Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Mounts

Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)
psandelle
professor emeritus


Reged: 06/18/08

Loc: Los Angeles
Re: Overload result on ZEQ25GT, 60 + pounds. new [Re: crow]
      #5896485 - 06/01/13 05:37 PM

The 45+ with the encoders is my next mount and if it's G11 pricing, it would be a real nice item.

Paul, did the encoders make a huge difference when guiding (with guidescope) your iEQ45?

Thanks,

Paul


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Edmond S.
member


Reged: 07/05/10

Re: Overload result on ZEQ25GT, 60 + pounds. new [Re: crow]
      #5896610 - 06/01/13 07:09 PM

Off topic to Paul: Does TDM worth the money ?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Edmond S.
member


Reged: 07/05/10

Re: Overload result on ZEQ25GT, 60 + pounds. new [Re: Dan Finnerty]
      #5896617 - 06/01/13 07:15 PM

Quote:


I'm keeping my eyes out for a heavy version of the zeq. If they came out with something designed for 45+ pound capacity, the Losmandy G11 would finally have some real competition. There is not much to choose from above the Cgem and below the Mach 1.




Me 2. I found that my CGEM is at its limit at 35lbs. If I can get a ZEQ of 45lbs version with less money than G11, I'd go for it. I was thinking about upgrading to G11 and luckily this comes along and I can hold on my plan for a while.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Midnight Dan
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/23/08

Loc: Hilton, NY, Yellow Zone (Bortl...
Re: Overload result on ZEQ25GT, 60 + pounds. new [Re: Edmond S.]
      #5902061 - 06/04/13 03:42 PM

So Paul ... hypothetical situation.

Someone steals your iEQ45 and your ZEQ25. You need an imaging mount and you have about 35 pounds of gear all in. You want to be able to image with a variety of scopes including long-ish focal lengths like a C8. I offer to give you, free of charge (so price is not a consideration), either an IEQ45 (no encoders) or a ZEQ25. Knowing what you now know about the ability to overload the ZEQ25, which one do you take as your only mount going forward and why?

-Dan


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rsbfoto
sage


Reged: 06/10/06

Re: Overload result on ZEQ25GT, 60 + pounds. new [Re: psandelle]
      #5902095 - 06/04/13 04:02 PM

Quote:

The 45+ with the encoders is my next mount and if it's G11 pricing, it would be a real nice item.

Paul, did the encoders make a huge difference when guiding (with guidescope) your iEQ45?

Thanks,

Paul




I do not have the ZEQ 25 yet, but would like to see a 60 to 70 pounds version.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Astronewb
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 09/19/11

Loc: Connecticut
Re: Overload result on ZEQ25GT, 60 + pounds. new [Re: rsbfoto]
      #5902756 - 06/04/13 09:59 PM

For the comments referring to the TDM on the iEQ45, it definitely does turn it into an observatory class mount as far as tracking. Only a encoder on the RA axis, autoguiding handles DEC variation.

for Paul:

PecPrepRA_032613_iEQ45wTDM by Astronewb2011, on Flickr

for Edmond: yes, definitely worth every cent, especially if you have to track at long focal lengths.

Quote:

So Paul ... hypothetical situation.

Someone steals your iEQ45 and your ZEQ25. You need an imaging mount and you have about 35 pounds of gear all in. You want to be able to image with a variety of scopes including long-ish focal lengths like a C8. I offer to give you, free of charge (so price is not a consideration), either an IEQ45 (no encoders) or a ZEQ25. Knowing what you now know about the ability to overload the ZEQ25, which one do you take as your only mount going forward and why?


Now you're making it tough, but I would have to sell the AT10RC, buy a AT8RC and do all my imaging off a new ZEQ25GT.

Why? It can handle a 8" carbon fiber nicely, I can pick up the entire mount, including one counterweight and carry it 50 feet to my setup location. And it tracks like a dream without any additional assistance.

I would only image up to about the 20-25 pound limit though, and then I would buy the next iteration of the Z-Balanced mount for that hypothetical 35 pound payload...;)

Clear sky all...

Paul


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Midnight Dan
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/23/08

Loc: Hilton, NY, Yellow Zone (Bortl...
Re: Overload result on ZEQ25GT, 60 + pounds. new [Re: Astronewb]
      #5903338 - 06/05/13 07:42 AM

Good answer ... thanks! Interesting that you'd still want to keep to the 25 pound limit despite the overload capacity.

If this mount design is so good, you gotta wonder if it will eventually replace their traditional GEM line of mounts. Are there any downsides you can see that would make a person want to buy a traditional GEM instead?

-Dan


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Astronewb
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 09/19/11

Loc: Connecticut
Re: Overload result on ZEQ25GT, 60 + pounds. new [Re: Midnight Dan]
      #5904488 - 06/05/13 06:22 PM

Quote:

If this mount design is so good, you gotta wonder if it will eventually replace their traditional GEM line of mounts. Are there any downsides you can see that would make a person want to buy a traditional GEM instead?




Dan, I think the iOptron GEM and CEM mounts will co-exist for a while yet. There are still those that are hesitant and cautious about 'change'.

Just look at WinXP vs Win7 and Win8. Even though the advantages of upgrading are well documented, some people just are comfortable with what they're familiar with.

The only downside I can think of at all, is in the 8408 hand controller, which is not as 'rich' in features as the 8407 on the GEM mounts. Of course, some software changes and an evolution in the hand controller could result in a "8409" hand controller, with a larger database, a hand controller heater, and a electronic balance routine I guess.

And a physically larger mount could result in enough room to add a RS232 port to the mount for PC control and imaging programs?

So, we all wait to see what the future has in store for iOptron's offerings, as well as all the other makers, now that the die has been cast....:) Where necessity has been called the mother of invention, it may well be that evolution and competition may be the new mother of invention.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rkayakr
sage
*****

Reged: 10/27/10

Loc: Northeast Ohio
Re: Overload result on ZEQ25GT, 60 + pounds. new [Re: Astronewb]
      #5904742 - 06/05/13 09:26 PM

Paul
Unfortunately even the 8407 is maxed out. I asked about the polar alignment error reporting after star alignment feature that was dropped in the latest firmware update and iOptron tech support said that they had to drop it due to lack of memory space.
With CPU power and memory as inexpensive as they are today, I think that they may have made an unfortunate design decision. With apps like Sky Safari and laptop programs I think that the size of the database is less important than the handbox having a rich mount feature set.
Given their good customer support perhaps, a super 8409 will drive a number of existing mounts given the proper firmware.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Astronewb
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 09/19/11

Loc: Connecticut
Re: Overload result on ZEQ25GT, 60 + pounds. new [Re: rkayakr]
      #5905055 - 06/06/13 12:04 AM

Quote:

Paul
Unfortunately even the 8407 is maxed out. I asked about the polar alignment error reporting after star alignment feature that was dropped in the latest firmware update and iOptron tech support said that they had to drop it due to lack of memory space.
With CPU power and memory as inexpensive as they are today, I think that they may have made an unfortunate design decision. With apps like Sky Safari and laptop programs I think that the size of the database is less important than the handbox having a rich mount feature set.
Given their good customer support perhaps, a super 8409 will drive a number of existing mounts given the proper firmware.




Good points all. I much prefer the previous Two Star align with a Polar Offset readout after.

However, one of the reasons iOptron dropped it, was because so many new users had problems wrapping their heads around it.

And also, without a properly aligned polar scope (to mount axis) and a proper mount zero position, they couldn't guarantee the results.

All that aside, if they are running out of room in the hand controller and boards, then there is always the option of installing a little 3~4" mini pier between the tripod and the mount base to house tons of electronics....?? That would also keep the electronics out of the elements.

Like, how about using a 64mb SD card in the mini pier to store all the firmware, and have it removable so you could just stick it in your PC SD port for a quick update with new firmware? Nah...that would be too easy.

Someone just needs to think 'out of the box' to solve all those issues. Imho.

Best,

Paul

Edited by Astronewb (06/06/13 12:07 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
AcTpoHoM
member


Reged: 08/05/12

Loc: Bulgaria
Re: Overload result on ZEQ25GT, 60 + pounds. new [Re: Astronewb]
      #5905684 - 06/06/13 10:41 AM

In my opinion the mini pier would not be even necessary. Electronics are advancing in a very fast pace and iOptron should be able to fit more memory in the existing designs (size-wise). A super 8409, as you call it, might be the best course of action and it might even drop their production costs (having in mind that they would have to produce a single hand controller, instead of 2 or 3 versions). Additionally, if it supports all of their mounts, I do believe that many of us will be wishing to purchase it separately, just for the extra features we might get.

Business logic + their apparently great attention to customer happiness (:)) say that this will probably happen Personally, I'm looking forward to it, ASPA is the thing I miss the most since I switched to IEQ45 (8406 controller).


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Edmond S.
member


Reged: 07/05/10

Re: Overload result on ZEQ25GT, 60 + pounds. new [Re: AcTpoHoM]
      #5907509 - 06/07/13 08:55 AM

Paul,

One question regarding the design. Because of the Z design and the scope at the back of the pier/tripod, do you find that the limit is tighter for imaging pass meridian as the OTA may easily hit the tripod/pier ?

Edmond


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Astronewb
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 09/19/11

Loc: Connecticut
Re: Overload result on ZEQ25GT, 60 + pounds. new [Re: Edmond S.]
      #5907654 - 06/07/13 10:16 AM

Quote:

Paul,

One question regarding the design. Because of the Z design and the scope at the back of the pier/tripod, do you find that the limit is tighter for imaging pass meridian as the OTA may easily hit the tripod/pier ?

Edmond




Not really Edmond. In fact, because of the Z-Balanced design and the fact that the saddle is offset from the pivot point and in balance with the counterweight, there is actually more room between the camera/diagonal and the tripod at meridian. Note how far back the camera is from the center of the mount in this pic:


ZEQ25 imaging setup by Astronewb2011, on Flickr

Since there is so much 'cushion', I have been imaging at 70 degrees + with the mount for the first time. I wouldn't even try that with the iEQ45 until I added a 8" mini pier for clearance.

Although you can set the hand controller to 'Continue' tracking past the meridian, at some point the camera would contact a rear leg..I normally image up to the meridian and when I hear the warning beep from the controller that meridian has been reached, I let the current exposure finish up and then do a flip.

At meridian, with the AT6RC on the 1.5" tripod, there is approximately 3" of clearance between the camera and the leg.

With a smaller OTA with less length, like this 60mm setup, it could probably track through the meridian for over an hour due to the increased clearance.


IMG_4836 by Astronewb2011, on Flickr

Hope the info helps,

Best,

Paul


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
txairman
member


Reged: 04/18/11

Re: Overload result on ZEQ25GT, 60 + pounds. new [Re: Astronewb]
      #5907851 - 06/07/13 12:29 PM

Would this mount be sufficient for visual with 8SE (2" diagonal and 2" eyepieces)? I'd like to give SE mount to my son's telescope and use ZEQ25 as main visual, occasional wide-field AP mount with 8SE OTA.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Astronewb
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 09/19/11

Loc: Connecticut
Re: Overload result on ZEQ25GT, 60 + pounds. new [Re: txairman]
      #5908414 - 06/07/13 05:31 PM

Quote:

Would this mount be sufficient for visual with 8SE (2" diagonal and 2" eyepieces)? I'd like to give SE mount to my son's telescope and use ZEQ25 as main visual, occasional wide-field AP mount with 8SE OTA.




I think the 8SE will weigh in around 25 pounds with a 2" diagonal and EP, so sure, that's fine for visual. You will need an additional counterweight for 25 pounds of payload.

I just received the additional counterweight, it's counterbored, so it slips over the safety stop an additional 1.5~2.0 inches for added leverage. Very nice touch.

Clear skies,

Paul


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
txairman
member


Reged: 04/18/11

Re: Overload result on ZEQ25GT, 60 + pounds. new [Re: Astronewb]
      #5908576 - 06/07/13 07:04 PM

I just weighed OTA with 2" accessories it was 16 lbs. So I guess it should be fine for visual.

Thanks!

Quote:


I think the 8SE will weigh in around 25 pounds with a 2" diagonal and EP, so sure, that's fine for visual. You will need an additional counterweight for 25 pounds of payload.

I just received the additional counterweight, it's counterbored, so it slips over the safety stop an additional 1.5~2.0 inches for added leverage. Very nice touch.

Clear skies,

Paul




Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Aaron Worley
member


Reged: 10/21/05

Re: Overload result on ZEQ25GT, 60 + pounds. new [Re: txairman]
      #5908610 - 06/07/13 07:22 PM

Hello,

I have a Celestron 8SE on my ZEQ25GT and I'm happy with the pair for visual use, even with heavy 2" eyepieces.

I also have a Celestron 9.25 SCT and that was pretty wobbly on this mount, it would take a long time to settle and it made focusing difficult.

Hope that helps,
Aaron


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rsbfoto
sage


Reged: 06/10/06

Re: Overload result on ZEQ25GT, 60 + pounds. new [Re: Aaron Worley]
      #5908687 - 06/07/13 08:07 PM

I got the mount today at noon and it is up and running. nothing mysterious.

2 Tak scopes side by side 1x FS78 and 1x SKY90 SV side by side.

Look at the image

http://astroforo.net/astro/zeq25/zeq25gt-01.jpg

THe counterweight is 16.5 lbs.

I am very happy with it. Having owned a Losmandy GM-8 I say tis better quality at third of the price. OK. The Gemini system is far ahead of the 8408 hand controller of the iOptron ZEQ 25GT


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
zjc26138
Loved By All
*****

Reged: 02/24/05

Loc: Mingo Junction, Ohio
Re: Overload result on ZEQ25GT, 60 + pounds. new [Re: rsbfoto]
      #5908735 - 06/07/13 08:38 PM

Beautiful setup Rainer!

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Astronewb
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 09/19/11

Loc: Connecticut
Re: Overload result on ZEQ25GT, 60 + pounds. new [Re: zjc26138]
      #5908746 - 06/07/13 08:47 PM

I got the mount today at noon and it is up and running. nothing mysterious.

Very nice setup Rainer, make sure the tension screws are not bottomed out when tracking, otherwise, you may get a 'overcurrent' message under load.

All the way in, and backed out 2 turns is the normal starting spot.

The 8408 handset is marginal, to say the least, but it will get the job done, and is very easy to navigate.

Clear skies, looking forward to your first light experience...

Paul


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)


Extra information
13 registered and 36 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Dave M, richard7, bilgebay, iceblaze 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 2944

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics