Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home page
   · Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article   

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu.... uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> ATM, Optics and DIY Forum

Pages: 1
davidpitre
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 05/10/05
Posts: 1985
Loc: Central Texas
Consequences of inaccuracies in mirror cell
      #2124436 - 01/16/08 01:26 PM

I'm considering an 18 point mirror cell design for my 18" x 1.6" f/4.2 mirror that uses a triangle of welded square tubing where the mirror support triangles are supported by bars balanced along side the main triangle.
Somewhat along the lines of this:
http://pw2.netcom.com/~ahighe/17_5ultra.html

My question is 2 parts:

1. What is the optical consequence of the the primary mirror being off-center laterally (side to side) with respect to
the mirror box? Does the tilt of the secondary compensate?
Say I was off .25 - .5" ?

2. My ability to place the mirror support triangles exactly where PLOP wants them is dependent on my ability to cut and weld the main frame steel tube triangle exactly.
If my mirror support points were off be .25" , how much will the figure of my mirror start to deform?
In a nutshell, how important is the exact placement of mirror support points in an 18 point cell for an 18" x 1.6" mirror?

--------------------
David


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Olivier BiotAdministrator
Amused
*****

Reged: 04/25/05
Posts: 17277
Loc: 51°N (Belgium)
Re: Consequences of inaccuracies in mirror cell new [Re: davidpitre]
      #2124641 - 01/16/08 03:08 PM

Answer to 1st question:

When collimating, you will try to make the optical axis of the primary and the focuser coincide. If the primary is off-center from the mirror box, then you will tilt the primary so the secondary mirror will probably not be at a 45° angle. The net effect of an offset primary is not a major concern. Offsetting the secondary will only affect the illumination of the field of view.

Regarding your 2nd question, a first run with PLOP (assuming Pyrex) yields a visible RMS error of .89nm and a visible P/V error of 7nm for an 18 points cell. The support circles are at 38.67% and 79.59%.

If I allow both support radii to vary +/- 8% (~16mm or ~2/3") and both support angles to vary +/- 5° to allow for some construction tolerances, then I get the following extremes:






 Radius of support circleAngle of 1st point of support circleRMS error
 inner circleouter circleinner circleouter circleRMS error
Minimum31%72%-5°+10°0.96 nm
Maximum47%88%+5°+20°4.74 nm


I believe this 18 points cell is quite sturdy to construction errors

Cheers,

Olivier

--------------------
Computer entomology: study of computer bugs

Tal-200K (#199) with JMI NGF-Mini2M focuser on GEM3 • Astro-Tech AT80ED • Orion Sirius EQ-G with wireless EQDIRECT • Astro-Tech Voyager • Celestron Regal LX 10x42 • Helios 15x70
ATM 14" f/5 (redesigning) • ATM 10" f/6 Portable Truss (polishing) • ATM 10" f/25 Dall-Kirkham (optics)
AstroForecast


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Olivier BiotAdministrator
Amused
*****

Reged: 04/25/05
Posts: 17277
Loc: 51°N (Belgium)
Re: Consequences of inaccuracies in mirror cell new [Re: Olivier Biot]
      #2124650 - 01/16/08 03:14 PM Attachment (9 downloads)

If you would like to run these tests for yourself, go to the Cell Design tab and select "Scan range" for each of the 4 parameters.

Or load the following PLOP input file:
Quote:


;18 point cell with fixed angles
diameter 456
thickness 40
focal-length 1920
n-mesh-rings 20
rel-support-radii 0.386654 0.795916
num-support 6 12
support-angle 0 15
basis-ring-size 6
basis-ring-min 0
obstruction-diam 0
scan-var rel-support-radii0 0.31 0.47 5
scan-var rel-support-radii1 0.72 0.88 5
scan-var support-angle0 -5 5 5
scan-var support-angle1 10 20 5
part triangle 6 point 0 0 point 1 0 point 1 11
part bar 3 part 0 0 part 0 1





Don't forget to select a file for saving the output:

--------------------
Computer entomology: study of computer bugs

Tal-200K (#199) with JMI NGF-Mini2M focuser on GEM3 • Astro-Tech AT80ED • Orion Sirius EQ-G with wireless EQDIRECT • Astro-Tech Voyager • Celestron Regal LX 10x42 • Helios 15x70
ATM 14" f/5 (redesigning) • ATM 10" f/6 Portable Truss (polishing) • ATM 10" f/25 Dall-Kirkham (optics)
AstroForecast


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
davidpitre
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 05/10/05
Posts: 1985
Loc: Central Texas
Re: Consequences of inaccuracies in mirror cell new [Re: Olivier Biot]
      #2124720 - 01/16/08 03:49 PM

Oliver.
I never expected to receive such a specific detailed answer.
I think I can speak for quite a few people who frequent Cloudy Nights when I say you provide some invaluable help and information .
Thank you!

--------------------
David


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Olivier BiotAdministrator
Amused
*****

Reged: 04/25/05
Posts: 17277
Loc: 51°N (Belgium)
Re: Consequences of inaccuracies in mirror cell new [Re: davidpitre]
      #2124882 - 01/16/08 05:06 PM

Thanks David

--------------------
Computer entomology: study of computer bugs

Tal-200K (#199) with JMI NGF-Mini2M focuser on GEM3 • Astro-Tech AT80ED • Orion Sirius EQ-G with wireless EQDIRECT • Astro-Tech Voyager • Celestron Regal LX 10x42 • Helios 15x70
ATM 14" f/5 (redesigning) • ATM 10" f/6 Portable Truss (polishing) • ATM 10" f/25 Dall-Kirkham (optics)
AstroForecast


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
sixela
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 12/23/04
Posts: 11497
Loc: Boechout, Belgium
Re: Consequences of inaccuracies in mirror cell new [Re: Olivier Biot]
      #2124925 - 01/16/08 05:30 PM

Yeah. If he were smaller, we could all start calling him "Kabouter Plop" .

--------------------

400mm f/4.46 self made Dobsonian on Tom Osypowski equatorial platform
Orion Starblast (114mm f/4 reflector, Alt/Az)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1


Extra information
7 registered and 3 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Don W, Mike I. Jones 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 256

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics