deSitter
Still in Old School
Reged: 12/09/04

Scary relativity
#6214651  11/25/13 09:14 AM

Edit

Reply

Quote 
Quick Reply



Scary because there is some linear algebra here!
A square matrix as many of you know, is an arrangement of numbers that embodies in some contexts a transformation of a certain sort  for example when I rotate the coordinates in the plane,
x' = x cos a  y sin a y' = x sin a + y cos a
This is more easily expressed (read brackets as a column vector, and parentheses as a row vector, and double brackets as a matrix with entries in "reading" order)
[x' y'] = M [x y]
where M is the square matrix [[ cos a, sin a, sin a, cos a ]]
The determinant is the product of the diagonal entries minus that of the offdiagonal entries, here cos^2 a + sin ^2 a = 1.
OK let's introduce four basic matrices (with complex numbers as entries)
Sx = [[ 0, 1, 1, 0]] Sy = [[ 0, i, i 0 ]] Sz = [[ 1, 0, 0, 1 ]] S0 = [[ 1, 0, 0, 1 ]]
and let's make the matrix object
R = x Sx + y Sy + z Sz + t S0 = [[ z + t, x  iy, x + iy, z + t ]]
The determinant is
R = (z+t)(z+t)  (xiy)(x+iy) = x^2  y^2  z^2 + t^2.
You'll see where this is going eventually. Ask questions now.
drl

Otto Piechowski
PoohBah
Reged: 09/20/05
Loc: Lexington, KY

Re: Scary relativity
[Re: deSitter]
#6214787  11/25/13 10:24 AM

Edit

Reply

Quote 
Quick Reply



For me, Danny, this math is over my head. I would need pictures to explain each step and a glossary (with pictures) to explain the words vector, row vector, column vector, and matrix.
BUT DO NOT DO THIS, at least at this time. Rick and Brentwood also asked you to explain the special relativity thing. It is quite likely they do understand simple math like this and I do not want to hold the three of you up. Later, perhaps y'all can draw pictures for me and stuff like that BUT NOT NOW, or perhaps, even at all.
Thank you for taking this on.
Otto

llanitedave
Humble Megalomaniac
Reged: 09/26/05
Loc: Amargosa Valley, NV, USA

Re: Scary relativity
[Re: Otto Piechowski]
#6214942  11/25/13 11:49 AM

Edit

Reply

Quote 
Quick Reply



Sounds like a job for numpy.

Rick Woods
Postmaster
Reged: 01/27/05
Loc: Inner Solar System

Re: Scary relativity
[Re: Otto Piechowski]
#6214978  11/25/13 12:08 PM

Edit

Reply

Quote 
Quick Reply



Quote:
Rick and Brentwood also asked you to explain the special relativity thing. It is quite likely they do understand simple math like this and I do not want to hold the three of you up.
It's even more likely that at least one of them has no idea what any of it means. I feel like Homer Simpson when someone talks to him, and all he's hearing is "blah, blah, blah". It may as well be runes, or the Voynich manuscript.
Is this degree of immersion in the math really necessary to create an understandable analogy for the carheadlight thing? If so, well, thanks anyway, but there's nothing here for me.

PeterR280
PoohBah
Reged: 05/27/13

Re: Scary relativity
[Re: Rick Woods]
#6214985  11/25/13 12:10 PM

Edit

Reply

Quote 
Quick Reply



The Lorentz transformations would be much easier to follow.

The Mighty Mo
professor emeritus
Reged: 10/12/13
Loc: South of North, North of South...

Re: Scary relativity *DELETED*
[Re: Rick Woods]
#6215014  11/25/13 12:23 PM

Edit

Reply

Quote 
Quick Reply



Post deleted by The Mighty Mo

brentwood
Carpal Tunnel
Reged: 11/04/05
Loc: BC Canada

Re: Scary relativity
[Re: The Mighty Mo]
#6215039  11/25/13 12:35 PM

Edit

Reply

Quote 
Quick Reply



Nothing here for me either. I can understand some of Otto's posts more! If the answer to the question, "What does an outside observer see when a vehicle travelling at just below c puts on its headlights" can only be answered with an equation, then I would say that there is no answer, it is still an unknown.

deSitter
Still in Old School
Reged: 12/09/04

Re: Scary relativity
[Re: brentwood]
#6215107  11/25/13 01:06 PM

Edit

Reply

Quote 
Quick Reply



C'mon be patient! You have to see things before you can understand them! It's not a linear process. Ask questions!
drl

dickbill
scholastic sledgehammer
Reged: 09/30/08

Re: Scary relativity
[Re: deSitter]
#6215126  11/25/13 01:17 PM

Edit

Reply

Quote 
Quick Reply



why do you introduce imaginary numbers?

deSitter
Still in Old School
Reged: 12/09/04

Re: Scary relativity
[Re: dickbill]
#6215138  11/25/13 01:26 PM

Edit

Reply

Quote 
Quick Reply



You'll see! It's nothing unreal  it's very real. You HAVE to be patient. It will all come down to a flag...
drl

choran
Carpal Tunnel
Reged: 12/28/12

Re: Scary relativity
[Re: deSitter]
#6215200  11/25/13 01:56 PM

Edit

Reply

Quote 
Quick Reply



Will the simplified version come down to solving a right triangle with sides ct, vt, and (hypotenuse) ct' and eventually solving for t'? I've seen that approach and it is pretty understandable, but requires pics.

brentwood
Carpal Tunnel
Reged: 11/04/05
Loc: BC Canada

Re: Scary relativity
[Re: choran]
#6215224  11/25/13 02:08 PM

Edit

Reply

Quote 
Quick Reply



Danny,aко аз ви е поискал въпрос в България, ще можете да го разбираме без да използвате Google? Не мога да поставя си пост в Google и да се превеждат.?

choran
Carpal Tunnel
Reged: 12/28/12

Re: Scary relativity
[Re: brentwood]
#6215269  11/25/13 02:27 PM

Edit

Reply

Quote 
Quick Reply




deSitter
Still in Old School
Reged: 12/09/04

Re: Scary relativity
[Re: choran]
#6215320  11/25/13 02:43 PM

Edit

Reply

Quote 
Quick Reply



Quote:
Will the simplified version come down to solving a right triangle with sides ct, vt, and (hypotenuse) ct' and eventually solving for t'? I've seen that approach and it is pretty understandable, but requires pics.
Nope, 100% rigorous.
drl

Crow Haven
PoohBah
Reged: 01/09/09
Loc: Oregon USA

Re: Scary relativity
[Re: deSitter]
#6215370  11/25/13 03:04 PM

Edit

Reply

Quote 
Quick Reply



I haven't the math background or understanding of relativity to be able to see how this turns out. Can light be slowed down or appear slowed down from an observer's perspective at the side of the road? I have a hard time with the idea of a light beam traveling at a foot a minute or looking like it is proceeding this slowly. I thought that the light sent from the headlights would just travel at the "speed of light" as soon as turned on from the car. That it would appear instanteous from the observer in the car and from the observer at the side of the road it would also, regardless of how fast the car moved. Is there enough time and distance between the car and when the light is switched on to make it look like the light comes on before the car appears? Sorry if this sounds really stupid. I'm totally confused by it, but am hoping there will be a way to describe what actually would appear to happen for the observer at the side of the road that I can understand.

choran
Carpal Tunnel
Reged: 12/28/12

Re: Scary relativity
[Re: deSitter]
#6215379  11/25/13 03:07 PM

Edit

Reply

Quote 
Quick Reply



Heck! Was hoping I could follow.

Neutrino?
sage
Reged: 12/14/09
Loc: Wasatch Front

Re: Scary relativity
[Re: deSitter]
#6215383  11/25/13 03:09 PM

Edit

Reply

Quote 
Quick Reply



Tough crowd.
Quote:
You'll see where this is going eventually. Ask questions now.
drl
SL(2,C) to SO+(1,3) to PSL(2,C) to M ?

Rick Woods
Postmaster
Reged: 01/27/05
Loc: Inner Solar System

Re: Scary relativity
[Re: Crow Haven]
#6215398  11/25/13 03:14 PM

Edit

Reply

Quote 
Quick Reply



Maya, it doesn't sound stupid to me; or else, I'm equally stupid. I can't help feeling that there must be a simple analogy that would give people like us at least a rough picture of the situation.
Danny, I appreciate your attempting to explain the whole thing, and I will follow it and try to understand. But I really hope this ends up with something on the order of "think of it like this..." But I have no questions now, beyond "what does it mean?"

Rick Woods
Postmaster
Reged: 01/27/05
Loc: Inner Solar System

Re: Scary relativity
[Re: brentwood]
#6215404  11/25/13 03:16 PM

Edit

Reply

Quote 
Quick Reply



Quote:
Danny,aко аз ви е поискал въпрос в България, ще можете да го разбираме без да използвате Google? Не мога да поставя си пост в Google и да се превеждат.?
Brentwood, is the above what you intended to post? Looks like a lot of ASCII to me.

Otto Piechowski
PoohBah
Reged: 09/20/05
Loc: Lexington, KY

Re: Scary relativity
[Re: Rick Woods]
#6215414  11/25/13 03:20 PM

Edit

Reply

Quote 
Quick Reply



ask questions: OK; now mind you, I'm not being sassy or trying to be stupid; I just have no more familiarity with this math than I do with a language foreign to me.
What is a "square matrix"?
What do
x' = x cos a  y sin a
y' = x sin a + y cos a
mean?
And what is the meaning of these things in relation to the paradox of 1+1=1 at near light speeds?
I mean, I can do the simple equations of t=t(0) X thesquareroot of 1  v^2/c^2; the same for Length and the same for mass when mass(0) is divided by thesquareroot of 1  v^2/c^2. I can do it. I don't understand why these do what they do. I don't understand why, from the perspective of an outside observer, the combined velocity of headlight beam and the galinthespaceshipalreadytravelingatnearc is still just less than c? I would like to understand why this is the case. And as one of our colleagues here said, it would be nice if there was a real world example that explained this phenomenon; not just gave an analogical similarity like that silly higgsbosonlikeasnowfield thing.
But, as I am writing, I am afraid I am getting to a really clear question.
Danny, even though this is special relativity and not quantum mechanics, is this an area of relativity which, like quantum mechanics, it cannot be explained with analogies from the ordinary world of fried eggs, baseball, and why the landlord can't get the furnace working?
Otto
Edited by Otto Piechowski (11/25/13 03:30 PM)
