Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home page

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu.... uh, User

Astrophotography and Sketching >> DSLR & Digital Camera Astro Imaging & Processing

Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)
Adam S
super member


Reged: 12/21/05
Posts: 192
Loc: Gunnison, Colorado
Re: 40D vs QHY8 Noise levels.......... new [Re: Strgazr27]
      #2401131 - 05/16/08 11:51 PM

Correct me if I'm wrong; but these cameras still require a laptop to control them. IMO this is really the strongest argument to use a DSLR over a CCD-a decision that becomes harder to make with CCD cameras at this price. Amazing what is available at these prices relative to several years ago.

--------------------
Adam S.

TEC 140
Tak FS 102 NSV
Coronado SM 60
Tak EM 200
Denk II
TEC Turret


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
David Pavlich
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 05/18/05
Posts: 6133
Loc: Mandeville, LA USA 30.38 X 90....
Re: 40D vs QHY8 Noise levels.......... new [Re: Adam S]
      #2401579 - 05/17/08 09:41 AM

Quote:

Correct me if I'm wrong; but these cameras still require a laptop to control them. IMO this is really the strongest argument to use a DSLR over a CCD-a decision that becomes harder to make with CCD cameras at this price. Amazing what is available at these prices relative to several years ago.




That was my rationale until I noticed that I had a 350D in the focuser and there was STILL a laptop sitting there in front of me guiding the mount. So...I sold the 350D and bought a QHY-8. Yes, it's a few extra cables, but there's those velcro straps to control everything.

David

--------------------
A few scopes and mounts.
Proud Member; PAS NOLA,

Life expectancies would go WAY up if green vegetables smelled like bacon...




Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Adam S
super member


Reged: 12/21/05
Posts: 192
Loc: Gunnison, Colorado
Re: 40D vs QHY8 Noise levels.......... new [Re: David Pavlich]
      #2401642 - 05/17/08 10:13 AM

If you've already got the laptop out there... you're right why not.

--------------------
Adam S.

TEC 140
Tak FS 102 NSV
Coronado SM 60
Tak EM 200
Denk II
TEC Turret


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jgraham
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 12/02/04
Posts: 5060
Loc: Dayton, Ohio
Re: 40D vs QHY8 Noise levels.......... new [Re: Adam S]
      #2402158 - 05/17/08 04:00 PM

I've found CCD and DSLR imaging to be two different experiences and I like having options depending on wha I'm goig after and what mood I'm in. Where the difference become important is when you're going after a specific target that pushes your equipment to the edge, and the edge for purpose-built CCDs tends to be a little further out than for DSLRs (and in some cases a lot further out depending on the camera). In my particular case (imaging from my mag 3-4ish back yard) CCDs and DSLRs are on a fairly even playing field. If I were imaging from a dark sky site were you could routinely go really deep the differences would be more significant.

It's fun to have options.

--------------------
-John
================================================
Homebuilt scopes from 4.25-16.5"
Meade LXD75-N6/SN6/SC8, DSX-90, ETX-60BB, ETX-125PE, DS-2130
Orion StarBlast, BinoViewers, Coronado PST
Rebel XT/XTi, DSI Pro, DSI, LPI, Electronic Eyepiece, Phillips SPC900NC
Tasco 60mm Refractors


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jilldwr
member


Reged: 02/17/06
Posts: 80
Loc: Ontario, Canada
Re: 40D vs QHY8 Noise levels.......... [Re: jgraham]
      #2402701 - 05/17/08 09:19 PM

I went to the U.S. dealer for QHY here:
https://www.ccd-labs.com/eshop.htm
but they don't carry the QHY-8? Is the Q453HR its replacement?
Darrell

--------------------
Celestron C8/ 90mm Flourite Triplet/6"F5 Newt-Astrograph/WO66
Losmandy GM100/ Custom Designed GEM
Orion Autoguider/ Canon 350T DSLR/STI Stiletto
http://www3.sympatico.ca/jilldwr/


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Strgazr27
Scope Junkie
****

Reged: 10/04/04
Posts: 5747
Loc: StonyHill Observatory
Re: 40D vs QHY8 Noise levels.......... new [Re: jilldwr]
      #2402750 - 05/17/08 09:43 PM

Darrell,

Welcome to CN's. Yes the 435 is the same camera with a few minor changes to the electronics. Same body, same chip, same performance!

CS's

--------------------
StonyHill Observatory

CGE
TMB 130SS
TMB 80SS CF
AT-111
AT66-ED
Vixen R200SS
QHY-8
SSAG

YAHOO TMB 130SS Group
YAHOO ASTRO-TECH GROUP



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Tonk
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 08/19/04
Posts: 3420
Loc: Leeds, UK, 54N
Re: 40D vs QHY8 Noise levels.......... new [Re: Strgazr27]
      #2403141 - 05/18/08 04:10 AM

Is there a UK supplier? Q453HR only hits ccd-labs and cloudynights!

Oh OK that is a QHY8 modified for the US market

--------------------
Televue 85, GM-8/Gemini, Canon 10D
Coronado SM60/BF10, Baader Herschel Wedge
Leeds Sky Clock Ripon Sky Clock

Edited by Tonk (05/18/08 04:17 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Fabio Papa
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 03/01/05
Posts: 1020
Loc: Piacenza, Italy
Re: 40D vs QHY8 Noise levels.......... new [Re: Tonk]
      #2403144 - 05/18/08 04:19 AM

Tonk, that camera is being renamed by every countrys distributor, it seems. Here in italy it's sold under the MagZero brand. I seem to recall the qhy page (not ccd-labs) had a list of international reseller / rebranding, but the site seems down now (www.coolccd.com).

--------------------
Fabio Papa
Celestron C8 F/10
Vixen ED81SWT F/7.7
Orion Atlas EQ-G
Gruppo Astrofili di Piacenza


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Fabio Papa
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 03/01/05
Posts: 1020
Loc: Piacenza, Italy
Re: 40D vs QHY8 Noise levels.......... new [Re: Fabio Papa]
      #2403146 - 05/18/08 04:21 AM

I found it: www.modernastronomy.com is the site listed for UK.

--------------------
Fabio Papa
Celestron C8 F/10
Vixen ED81SWT F/7.7
Orion Atlas EQ-G
Gruppo Astrofili di Piacenza


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Tonk
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 08/19/04
Posts: 3420
Loc: Leeds, UK, 54N
Re: 40D vs QHY8 Noise levels.......... new [Re: Fabio Papa]
      #2403163 - 05/18/08 04:52 AM

Cheers, Fabio - bookmarked for when I've got some money again

OK excellent DSS can debayer QHY8 images - that makes me happy. However to debayer one frame DSS has to pretend its calibrating and stacking a single image!!

http://qhyccd.com/ccdbbs/index.php?topic=727.new

And how geeky MaximDL appears to be when it comes to debayering with this offset X/Y stuff!!

--------------------
Televue 85, GM-8/Gemini, Canon 10D
Coronado SM60/BF10, Baader Herschel Wedge
Leeds Sky Clock Ripon Sky Clock


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Mr B
member


Reged: 01/31/06
Posts: 27
Loc: Southern California
Re: 40D vs QHY8 Noise levels.......... new [Re: Adam S]
      #2403807 - 05/18/08 02:04 PM

One of the big factors for our decision is simply the 40D is not restricted to the telescope.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Fabio Papa
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 03/01/05
Posts: 1020
Loc: Piacenza, Italy
Re: 40D vs QHY8 Noise levels.......... new [Re: Mr B]
      #2405202 - 05/19/08 02:00 AM

Yes, that's been discussed even earlier. However, we're talking ccd here, so obviously you have no daytime photos, at least not as easily as with a DSLR.

Another point to be considered is construction. Many on qhyccd forum have reported the formation of frost. That's not nice, and it's a indication of poor design. Another thing is it seems the construction itself changes without major notice or announcement. Someone received an interchangeable filter camera, someone had the ir/cut filter glued. That's a major feature. Can someone who has the camera shed more light on this aspect? Is your filter removeable or interchangeable with something else, eg. LP filters?

--------------------
Fabio Papa
Celestron C8 F/10
Vixen ED81SWT F/7.7
Orion Atlas EQ-G
Gruppo Astrofili di Piacenza


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Strgazr27
Scope Junkie
****

Reged: 10/04/04
Posts: 5747
Loc: StonyHill Observatory
Re: 40D vs QHY8 Noise levels.......... new [Re: Fabio Papa]
      #2405370 - 05/19/08 07:01 AM Attachment (14 downloads)

Quote:

Another point to be considered is construction. Many on qhyccd forum have reported the formation of frost. That's not nice, and it's a indication of poor design.




Actually the reports of frost have become almost non-existant at this point and if they do occur it's usually been found to be operator error. A few were also the result of the camera being positioned with the optical window in a diownward facing position on some Newts which allowed the super cooled air to pool on the window which of course will cause frosting. A few were also brought about by using more than 12V to the cooler dropping temps further below what the camera was designed for. It should also be noted that if it's left on long enough the frost usually clears itself. Realize even SBIG cameras will frost and will need to have their dessicant packs recharged after a certain point.

Quote:

Another thing is it seems the construction itself changes without major notice or announcement. Someone received an interchangeable filter camera, someone had the ir/cut filter glued. That's a major feature. Can someone who has the camera shed more light on this aspect? Is your filter removeable or interchangeable with something else, eg. LP filters?




Quihy has posted about most major changes to the camera from what I have seen. You can request "No Filter" or his version of the IR/Cut filter. I think you may also be speaking of several changes that are carried out by the dealers. CCDLabs does a redesign on the camera as far as powering the camera and removing a cable (The reason I cannot find out) and purges with Argon while Starizona purges with Nitrogen.

One also needs to realize that sometimes when you use a product on the cutting edge at times there is a little bleeding so to speak. I feel at this point the QHY is a proven performer (Joe G and Gerhard as well as those using it with the Hyperstar system are proof of this. I had a 5 minute first light with the camera last night and found focusing to be no harder than with the 40D it just took a bit longer as the camera has no "Live View" function but once focused was very easy to use with both Nebulosity as well as the current version of MaximDL.

This is the offiicial first sub with the camera. Gain of 10/Offset of 120, 1/100 second exposure with the TMB130SS. Converted in IPv3, levels in PSCS2. It's a little blown out but as I said I had about a 5 minute window between storms/clouds and rain last night.

--------------------
StonyHill Observatory

CGE
TMB 130SS
TMB 80SS CF
AT-111
AT66-ED
Vixen R200SS
QHY-8
SSAG

YAHOO TMB 130SS Group
YAHOO ASTRO-TECH GROUP



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Fabio Papa
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 03/01/05
Posts: 1020
Loc: Piacenza, Italy
Re: 40D vs QHY8 Noise levels.......... new [Re: Strgazr27]
      #2405431 - 05/19/08 08:38 AM

Thanks for the info. No live view? I thought the focusing procedure was about the same. I also read that the camera is capable of 1/1000 sec, so I thought you would put it in some sort of continuous mode, just like a webcam, to focus. Isn't this the case?

Sorry for the questions, but you seem so kind...

--------------------
Fabio Papa
Celestron C8 F/10
Vixen ED81SWT F/7.7
Orion Atlas EQ-G
Gruppo Astrofili di Piacenza


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)


Extra information
12 registered and 14 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Charlie Hein, knuklhdastnmr 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 1046

Jump to

Home



Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics