Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums
Privacy Policy |
Please read our Terms
of Service | Signup and
Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu.... uh, User
roccodm
member
Reged: 01/15/08
Posts: 36
|
|
i recently acquired a pair of apogee 10x60 binos-when i attempt to use them for astro i can not view with both eyes or i have double images- i dont experience this viewing terresterial objects- i do where glasees which i always remove when using the binos or scope- i am just wondering if my eye malady is something anyone else has experienced and if so is there something that i can do when attempting to use the binos-clear skies rocco
|
rickertk
super member
Reged: 06/14/07
Posts: 199
Loc: Outer Philadelphia suburbs
|
|
The binoculars are probably somewhat out of collimation. I've had a pair of older binoculars that gave me the same problem; my personal theory is that for a daytime terrestrial image that's just a bit off, your brain does a good job of merging the images based on background detail, but it can't do that for an astronomical view. In my case, a newer, better pair of binoculars made an enormous improvement.
Keith
--------------------
Oberwerk 11x56
Orion 8XTi
|
werewolf6977
Lord High Smasher
Reged: 12/15/03
Posts: 7292
Loc: Hanover, Ohio
|
|
You can do a "conditional alignment" (rough collimation for 1 ipd). There should be instructions in the "Best Of" section in this forum.
--------------------
Pete
6" Apogee/LXD55 - "The Beast"
Starhopper 6" Dob - "Shiva"
Spaceprobe 130 EQ - "Spacey"
Bushnell Fatboy
The Abomination
Sun Pak Pro 7500 Platinum Edition
10X25 Bushnell Camo Roofies
7X35 Tasco Classic Plastic (good views though)
7X42 Tasco Rare Bird
10X50 Nikon Actions (Type 7)
15X70 Skymasters - "DroolMeisters"
One ratty old IBM 600E LapTop
|
|
7 registered and 16 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
Moderator: EdZ
Print Thread
|
Forum Permissions
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled
UBBCode is enabled
|
Thread views: 268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
Edit
Reply
Quote
[Re: 