fine readjustment may be necessary when the mount arrives at its destination because things may have either tighten or loosened up in the process. This is probably less the case with higher quality mounts that use flat metal plate machined construction, but with mounts that mix machined and cast metal parts I see it fairly often. For the most part, I don't think that it is attributable to handling in shipping. In general most mounts are actually pretty tough pieces of equipment that can handle a fair amount of abuse in shipping and tavelling without and real problems. About the only shipping damage I ever see, even with poorly packed mounts, is a bent adjustment bolt or a cracked plastic housing on a lower end mount and I get mounts from and send them to everywhere in the country and Canada.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Mike Wiles
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 02/04/09

Loc: Goodyear, AZ
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: jmiele]
      #4561168 - 05/04/11 12:09 PM

My CGEM has performed admirably in the six months that I've owned it. I've set it up and taken it down perhaps 30 times in that period and I've had no issues. I do a 2 star alignment, and then 4 calibration stars. After that, I use the all star polar alignment routine to nail down the polar alignment. Many people will turn off the CGEM and start all over at this point. I simply slew to another bright star, sync to that star and get busy imaging.

The mount tracks well, autoguides well and does everything I ask of it every time I do it. I couldn't be happier with it - especially for what it cost.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
EFT
Vendor - Deep Space Products
*****

Reged: 05/07/07

Loc: Phoenix, AZ
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: jmiele]
      #4561178 - 05/04/11 12:13 PM

Quote:

Just to add to that - Celestrons packaging is as BAD as it gets. They ship a $4500 C-14 in less than 100lb burst strength cardboard. They only support and protect the tube at the ends with foam. You can push the box with your hands until you hit the tube at the center. If you are to use the same box again to send to someone else it will fail. Then everyone is mad at UPS/FedEx when they won't pay a claim. Joe




I haven't seen a C14 in the box but all of the C11s I have seen came in double boxes that were pretty good although not as good as the mount boxes. They use to come packed in the expanding foam that was better though. Some manufacturers use that stuff and it works pretty well. Considering the size and wieght of the C14 I would definitely want that double boxed and probably center supported.

If you ever need to ship something that was poorly boxed in the first place, that is the only time I will go to a pack-and-ship place to have them use the expanding foam material for packing. But you have to watch how they do it and make sure it is done correctly. For the most part I never recommend allowing someone else to pack your gear since they will just throw it in a box with peanuts and call it good. That is how gear gets broken in shipping. Peanuts are OK as long as the item being shipped is also very well wrapped in bubble wrap and cushioned with the peanuts packed tightly so that the item cannot just bounce around in the box.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
amys
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 06/12/06

Loc: Groton, CT
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: EFT]
      #4561219 - 05/04/11 12:26 PM

Just a quick set up question: how much should you tighten the RA and DEC knobs after balancing? With my Sphinx, I make them good and tight but every mount is different.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BCB
Undercover Saboteur
*****

Reged: 11/24/03

Loc: Look over your shoulder
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: amys]
      #4562770 - 05/05/11 05:38 AM

Make em tight.. Wont hurt a thing. The worm gears are double bearing (top and bottom) unlike the cg5 style of just smooth inner mating surfaces.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
amys
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 06/12/06

Loc: Groton, CT
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: BCB]
      #4562890 - 05/05/11 08:07 AM

OK, thanks. I'll pass that along.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
EFT
Vendor - Deep Space Products
*****

Reged: 05/07/07

Loc: Phoenix, AZ
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: amys]
      #4562954 - 05/05/11 09:05 AM

Quote:

Just a quick set up question: how much should you tighten the RA and DEC knobs after balancing? With my Sphinx, I make them good and tight but every mount is different.




The clutches on the Sphinx work much differently from the CGEM. If you clamp down on the CGEM clutches you will slightly deform the ring gears and the mount will run very poorly due to the gears no longer being round. You need to use as little pressure as possible on the CGEM clutches.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
clchildress
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 04/22/10

Loc: NW Georgia, USA
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: EFT]
      #4562968 - 05/05/11 09:20 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Just a quick set up question: how much should you tighten the RA and DEC knobs after balancing? With my Sphinx, I make them good and tight but every mount is different.




The clutches on the Sphinx work much differently from the CGEM. If you clamp down on the CGEM clutches you will slightly deform the ring gears and the mount will run very poorly due to the gears no longer being round. You need to use as little pressure as possible on the CGEM clutches.




That's good information to have! I just acquired a used CGEM and the last thing I'd want to do is damage it, ham-fist style.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
EFT
Vendor - Deep Space Products
*****

Reged: 05/07/07

Loc: Phoenix, AZ
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: clchildress]
      #4562994 - 05/05/11 09:35 AM

Quote:

That's good information to have! I just acquired a used CGEM and the last thing I'd want to do is damage it, ham-fist style.




The gears seem to spring back reasonably well so if you have been overtightening the clutches you are probably OK. Its just that you can really tell when the mount is running with oval shaped gears. Two opposite quarters of the gear will run smooth and loose while the other quarters will bind and it is only temporary PE since the positions will change whenever you release the clutches. Even in these mounts changes of 100ths or 1000ths of an inch can make a significant difference sometimes.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrbarnett
Eyepiece Hooligan
*****

Reged: 02/28/06

Loc: Petaluma, CA
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: EFT]
      #4563911 - 05/05/11 05:50 PM

On the other hand, I've never had to touch the Atlas in this regard. Mine is many, many years old, is well traveled (including many off pavement dark sky trips) and has not been treated gently in any way.

I find it strange that a much younger and less traveled CGEM would manifest this issue unless caused by human intervention, when a much older, untouched, more abused Atlas would not. Would it be legit to use Locktite blue on these screws to avoid having to deal with the loosening screw issue in the future?

- Jim

Edited by jrbarnett (05/05/11 06:01 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Phil Cowell
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 05/24/07

Loc: Southern Tier NY
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: jmiele]
      #4563917 - 05/05/11 05:53 PM

Quote:

Can you ship Eggs via UPS.....? Sure you can, but not in the catron you buy at the supermarket. But as we learned in school, you can make a carton or package to support dropping the egg from the 2nd floor window without it breaking. Joe




Joe you can put a house brick in 3 meters of packing and foam. Even that stuff they show on the ads for pillows that stop stop eggs being broken and you'll have house brick dust by the time it arrives. They teach these guys how to trash military survive space flight stuff.
The test sheets read:
1, 150' drop test....Passed
2, 60G edge impact....Passed
3, 60MPH vehicle impact.....Passed
4, Shoot from chicken cannon into aircraft windscreen.....Passed
5, Fedex, UPS test 500mile delivery test....Failed both carriers, nothing but dust in both containers.

They could trash anything and take pride in it.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Phil Cowell
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 05/24/07

Loc: Southern Tier NY
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: jmiele]
      #4563923 - 05/05/11 05:55 PM

UPS/Fedex have the same logo now....

The jobs not done until any delivered product won't run.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
EFT
Vendor - Deep Space Products
*****

Reged: 05/07/07

Loc: Phoenix, AZ
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #4563965 - 05/05/11 06:16 PM

Quote:

On the other hand, I've never had to touch the Atlas in this regard. Mine is many, many years old, is well traveled (including many off pavement dark sky trips) and has not been treated gently in any way.

I find it strange that a much younger and less traveled CGEM would manifest this issue unless caused by human intervention, when a much older, untouched, more abused Atlas would not. Would it be legit to use Locktite blue on these screws to avoid having to deal with the loosening screw issue in the future?

- Jim




If someone has a persistent problem with the worm gear housing bolts loosening up, then some medium strength (usually blue) threadlock on these bolts is fine. However, I have generally not heard of people having this problem. It is more common, when a mount is set very tight and shipped to a different climate, that a little fine adjustment may be necessary sometimes to counter the effects of differential expansion and contraction in the mount that may cause the gears to become a little more tight or loose (you probably won't notice loose but you will definitely notice tight).


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrbarnett
Eyepiece Hooligan
*****

Reged: 02/28/06

Loc: Petaluma, CA
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: EFT]
      #4564051 - 05/05/11 07:20 PM

Thanks Ed. Makes sense.

Regards,

Jim


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
deepskyguy
member


Reged: 12/16/09

Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #4564402 - 05/05/11 11:19 PM

One other question regarding the clutches. I always leave my mount together and carry it out in the back yard. When not in use, I leave it with the clutches disengaged. What would happen if the clutches were engaged and the mount got bumped or someone moved either the RA or DEC? Would that damage the gears?

Thanks,
DSG


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
EFT
Vendor - Deep Space Products
*****

Reged: 05/07/07

Loc: Phoenix, AZ
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: deepskyguy]
      #4564474 - 05/06/11 12:10 AM

Quote:

One other question regarding the clutches. I always leave my mount together and carry it out in the back yard. When not in use, I leave it with the clutches disengaged. What would happen if the clutches were engaged and the mount got bumped or someone moved either the RA or DEC? Would that damage the gears?

Thanks,
DSG




How a mount will do with the clutches engaged varies with the mount to some extent. I worry less about an Atlas being bumped with the clutches engaged than I do a CGEM because the Atlas has only 3 large-toothed gears between the motor and the worm whereas the CGEM has about 8 gears between the motor and the worm. However, realistically, the greatest danger is to the worm and ring gears and the clutches would have to be very tight to not slip at all which is not very likely. Overall, there is probably not much to worry about with the CGEM and Atlas mounts and I have seen them shipped with the clutches both engaged and disengaged without damage. I think Celestron recommends shipping with the clutches disengaged but the mount is much more difficult to carry or even get in and out of the box with the clutches disengaged. I usually have to engage the clutches to place the mount in the box or take it out and then release them after it is in the box.

In a mount that has spring loaded worm gears the risk of doing damage to the worm wheels with the cluches engaged may be greater because, rather than the gears being locked together and the clutches slipping, the worm gear might slip up and rachet across the top of the worm wheel doing damage to one or both of the gears.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrbarnett
Eyepiece Hooligan
*****

Reged: 02/28/06

Loc: Petaluma, CA
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: EFT]
      #4565543 - 05/06/11 02:49 PM

Ed:

You said something interesting:

"...because the Atlas has only 3 large-toothed gears between the motor and the worm whereas the CGEM has about 8 gears between the motor and the worm."

Folks often assume that these are very similar mounts, other than cosmetics and motor type. It sounds like that may not be wholly accurate. Any idea why Celestron would opt for so many more gears in the drive train than Orion/Sky Watcher?

Are there advantages (real or theoretical) to either approach?

Thanks!

- Jim


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
EFT
Vendor - Deep Space Products
*****

Reged: 05/07/07

Loc: Phoenix, AZ
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #4565600 - 05/06/11 03:11 PM

Quote:

Ed:

You said something interesting:

"...because the Atlas has only 3 large-toothed gears between the motor and the worm whereas the CGEM has about 8 gears between the motor and the worm."

Folks often assume that these are very similar mounts, other than cosmetics and motor type. It sounds like that may not be wholly accurate. Any idea why Celestron would opt for so many more gears in the drive train than Orion/Sky Watcher?

Are there advantages (real or theoretical) to either approach?

Thanks!

- Jim




The difference between the two mounts is due to the motors used. The Atlas uses stepper motors which require only a motor spur, an idler gear and a worm spur. The CGEM uses servo motors which have a motor gear box which contains 6 gears if I remember correctly, a motor spur and a worm spur.

There are advantages and disadvantages to both types of motor. The servo/encoder combination has a better idea of its position than the stepper motor without an encoder that relies on counting the steps (or microsteps) made. However, the stepper is far more robust and difficult to damage since if the mount gets jammed, the motor just starts to skip, which sounds awful but doesn't cause damage. The servo motor on the hand is far more delicate and if the mount jams the system applies increase power to the motor to overcome the jam which can result in the stripping of gears inside the gearbox.

When it comes down to it, personal preference for the sound and feel of the motors is often what decides the debate. I prefer the sound of servos over steppers but I can't really say that one works better than the other. The greatest difference between these two mounts is the hand controller.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
delgado39
super member
*****

Reged: 11/13/07

Loc: Glen Ellen, California
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: EFT]
      #4566159 - 05/06/11 08:33 PM

Would like to add that Ed helped me through the problem I experienced with my used CGEM when the DEC axis was binding on a high spot in the gears. Reported earlier in this thread by JRBarnett. Following Ed's worm gear adjustment directions and "taking my time" the issue was resolved; which I'm greatly relieved. After a 2 star - 4 star calibration alignment and using the precise GOTO feature, I was able to GOTO stars with a 5mm eyepiece and have them appear in the FOV. Amazing. Ed's a great resource in understanding CGEMs. My mount which he hypertuned for the original owner is incredibly well balanced.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bob midiri
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 06/17/04

Loc: pa 19320
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: amys]
      #4566754 - 05/07/11 06:26 AM

Amy I received mine last spring. After a few weeks I started getting errors on the HC. Celestron exchanged HC with me and its been a pleasure to use ever since. I love it, and how it handles my C6R. I do a 2 star western alignment with 3 caleb stars in the east, and its goto's are just dead on. Great mount for the money. Bob

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
amys
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 06/12/06

Loc: Groton, CT
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: bob midiri]
      #4566809 - 05/07/11 07:15 AM

I'm looking forward to having another opportunity to use it. In the meantime, I'll be checking to see if my Celestron CG-5 hand controller is flash upgradable and if so, will probably order the NexSXW board for my Sphinx. Why not take advantage of clearly superior software if I can, right? Especially with my small scopes, knowing that the go-tos are accurate will help me find those really faint fuzzies.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BCB
Undercover Saboteur
*****

Reged: 11/24/03

Loc: Look over your shoulder
Re: CGEM -- first impressions new [Re: amys]
      #4566824 - 05/07/11 07:34 AM

Quote:

I'm looking forward to having another opportunity to use it. In the meantime, I'll be checking to see if my Celestron CG-5 hand controller is flash upgradable and if so, will probably order the NexSXW board for my Sphinx. Why not take advantage of clearly superior software if I can, right? Especially with my small scopes, knowing that the go-tos are accurate will help me find those really faint fuzzies.




Agreed.. Up here, we need all the help we can get with our light pollution.. I'm a few miles off the 95 corridor and ill tell ya, some nights, the southern skys BURIED in it..


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)


Extra information
24 registered and 36 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Dave M, richard7, bilgebay 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 3929

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics