Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home page

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu.... uh, User

Observing >> Deep Sky Observing

Pages: 1
cpsTN
professor emeritus
*****

Reged: 04/26/07
Posts: 742
Loc: Smyrna, TN USA
accurate Messier list?
      #2439099 - 06/04/08 10:54 AM

Over that last several days, I have been compiling a list of the Messier OCs and GCs for hunting. Somewhere in my workings, I have come across a variation in the number of clusters in some listings. I am getting either 27 or 30 OCs and 29 or 30 GCs. What could be the reason for this and is there any dispute as to what some of the Messiers are that might lead to varying counts. Can someone point me toward an acurate count of each type of Messier.

Also, Some lists I have found label M16 as a Nebula and others as an OC. Since both are present in M16, which one is it officially? Thank you all.

--------------------
Charles P. Sands

Zhumell 8" f/5.9 dob
Looking Up since 1982

The heavens declare the glory of God;
and the firmament sheweth His handywork
(Psalm 19:1)



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
MikeRatcliff
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 06/12/04
Posts: 1107
Loc: Redlands, CA
Re: accurate Messier list? new [Re: cpsTN]
      #2439752 - 06/04/08 04:35 PM

I don't think there is an "official" counting of object types.

I like the SEDS website SEDS Messier list organized by type

For open clusters, there is the complication you stated that some nebula have embedded open clusters. Other complications include M73 that is really a multiple-star, and M24 that is really a star cloud in the Milky Way. And M24 has a small embedded open cluster NGC6603 that Messier did not mean to be the entry.

Now globular clusters I thought there was not much confusion. SEDS only has 29. I would be curious to see what the 30th one might be. I recall some debate about M71 but it is generally considered a globular these days.

And there were questions about the total number. The SEDS website has a lot of good history and links.

--------------------
16" f/4.9 dob
Tele Vue Plossls 32,25,20,15,11
13 Nagler T6
10.5 Pentax XL
Brandon 32, 16
12.5 UO ortho, 9 Circle T ortho
2x TV Barlow






Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Michael & Louise
member


Reged: 06/02/08
Posts: 11
Loc: Calgary, Alberta
Re: accurate Messier list? new [Re: MikeRatcliff]
      #2439927 - 06/04/08 06:18 PM

M8, M17 and M20 can also be considered to include clusters and most likely, although I don't have the info handy right now, Messier saw the clusters in M16 and M17 rather than the nebulae. I get 30 OCs and 29 GCs overall.

--------------------
Louise and Michael
Astronomical Sketches


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Tony Flanders
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 05/18/06
Posts: 2098
Loc: Cambridge, MA, USA
Re: accurate Messier list? new [Re: Michael & Louise]
      #2440822 - 06/05/08 06:11 AM

Quote:

M8, M17 and M20 can also be considered to include clusters and most likely, although I don't have the info handy right now, Messier saw the clusters in M16 and M17 rather than the nebulae.




All emission nebulae have embedded star clusters. That's what powers them to emit light. M42 is another really obvious example. You don't really think that the Trapezium is a quadruple (or hexuple) star, do you? It's a mini star cluster showing hundreds of members in deep photographic images.

In the case of M16, the star clusters is much more obvious than the nebulosity. M17 is just the opposite. Its star cluster is pretty much hidden inside the gas and dust, and really visible only in infrared images.

Conversely, all open star clusters used to be emission nebulae, and many of them still have some faint nebulosity hanging around. Open clusters and emission nebulae are really just two different aspects of the same category of objects.

--------------------
Tony Flanders

eyeglasses
6x15 and 8x32 monoculars
8x25, 7x35, 10x30 IS, 10x50, and 15x70 binoculars
70mm and 100mm achromatic refractors
4.5", 7", and 12.5" Dobs


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
cpsTN
professor emeritus
*****

Reged: 04/26/07
Posts: 742
Loc: Smyrna, TN USA
Re: accurate Messier list? new [Re: Tony Flanders]
      #2441256 - 06/05/08 11:20 AM

Thank you, Tony. That is an insight that I should have had by now, which tells me I need to pay more attention. A review of the emission nebulas should now be on the list. I will probably start finding OCs everywhere, now!

--------------------
Charles P. Sands

Zhumell 8" f/5.9 dob
Looking Up since 1982

The heavens declare the glory of God;
and the firmament sheweth His handywork
(Psalm 19:1)



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1


Extra information
2 registered and 3 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  matt, Olivier Biot 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 202

Jump to

Home



Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics