Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums
Privacy Policy |
Please read our Terms
of Service | Signup and
Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu.... uh, User
ZX12
super member
   
Reged: 12/29/05
Posts: 155
Loc: Rhode Island
|
|
I was going to post this observing report in the eyepieces forum, but I think it really belongs here since we have quite a few owners of giant binos these days. Last night I tried a pair of 16mm Nagler T5’s in my Vixen BT 125. I read many reports about these being great as a binoviewer e.p., so I bought a pair during Televue's recent sale
Starting around 8pm, transparency was excellent, with seeing fair to good. NELM was around 5.5. The 16mm T5’s in the 125’s give 48x magnification, a 2.6mm exit pupil and a 1.7 degree true field, which I find more than adequate to find deep space objects using a red dot finder. Eye relief is short at 10mm, but I found it to be okay since I don’t use glasses. I like to use the Orion Nebula along with the four stars of the trapezium to test new eyepieces when it is visible. The full sweep of the nebula was apparent, with both arms nearly making the connection at the bottom. The depth and extent of nebulosity were both excellent at this magnification and field size. Color appeared a faint green/gray. A 3D effect was apparent when using both eyes. Switching back and forth to a single eye reduced the visible portion of the nebula dramatically. In the BT 125’s, the 16 T5’s have good light transmission and excellent contrast.
Next up was the Trapezium. I use a pair of custom machined 100mm aperture masks to sharpen the image quality just enough to see fine detail at high powers. The Trapezium was very sharp with large separation between A, B, C, and D. “E” was clearly apparent when seeing would settle down, but remained an indistinct blur most of time. Using OIII filters on the 16T5’s, I took a peek at the Horsehead Nebula while in the region. For a moment I thought I caught a glimpse of it, but it could have been my imagination as the Horsehead has a way of playing games with smaller apertures. I picked it off once in the 125’s last year using a pair of Series 5000 Meade 26mm Plossl’s from a mag 6.5+ location, but it pops in and out of view as you switch from direct to averted vision and can wear your eyes out pretty fast.
Mars was blazing overhead and had a nice light orange color. Being near opposition, the disk was large enough to see some dark surface features and a faint polar cap.
The prize of the morning was Saturn. Around 1:30am, Saturn was high enough to see. I was actually looking over my house so seeing was not at its best, but the image was still beautiful. The rings were cleanly separated from the disk, with a hint of ring shadow seen on the planet itself. One band, whitish in color could be seen just above the ring. The Cassini Division would appear momentarily when seeing improved, but the rings have become so close to edge on that it is almost impossible to see at this power. Three moons were visible, with Titan clearly the largest. What really impressed me was the overall sharpness of the image quality. Stars are pinpoint to the edge of the field. I didn't expect the 82 degree AFOV to be as comfortable in a binocular view as these are.
The 16mm T5’s are keepers for sure and are a good compliment to my 24 Panoptics.
Happy New Year and clear skies to everyone here at CN.
Mike
-------------------- AP 160 Starfire/AP 1200GTO
Stellarvue SV809D
Vixen BT 125 HFT-MA
Oberwerk BT 100/45
Tak 22x60 Astronomer
Nikon 10x70 FMT-SX
Leica 8-12x42 Duovid
WO 66mm SD
|
Mark9473
Post Laureate
   
Reged: 07/21/05
Posts: 3210
Loc: 51°N 4°E
|
|
Thanks Mike for posting that review here! With the BT125 masked down to 100mm, how does it compare to your BT100?
-------------------- Mark
Leica 8x20; Vixen 8x42; Swift 8.5x44, 10x50 and 20x80; TS 7x50; Orion 15x63; Docter 15x60
WO Megrez II 80 FD + Baader 90° T2 Amici
|
ZX12
super member
   
Reged: 12/29/05
Posts: 155
Loc: Rhode Island
|
|
Hi Mark,
As far as light gathering ability goes, I cannot perceive any difference between the BT 100 and BT 125 masked to 100mm. Even with the 125 at full aperture the difference is not enough to get excited about.
What sets them apart is image quality and the ability to merge images.
My BT 100 does not provide as sharp an image as the BT 125 whether the 125 is masked or not. It is still a good image, but when compared it is slightly soft appearing, especially on planets.
The BT 125 can go well beyond 100x and still maintain a sharp, perfectly merged image.
Mike
-------------------- AP 160 Starfire/AP 1200GTO
Stellarvue SV809D
Vixen BT 125 HFT-MA
Oberwerk BT 100/45
Tak 22x60 Astronomer
Nikon 10x70 FMT-SX
Leica 8-12x42 Duovid
WO 66mm SD
|
edwincjones
Postmaster
   
Reged: 04/10/04
Posts: 5667
|
|
Thanks for the observing report on a fairly rare binocular. Did you see the two comets?
edj
--------------------
n w arkansas
|
ZX12
super member
   
Reged: 12/29/05
Posts: 155
Loc: Rhode Island
|
|
Hi Edj,
Yes, I did find both of them earlier in the evening, though my western horizon has some tree branches and a light dome from a city that limit my views.
Comet Tuttle appeared the brighter of the two with a distinct but dim nucleus surrounded by a gray halo. It seemed as though the outer region of the comet had a slight tail like shape.
I've been catching Comet Holmes every week or so from late October with the BT 125's and was amazed at how large and faint it has become over time. Nucleus was not apparent. It filled the field in the 16T5's, appearing more like a larger version of M 101, kind of a large gray haze with no apparent shape.
Mike
-------------------- AP 160 Starfire/AP 1200GTO
Stellarvue SV809D
Vixen BT 125 HFT-MA
Oberwerk BT 100/45
Tak 22x60 Astronomer
Nikon 10x70 FMT-SX
Leica 8-12x42 Duovid
WO 66mm SD
|
|
4 registered and 13 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
Moderator: EdZ
Print Thread
|
Forum Permissions
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled
UBBCode is enabled
|
Thread views: 426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|