Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

CN Feedback and Vendor Announcements >> Vendor and Group Announcements

Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)
michael
Vendor (Starstructure Telescopes)


Reged: 01/24/04

Loc: Trinity Florida
STARSTRUCTURE TELESCOPES
      #5356562 - 08/07/12 02:15 PM

Starstructure Telescopes announces something new on the HORIZON...

Mike Z.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Starman1
Vendor (EyepiecesEtc.com)
*****

Reged: 06/24/03

Loc: Los Angeles
Re: STARSTRUCTURE TELESCOPES new [Re: michael]
      #5356604 - 08/07/12 02:39 PM

Mike,
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't the baffle above the primary mirror represented by the mirror box opening, be an oval instead of a circle?

I see some advantages:
--lower eyepiece height
--easier placement of UTA on poles in the larger size scopes

Also, the trunnions seem a little small compared to the mirror diameter. Usually, trunnions on a 16" would be 24" in diameter.
Or is this box unusually larger for a 16" mirror?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
michael
Vendor (Starstructure Telescopes)


Reged: 01/24/04

Loc: Trinity Florida
Re: STARSTRUCTURE TELESCOPES new [Re: Starman1]
      #5356641 - 08/07/12 03:00 PM

Hi Don,
I think this is the beauty of the design…it’s an optical illusion. (pun intended)

Your are correct that the opening in the top of the mirror box is oval, but when viewed through the UTA it looks round. Same as the secondary optic does when viewed from the primary mirror.

I’m not sure how you’re calculating the altitude bearing diameter, as it can run plus or minus of the size you mentioned.

An example would be that on my LE Series Scopes the diameter of the altitude bearing is 20” and works just fine. But…the bearing diameter of this concept scope is indeed 24”.

The new Horizon has clear advantages in size to the traditional build.
Honestly the photos don’t do it justice.

Thanks for the questions,

Mike


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Starman1
Vendor (EyepiecesEtc.com)
*****

Reged: 06/24/03

Loc: Los Angeles
Re: STARSTRUCTURE TELESCOPES new [Re: michael]
      #5356644 - 08/07/12 03:03 PM

Quote:

Hi Don,
I think this is the beauty of the design…it’s an optical illusion. (pun intended)

Your are correct that the opening in the top of the mirror box is oval, but when viewed through the UTA it looks round. Same as the secondary optic does when viewed from the primary mirror.

I’m not sure how you’re calculating the altitude bearing diameter, as it can run plus or minus of the size you mentioned.

An example would be that on my LE Series Scopes the diameter of the altitude bearing is 20” and works just fine. But…the bearing diameter of this concept scope is indeed 24”.

The new Horizon has clear advantages in size to the traditional build.
Honestly the photos don’t do it justice.

Thanks for the questions,

Mike



Mike, I was thinking the hole was round. If it's oval, that's genius!

So your mirror box obviously has plenty of ventilation room inside.

I think it looks great.

Does it cost more to build?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
michael
Vendor (Starstructure Telescopes)


Reged: 01/24/04

Loc: Trinity Florida
Re: STARSTRUCTURE TELESCOPES new [Re: Starman1]
      #5356669 - 08/07/12 03:24 PM


Don,
Your correct, ventilation is wide open.

The scope will be offered as both a TL and an LE. All options available on the LE Series will be the same. However, the TL will be available as a “push to” only, no goto option. All other listed options on the TL will be available. The Horizon for both series has been fully tested and ready for production.

There will be no price increase to the LE Series and just a small increase to the TL Series. All details will be on the web site soon.

For more details on pricing please call or e-mail.

Mike


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
alancygnusx2
professor emeritus


Reged: 11/25/08

Loc: CA
Re: STARSTRUCTURE TELESCOPES new [Re: michael]
      #5356785 - 08/07/12 05:05 PM

Congrats on the new design Mike, very exciting!!!

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
michael
Vendor (Starstructure Telescopes)


Reged: 01/24/04

Loc: Trinity Florida
Re: STARSTRUCTURE TELESCOPES new [Re: alancygnusx2]
      #5356893 - 08/07/12 06:31 PM

Thanks Alan

Mike


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
GeneT
Ely Kid
*****

Reged: 11/07/08

Loc: South Texas
Re: STARSTRUCTURE TELESCOPES new [Re: michael]
      #5357011 - 08/07/12 07:49 PM

Quote:

However, the TL will be available as a “push to” only, no goto option.




Would you please clarify this point?
Thanks,
GeneT


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
plav1959
sage
*****

Reged: 05/10/07

Loc: Central Florida
Re: STARSTRUCTURE TELESCOPES new [Re: michael]
      #5357046 - 08/07/12 08:10 PM

Very nice looking scope Mike! Can't wait to see one up close. May be time for a larger scope.....

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
michael
Vendor (Starstructure Telescopes)


Reged: 01/24/04

Loc: Trinity Florida
Re: STARSTRUCTURE TELESCOPES new [Re: GeneT]
      #5357311 - 08/07/12 10:57 PM

Hi Gene,
Pretty much just what I stated...The TL Series Horizon will be for those that are just looking for a basic scope. No Goto System. But you can get A DSC, secondary dew heater, balance weight kits, etc.

Mike


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
michael
Vendor (Starstructure Telescopes)


Reged: 01/24/04

Loc: Trinity Florida
Re: STARSTRUCTURE TELESCOPES new [Re: plav1959]
      #5357342 - 08/07/12 11:19 PM Attachment (116 downloads)

Thanks Paul,
In the case of the Horizon…bigger doesn’t necessarily mean bigger.

The Horizon sizes are running a full size smaller then the standard LE design. (RE: An 18" scope is the same size in the square dim as the 16" a 20" same as the 18" etc...) Consider that my LE scopes are already smaller then most other designs. When we include the 2.5” added for the Servocat altitude drive motor that now installs under the mirror box the Horizons are running 5.5" less in width.

Altitude bearing heights are running about 8" to 14" lower (depending on size) when in transport mode.

The 16" prototype scope has a 21" height when in transport mode.
The standard 16" LE is about 29.5"+ depending on focal length.

The design really shines on the big boys. With 22” and up you really see the difference.

Anyone considering a 40” plus dob...this bad boy is DEFINITELY for you !!!!

Photo showing the 16" prototype scope before finishing.

Mike Z

Edited by michael (08/07/12 11:23 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Albert
Super Member
*

Reged: 06/01/05

Loc: Redwood City, CA
Re: STARSTRUCTURE TELESCOPES new [Re: michael]
      #5357461 - 08/08/12 01:19 AM

Hi Mike,

One of the potential disadvantages of using struts of unequal length is that collimation changes as a function of temperature. The amount of mis-collimation depends on many variables such as the lengths and length differences of the struts, their coefficients of thermal expansion, the temperature change from when the telescope was collimated, etc. Whether the magnitude of mis-collimation is an issue depends on the allowed tolerances for differant focal ratios, among other things. Have you determined the mis-collimation vs. temperature for the various telescope sizes?

Albert


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
michael
Vendor (Starstructure Telescopes)


Reged: 01/24/04

Loc: Trinity Florida
Re: STARSTRUCTURE TELESCOPES new [Re: Albert]
      #5357694 - 08/08/12 09:11 AM

Great question, I certainly expected the design to get pulled apart here on CN.

To answer your question...No I have not tested every size because I don’t see it as a problem.

It’s important to understand that the back 4 trusses (long ones) are all the same length. Same as the front 4 (short ones)

From the smallest scope to the largest, there is from an 8” to 30” differential in length.

Considering the largest 30” differential in length using a 6063 T52- 2” OD pipe with a .055 wall and using a 30 degree temperature shift over a 6 hour period (basically 5 degree +/- per hour shift) Using a .000023 coefficient (m/m* c) I see a length shift of about .002. This and how it would equate to actual secondary misalignment to the primary is probably a quarter of that as most of the expansion would be absorbed in the attachment points of the trusses.

The biggest factor (which makes the math almost impossible to calculate) is the inconsistency of the alloy throughout a given pipe. Another words...you will be hard pressed to find 2 equal length pipes cut from the same piece that will expand at EXACTLY the same rate. I know this for a fact with my over 30 years of welding experience that there are hard and soft spots throughout extruded aluminums.

Because “tweaking” collimation during the night, on a Dob, should be looked at as common practice rather then an inconvenience. And when considering expansion and contraction throughout the entire structure of a Dob (which is far greater then any you’ll see in a few inches of length difference in these trusses) This is a none issue.

Thanks,

Mike Z

PS...Quick note, all the trusses on the Horizon are rubber wrapped, so the temperature of the trusses will be very stable.

Edited by michael (08/08/12 12:18 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
lucky305
member


Reged: 04/03/08

Re: STARSTRUCTURE TELESCOPES new [Re: michael]
      #5358026 - 08/08/12 01:15 PM

Hi Mike,
I really like the new design. It is awesome that you are always looking for new and better ways to improve something that is already top notch. Does the servo-cat still have to be used with the cable? I've always hated to have to set up the cable at night.
Maykel


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
FrankG
super member


Reged: 07/13/04

Loc: Richmond, Va.
Re: STARSTRUCTURE TELESCOPES new [Re: michael]
      #5358269 - 08/08/12 03:22 PM

Mike, When do you find the time to do all this? If you aren't doing AN/SC on the TLs any longer glad I picked up that 15" TL/LE up in June.
Frank


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
michael
Vendor (Starstructure Telescopes)


Reged: 01/24/04

Loc: Trinity Florida
Re: STARSTRUCTURE TELESCOPES new [Re: lucky305]
      #5358304 - 08/08/12 03:46 PM

Hi Maykel,
Still using the cable as of now, Gary's working with me on this so I'm always looking.

Mike


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
michael
Vendor (Starstructure Telescopes)


Reged: 01/24/04

Loc: Trinity Florida
Re: STARSTRUCTURE TELESCOPES new [Re: FrankG]
      #5358311 - 08/08/12 03:49 PM

Hi Frank,

No servocat only on the TL Horzon.
Been working on this for a long time now, about 2 years on and off.

Mike


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pinbout
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 02/22/10

Loc: nj
Re: STARSTRUCTURE TELESCOPES new [Re: michael]
      #5358657 - 08/08/12 07:18 PM

is there a tailgate? no vent from below?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Albert
Super Member
*

Reged: 06/01/05

Loc: Redwood City, CA
Re: STARSTRUCTURE TELESCOPES new [Re: michael]
      #5358671 - 08/08/12 07:31 PM

Quote:

Great question, I certainly expected the design to get pulled apart here on CN.




Hi Mike,
I'm not trying to pull it apart. Just want to point out a potential issue. Some customers may be reluctant to buy a telescope where mis-collimation as a function of temperature is introduced by design. I belong to the school of thought that if you can't see it, it doesn't matter. So I believe in tackling the issue head-on.

Quote:

To answer your question...No I have not tested every size because I don’t see it as a problem.




You don't necessarily need to test every one. I derived and experimentally verified equations that address this case as well as many others. You can calculate the expected deviations vs. temperature.

Quote:

It’s important to understand that the back 4 trusses (long ones) are all the same length. Same as the front 4 (short ones)




This insures that no mis-collimation is introduced side-to-side. But there are two consequences of the set of longer and shorter struts.

Quote:

Considering the largest 30” differential in length using a 6063 T52- 2” OD pipe with a .055 wall and using a 30 degree temperature shift over a 6 hour period (basically 5 degree +/- per hour shift) Using a .000023 coefficient (m/m* c) I see a length shift of about .002. This and how it would equate to actual secondary misalignment to the primary is probably a quarter of that as most of the expansion would be absorbed in the attachment points of the trusses.




I'm not sure what the 0.002 refers to since it appears without units and you mixed units in the paragraph. For a 30" difference, I calculate a change of approximately 0.01" over a 30 F temperature change. This introduces a rotation of the upper optical assembly. I don't know your dimensions, but I estimate that the rotation is less than one arc min. I don't think this is an issue for most folks.

A potentionally larger issue is one you didn't address. The change in length between the struts in the two side trusses is magnified by the ratio of strut length divided by their base separation (actually, the separation measured perpendicular to the telescope optical axis). The equation becomes a little more complicated since the the struts are of unequal length, but the mis-collimation is easily calculated. The mis-collimation is front-to-back. Again, I don't know the dimensions of your telescopes, but I estimate the amount to be approximately 0.02". Again, I doubt few could detect this. Some truss telescopes show greater deflection between vertical and horizontal and their owners don't seem to notice or care. Others might since the magnitude is larger than stiff truss structures show when traversing the same angular orientations.

Quote:

PS...Quick note, all the trusses on the Horizon are rubber wrapped, so the temperature of the trusses will be very stable.




No doubt the rubber will cause the temperature of the struts to lag, but I'd wager that at any point their temperature is closer to ambient than they are to the initial temperature. Of course, no need to debate. Easy enough to measure.

I'b be happy to discuss further off-line.
Albert

Edited by Albert (08/08/12 07:33 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
michael
Vendor (Starstructure Telescopes)


Reged: 01/24/04

Loc: Trinity Florida
Re: STARSTRUCTURE TELESCOPES new [Re: Pinbout]
      #5358729 - 08/08/12 08:12 PM

Hi Pinbout,
No tail gate. The primary will be installed and removed from the top of the mirror box. I have designed the scope so that the top plate of the mirror box is removable so there is plenty of room to get to it. The scope shown was the concept scope and it does have a rear opening. On the final design the opening is much bigger. I also designed in side ventilation as well.

Mike


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)


Extra information
5 registered and 7 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Brian Risley, bilgebay 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 3951

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics