Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Mounts

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)
Space_Girl1234
member


Reged: 03/06/11

Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope
      #6044212 - 08/24/13 08:50 PM

I am buying this scope...

http://www.optcorp.com/celestron-102mm-nexstar-gt-optical-tube-only.html

What mount would you recommend for this telescope with LOW PRICE being the NUMBER ONE overwhelming factor to consider?

Thank you


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
scottk
sage


Reged: 08/29/09

Loc: Tennessee
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: Space_Girl1234]
      #6044353 - 08/24/13 10:35 PM

There's a "like new" motorized eq1 mount in the cloudynights classifieds right now. It would be wobbly with a scope that is so long, but if low cost is the number 1 priority, I've worked with less stability.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
cn register 5
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 12/26/12

Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: scottk]
      #6044652 - 08/25/13 03:46 AM

Aren't you asking exactly this question on the Refractors forum? And getting lots of good suggestions.

It does not follow that because someone is dumping scopes at a very low price someone also has to sell mounts at a low price.

Essentially a mount to hold this scope will need to be reasonably sturdy and that costs money.

Chris


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
frito
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 10/05/12

Loc: Fremont, CA
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: cn register 5]
      #6044682 - 08/25/13 05:01 AM

as Chris said above the thread you got going over in the Refractor forum has a ton of great suggestions.

I thank you though for posting this because i may pick one of these up at that price just to have for visual use on my CG-5. I've used a Celestron 102F F/9 refractor my club has on my mount before and it handled it wonderfully for visual use, this scope is pretty similar in size, length and probably weight as well.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
dpippel
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 04/05/13

Loc: Desierto de Sonora
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: cn register 5]
      #6045084 - 08/25/13 12:12 PM

Quote:

Aren't you asking exactly this question on the Refractors forum? And getting lots of good suggestions.





Exactly. What's the point of doing this all over again? The low-cost options were exhaustively covered in her original thread. The answers will be NO different here Space_Girl1234.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
KarlL
sage
*****

Reged: 12/14/12

Loc: Northern Illinois
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: Space_Girl1234]
      #6045246 - 08/25/13 01:52 PM

I just bought the same scope and need a mount. I am seriously considering a pipe mount on a surveyor's tripod. It should be very stable. There is a good article on such a mount in the articles section of this site: "How-to Make an Alt-az Pipe Mount", by Ging-Li Wang. Jim in the Refractors forum recommended this article. Although expensive, a surveyor's tripod will give much-needed stability. An unstable mount makes using a telescope miserable.

Regards,

Karl

Edited by KarlL (08/25/13 01:53 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ziggarut69
member


Reged: 07/17/13

Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: Space_Girl1234]
      #6045257 - 08/25/13 01:57 PM

Space_Girl1234, I think it would clear things up if you could let everyone know exactly how much money you were willing to spend on a mount. just how LOW COST is LOW COST?. If you mean less than the cost of the telescope I think short of possibly making your own, you will be out of luck.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
gdd
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 11/23/05

Loc: N Seattle suburb, WA
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: ziggarut69]
      #6045415 - 08/25/13 03:37 PM

Hi Space_Gir1234,

This problem of how to mount an inexpensive telescope capable of high magnification is what led to the development of the "department store telescope" bundled with an inadequate low cost mount we are all warned to avoid.

Gale


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Space_Girl1234
member


Reged: 03/06/11

Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: ziggarut69]
      #6045417 - 08/25/13 03:39 PM

I am asking here in the mounts section because no one has yet provided a satisfactory answer for a LOW COST mount that can be purchased today from a retailer. The earlier answers of buy a dob or build a homemade mount while appreciated are not the info I am looking for.

Hopefully someone will offer a source since many buyers are looking for one just like I am.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
cn register 5
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 12/26/12

Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: Space_Girl1234]
      #6045450 - 08/25/13 04:04 PM

Let's apply some logic to this.

Suppose there is a mount for $100.
Now suppose there is another mount for $50. LOW PRICE is the NUMBER ONE overwhelming factor so that one is preferable.
Now suppose there is one available for $25. That's less than $50 so it's preferable. After all LOW PRICE is the NUMBER ONE overwhelming factor.
We can continue this indefinitely until we get to the point where the $0 mount becomes preferable to the $1 mount, after all LOW PRICE is the NUMBER ONE overwhelming factor.

So the logical conclusion is not to get a mount at all. Hand hold the scope. That is the lowest cost.

This is, of course, ridiculous. It will be totally impractical to hand hold this scope. But it makes a point. Low cost cannot be the only consideration. performance is also a consideration, particularly stability.

People need to know what your other, unstated needs are.

In any case even the simplest mount will probably cost more than the mount, and the options have already been suggested.

Chris


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
scottk
sage


Reged: 08/29/09

Loc: Tennessee
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: Space_Girl1234]
      #6045598 - 08/25/13 05:45 PM

Like zigg suggested, stating what you mean by "low cost" would be helpful to those trying to answer your question.

As far as telescope mounts go, 200 or 300 dollars is considered very low cost by most standards, but there are mounts out there that, while not very quality based, can be had for less.

How many dollars are you looking to spend? How much money is "low cost"?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
christheman200
sage


Reged: 06/12/13

Loc: Toronto, Canada
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: scottk]
      #6045760 - 08/25/13 07:05 PM

If you really don't want to spend any money, which is what it seems like so far, then just put it on a tripod. Find a way to bolt it onto the tripod and you have a working telescope and mount. Right now as I'm waiting for a mount (for free! worth around $400 normally) for my AR102 I'm putting it on a tripod. It has cost absolutely nothing as I already had the tripod. I think you have the mentality that there has to be something good out there for a really low price, but you simply won't find one new. If you look for a used mount you could find one but the chances are very low. If you have a local club, ask everyone if they have an old mount you can have. You will get one. The membership would cost less than the mount.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
dpippel
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 04/05/13

Loc: Desierto de Sonora
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: Space_Girl1234]
      #6045973 - 08/25/13 09:02 PM

Quote:

I am asking here in the mounts section because no one has yet provided a satisfactory answer for a LOW COST mount that can be purchased today from a retailer. The earlier answers of buy a dob or build a homemade mount while appreciated are not the info I am looking for.

Hopefully someone will offer a source since many buyers are looking for one just like I am.




No one has supplied a "satisfactory answer"? Um, I hate to be blunt, but the answers you received to this query in the refractors forum are all that there is. There are simply no more low cost mounts that can be suggested to you. They've all been covered. You may not like the answers you received, but they are what they are. You're not going to buy a mount for the same price you paid for the C102 unless you a) luck out on a used Craigslist find, b) simply buy a cheap camera tripod, or c) build your own pipe mount.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rdandrea
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 06/13/10

Loc: Colorado, USA DM59ra
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: Space_Girl1234]
      #6045983 - 08/25/13 09:08 PM

Quote:

What mount would you recommend for this telescope with LOW PRICE being the NUMBER ONE overwhelming factor to consider?




Nail it to a tree stump.

If you want a different answer, you might think about loosening up the criteria a tad.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
dpippel
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 04/05/13

Loc: Desierto de Sonora
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: rdandrea]
      #6045992 - 08/25/13 09:12 PM

Or get more specific about the criteria. We still don't know what "LOW PRICE" means.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
gdd
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 11/23/05

Loc: N Seattle suburb, WA
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: christheman200]
      #6045997 - 08/25/13 09:14 PM

You are getting the telescope for such a good price because the manufacturer has a surplus of them and has decided to put them on clearance sale, probably at below cost. That does not mean someone has to sell the mount and other accessories at below cost just to make the total system cost low.

Probably the reason you do not see many low cost but good mounts able to handle a 4" f/10 refractor is the costs involved to build them compared to the number of people likely to buy them. The companies would have to sell huge numbers of mounts each year if they had to sell them at low prices with low profit margins. And because the general public's overwhelming number one priority is cost, they will accept undersized mounts - so why offer anything else?

Gale

Edited by gdd (08/25/13 09:15 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
dpippel
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 04/05/13

Loc: Desierto de Sonora
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: gdd]
      #6046009 - 08/25/13 09:19 PM

This has all been covered over in the refractors forum:

http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/6025227/page...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
gdd
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 11/23/05

Loc: N Seattle suburb, WA
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: dpippel]
      #6046046 - 08/25/13 09:41 PM

Quote:

This has all been covered over in the refractors forum:

http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/6025227/page...





Yes, I know. This thread is the Reader's Digest version.

Gale


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rigel123
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 06/29/09

Loc: SW Ohio
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: dpippel]
      #6046048 - 08/25/13 09:42 PM

Here you go Spacegirl, this is in line with what you want. It is twice the price of your scope but that's still a bargain when it comes down to a mount.
http://www.telescope.com/Mounts-Tripods/Altazimuth-Mounts-Tripods/Orion-AZ-4-...

By the way, do you realize the scope you are buying does not come with a diagonal or an eyepiece? Both of those will probably cost more than the scope as well.

Edited by rigel123 (08/25/13 09:45 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
christheman200
sage


Reged: 06/12/13

Loc: Toronto, Canada
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: rigel123]
      #6046129 - 08/25/13 10:31 PM

Please provide us with what you are willing to spend.
I'm sorry, but until you do I will assume you are an internet troll.
You keep repeating the same thing and won't give us any feedback. Yes this assumption is harsh, but it needs to be said (IMO).
Well, I guess I don't really think you're a troll, but you are acting like one.

Edited by christheman200 (08/25/13 10:44 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
stevenf
sage


Reged: 10/11/09

Loc: Vancouver, BC
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: christheman200]
      #6046164 - 08/25/13 11:10 PM

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B004KM82LI/ref=s9_dcbhrz_bw_d0_g421_ir01_sh

$59, free shipping.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
scottk
sage


Reged: 08/29/09

Loc: Tennessee
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: rdandrea]
      #6046189 - 08/25/13 11:28 PM

Then there's the possibiliy of an anti-gravity configuration, a sort of invisible fence for the telescope. One might be able to install what would be an essentially permanent magnetic base and spinning top plate, ring, or alternate geometric configuration. Functional parameters, such as the balance or top weighting, would be stringent. Employing principles of the magnetic field and gyroscopic stabilization, the optical tube would induce levitation through a series of interactive steps. The levitated top's stabilizing rotation would undergo natural, gradual slowing, so that the levitation phenomenon would fail within four minutes unless external power was supplied to sustain rotation.

Of course, none of this would work, and would cost a fortune to even attempt.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
christheman200
sage


Reged: 06/12/13

Loc: Toronto, Canada
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: stevenf]
      #6046281 - 08/26/13 12:53 AM

Quote:

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B004KM82LI/ref=s9_dcbhrz_bw_d0_g421_ir01_sh

$59, free shipping.




If she doesn't go with this, I don't know what else she can use!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Brent Campbell
sage


Reged: 02/09/10

Loc: Olympia, WA
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: christheman200]
      #6046588 - 08/26/13 09:11 AM

First off I've been there having to economize. What people in the hobby often forget is that beginners don't just have "stuff sitting around" to make a scope work.

Perhaps she purchased the wrong scope? Yes the 102GT OTA is a steal, but was it right for her? Maybe an astroscan, and ETX90, or a Galileoscope would have been a better deal? Despite the being a good deal on the OTA what are you going to spend?

OTA $69.00
Diagonal: Around $75.00
Finder: $25.00
Mount $125.00
Eyepieces (2): $50.00 each or $100.00
Case (A piece of PVC pipe with padding might work) $20.00

I get a total for $414.00 to get the scope ready. Essentially this OTA combo has turned into "buy the accessories get the OTA for free"! So I can't fault her for trying to save a couple of bucks on the mount.

If I was her I would look for a good used CG-4. I purchased mine for $125.00. New I believe they are $375.00. They are around, although I don't see any for sale right now, and would make a good match for the 102 GT.

There is a VIXEN Portamount II for sale for $175.00 in the classifieds that is interesting. I would look at this seriously!

The $69.00 tripod deal mentioned would work but wouldn't be optimal.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
cirrus1500
member


Reged: 04/09/13

Loc: California
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: Brent Campbell]
      #6048462 - 08/27/13 09:38 AM

Quote:

There is a VIXEN Portamount II for sale for $175.00 in the classifieds that is interesting. I would look at this seriously!




I too bought the C102 from OPT and I was very interested in this Porta II mount in the classified. At that price, I can imagine many others will be interested. However, the seller haven't got back to me on the shipping cost after 2 days so i went ahead to buy a new Porta II with an upgraded tripod (starguy) at OpticsPlanet (they have a $40 discount for right now). The starguy cost me $359 but in addition to the c102, I know i can use it with my other scopes, and reviews have been great so i think it is well worth it.

Spacegirl, i think you should consider the one in the classified. Or the closest that may be acceptable seems to be the Celestron Heavy Duty Altazimuth mount that Starion recommended ($79 shipped). It seems quite robust compared to others at this price, and it has slow motion control.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
terraclarke
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 05/29/12

Loc: Just South of the Mason-Dixon ...
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: cirrus1500]
      #6048538 - 08/27/13 10:27 AM

I think you will detest that cheap Celestron alt-az mount in a hurry when you try and use it effectively with that telescope. While it may lock and hold the tube it is going to vibrate and the clutches will be worthless for making positional adjustments at anything other than very low power when you don't want to crank the slow-mos. It also does not have 360 degree gears and so they will have to be reset every hour. Bottom line, the torque with a tube that length on that mount will be a total PITA. Don't waste your 80 bucks as you will no doubt regret it.

Just wait for a used Vixen polaris mount. They periodically come up for around 100 bucks here on CN. As PDXmoon indicated in your other thread in the refractors forum, you might even find one for less on Craigslist. You will however need a set of rings. A rail is not necessary as the rings bolt directly to the mount. You will also have to take off the stock side mounted rails to get the proper ring spacing on the tube to fit the mount. It will be a fine mount to accommodate that scope.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Space_Girl1234
member


Reged: 03/06/11

Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: terraclarke]
      #6056782 - 08/31/13 10:02 PM

Thank you for your suggestions.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Space_Girl1234
member


Reged: 03/06/11

Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: Brent Campbell]
      #6056791 - 08/31/13 10:08 PM

Quote:

First off I've been there having to economize. What people in the hobby often forget is that beginners don't just have "stuff sitting around" to make a scope work.

Perhaps she purchased the wrong scope? Yes the 102GT OTA is a steal, but was it right for her? Maybe an astroscan, and ETX90, or a Galileoscope would have been a better deal? Despite the being a good deal on the OTA what are you going to spend?

OTA $69.00
Diagonal: Around $75.00
Finder: $25.00
Mount $125.00
Eyepieces (2): $50.00 each or $100.00
Case (A piece of PVC pipe with padding might work) $20.00

I get a total for $414.00 to get the scope ready. Essentially this OTA combo has turned into "buy the accessories get the OTA for free"! So I can't fault her for trying to save a couple of bucks on the mount.

If I was her I would look for a good used CG-4. I purchased mine for $125.00. New I believe they are $375.00. They are around, although I don't see any for sale right now, and would make a good match for the 102 GT.

There is a VIXEN Portamount II for sale for $175.00 in the classifieds that is interesting. I would look at this seriously!

The $69.00 tripod deal mentioned would work but wouldn't be optimal.




Thank you for reminding others that amateur astronomy shouldn't be the rich man's hobby it really is. It is rare that posters weigh cost as a primary factor in this hobby.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Space_Girl1234
member


Reged: 03/06/11

Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: christheman200]
      #6056812 - 08/31/13 10:21 PM

Quote:

Please provide us with what you are willing to spend.
I'm sorry, but until you do I will assume you are an internet troll.
You keep repeating the same thing and won't give us any feedback. Yes this assumption is harsh, but it needs to be said (IMO).
Well, I guess I don't really think you're a troll, but you are acting like one.




Again thanks everyone for helping me.

I asked a simple question for a LOW COST mount for a LOW COST telescope...the same question many have since buying the Celestron scope.

FWIW...asking a simple question is not being a troll.

Reviewing some of the answers I got from those who feel the need to act like trolls, it would seem that Cloudy Nights is not the kid friendly place it advertises to be. My Dad warned me that asking about a low cost mount in a hobby that spends thousands of dollars for a mount would be a problem.

If kids can't afford equipment, how can this neat hobby of the stars continue?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
cn register 5
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 12/26/12

Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: Space_Girl1234]
      #6057084 - 09/01/13 04:16 AM

Did your dad also explain that being rude to people who are trying to help you is not polite?

This is not a simple question. And the answers you have been given explain why.

Astronomical telescopes work at quite high magnifications, the one you are thinking of getting will probably not be able to work at less than 25 or 30 times, and more like 60x to 100x. This means that any wobbliness is magnified a lot and this make is difficult and frustrating to see anything through it.

This means that in addition to low cost the mount has to be rigid enough to hold the scope. It really also needs a way to adjust it's position smoothly in small amounts.

This sort of thing costs money. People have to be paid to design it. People have to be paid to make it. The materials have to be paid for, so does the dealer who sells it. And it has to be shipped to you. All these things cost money. People have to eat and if they can't do so supplying a mount to you they will have to do something else.

The best mount for that scope will probably be something like a CG5 mount, maybe a CG4. A manual one, with no motors may be available second hand for $100 I guess. Smaller mounts may also be possible, but as they get smaller they get more wobbly.

I doubt that you will get a commercial mount that will actually hold that scope for less than the price of the scope.

The other alternative is to make one and it's possible to make a dobsonian style refractor mount and tripod from plywood for not very much in money but some investment in time. Your dad will need to help with this diy. It's more fun than painting the spare bedroom!

Another idea, do you have a local Astronomy Society? If so join it and talk to the members. They may have loan scopes or mounts. My astro society has all sorts of things like this for loan, including a CG5 with one of those scopes. There may also be a helpful member or two who can help with loaning something they have abandoned.

We are in the UK so that's probably a bit far to travel.

Hope that helps,

Chris


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
pugliano
super member


Reged: 06/16/11

Loc: Michigan
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: cn register 5]
      #6057336 - 09/01/13 10:00 AM

First, think of it as a $300 scope that you got for an amazing price, rather than as a "low cost scope"!

Second, since price is your primary objective (I get it, you just want to be able to enjoy looking at the stars with your scope without spending a fortune to do it!), then I would say the $59 mount from Amazon will work fine for what you want. Just make sure you don't touch the scope while looking through it, as it will shake.

Most of us old-timers pretty much all started with shakey mounts, and with scopes that were of much lower quality than the 4" refractor you now possess, and we managed to survive and be thrilled with the views until we were able to afford something better.

So, welcome to astronomy! May you always be in awe of what you see in the Heavens.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Raginar
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 10/19/10

Loc: Rapid CIty, SD
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: pugliano]
      #6057349 - 09/01/13 10:08 AM

Spacegirl,

You'll find that most of the people around here aren't young and very established in our careers. We have differing definitions of 'low cost' as well. I think what many people remember from their first scopes is how frustrating it could be trying to deal with a mount that is 'shaky' and how they wish they'd spent a little more money instead of going through the upgrade cycle.

Now, I'm guilty of it . I went through a First Scope 114 to star with, and followed that up with a Firstscope 114 "GT" that gave me GOTO! Very frustrating scopes/mounts, and I wish I'd gone a different route. If I'd saved the money from those two I could've bought... well, I dunno, something else .

So, people are leery to recommend the mount you suggested because they don't want to give you bad advice. Will it work? Maybe. Might it not work well? Maybe. The low end market is full of stuff that barely works .

The recommendation to find a local astronomy group is very valid. In fact, before spending any more money, look into that. You might find that there are people with old gear they'd loan you or even give you. You'll find many astronomers love to share what they've collected over the years and you'll have someone to ask questions of as you explore the sky.

Good luck!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
clintwhitman
Caveman
*****

Reged: 01/01/07

Loc: CALI SoEasyACavemanCanSlewIt
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: Space_Girl1234]
      #6057423 - 09/01/13 11:02 AM Attachment (6 downloads)

Spacegirl,
This is actually a friendly place for anyone. Folks are so excited about your post they just get carried away!!
It also is not a rich mans hobby. It seems I have mostly let the Rich guys buy the stuff and then when they cant lift it anymore I swoop in like a vulture and grab it cheap...

I remember being like 16 and wanting a bigger telescope. So I know what it is like to get the wants and being short of haves. In fact I still have that problem allot.
.
That time some rich guy backed over his expensive telescope in his garage and he gave it to me for mowing his yard a few times.

The best suggestion on here was to go find the local astronomy group. Go to a meeting or star party, and make a few friends. I was at a star party last month and a friend wanted to sell me a super polaris with motor drives for $100, he was out of room and needed to get rid of it. I am in the same boat "No More Room" Seeing how these sell for $400 used it qualified to me as a cheap really super nice mount for your scope.
Not quite a Troll, but sorta.
(aveman
1947 Nippon Kogaku 5CM
1980 Brandon 80mm
1980 Super Polaris Mount
If you need any help with odds and ends we are in SoCal Clint and Debbie Whitman do a search
And have fun on the Group!


Edited by clintwhitman (09/01/13 07:49 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
cirrus1500
member


Reged: 04/09/13

Loc: California
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: Raginar]
      #6057435 - 09/01/13 11:06 AM

Or, knowing the weakness of the "low cost" mounts, you can manage your expectations and go for the one most acceptable to you. e.g. some are shaky when touched lightly. Some cannot point higher than 70 degrees (photo tripods), etc. Once you know what you get and can accept it, you could still be satisfied with it for some time, until you are ready to spend more. Once you have experience with a "low cost" mount first hand, you will know what to look for in you next purchase. Then you can sell off your first mount and buy the 2nd one. I think that is a valid solution, too.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Lost in Space
Vendor - Galactic Rocks
*****

Reged: 11/14/04

Loc: North Carolina
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: clintwhitman]
      #6057763 - 09/01/13 02:21 PM

Hi Space Girl!

I heartily endorse checking out a local Astronomy Club. Don't know your locality, but I think that unless you are living really out and away from even a small city, you should be able to find one. A quick Google search may be worthwhile, but I am including one link here for you that lists some, but not all US Astronomy Clubs - assuming you are in the US. They also list internationally located clubs:

Some US Astronomy Clubs

My club has a loaning library of telescopes, mounts, binoculars, (yes, binocular astronomy is fun too!) books, and who knows what else. Plus, there are members who are willing to help out newcomers.

Locate a nearby club, and have your Dad take you to a meeting and see if you find a similar circumstance. I believe that you will be very happy.

Regards,
Ed


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Lost in Space
Vendor - Galactic Rocks
*****

Reged: 11/14/04

Loc: North Carolina
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: Lost in Space]
      #6057771 - 09/01/13 02:26 PM

P.S. -- When you look at the clubs on that link (I just checked several out in North Carolina) the member count shows 0. I don't believe that they have a very good handle on that, so don't take that number as gospel.

Ed


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Wmacky
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 11/24/07

Loc: Florida
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: Lost in Space]
      #6058477 - 09/01/13 11:23 PM

I have a new in the box CG5 (manual only) that I might sell for $100. I wonder if that would be the right mount for her? I was going to use the nice tripod on a future Alt- AZ head, but what the heck.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Brent Campbell
sage


Reged: 02/09/10

Loc: Olympia, WA
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: Space_Girl1234]
      #6060804 - 09/03/13 10:31 AM

Your very welcome! Keep looking. Don't get discouraged. When I was looking for my C8 it took several weeks before I got the deal that I wanted. My CG-4 took 3 weeks to find.

Keep your criteria "general" (be flexible) and look around. A CG-4, Vixen Portamount, Astro Tech Voyager, Vixen Polaris, Vixen Super Polaris - all of them make great mounts for this scope. Each of them are going to be somewhat different in function but all of these mounts will get the job done.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Brent Campbell
sage


Reged: 02/09/10

Loc: Olympia, WA
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: Space_Girl1234]
      #6060818 - 09/03/13 10:40 AM

Quote:


Again thanks everyone for helping me.

I asked a simple question for a LOW COST mount for a LOW COST telescope...the same question many have since buying the Celestron scope.

FWIW...asking a simple question is not being a troll.

Reviewing some of the answers I got from those who feel the need to act like trolls, it would seem that Cloudy Nights is not the kid friendly place it advertises to be. My Dad warned me that asking about a low cost mount in a hobby that spends thousands of dollars for a mount would be a problem.

If kids can't afford equipment, how can this neat hobby of the stars continue?




As a father of two girls I applaud your efforts. One of my daughters is interested in this hobby and in the next year we will be exploring that interest together.

One thing to remember that Astronomy is hard! (It really is)....Much harder than sitting in front of a cell phone and texting....

Spacegirl, you will be able to do this although it won't be easy. Your mount will be available, and if it isn't you can even build one... (see pipe mount). I would go for a good used mount. Check out Ebay, Cloudy nights, and Astromart. The lesson that you learn in overcoming the lack of resources will serve you well into the future.....Keep going!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Brent Campbell
sage


Reged: 02/09/10

Loc: Olympia, WA
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: Brent Campbell]
      #6060984 - 09/03/13 12:32 PM

Spacegirl take wmakey up on the offer to sell the manual cg5 for 100.00 .if you can make the deal and if the mount is complete you wont find a better deal.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
cirrus1500
member


Reged: 04/09/13

Loc: California
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: Brent Campbell]
      #6062655 - 09/04/13 01:07 PM

That will be the best deal you will ever find. Just like the 102GT you bought, CG5 at $100 is a non low cost mount at low cost

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
PeterR280
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 05/27/13

Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: cirrus1500]
      #6062684 - 09/04/13 01:23 PM

The $59 telescope you got is a wonderful bargain. You will be able to experience high quality views that are usually reserved for much more expensive telescopes. It's also something you can keep for a long time and grow with. I wish I had a telesope of that quality when I was young.

Start with a used CG4 or equivalent(the used CG5 deal for $100) and upgrade when the time, money aand opprtunity comes.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
WesC
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 02/06/13

Loc: La Crescenta, CA
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: cirrus1500]
      #6062745 - 09/04/13 01:58 PM

I too tried to go the budget route when I started out. I read a little bit (too little in fact) and ended up buying a Nexstar 130SLT. Even for $450 that thing was so shaky and had such a poorly made focuser that all I wanted to do was kick it off of my porch. I had to collimate it every time I moved it, and the gotos were never quite right. I struggled with it for months. I was really frustrated and not having much fun.

I realized pretty quickly that to meet my expectations I would have to spend more money. So, to do things right, I went back to reading and asking a lot of questions. The answers were not always what I wanted to hear, but they taught me a lot. This went on for a good 3-4 months before I finally had a clear idea of what I would need... and how much I would need to spend to get it.

In the end my $450 ended up being almost $4,000 for a Celestron Edge 11 on a CGEM and a few high-quality eyepieces. NOW I am getting the stable, deep views that I was after! I cannot get enough of using my telescope!

And eventually I want to do astrophotography, and I know even the mount I have now won't completely meet my goals and I will need to buy a better mount.. and a CCD camera, reducer, filters, guider, software and even a second scope for wider field imaging. This is what the hobby is.

Yes, astronomy doesn't have to be for the rich person. You don't HAVE to spend what I and many people choose to. But there are physical limits and realities to this hobby that can only be overcome by spending money on high quality equipment. You just have to adjust your expectations accordingly and that comes through experience.

There is a massive wealth of experience for you to learn from on Cloudy Nights, just as I have. You can choose to accept the advice given you or not. But one way or another you will learn that these folks are correct in what they're telling you.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
pogobbler
sage


Reged: 09/30/08

Loc: Central Indiana, USA
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: WesC]
      #6063020 - 09/04/13 04:44 PM

I agree with others who recommend finding a used CG5 mount. It'd be a nice, sturdy, relatively simple mount that would hold that scope with ease. The one another poster mentioned he might let go for $100 would be a good deal. I purchased one of those scopes, too, and I currently have mine mounted on an old CG5 I had and it works great. I'm eventually going to build a Dob style mount for it, for the ultimate ease of use, but it works just fine on the CG5 now.

Note that the CG5s that I know of, shipped with an 11lb counterweight, which I know from experience is too much for a scope that light, so you might need to rig up some sort of lighter counterweight for the mount. I'm currently using a 5lb weightlifting type weight that's secured from falling off the counterweight shaft with one of the things you use to keep the weights from falling off on a barbell.

If you've go this route and have any further questions about this type of mount or anything else, the people on here really are very helpful, or you can feel free to send a private message my way. Just a quick note about being a beginner and most everyone who might be otherwise will lighten up.

Good luck with the new scope! I know when I was young and starting out in astronomy, I'd have killed for a scope that good. haha


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Wmacky
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 11/24/07

Loc: Florida
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: pogobbler]
      #6067141 - 09/07/13 01:04 AM

Well, no word from Space Girl so I guess she bailed on the astronomy project! I guess I'm going to keep the CG5 as the tripod alone was worth the $100 to me! I just wish they still sold the tracking motor kits for it.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
orlyandico
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 08/10/09

Loc: Singapore
Re: Recommended LOW COST mount for this telescope new [Re: Wmacky]
      #6067158 - 09/07/13 01:25 AM

Wmacky, you can use the Orion Sky View Pro dual-axis motors, or any of the innumerable clones on fleabay, or the "DK-3" dual-axis drive. All of which cost over $100.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)


Extra information
23 registered and 36 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Dave M, richard7, bilgebay, iceblaze 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 1656

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics