Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Refractors

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)
jrbarnett
Eyepiece Hooligan
*****

Reged: 02/28/06

Loc: Petaluma, CA
Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, (w/ Pics now!!!).
      #5491022 - 10/26/12 11:14 PM

Well, it's here. It arrived in good shape. I'll have some pictures tomorrow assuming we don't get rain. I like the new R&P focuser. It's a bit stiffer than the 2" Crayford on other Astro-Tech scopes, but nice and smooth. I'll play around with tensioning on it tomorrow.

A couple of other points: While the scope is white and gunmetal gray in typical Astro-Tech colors, the paint textures are NOT consistent with those used on the other Astro-Tech scopes. Instead they (both the white and gray) are a semi-pebbled finish rather than glossy. I like it, but for folks that want to mount this little guy as a finder/guider on their AT130EDT, AT111EDT, AT106EDT, etc., may be bummed that the finishes aren't matched. C'est la vie.

It is a dense, heavy little blighter, too. Like a tiny brick. First light is doubtful this weekend, due to rain and clouds in the forecast, but I may get a chance to mount it up for some pictures.

I think it will be a great fit (better than the AT72ED) on a Celestron Nextsr SE alt-az by virtue of its shorter OTA. I'll run it against a 60mm f/16.7 Carton achromat when I first light the scope. Compared to the meter-long Carton, though, it's a very portable scope.

Regards,

Jim

Edited by jrbarnett (10/27/12 04:38 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
zjc26138
Loved By All
*****

Reged: 02/24/05

Loc: Mingo Junction, Ohio
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5491050 - 10/26/12 11:42 PM

Congrats on the new scope. I look forward to your first light report. I'm thinking about buying one of these scopes or maybe the TS50ED.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrbarnett
Eyepiece Hooligan
*****

Reged: 02/28/06

Loc: Petaluma, CA
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: zjc26138]
      #5491076 - 10/27/12 12:14 AM

Thanks Zack.

Have you thought about the AT72ED? For the dough, it's a really nice scope. A little bigger than the 60mm triplet or 50mm ED doublets, but not too big, really.

Just another option to think about...

I'll get some pictures up as soon as I can. Perhaps I can also set up the AT72ED for comparison. My AT72ED is pink (yeah, a long story), but for size comparison it may be helpful.

Regards,

Jim


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
plyscope
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 11/23/06

Loc: Perth, West Australia
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5491125 - 10/27/12 01:12 AM

Thanks for your report Jim, I am curious about this little triplet though I am really more than satisfied with my TV60.

An Australian vendor is offering a similar scope but with a 1.25" crayford.

Long Pern 60mm triplet

Looking forward to hearing more about this one.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
zjc26138
Loved By All
*****

Reged: 02/24/05

Loc: Mingo Junction, Ohio
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5491388 - 10/27/12 09:40 AM

Quote:

Thanks Zack.

Have you thought about the AT72ED? For the dough, it's a really nice scope. A little bigger than the 60mm triplet or 50mm ED doublets, but not too big, really.

Just another option to think about...

I'll get some pictures up as soon as I can. Perhaps I can also set up the AT72ED for comparison. My AT72ED is pink (yeah, a long story), but for size comparison it may be helpful.

Regards,

Jim




Jim,
I have given the At72 some thought as well. A side by side comparison between it and the AT60 would be great whenever you get time and clear skies.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
chboss
professor emeritus


Reged: 03/24/08

Loc: Zurich Switzerland
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: plyscope]
      #5491390 - 10/27/12 09:41 AM

Looking forward to your first light experience.

regards
Chris


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
RAKing
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 12/28/07

Loc: West of the D.C. Nebula
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5491515 - 10/27/12 11:00 AM

I sold my little Tak FS-60 a couple years ago and often thought about replacing it - but I just don't have a spare thousand sitting around for a "super finder".

I look forward to your report.

Thanks,

Ron


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
hottr6
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 06/28/09

Loc: 7,500', Magdalena Mtns, NM
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5491561 - 10/27/12 11:32 AM

Quote:

I'll run it against a 60mm f/16.7 Carton achromat when I first light the scope.





Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Eric Gage
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 12/13/05

Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: hottr6]
      #5491731 - 10/27/12 01:39 PM

I don't even see this scope on the Astronomics website. Am I missing something?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jim7728
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 04/10/05

Loc: Stoop Landing Observatory, NYC
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: Eric Gage]
      #5491765 - 10/27/12 02:10 PM

It's definitely there.

---> https://www.astronomics.com/at60edt-60mm-f7-ed-triplet-apo-refractor-white-and-gray-tube_p20001.aspx

I almost want one.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrbarnett
Eyepiece Hooligan
*****

Reged: 02/28/06

Loc: Petaluma, CA
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: Jim7728]
      #5491796 - 10/27/12 02:36 PM

Miracle of miracles. The Sun is out. I'll head out and set her up in a few, and snap some pics. I'll also take a few of the AT72ED (my size reference scope; everyone has one and can figure out how much larger or smaller a new scope is when paired with an AT72ED ). I typically don't name my scopes, but my AT72ED has a name. It's the "Faerie Queene". Before anyone gets all uptight, it's a name taken from the original mainframe Star Trek game. When the Klingons blew up your Enterprise, you got a second chance. Your replacement ship was the Faerie Queene. It's named after an unfinished epic poem by Sir Edmund Spenser. No kidding.

My poor Faerie Queene has had a rough life, though. When we moved into the new house she was left outside in her case inadvertently and got rained on and very wet. I dried her out as best I could, and she looked spry. In fact I was going to sell her to another CNer, but when I took her out for my own pre-sale inspection, I noted a few spots betwixt the lenses. I screwed my courage to the sticking place and opened her up, cleaned all sides of the elements with Pursol, and put he back together. She's better than new. The proto-fungus is no longer among us. (Actually true that she is much improved; an unintended side effect of her surgery was to improve the image quality; perhaps an accidental but more optimal reorientation of the two elements relative to one another? Dunnom but I'll take it.)

In any case, I'll get some pictures up soon of the new AT triplet and the Faerie Queene (I did mention that the FQ is pink, right?).



- Jim

Edited by jrbarnett (10/27/12 06:25 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrbarnett
Eyepiece Hooligan
*****

Reged: 02/28/06

Loc: Petaluma, CA
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5491851 - 10/27/12 03:40 PM

Here are a few pictures. I spotted a bit more fungal residue on the AT72ED, so I may take it apart and clean it again - a bit more aggressively this time.

The two cases; note the 60mm EDT case does not say "Astro-Tech" on it.



When viewed in their respective cases the two scopes aren't as different in size as you might expect:







More in a few...

- J

Edited by jrbarnett (10/27/12 06:22 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrbarnett
Eyepiece Hooligan
*****

Reged: 02/28/06

Loc: Petaluma, CA
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5491861 - 10/27/12 03:43 PM





The new R&P locking focuser:



The bidness end. Note that it, like the AT72ED but unlike the AT111EDT, cam with a little bit of dust between elements.



Regards,

Jim


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrbarnett
Eyepiece Hooligan
*****

Reged: 02/28/06

Loc: Petaluma, CA
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5491872 - 10/27/12 03:58 PM

The AT60EDT has a single thin baffle near the objective end and a highly textured flat black interior the rest of the way down rather than multiple baffles like the AT72ED.

Regards,

Jim


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
iceblaze
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 10/15/11

Loc: 33.9° N, 118.4° W Lawndale, ...
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5491923 - 10/27/12 04:55 PM

Very cool little scope Jim! Shootout between it and your Carton?

-James


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrbarnett
Eyepiece Hooligan
*****

Reged: 02/28/06

Loc: Petaluma, CA
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: iceblaze]
      #5491985 - 10/27/12 05:38 PM

Jup.

I have 'em both set up and ready to rumble. Luna and some doubles on the menu for this evening. No holds barred up to 140x. Carton on the Teegul and AT60EDT on the Nexstar SE. I'll be working with the Televue Plossls and Nagler Zoom (3-6mm), and a Barlow or two.

I'll go get some pics. After all, a pic is worth at least 1000 words.

- Jim


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrbarnett
Eyepiece Hooligan
*****

Reged: 02/28/06

Loc: Petaluma, CA
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5492005 - 10/27/12 05:52 PM







- Jim


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
MRNUTTY
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 11/22/11

Loc: Mendon, MA
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5492012 - 10/27/12 05:59 PM

Jim, what made you choose the 60mm triplet over the 65mm quad for the same money? I love my 72ED, but had my eye on the quad ever since they finally restocked them.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrbarnett
Eyepiece Hooligan
*****

Reged: 02/28/06

Loc: Petaluma, CA
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: MRNUTTY]
      #5492038 - 10/27/12 06:20 PM

The quad is "icky" for visual use.

More in this thread on the reason to pick one over the other:

http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/5477603/page/1/view/collapsed/sb/5/o/all/fpart/1

"For visual observing, the 65EDQ is fine at low powers, using a 1.25" diagonal. As mentioned elsewhere, a 2" diagonal does not work with all eyepieces (can't come to infinity focus with some eyepieces). One strike against the 65EDQ as a visual scope. For high magnifications, the field flattener lens in the focuser can prevent a Barlow from being inserted into the scope in front of the diagonal (some Barlows may be long enough to hit the field flattener). Another strike against the EDQ visually.

As a travel scope, a wash, except that the 60EDT comes with a fitted lockable hard case for traveling standard. The 65EDQ does not come with a case. Strike two and a half.

As an astrograph, the EDQ has a built-in flattener, the 60EDT does not. Take away a strike from the EDQ.

As a spotting scope, another wash. If all you want is a spotting scope, however, there are dedicated 60mm and 65mm spotting scopes with zoom eyepieces and built-in image erectors -- both of which would have to be bought with the 60EDT and 65EDQ to equal the terrestrial functionality of a pure spotting scope. Dedicated spotting scopes also tend to be at least water resistant and armored for rough daytime use. Neither the 60EDT or the 65EDQ are weather resistant or armored, so spotting scope use is possible if you don't traipse through woods a lot with your scope on a tripod over your shoulder getting slapped by tree branches and it doesn't rain while you're out. Spotting scope use would not be high on my list of uses for either, although I really like the terrestrial views with both.

As a nature photography scope, another wash, although I get the feeling from handling both that I would be able to fight off a grizzly with the 60EDT, whereas the 65EDQ would slow him down but not stop him. Also, with 90mm of focuser travel for the 60EDT, compared to 62mm with the 65EDQ, I believe that the 60EDT will focus closer than the 65EDQ (although I haven't measured the close focus of either, so take my comment with a grain or two of salt), which would incline me a little more towards the 60EDT as a nature scope. Maybe a quarter of a strike against the 65EDQ as a nature scope.

Total is one and three-quarter strikes against the 65EDQ astrograph as an all-purpose scopoe compared with the 60EDT. Not quite a strikeout, but leaning me towards the 60EDT if I wanted a small scope to do everything, and towards the 65EDQ if I primarily wanted a really good wide field astrograph."


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Don Taylor
professor emeritus


Reged: 07/12/09

Loc: South TEXAS
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5492048 - 10/27/12 06:31 PM

That focuser appears to be the same as the one on my new (just received) Astro Telescopes AT102F11 achromat. It seems to work very, very well.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
teelgul
sage


Reged: 09/02/11

Loc: Australia
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5492100 - 10/27/12 07:05 PM

congrats.looks cute and solid in styling. wish my np 101 were styled this way!! waiting for the shootout result. and may be a future shootout with the takFS60 CB!!
cheers


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrbarnett
Eyepiece Hooligan
*****

Reged: 02/28/06

Loc: Petaluma, CA
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: teelgul]
      #5492144 - 10/27/12 07:27 PM

I used to have an FS-60C.

No longer, though. This is about it in the 60mm range for me I'm afraid.

- Jim


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
MRNUTTY
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 11/22/11

Loc: Mendon, MA
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5492180 - 10/27/12 07:57 PM

Jim, I'm not really up on all the apo jargon, so forgive the naive question, the only value the forth element in a quad apo is a field flattener? If so, and the AT2FF works with the EDT, then it would be better to buy the EDT for all the perceived pluses it has?

The EDQ was attractive from just the APO cost perspective. If the EDT has more pluses, the I'll switch my allegiance to the EDT. I'm in the market for a wide field refractor for AP. The AT72ED was finding a home as the sight scope for my dob.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrbarnett
Eyepiece Hooligan
*****

Reged: 02/28/06

Loc: Petaluma, CA
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: MRNUTTY]
      #5492329 - 10/27/12 10:01 PM

Y'know, I think it depends on the design of the quad in question.

The EDT is almost certainly an FPL-51 triplet similar to the AR111EDT (when AT uses FPL-51, they tend to say only "ED glass"; when they use FPL-53, they tend to say "FPL-53 ED glass"). At just 2.4" and f/7, even an ED doublet would be pretty well corrected for false color. This triplet should be overkill. We'll see soon enough. A little Barlowed Vega action should separate the men from the boys.

Regards,

Jim


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrbarnett
Eyepiece Hooligan
*****

Reged: 02/28/06

Loc: Petaluma, CA
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5492449 - 10/27/12 11:34 PM

We have first light and some comparisons.

Optically the scope is "just okay". I'd put it between 1/4 wave and 1/5 wave with some lower order SA. Good enough to be called "diffraction limited" in a spec sheet, but not good enough to stand up to the Carton, unfortunately.

Let's talk some specifics beyond the scope's star test. I used both Vega and Luna for false color evaluation. On Vega at 50x, the Carton shows just a hint of false color in focus. The AT60EDT shows plentiful false color outside and inside of (it's noticeably shorter depth of) focus; yellow-green on one side and magenta-violet on the other, but in focus at 52x it showed only an averted vision hint of ruddy haloing. I'd give the color correction edge to the triplet, but not by much; I just think that the triplet leaves less visually aggressive wavelengths unfocused, and to a lesser degree. This was confirmed bumping each up to 100x and 104x respectively; same colors, just in greater abundance.

Luna was interesting, too. Much like Vega, the triplet showed boatloads of false color on either side of focus, but in focus the image was almost color free (ruddy hint on the lunar limb only) at 52x and the same only moreso at 104x. The Carton behaved much as it did on Vega. More false color at 50x and 100x respectively, and of more common hue (violet), but...

Let me back up. The Carton is a meter-long OTA and was mounted on a Tak Teegul alt-az mount. I was observing on concrete. It was mid 70s today and mid-60s during the observations. The Carton's objective was roughly 6.5 feet above the ground for Vega, for reference. The AT60EDT was on a Nexstar SE. On Vega its objective was more like 4 feet off the pitch.

With that as context, Luna. The Carton was sharper and steadier. The slight rippling of thermals at the Moon's lower limb in the Carton was much more pronounced in the AT60EDT. Why? I'm not sure but I have a few theories. First, the lesser figure quality and shorter focal ration of the triplet allows it to suffer more from induced defocus than the slower, better figured Carton. The triplet, also, may not be fully acclimated yet. (Both scopes are out cooling until later, for a rematch). The proximity of the AT60EDT's objective to the heat rising from the ground, too, may help explain the greater apparent instability seen in the triplet versus the doublet. More later.

Switching gears, how about DSOs? It's a little "Moony" for that, but I went ahead and took a peak at M13 in each, at ~50x and ~100x. This is where it gets a little weird. The triplet is fully multi-coated with modern coatings. The Carton is single coated with MgFl on just one surface; leaving 3 surfaces uncoated. But...M13 was a bit brighter in the Carton than in the triplet, and also showed just a hint more granularity. Go figure. I don't make the news, I just report it.

Televue Plossls and an Orion Deluxe 2x Barlow were used in each scope. Vixen prism diagonals, too, were used in each. I tried to keep things as close as I could for the testing.

More to come.

- Jim


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
johnnyha
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 11/12/06

Loc: Sherman Oaks, CA
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5492458 - 10/27/12 11:46 PM

So... was the Federation Starship Fairie Queene also pink?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
teelgul
sage


Reged: 09/02/11

Loc: Australia
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5492465 - 10/27/12 11:50 PM

Where do they say it's made or assembled ?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrbarnett
Eyepiece Hooligan
*****

Reged: 02/28/06

Loc: Petaluma, CA
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: johnnyha]
      #5492477 - 10/27/12 11:59 PM

No, actually. It was represented in luminous green on a text terminal, represented by the letter "F". The Enterprise was an "E", also green. This was awhile ago. The modem was the kind you plugged the phone headset into. 200 baud. Yee-haw, talk about fat-pipe.

- Jim


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrbarnett
Eyepiece Hooligan
*****

Reged: 02/28/06

Loc: Petaluma, CA
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: teelgul]
      #5492482 - 10/28/12 12:02 AM

They don't say. But I'm pretty sure it's made and assembled in Taiwan. Long Perng looks to be the manufacturer.

Regards,

Jim


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Traveler
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 08/19/07

Loc: The Netherlands
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5492665 - 10/28/12 06:03 AM


Nice report Jim.

Good to see that the Achromat is doing alright. How old is your Carton btw?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrbarnett
Eyepiece Hooligan
*****

Reged: 02/28/06

Loc: Petaluma, CA
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: Traveler]
      #5492877 - 10/28/12 10:26 AM

I built it up out of parts sourced from Sheldon Faworski who used to be a US astro-dealer. The Carton tubes came wrapped in Japanese newspaper dated 1980, so that's the best guess I have as to the vintage of the Carton optics I used.

Regards,

Jim


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Cyclop_si
professor emeritus
*****

Reged: 03/13/08

Loc: Slovenia
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5492884 - 10/28/12 10:29 AM

Jim,

For strictly visual, which you would be your first choice, AT72 or AT60EDT?

Regards,


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrbarnett
Eyepiece Hooligan
*****

Reged: 02/28/06

Loc: Petaluma, CA
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: Cyclop_si]
      #5492893 - 10/28/12 10:37 AM

Tough choice. Neither of the two have great optics, to be honest, but that could also be "luck of the draw" with me coming up on the short end. Based on my experience, I'd probably say "neither", but assuming there are some really good quality examples of the AT72ED and AT60EDT out there (i.e., mine are not typical), I'd probably go with the AT72ED for visual unless I needed the slightly more compact dimensions (due to travel needs, mount needs, etc.) of the 60mm.

The 60mm did do a bit better, to be fair, late last night after it had acclimated a bit more and the slab cooled. I'm going to move it to the taller mount tonight. I haven't given up on it, but I think my earlier verdict - good but not great optics - was correct.

- Jim

Edited by jrbarnett (10/28/12 10:39 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Eric Gage
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 12/13/05

Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5493040 - 10/28/12 12:12 PM

Quote:



Let me back up. The Carton is a meter-long OTA and was mounted on a Tak Teegul alt-az mount. I was observing on concrete. It was mid 70s today and mid-60s during the observations. The Carton's objective was roughly 6.5 feet above the ground for Vega, for reference. The AT60EDT was on a Nexstar SE. On Vega its objective was more like 4 feet off the pitch.




Hold on there, partner. What were the prevailing winds? Were these observations before or after Happy Hour? Red state or blue state? Boxers or briefs?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrbarnett
Eyepiece Hooligan
*****

Reged: 02/28/06

Loc: Petaluma, CA
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: Eric Gage]
      #5493355 - 10/28/12 04:47 PM

Windless. Tea-totalled (almost; white Rhone blend at lunchtime; 6oz.). True blue state. Commando.

- Jim


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
teelgul
sage


Reged: 09/02/11

Loc: Australia
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5493396 - 10/28/12 05:18 PM

Quote:

good but not great optics - was correct.





silly question jim as you said earlier that you have sold your FS60.but based on past experience where would you place the Fs60 optics compared to the AT60. just to know the best in the 60mm range.
cheers


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrbarnett
Eyepiece Hooligan
*****

Reged: 02/28/06

Loc: Petaluma, CA
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: teelgul]
      #5493439 - 10/28/12 05:48 PM

Of the three FS-series scopes I've owned, the FS-60C was the least well-figured, but still probably an order of magnitude better than this scope (figure ~1/6 wave on my 60mm Tak).

I also doubt that the ED glass used is FPL-51. My 111mm FPL-51 triplet is considerably better color corrected visually. I'm thinking this one uses something else.

- Jim

Edited by jrbarnett (10/28/12 05:49 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ed D
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 04/30/10

Loc: Sunny South Florida
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5493463 - 10/28/12 06:04 PM

Jim,

One thing I would be very interested in is your comparison of the AT R&P focuser to the Crayford used on the AT72ED.

Thanks for the good report so far.

Ed D


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Binojunky
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 12/25/10

Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: Ed D]
      #5493571 - 10/28/12 07:25 PM

Looks a nice small scope, of course one wonders if its as good optics wise as say a TV60?,going by Jims assesment probably not, an interesting thing to ponder is that a lot of buyers can be(and not meaning Jim) seduced by a multi element design thinking that automaticaly you will end up with superb optics.Owning a ways back a triplet from one of the big names I found it gave colour free images as adverised however when cranking up the magnification even close to where it should perform it fell apart, a smaller two element ED I had would (yup I know its an overblown phrase) leave it in the proverbial dust,DA.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrbarnett
Eyepiece Hooligan
*****

Reged: 02/28/06

Loc: Petaluma, CA
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: Ed D]
      #5493581 - 10/28/12 07:33 PM

Hi Ed.

Re the focusers on the two AT scopes, last night I did have a chance to use a medium-large sized eyepiece (new 35mm Panoptic) in the AT60EDT. I have on many prior occasions used the 34mm Meade Series 5000 SWA on the AT72ED, which is a similarly medium-large eyepiece. Here are my impressions of the two.

I am still getting used to the new R&P. The lock knob seems to gradually add friction. When you get it very tight, the focus gets stiff and you can see the box-like assembly that surrounds the pinion flex and shift as you turn the knob. With the drag set so that the focus was buttery, the mid-large load would tend to slowly slip outward and defocus. With the tension set sufficient to hold the big load, the focuser motion was stiff in effort but still smooth in motion.

The Crayford on the AT72ED is a different beast. It is very smooth, but not that easy to adjust to carry the heavy load. When stiff enough to hold the eyepiece, focusing action is a little stictiony.

For visual use, both are decent focusers. I don't at this stage have a decided preference for one over the other.

- Jim


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
astroneil
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/28/09

Loc: res publica caledoniae
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5494191 - 10/29/12 08:02 AM

Dear Jim,

A most interesting shootout.

I have obtained similar results comparing an 80mm f/11 achromat to a high quality 76mm f/6.3 ED 'scope.

I doubt elevation has very much to do with your results, but of course, it's always good to test that.

Been doing some work on my own 60mm f/16.7 Skylight-Carton lately.
Details here;

http://neilenglish.net/further-studies-on-reverend-dawes-...

Regards,

Neil.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ed D
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 04/30/10

Loc: Sunny South Florida
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: astroneil]
      #5494793 - 10/29/12 02:59 PM

Jim,

Thanks for sharing your impressions on the two focusers. From what you found it seems either one would need to be set a bit firm to carry a heavy load, like a binoviewer. Also, the design of the Astro Tech R&P looks different from the ones I'm used to seeing.

Ed D


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Wes James
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 04/12/06

Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, first report. new [Re: Ed D]
      #5510184 - 11/08/12 04:09 PM

Thanks for a great report, Jim.... good job!

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
dscarpa
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 03/15/08

Loc: San Diego Ca.
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, (w/ Pics now!!!). new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5510281 - 11/08/12 05:18 PM

It's odd that AT has quality optics in their larger scopes but judging from your excellent report the AT-60 leaves something to be desired in that reguard. On the plus side of the ledger at least it isn't pink. David

Edited by dscarpa (11/08/12 05:22 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
moynihan
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 07/22/03

Loc: Lake Michigan Watershed
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, (w/ Pics now!!!). new [Re: dscarpa]
      #5562891 - 12/09/12 06:15 PM

Any final verdict/more insight on the optical quality in the AT60EDT?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
SKYGZR
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 08/14/09

Loc: Planet Earth, Milky Way Galaxy...
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, (w/ Pics now!!!). new [Re: moynihan]
      #5563484 - 12/10/12 02:04 AM

I really like my AT72, yet haven't really used it for astro-visual as of yet (only asto-imaging). I have hooked up various combinations for imaging to test the train, yet this was under day light conditions on a distant tree. Perhaps someday I'll spend some eye piece time with it.

P.S. did use it with a solar filter to check out SOL a couple times.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Mr Onions
Two Time International Photographical Competition Winner
*****

Reged: 04/14/07

Loc: Newcastle upon Tyne.
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, (w/ Pics now!!!). new [Re: SKYGZR]
      #5563522 - 12/10/12 03:42 AM

Wonderful read Jim.
My TV60 will be coming sometime at the start of the year,I'm sure it will go up against my Skylight { If the breeze round here ever dies down and that's not a given in the north east of England }
I walked two miles last night with my 80mm to observe Jupiter in honour of the great Patrick Moore,I only managed about 20 seconds through a 32mm plossl,I just bring that as a finder.
When is your LOMO due?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrbarnett
Eyepiece Hooligan
*****

Reged: 02/28/06

Loc: Petaluma, CA
Re: Astro-Tech 60mm f/7 ED triplet, (w/ Pics now!!!). new [Re: dscarpa]
      #5563926 - 12/10/12 10:50 AM

My AT72ED, too, is pretty middlin' in the optical quality department. FYI.

The AT60EDT requires a surprisingly long time (for a 60mm) to cool down. Image quality improves somewhat after about an hour (assuming a 20F temperature delta to be overcome), but even so, it's not in the same league as the AT111EDT I also have.



- Jim


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)


Extra information
31 registered and 38 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  FirstSight, panhard, star drop, dr.who 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 4346

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics