Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home page

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu.... uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Binoculars

Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)
edcannon
professor emeritus


Reged: 11/19/03
Posts: 679
Loc: Austin, Texas
Why are they so heavy?
      #1806929 - 08/29/07 02:32 AM

Why are the Garrett Signatures, Oberwerk Ultra, Orion Resolux, etc., so exceedingly heavy?

--------------------
Ed Cannon - Austin, Texas, USA

As of 23 August 2008 - Celestron Skymaster 12x60


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
refractory
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 02/05/05
Posts: 1016
Re: Why are they so heavy? new [Re: edcannon]
      #1806936 - 08/29/07 02:47 AM

Dark matter.

Jess Tauber


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
werewolf6977
Lord High Smasher
*****

Reged: 12/15/03
Posts: 7444
Loc: Hanover, Ohio
Re: Why are they so heavy? new [Re: refractory]
      #1806972 - 08/29/07 03:48 AM

More glass? Build quality? Dunno.

--------------------
Pete
6" Apogee/LXD55 - "The Beast"
Starhopper 6" Dob - "Shiva"
Spaceprobe 130 EQ - "Spacey"
Bushnell Fatboy
The Abomination
Sun Pak Pro 7500 Platinum Edition
10X25 Bushnell Camo Roofies
7X35 Tasco Classic Plastic (good views though)
7X42 Tasco Rare Bird
10X50 Nikon Actions (Type 7)
15X70 Skymasters - "DroolMeisters"
One ratty old IBM 600E LapTop


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
EdZModerator
Professor EdZ
*****

Reged: 02/15/02
Posts: 12581
Loc: Cumberland, R I , USA42N71.4W
Re: Why are they so heavy? new [Re: werewolf6977]
      #1807026 - 08/29/07 05:36 AM

Well for one they have metal barrels. Most binoculars are plastic. Except don't associate the light weight of the Nikon SE with plastic, they are titanium. Second is they have larger prisms, more glass = heavier.

edz

--------------------
Teach a kid something today. The feeling you'll get is one of life's greatest rewards.
member#21


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rick
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 04/12/05
Posts: 2575
Loc: Tokyo, Japan
Re: Why are they so heavy? new [Re: EdZ]
      #1807030 - 08/29/07 05:45 AM

Ed, the SE and EII's have a Magnesium body. Nikon has a small 5x/7x 15mm opera bin made from Titanium though

Rick


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
EdZModerator
Professor EdZ
*****

Reged: 02/15/02
Posts: 12581
Loc: Cumberland, R I , USA42N71.4W
Re: Why are they so heavy? new [Re: Rick]
      #1807037 - 08/29/07 05:53 AM

my mistake.

edz

--------------------
Teach a kid something today. The feeling you'll get is one of life's greatest rewards.
member#21


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
edwincjones
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 04/10/04
Posts: 4423
Re: Why are they so heavy? new [Re: EdZ]
      #1807063 - 08/29/07 07:00 AM

traditio;n-they are clones of the fuji 70mms so they should be heavy like the fujis.

edj

--------------------

n w arkansas
Binocular, Solar, General Amateur Astronomy



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
edwincjones
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 04/10/04
Posts: 4423
Re: Why are they so heavy? new [Re: edwincjones]
      #1807065 - 08/29/07 07:02 AM

or, it just cost more to manufacture a lighter weight binocular with lighter materials and design-the benefit of the clones is a cheaper price

edj

--------------------

n w arkansas
Binocular, Solar, General Amateur Astronomy



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BillC
on a new path
*****

Reged: 06/04/04
Posts: 2110
Loc: Washington, USA
Re: Why are they so heavy? new [Re: edwincjones]
      #1807517 - 08/29/07 12:23 PM

Fujinon FMTR-SX clones win.

Cheers,

Bill

--------------------
William J. Cook, Chief Opticalman, USNR-Ret.
Founding Editor, Amateur Telescope Making Journal
20-year vet. of Captain's Nautical Supplies, Optics Dept. Mgr.
Optics Machanic, WG11-3306, Ft. Lewis, Tacoma,WA
Yata, Yata, Yata . . .


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DeepSpace67
sage


Reged: 05/13/06
Posts: 448
Loc: Kansas City, KS, USA
Re: Why are they so heavy? new [Re: edcannon]
      #1807608 - 08/29/07 01:17 PM

Quote:

Why are the Garrett Signatures, Oberwerk Ultra, Orion Resolux, etc., so exceedingly heavy?




These resellers should find a way to convince their Chinese suppliers to use lighter materials like those used by Miyauchi. Miyauchi's offerings are about 1/2 the weight, and this results in much greater portability and reduces mount cost.

--------------------
Matthew

10" Antares Dobsonian, 8x50 RACI, Telrad, Green Laser
Apogee RA-88-SA, Custom Mount, Green Laser
Garrett Gemini Lightweight 11x56 Binoculars


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
edwincjones
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 04/10/04
Posts: 4423
Re: Why are they so heavy? new [Re: DeepSpace67]
      #1807636 - 08/29/07 01:29 PM

If you want a Miyauchi-like binocular, then buy the miyauchis. If you want a cheaper one, the makers have to cut corners somewhere.

edj

--------------------

n w arkansas
Binocular, Solar, General Amateur Astronomy



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BillC
on a new path
*****

Reged: 06/04/04
Posts: 2110
Loc: Washington, USA
Re: Why are they so heavy? new [Re: edwincjones]
      #1807651 - 08/29/07 01:37 PM

Believe me, PLENTY of corners are being cut. That's why collimation with soon be the #1 topic on the list.

Cheers,

Bill

--------------------
William J. Cook, Chief Opticalman, USNR-Ret.
Founding Editor, Amateur Telescope Making Journal
20-year vet. of Captain's Nautical Supplies, Optics Dept. Mgr.
Optics Machanic, WG11-3306, Ft. Lewis, Tacoma,WA
Yata, Yata, Yata . . .


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Mark9473
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/21/05
Posts: 2699
Loc: 51°N 4°E
Re: Why are they so heavy? new [Re: BillC]
      #1807709 - 08/29/07 02:06 PM

Bill, do you mean this specifically in regard to the binoculars addressed in this thread?

--------------------
Mark
Leica 8x20; Vixen 8x42; Swift 8.5x44, 10x50 and 20x80; TS 7x50; Orion 15x63
WO Megrez II 80 FD + Baader 90° T2 Amici


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
billbob
member


Reged: 08/07/07
Posts: 74
Loc: Kimberling City, MO
Re: Why are they so heavy? new [Re: BillC]
      #1807713 - 08/29/07 02:07 PM

BillC:

A little clarification. Are you speaking of the Miyauchi's, Garrett Signatures, or less costly binoculars in general?

--------------------
Orion XT8 w/intelliscope

GO 10x50 HD-WP ss


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BillC
on a new path
*****

Reged: 06/04/04
Posts: 2110
Loc: Washington, USA
Re: Why are they so heavy? new [Re: billbob]
      #1807903 - 08/29/07 03:57 PM

Sorry for the confusion. I was speaking in general terms. I have fought the good fight, but people just keep thinking that you can buy a quality instrument for paperweight prices.

I know some folks believe that $100-$150 with purchase the Nirvana of optical perfection. However, what they don't know won't make that true.

Ah, but experience is a great teacher . . . also expensive. This is especially true if one considers the time he or she spends in writing memo after memo for the collimation threads and returning things to the “manufacturer.”

Just a thought.

Cheers,

Bill

--------------------
William J. Cook, Chief Opticalman, USNR-Ret.
Founding Editor, Amateur Telescope Making Journal
20-year vet. of Captain's Nautical Supplies, Optics Dept. Mgr.
Optics Machanic, WG11-3306, Ft. Lewis, Tacoma,WA
Yata, Yata, Yata . . .


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
edcannon
professor emeritus


Reged: 11/19/03
Posts: 679
Loc: Austin, Texas
Re: Why are they so heavy? new [Re: BillC]
      #1808088 - 08/29/07 05:56 PM

Quote:

Fujinon FMTR-SX clones win.

Cheers,

Bill




Okay, why are Fujinon FMTR-SX so exceedingly heavy?

--------------------
Ed Cannon - Austin, Texas, USA

As of 23 August 2008 - Celestron Skymaster 12x60


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rick
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 04/12/05
Posts: 2575
Loc: Tokyo, Japan
Re: Why are they so heavy? new [Re: edwincjones]
      #1808111 - 08/29/07 06:06 PM

Quote:

If you want a Miyauchi-like binocular, then buy the miyauchis. If you want a cheaper one, the makers have to cut corners somewhere.




I think Miyauchi might be caught in a "death-roll" now. None of the optics dealers in Tokyo give their products shelf space any longer. Their web site has disappeared too. I will surprised if they are still in business after Xmas.

Rick


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ronharper
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 02/14/06
Posts: 1006
Re: Why are they so heavy? new [Re: Rick]
      #1808185 - 08/29/07 06:52 PM

Long the gold standard of sheer mass, the FMT-SX has been sadly supplanted. While a healthy 1 pound more than the lightweight style Chinese 15x70, the new Fuji 16x70 is a whopping 1.5 pounds lighter than the comparable Signature. Why is the Fuji so light?
Ron


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
edcannon
professor emeritus


Reged: 11/19/03
Posts: 679
Loc: Austin, Texas
Re: Why are they so heavy? new [Re: ronharper]
      #1808222 - 08/29/07 07:20 PM

Of course my point is that I would think that one attractive feature of a high-quality binocular that will often be used handheld by many users would be light weight. So I'm very puzzled that the models I asked about, and their apparent Fujinon role model, are so heavy. I guess they were just not intended to be used handheld. But especially 7x50 sure seems like a handheld size to me. (I used a borrowed 7x50 1980s-model Celestron Ultima for a few months several years ago.)

--------------------
Ed Cannon - Austin, Texas, USA

As of 23 August 2008 - Celestron Skymaster 12x60


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
edwincjones
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 04/10/04
Posts: 4423
Re: Why are they so heavy? new [Re: Rick]
      #1808273 - 08/29/07 07:54 PM

Quote:

Quote:

If you want a Miyauchi-like binocular, then buy the miyauchis. If you want a cheaper one, the makers have to cut corners somewhere.




I think Miyauchi might be caught in a "death-roll" now. None of the optics dealers in Tokyo give their products shelf space any longer. Their web site has disappeared too. I will surprised if they are still in business after Xmas.

Rick




I hope that you are wrong. My 20x100 Galaxy florite is an outstanding binocular, my 22x60 a good two eyed spotting scope. The Saturn models have received high reviews here also.
I hope that the miyauchis do not go the way of the Tak 22x60.



--------------------

n w arkansas
Binocular, Solar, General Amateur Astronomy



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)


Extra information
5 registered and 13 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  EdZ 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 1287

Jump to

Home



Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics