Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Refractors

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)
Plane_Guru
member


Reged: 02/17/13

Refractor Anti Reflection Coating longevity.
      #5692268 - 02/21/13 07:10 AM

Hello everybody,

I-am interested to know your opinions regarding the longevity/lifespan of Anti-Reflection Coatings on Refractor Telescopes.

In your Opinion would UV Radiation from Sunlight have a detrimental effect on the Anti-Reflection Optical Coatings in Refractor Telescopes? Does continual bombardment by Solar Radiation from the Sun degrade Optical Coatings(like Anti Reflection Coatings) over time?

I am of the belief that Magnesium Fluoride is still the mainstay of Anti-reflection Coatings, and that this material has almost zero solubility in water and all common organic solvents. Another material commonly used in Anit-Reflection Coatings is Silicon Dioxide (Quartz) which is an extremely hard and tough material. I believe both Magnesium Fluoride and Silicon Dioxide (Quartz) are highly transparent to UV light, and so will have little interaction with Solar UV Light due to the transparency of these Materials.

I presume that the Solar Radiation ( Light Energy) that passes through Refractor Anti-Reflection Optical Coatings does not damage or degrade the Optical Coatings over time due to the light having little interaction with the Optical Coatings.

I also learned that Optical Coatings were originally developed to retard the migration of Fluoride out of Glass.

Many Thanks for your input.

Edited by Plane_Guru (02/21/13 07:11 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Starhawk
Space Ranger
*****

Reged: 09/16/08

Loc: Tucson, Arizona
Re: Refractor Anti Reflection Coating longevity. new [Re: Plane_Guru]
      #5692392 - 02/21/13 09:23 AM

The coatings are really glasses of various types. They should last indefinitely. The main coatings for cheap optics are magnesium fluoride. The nicer stuff has all moved on to much more sophisticated multicoated systems, which give themselves away with colored sheens, or in the really high end ones, by completely vanishing except for very careful illumination.

With that said, surface prep and processing are paramount for getting them on there properly. And if you ever deal with a coating vendor, you will discover they only warranty them for 1 year in most cases.

So what happens if anti reflection coatings fail or are damaged? I asked Roland about that, and his answer was it is more work to polish the coatings off, recorrect the figure, recoat, and put an optical set back together than it is to build a new telescope.

So take care of your coatings.

-Rich


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Plane_Guru
member


Reged: 02/17/13

Re: Refractor Anti Reflection Coating longevity. new [Re: Starhawk]
      #5692402 - 02/21/13 09:33 AM

Hi Rich,

I am purchasing a new Televue NP-101 and Televue 60 IS Guidescope,I would hope the coatings would last indefinitely.I hope for the two Televue Telescopes to outlive me.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Binojunky
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 12/25/10

Re: Refractor Anti Reflection Coating longevity. new [Re: Plane_Guru]
      #5692550 - 02/21/13 11:18 AM

Providing you don,t get silly with constantly cleaning every minor blemish and mark off they will last a lifetime,DA.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrbarnett
Eyepiece Hooligan
*****

Reged: 02/28/06

Loc: Petaluma, CA
Re: Refractor Anti Reflection Coating longevity. new [Re: Plane_Guru]
      #5692915 - 02/21/13 03:06 PM

Only diamonds are forever. All else is subject to the ravages of time and misuse.

Seriously though, why the fixation on coatings? A well-cared-for refractor used and stored sensibly will outlast you, whether or not its coatings remain exactly as they were the day you took delivery of the scope.

In the grand scheme of things, the coating type and durability is way down the list of things to worry about when choosing a refractor. Coating type and integrity are not crucial for achieving excellent performance from a refractor. You can't say that about mirrored scope coatings, but you can about refractors.

Instead of worrying about coatings, I would worry about mechanical design, robustness of the optical alignment retention design (i.e., the lens cell), and above all optical figure quality. An uncoated excellent quality refractor will outperform a perfectly coated, poorly figured refractor every time.

Seriously, worry more about the optical quality and how well the scopes you're considering maintain optical alignment rather than coatings. Those are far more relevant concerns affecting enjoyable "lifetime" use and performance of a refractor.

Best of luck with your choice.

Regards,

Jim

Edited by jrbarnett (02/21/13 03:08 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
KWB
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 09/30/06

Loc: Westminster,Co Elev.5400 feet
Re: Refractor Anti Reflection Coating longevity. new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5693002 - 02/21/13 03:58 PM

Quote:

Only diamonds are forever. All else is subject to the ravages of time and misuse.

Seriously though, why the fixation on coatings? A well-cared-for refractor used and stored sensibly will outlast you, whether or not its coatings remain exactly as they were the day you took delivery of the scope.

Jim



I think Jim makes a very good point here,just like the one he made to the identical question asked in another thread.

To the OP,in the future,please just ask a specific question one time, in one thread.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Plane_Guru
member


Reged: 02/17/13

Re: Refractor Anti Reflection Coating longevity. new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5693017 - 02/21/13 04:04 PM

Hi jrbarnett ,

Thanks for the input.I was just curious as to the estimated longevity of Anti-Reflection Coatings because I am not wealthy and naturally I would hope that my expensive Televue NP-101 Telescope that I just invested in would outlive me .

Sadly these Days we live in a Throw away Society.I look after what I own .I love Science too and the Science behind Anti-Reflection Coatings.I love learning,in general.

All my best


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
la200o
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 09/09/08

Loc: SE Michigan, USA
Re: Refractor Anti Reflection Coating longevity. new [Re: Plane_Guru]
      #5693099 - 02/21/13 04:38 PM

yer NP101 will outlive you, no problemo

Bill


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
EdZ
Professor EdZ
*****

Reged: 02/15/02

Loc: Cumberland, R I , USA42N71.4W
Re: Refractor Anti Reflection Coating longevity. *DELETED* new [Re: KWB]
      #5693436 - 02/21/13 07:59 PM

Post deleted by KWB

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Starhawk
Space Ranger
*****

Reged: 09/16/08

Loc: Tucson, Arizona
Re: Refractor Anti Reflection Coating longevity. new [Re: EdZ]
      #5693475 - 02/21/13 08:17 PM

The only real failure I've seen in TV OTAs is the flocking coming off in the interior. In everyday life, coatings die from over cleaning and using the wrong materials.

So:

Plan A keep it clean- no touching, think before you take it out in blowing dust or pollen, and store horizontally.

-Rich


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Plane_Guru
member


Reged: 02/17/13

Re: Refractor Anti Reflection Coating longevity. new [Re: Starhawk]
      #5693701 - 02/21/13 10:32 PM

Hi Starhawk,

Thank-you.I hope the Flocking Paper peeling is not a major issue with Televue NP-101 Refractor Telescopes?.Is Peeling Flocking Paper rare in Televue Refractor Telescopes?

I would hope that this issue has been rectified by now? Has Televue changed to better stronger Adhesive technologies by now?

Peeling Flocking Paper is a concern of mine due to the fact I reside in a Humid locale.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Plane_Guru
member


Reged: 02/17/13

Re: Refractor Anti Reflection Coating longevity. new [Re: Plane_Guru]
      #5693714 - 02/21/13 10:37 PM

Hi,

While I am thinking of this..I also have to ask abut Dielectric Coated Star Diagonals? I read that Dielectric Star Diagonals supposedly never go bad due to the fact that Dielectric Coatings never oxidise and so should last "Forever" with no loss of brightness( performance)?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrbarnett
Eyepiece Hooligan
*****

Reged: 02/28/06

Loc: Petaluma, CA
Re: Refractor Anti Reflection Coating longevity. new [Re: Plane_Guru]
      #5693795 - 02/21/13 11:47 PM

Brightness (reflectivity) of a diagonal is pretty much irrelevant. What are key are flatness, mechanical precision and smoothness of the surface. While a dieclectric coated diagonal won't need a recoat, they do tend to be rougher than standard coated mirror diagonals. Also, not all dielectric diagonals are created equally. Some have rougher surfaces than others. The A-P Maxbrights and TV Everbrites are in the middle in terms of surface smoothness. The GSO Quartz diecletrics are smoother, but mechanically the housings are a little flimsy. For my most critical observing (planets and double stars) is use a conventional mirrored turret.

Again, only diamonds are forever. There is nothing else under the Sun that will last forever. These items are tools. They are meant to be used, not put on display. A scope used every clear night for 10 years that then fails is still a better scope than one that lasts fifty years but isn't used by the owner for fear of it losing its "newness".

Refractors don't fail catastrophically. Wear items include the focusers and the retractable dew shade retention materials. Regular maintenance items include occasionally cleaning the front of the objective. Mishandling related maintenance might include recentering and/or collimating the objective. NP-101s are sensitive to decentering as all four elements need a common center and squaring. If you whack it hard on accident, you will either need to build your own jig and recenter the front elements relative to one another and the rear group or else send it off to Televue for service.

It's nice that Televue offers service. They will repair, clean, colimate, etc., Televue refractors for a fee. Of course, nothing lasts forever and one day Televue will fold or be acquired, and the days of readily available service may end.

Are you planning on imaging or observing visually, or both? What makes you think the NP-101 is your best option? There are many nice 4" and larger refractors available that cost much, much less than the NP-101. have you considered other makes and models?

Perhaps if you didn't spend quite so much, you'd be less worried about it lasting "forever" which is an unrealistic expectation, though pretty much any refractor is likely to outlast you and me.

- Jim


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
la200o
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 09/09/08

Loc: SE Michigan, USA
Re: Refractor Anti Reflection Coating longevity. new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5694257 - 02/22/13 09:22 AM

Deflocking and loss of collimation are rare problems. Get your NP101 and don't look back. It can do things no other 4" refractor can do. Superb wide field views and great at high power. Wouldn't be without one, myself.

Bill


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Paul G
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 05/08/03

Loc: Freedonia
Re: Refractor Anti Reflection Coating longevity. new [Re: Plane_Guru]
      #5694405 - 02/22/13 10:36 AM

Quote:

Hi,

While I am thinking of this..I also have to ask abut Dielectric Coated Star Diagonals? I read that Dielectric Star Diagonals supposedly never go bad due to the fact that Dielectric Coatings never oxidise and so should last "Forever" with no loss of brightness( performance)?




The benefits of a dielectric diagonal are:
-- coatings don't degrade over time
-- they can be kept clean without risking damaging delicate coatings; dielectric coatings actually become part of the glass and must be ground off to remove
-- much less scatter than aluminum mirror diagonals (on a molecular level the aluminum coating is quite rough)

Some cautions:
-- not all dielectrics are the same
-- there are some cases of inexpensive dielectrics flaking off, a sign of improper surface preparation or improper application of the coatings
-- the coatings are designed to have maximum reflection for light coming in at a 45 degree angle, can be less reflective and /or more transparent if the light comes from a nonoptimal angle (for instance, shining a laser straight down on the mirror)
-- how the mirror is supported is important
-- how the diagonal is baffled is important
-- how the diagonal is designed to dissipate the small % of light that isn't reflected is important, you don't want that light reflecting around inside the substrate and coming out the other end (there has been at least one post here on CN where this dissipation was incorrectly thought to be scatter; scatter of the transmitted light isn't the same in terms of affecting the image as scatter that is reflected off the surface)

A good dielectric is likely to be the most accurate surface in the optical train. The AP Maxbright, for instance, is guaranteed to be at least 1/20 wave, most are around 1/40 wave.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Plane_Guru
member


Reged: 02/17/13

Re: Refractor Anti Reflection Coating longevity. new [Re: la200o]
      #5694414 - 02/22/13 10:42 AM

Hi Bill,

Good to hear that De-Flocking is rare.I have a new Televue NP-101 on order.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrbarnett
Eyepiece Hooligan
*****

Reged: 02/28/06

Loc: Petaluma, CA
Re: Refractor Anti Reflection Coating longevity. new [Re: Paul G]
      #5694431 - 02/22/13 10:52 AM

"much less scatter than aluminum mirror diagonals (on a molecular level the aluminum coating is quite rough)"

Sadly, this is untrue. Having tested a host of diagonals, including the A-P Maxbright using a precisely spaced green laser and calipers to measure contact spot size on the mirror or prism first surface, even cleaned dielectric diagonals, on average, show larger contact spots (indicating greater surface scatter) than standard aluminum coated and quality prism surfaces. Theory is fine as far as it goes, but when it is accepted as fact without verification it becomes marketing hype.

Dielectric diagonals have more durable coatings, which is great because diagonals are rubbish bins collecting all kinds of junk and need to be cleaned, but you buy that virtue with the vice of higher scatter on average.

Now whether you can see the level of reduced scatter of a quality enhanced aluminum diagonal over a quality dielectric one at the eyepiece is debatable, but I hate to see the marketing myth of superior surface smoothness perpetuated as fact.

Regards,

Jim


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
la200o
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 09/09/08

Loc: SE Michigan, USA
Re: Refractor Anti Reflection Coating longevity. new [Re: Plane_Guru]
      #5694476 - 02/22/13 11:21 AM

Quote:

Hi Bill,

Good to hear that De-Flocking is rare.I have a new Televue NP-101 on order.




You will love it.

Bill


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BCNGreyCat
member
*****

Reged: 08/06/12

Loc: Virginia, USA
Re: Refractor Anti Reflection Coating longevity. new [Re: Plane_Guru]
      #5694780 - 02/22/13 01:47 PM

I have a tv-102 manufactured around 2002 and the flocking paper is still very good. No sign of peeling or bubbling. I once thought there was one but it turned out to be under the lens cell bolt, where the inside surface of the tube is not flat.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Paul G
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 05/08/03

Loc: Freedonia
Re: Refractor Anti Reflection Coating longevity. new [Re: jrbarnett]
      #5694831 - 02/22/13 02:18 PM

Quote:

"much less scatter than aluminum mirror diagonals (on a molecular level the aluminum coating is quite rough)"

Sadly, this is untrue. Having tested a host of diagonals, including the A-P Maxbright using a precisely spaced green laser and calipers to measure contact spot size on the mirror or prism first surface, even cleaned dielectric diagonals, on average, show larger contact spots (indicating greater surface scatter) than standard aluminum coated and quality prism surfaces. Theory is fine as far as it goes, but when it is accepted as fact without verification it becomes marketing hype.




What you're seeing was discussed some time ago:

Dielectric vs aluminum mirror diagonals

Back to the op, the primary reason to get a dielectric diagonal is the ability to clean it without causing sleeks in the coatings. A little dust on the diagonal mirror surface will have a much greater adverse effect on the image than any difference in reflectivity or scatter. Keep in mind the image occupies the central 1/4 inch or so of the mirror, a little dust that would cause zero degradation in the image if on the objective surface causes noticeable loss of low contrast detail if on the diagonal mirror (as does dust on the surface of an eyepiece where the image is also concentrated in a very small area).

Edit:

Also to the op, mag fluoride has its applications but has drawbacks as well. It would be an especially poor choice for ED glass elements since both the ED glass (including fluorite) and mag-fl are both very low refractive index materials and there wouldn't be enough difference between them to reduce reflections by more than a very small amount. On an appropriate type of high index glass mag-fl at best still leaves about 1.5% reflection, modern multicoatings are in the 0.25% range. Also, mag fluoride's transmission curve isn't flat over the color spectrum.

Edited by Paul G (02/22/13 03:28 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | (show all)


Extra information
40 registered and 40 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Scott in NC, FirstSight, panhard, star drop 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 2034

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics