Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums
Privacy Policy |
Please read our Terms
of Service | Signup and
Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User
Ray Gralak
Vendor (PEMPro)
Reged: 04/19/08
|
Re: Paramount ME Discontinued!!
[Re: KietTran]
#5448562 - 09/30/12 02:11 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Kiet,
Tightly integrated software and hardware has advantages and disadvantages. Astro-Physics mounts were designed to be compatible with Astronomy applications through its ASCOM driver. You are not restricted to any one planetarium program so you can mostly pick and choose the applications you want to use, include Software Bisque applications.
That said, Astro-Physics is finalizing its own pointing correction and tracking rate correction software (in fact I wrote it! ). This software already works with the first generation of encoder technology in AP's 3600GTO mounts as well as any other Astro-Physics mount with the current controller, which I think has shipped with mounts for at least the last 5 years. This means that all mounts with this controller will soon have the potential to point and track more precisely. If you can't afford a new AP1600 mount you can always buy a used mount and use this software.
BTW, AP is upping the game with a second generation encoder implementation in the AP1600. The encoders will be fully compatible and transparent to any ASCOM client application out there. Pointing correction and Tracking rate correction will work with them and, like some alternatives mentioned, you can do one-click automated pointing correction runs.
-Ray Gralak
|
Chris Purves
super member
Reged: 11/01/08
Loc: Wimbledon, London
|
Re: Paramount ME Discontinued!!
[Re: Ray Gralak]
#5448631 - 09/30/12 02:44 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
All I can say Ray is please hurry up with V. 3 (of Pempro) 
I would also agree with one of the posters that having 2 great mount companies fight it out can only be a good thing!
Now if only Takahashi would join in and get their prices down! The EM-11 I just ordered is priced at the criminal end of the spectrum.
I think I am right in saying that the larger AP mounts have homing ? Absolutely vital for remote operation IMHO.
Chris
|
Alph
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 11/23/06
Loc: Melmac
|
Re: Paramount ME Discontinued!!
[Re: Chris Purves]
#5448690 - 09/30/12 03:35 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Quote:
I think I am right in saying that the larger AP mounts have homing ?
No, unless you buy absolute encoders. It is beyond my comprehension why A-P decided not to provide homing sensors. A $3000 or so declination encoder on the AP1600 does not improve guiding or tracking in declination. It's sole purpose is to provide homing or pointing recovery capabilities
|
Chris Purves
super member
Reged: 11/01/08
Loc: Wimbledon, London
|
Re: Paramount ME Discontinued!!
[Re: Alph]
#5448713 - 09/30/12 03:52 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Eek - no proper homing. For those of you that don't know when you turn on an ME it must 'home' to a mechanical fixed point so the mount always knows exactly where the telescope is pointing at - this completely avoids the possibility of a crash. As long as your computer clock is accurate you never need to 'sync' again (in theory).
This allows me to be up and imaging in a couple of minutes after the pc has booted up. Super simple.
Chris
|
Alph
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 11/23/06
Loc: Melmac
|
Re: Paramount ME Discontinued!!
[Re: Chris Purves]
#5448814 - 09/30/12 05:00 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Quote:
Super simple.
People sing prayers about Software Bisque software on-line. However, when you talk to them off-line, a different picture emerges. What's supposed to be their biggest strength, looks to me increasingly as their weakness. There isn't a mount worth the money yet, maybe one day. They all have laughable shortcomings.
|
Bill Dean
Vendor - OPT
Reged: 09/05/05
Loc: Encinitas, CA
|
Re: Paramount ME Discontinued!!
[Re: Alph]
#5448861 - 09/30/12 05:30 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Not sure what you're referring to as "their weakness" Alph but if you mean absolute homing isn't the bee's knees you have no idea why it's there and why it's important.
|
Bill Dean
Vendor - OPT
Reged: 09/05/05
Loc: Encinitas, CA
|
Re: Paramount ME Discontinued!!
[Re: Ray Gralak]
#5448945 - 09/30/12 06:31 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Hi Ray,
I guess you didn't know that the ASCOM Sky Controlled telescope driver allows you to use pretty much the same "any" planetarium software to drive the mount or perhaps forgot to mention it.
I'm not a big fan of The Sky X but since it's included with the Paramounts and more or less required to take advantage of the great feature set present I have to run it. But for the most part I continue to use GUIDE9 as my planetarium interface via the ASCOM driver and to a lesser degree the observatory control interface in MaximDL while taking full advantage of the included TPoint plugin. TSX is growing on me and has some pretty neat features so I could see myself using more as I get more comfortable.
Clear skies, Bill
Quote:
Kiet,
Tightly integrated software and hardware has advantages and disadvantages. Astro-Physics mounts were designed to be compatible with Astronomy applications through its ASCOM driver. You are not restricted to any one planetarium program so you can mostly pick and choose the applications you want to use, include Software Bisque applications.
-Ray Gralak
|
Bill Dean
Vendor - OPT
Reged: 09/05/05
Loc: Encinitas, CA
|
Re: Paramount ME Discontinued!!
[Re: Alph]
#5448970 - 09/30/12 06:38 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I use (actually used) both and it doesn't matter mount I drive, TPoint gives far better pointing results than MaxPoint.
And there's ProTrack included with the SB suite. TPoint and ProTrack are far, far superior in my experience. Much quicker to get a model, polar alignment is way ahead, and unguided subs of 300" at over 2m fl with an older C9.25 is pretty compelling.
Clear skies, Bill
Quote:
Quote:
To give an idea of how well this all works try and get to see a fully automated T-point run in the SkyX. Single button click in a single app will perform goto / photograph / analyze / model on hundreds of stars to get an accurate pointing model. I did this in central London and it still worked perfectly.
You can accomplish the same with MaxPoint, MaximDL, and any ASCOM driven mount.
|
Ray Gralak
Vendor (PEMPro)
Reged: 04/19/08
|
Re: Paramount ME Discontinued!!
[Re: Bill Dean]
#5448997 - 09/30/12 07:08 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Hi Bill,
First, I'm guessing you are mistaking me for Kiet. I never said anything about Paramounts and TheSky. I was only talking about AP mount features without specific reference to any other mounts.
Second, since you brought it up, if you use another planetarium program with the mount you mentioned don't you still have to run TheSky? If that's true then I'll let others decide if the extra overhead of running two planetarium programs simultaneously is an advantage (or not) of tight integration of hardware and software.
-Ray
Quote:
Hi Ray,
I guess you didn't know that the ASCOM Sky Controlled telescope driver allows you to use pretty much the same "any" planetarium software to drive the mount or perhaps forgot to mention it.
I'm not a big fan of The Sky X but since it's included with the Paramounts and more or less required to take advantage of the great feature set present I have to run it. But for the most part I continue to use GUIDE9 as my planetarium interface via the ASCOM driver and to a lesser degree the observatory control interface in MaximDL while taking full advantage of the included TPoint plugin. TSX is growing on me and has some pretty neat features so I could see myself using more as I get more comfortable.
Clear skies, Bill
Quote:
Kiet,
Tightly integrated software and hardware has advantages and disadvantages. Astro-Physics mounts were designed to be compatible with Astronomy applications through its ASCOM driver. You are not restricted to any one planetarium program so you can mostly pick and choose the applications you want to use, include Software Bisque applications.
-Ray Gralak
|
Ray Gralak
Vendor (PEMPro)
Reged: 04/19/08
|
Re: Paramount ME Discontinued!!
[Re: Alph]
#5449019 - 09/30/12 07:20 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
I think I am right in saying that the larger AP mounts have homing ?
No, unless you buy absolute encoders. It is beyond my comprehension why A-P decided not to provide homing sensors. A $3000 or so declination encoder on the AP1600 does not improve guiding or tracking in declination. It's sole purpose is to provide homing or pointing recovery capabilities
You can get homing sensors for the 3600 without the encoders.
Second, there are some advantages to declination encoders. You can use them for better unguided tracking of fast moving satellites, asteroids, and comets. You can also use them to detect and remove dec backlash.
Of course, using the absolute encoders on both axes on the 1600GTO is the holy grail of mount positioning. You don't need home switches at all because with the absolute encoders the mount position is always known.
-Ray
Edited by Ray Gralak (09/30/12 07:20 PM)
|
Bill Dean
Vendor - OPT
Reged: 09/05/05
Loc: Encinitas, CA
|
Re: Paramount ME Discontinued!!
[Re: Ray Gralak]
#5449136 - 09/30/12 08:34 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Hi Ray,
Nope, that's why I quoted your reply! Respectfully Ray, the thread IS titled "Paramount ME Discontinued".
I read your same reply as an implied caveat and was simply pointing out that there is an ASCOM driver (The Sky controlled telescope) that allows one to take advantage of the features offered by the tight integration of mount and software that *is* the Paramount while using whatever planetarium software the user prefers.
Not sure how to reply to your second point as I assume it's a bit leading but yeah, you have the idea. I personally don't carry a laptop around that isn't older than a couple of years so no problem and have used six year old CF-29s in this manner without a hitch. If there's a problem I'd guess it would be with the ASCOM driver (not a stretch) but the Bisque boys and crew do respond pretty quickly to requests for features and bug reports. On their end that is- ASCOM stuff is what it is.
Just trying to clear up things for someone who might be reading this a few months down the road. Feel free to PM me if need be, not trying to stir things up.
Clear skies,
Bill
Quote:
Hi Bill,
First, I'm guessing you are mistaking me for Kiet. I never said anything about Paramounts and TheSky. I was only talking about AP mount features without specific reference to any other mounts.
Second, since you brought it up, if you use another planetarium program with the mount you mentioned don't you still have to run TheSky? If that's true then I'll let others decide if the extra overhead of running two planetarium programs simultaneously is an advantage (or not) of tight integration of hardware and software.
-Ray
Quote:
Hi Ray,
I guess you didn't know that the ASCOM Sky Controlled telescope driver allows you to use pretty much the same "any" planetarium software to drive the mount or perhaps forgot to mention it.
I'm not a big fan of The Sky X but since it's included with the Paramounts and more or less required to take advantage of the great feature set present I have to run it. But for the most part I continue to use GUIDE9 as my planetarium interface via the ASCOM driver and to a lesser degree the observatory control interface in MaximDL while taking full advantage of the included TPoint plugin. TSX is growing on me and has some pretty neat features so I could see myself using more as I get more comfortable.
Clear skies,
Bill
Quote:
Kiet,
Tightly integrated software and hardware has advantages and disadvantages. Astro-Physics mounts were designed to be compatible with Astronomy applications through its ASCOM driver. You are not restricted to any one planetarium program so you can mostly pick and choose the applications you want to use, include Software Bisque applications.
-Ray Gralak
Edited by Bill Dean (09/30/12 08:46 PM)
|
Ray Gralak
Vendor (PEMPro)
Reged: 04/19/08
|
Re: Paramount ME Discontinued!!
[Re: Bill Dean]
#5449185 - 09/30/12 09:06 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Hi Bill,
Sorry, despite the thread title, in your original quote of my post I don't see where I said anything specific about any mount except Astro-Physics mounts. I only responded to the post because there was mention of AP mount software... and only because I have some experience with that.
And for those reading this in a few months -- AP mounts don't need *any* planetarium programs to run ASCOM software applications. And if you choose to use a planetarium program you just need one and you can pick any one you like.
-Ray
Quote:
Hi Ray,
Nope, that's why I quoted your reply! Respectfully Ray, the thread IS titled "Paramount ME Discontinued".
I read your same reply as an implied caveat and was simply pointing out that there is an ASCOM driver (The Sky controlled telescope) that allows one to take advantage of the features offered by the tight integration of mount and software that *is* the Paramount while using whatever planetarium software the user prefers.
Not sure how to reply to your second point as I assume it's a bit leading but yeah, you have the idea. I personally don't carry a laptop around that isn't older than a couple of years so no problem and have used six year old CF-29s in this manner without a hitch. If there's a problem I'd guess it would be with the ASCOM driver (not a stretch) but the Bisque boys and crew do respond pretty quickly to requests for features and bug reports. On their end that is- ASCOM stuff is what it is.
Just trying to clear up things for someone who might be reading this a few months down the road. Feel free to PM me if need be, not trying to stir things up.
Clear skies,
Bill
Quote:
Hi Bill,
First, I'm guessing you are mistaking me for Kiet. I never said anything about Paramounts and TheSky. I was only talking about AP mount features without specific reference to any other mounts.
Second, since you brought it up, if you use another planetarium program with the mount you mentioned don't you still have to run TheSky? If that's true then I'll let others decide if the extra overhead of running two planetarium programs simultaneously is an advantage (or not) of tight integration of hardware and software.
-Ray
Quote:
Hi Ray,
I guess you didn't know that the ASCOM Sky Controlled telescope driver allows you to use pretty much the same "any" planetarium software to drive the mount or perhaps forgot to mention it.
I'm not a big fan of The Sky X but since it's included with the Paramounts and more or less required to take advantage of the great feature set present I have to run it. But for the most part I continue to use GUIDE9 as my planetarium interface via the ASCOM driver and to a lesser degree the observatory control interface in MaximDL while taking full advantage of the included TPoint plugin. TSX is growing on me and has some pretty neat features so I could see myself using more as I get more comfortable.
Clear skies,
Bill
Quote:
Kiet,
Tightly integrated software and hardware has advantages and disadvantages. Astro-Physics mounts were designed to be compatible with Astronomy applications through its ASCOM driver. You are not restricted to any one planetarium program so you can mostly pick and choose the applications you want to use, include Software Bisque applications.
-Ray Gralak
Edited by Ray Gralak (09/30/12 09:27 PM)
|
David Pavlich
Transmographied
   
Reged: 05/18/05
Loc: Mandeville, LA USA
|
Re: Paramount ME Discontinued!!
[Re: JAT Observatory]
#5449775 - 10/01/12 08:33 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Ok guys..this is a thread about the ME being discontinued and its replacement, not a comparo thread. Let's get it back on topic.
David
|
|
29 registered and 36 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
Moderator: Bowmoreman, bilgebay, iceblaze
Print Thread
|
Forum Permissions
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled
UBBCode is enabled
|
Thread views: 2793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|