Dubboy
Carpal Tunnel
   
Reged: 07/05/05
Loc: Western Kentucky
|
Re: AT111EDT vs WO Megrez 110ED
[Re: Dubboy]
#2550179 - 07/30/08 11:26 AM Attachment (86 downloads)
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
M101
|
Dubboy
Carpal Tunnel
   
Reged: 07/05/05
Loc: Western Kentucky
|
Re: AT111EDT vs WO Megrez 110ED
[Re: Dubboy]
#2550188 - 07/30/08 11:28 AM Attachment (72 downloads)
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
M51
|
Dubboy
Carpal Tunnel
   
Reged: 07/05/05
Loc: Western Kentucky
|
Re: AT111EDT vs WO Megrez 110ED
[Re: Dubboy]
#2550191 - 07/30/08 11:30 AM Attachment (63 downloads)
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
M63
|
Dubboy
Carpal Tunnel
   
Reged: 07/05/05
Loc: Western Kentucky
|
Re: AT111EDT vs WO Megrez 110ED
[Re: Dubboy]
#2550197 - 07/30/08 11:32 AM Attachment (68 downloads)
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
As others have mentioned, you will get a blue halo around very bright stars
|
rchozick
member
Reged: 05/11/08
Loc: Plano, Texas
|
Re: AT111EDT vs WO Megrez 110ED
[Re: Dubboy]
#2550512 - 07/30/08 02:23 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I recently acquired an AT 111 EDT. I am amazed by the views. I cannot see any CA on anything - the moon, planets Vega. I have one eyepiece when used on the moon produces an extremely faint blue fringe - no other eyepieces do the same. I have recently seen the Great Red Spot better in the 111 than in any telescope and I have owned an SCT, Mak-Newt and have a 12.5 inch Dob. The 111, like the WO 110 FLT, is a Thomas Back design. I believe they are the exact same lens. Does anyone know what glass is in the 111? Is it FPL-51 and 53 or just one of 51 or 53?
|
AstroSteve
scholastic sledgehammer
Reged: 08/17/04
Loc: Kissimmee, Florida
|
Re: AT111EDT vs WO Megrez 110ED
[Re: rchozick]
#2550601 - 07/30/08 03:07 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I understood it to be a FPL-51 Triplet.
|
denjo
professor emeritus
Reged: 11/25/05
|
Re: AT111EDT vs WO Megrez 110ED
[Re: AstroSteve]
#2551087 - 07/30/08 06:59 PM Attachment (97 downloads)
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Some shots with my AT111. I have been very happy with mine.
|
denjo
professor emeritus
Reged: 11/25/05
|
Re: AT111EDT vs WO Megrez 110ED
[Re: denjo]
#2551093 - 07/30/08 07:00 PM Attachment (91 downloads)
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
One of M27
Edited by denjo (07/30/08 07:02 PM)
|
Dubboy
Carpal Tunnel
   
Reged: 07/05/05
Loc: Western Kentucky
|
Re: AT111EDT vs WO Megrez 110ED
[Re: denjo]
#2551094 - 07/30/08 07:01 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Quote:
Some shots with my AT111. I have been very happy with mine.
Excellent!!, Dennis
|
Scott Beith
SRF
   
Reged: 11/26/03
Loc: Frederick, MD
|
Re: AT111EDT vs WO Megrez 110ED
[Re: Dubboy]
#2551099 - 07/30/08 07:03 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
you are right FPL-51.
I was incorrect.
|
Astronomics
Vendor if you must, AKA The Mighty Kong.
   
Reged: 06/07/04
Loc: Right Here
|
Re: AT111EDT vs WO Megrez 110ED
[Re: Scott Beith]
#2551331 - 07/30/08 08:58 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
The lenses of the 111 and the 110 are actually different.
|
David Pavlich
Transmographied
   
Reged: 05/18/05
Loc: Mandeville, LA USA
|
Re: AT111EDT vs WO Megrez 110ED
[Re: Astronomics]
#2551486 - 07/30/08 10:24 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Is there a field flattener that works well with the 111?
Thanks! David
|
katodog
Supreme Grandmaster
   
Reged: 03/31/06
Loc: Carol Stream, Illinois
|
Re: AT111EDT vs WO Megrez 110ED
[Re: David Pavlich]
#2551505 - 07/30/08 10:30 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Well, I was going to shoot some stuff with my Megrez tonight, but there was two things stopping me: Heat waves and Mosquitoes. Not a good combination for standing outside. But at least I got about 15 minutes with the binoviewer and a few different mags with Jupiter. Looked pretty good except for the wavy atmosphere.
I tried a Proxima zoom, an Orion Epic 5.1mm, and a few different sets in the binoviewer and can't say that I saw any CA. Even with the cruddy atmosphere Jupiter looked perfect.
|
rchozick
member
Reged: 05/11/08
Loc: Plano, Texas
|
Re: AT111EDT vs WO Megrez 110ED
[Re: katodog]
#2552012 - 07/31/08 08:36 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Mike, can you tell us about the AT 111 design versus the WO 110 triplet?
|
Astronomics
Vendor if you must, AKA The Mighty Kong.
   
Reged: 06/07/04
Loc: Right Here
|
Re: AT111EDT vs WO Megrez 110ED
[Re: rchozick]
#2552017 - 07/31/08 08:39 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Not really as I have no access to the WO design. What I can tell you is WO paid for a design, so Tom would not use the same design in a different scope. Plus Tom said it was different.
Mike
|
David Pavlich
Transmographied
   
Reged: 05/18/05
Loc: Mandeville, LA USA
|
Re: AT111EDT vs WO Megrez 110ED
[Re: Astronomics]
#2556868 - 08/02/08 10:44 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Go ahead and order the 111....I just did. 
David
|
carlcat
sage
   
Reged: 11/26/07
Loc: Northern California
|
Re: AT111EDT vs WO Megrez 110ED
[Re: David Pavlich]
#2556908 - 08/02/08 11:08 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I can only fantasize what the WO 98mm fpl-53 triplet is gonna be like to look through.
|