Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums
Privacy Policy |
Please read our Terms
of Service | Signup and
Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu.... uh, User
Doug D.
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 08/23/05
Posts: 1327
Loc: Virginia
|
|
The Half-Hitch mount came to my attention some months ago from a few posts I read here on CN and from ads by the manufacturer on Astromart and more recently, in the back of S&T.
I was instantly interested for a couple of reasons. First, I'm a bit of an Alt/Az nut and have tried many over the years and settled on only a few. I still have a DM-6 that I use with an AP 140 and a Lapides Modified Teegul that I use with my 105 Traveler. The Teegul got me convinced that slo-mo controls are very enjoyable/useful and the DM-6 showed me how important stability was and how useful DSCs could be. A host of other mounts (including some highly recognizable and expensive Alt/Az mounts I won't mention) convinced me that there were lots of compromises made in most designs and that with a poor mount and tripod you are better off going online and looking at pictures from Hubble.
Although I am very happy with both the Teegul and the DM-6 they are less than ideal for smaller scopes and as I've already mentioned, they have non-overlapping features I'd like to see incorporated into a single Alt/Az (i.e., slo-mo, DSCs). So, lets just say the Half-Hitch caught my eye.... but I needed yet another Alt/Az like hole in the head (or so I thought).
A few weeks ago I noticed an ad in Astromart for a final price reduction on the "pre-production" version of the Half-Hitch from Charles Riddel, the designer and owner of Half Hitch. At considerably less than half the cost of the current production version but with maybe 80-90% of the performance, I couldn't resist. I decided that there is no better way to judge the mount than to try it myself. My goal was to put together a featherweight grab and go for my Solarscope SV50 rig (as seen in attached photos) paired with a Gitzo 2530 carbon fiber - and to test it out with my 3 and 4 inch refractors.
Let me emphasize at the outset that my comments are based on a "pre-production" mount and Charles was exceedingly careful to make sure I understood this point before taking my money. He recommended the pre-pro version for an 80 mm refractor without binoviewers and was careful to also point out that the anodizing was less than perfect on this version. The current version has more bracing to increase torsional rigidity a few more tweaks and bells and whistles. In retrospect, I'd say Charles was more cautious than necessary but it is very refreshing to see a vendor bend over backwards to disclose exactly what you are paying for.
The mount arrived carefully packed and in excellent condition - and the finish on the pieces look great to me. I can only imagine what the current production mount looks like if this version isn’t cosmetically perfect! Ok, I'm a sucker for innovative designs, high quality materials and careful, precise machining - and this mount has all of these attributes in spades. No plastic, metal casting or mass-produced parts on this mount - it is high quality all the way and I am very impressed with the tolerances needed to make this mount perform.
Ok, so how does it perform? I’ve had it out for several days now on the Gitzo 2530 with my Solarscope SV50. First, talk about grab and go! I feel like I’ve been liberated from a burden – I will never again give a moments thought to heading out the door for a quick peek of the sun. If that isn’t the definition of grab and go, I’m not sure what is. It makes the Teegul on my Gitzo 5530S feel like a dead weight by comparison. Second, the controls for moving the scope in altitude and azimuth are remarkably smooth and a real joy to use when following the sun in H-alpha. The controls are unlike any other I’ve seen on an Alt/Az and do not rely on friction bearing surfaces. The closest comparison I can make is to the mechanism of a Crayford focuser. Thus, there is zero backlash and if balanced as described in the clear instructions, no slippage. It isn’t quite fair to the Half-Hitch to define these as just slo-mo controls, they are responsive enough to touch and slight pressure to give you unprecedented control. I almost feel as though I could guide a long exposure using them – as it is I think this is the first Alt/Az I could, in fact, use to track the sun with a webcam for a 1000 frames or more for trouble free registration and stacking. Third, vibration damping was outstanding (less than 1 second) even on the lightweight Gitzo tripod. The mount is highly rigid and stable and the OTA is centered over the tripod with this design. Reaching zenith is no problem. I am nowhere near capacity with the SV50 (heavier than a typical 60mm APO but lighter than a 70-80mm scope). Did I mention the mount is highly rigid and stable?
So, the pre-production Half-Hitch exceeds the expectations I had for this mount as a grab-and-go travel set up for the Solarscope SV50. In fact, I’m impressed enough already to go ahead and order a full production mount (with encoders) within the next month and I will be glad to report back on its performance with my 3 and 4” refractors – one of which will be at or near the stated capacity for the mount. Rarely am I so enthusiastic about a new mount (or any other piece of gear) to want to post about it. But the simplicity and performance of this mount has redefined the genre for me enough to maybe even rethink the way I normally view (and certainly my frequency of viewing). It isn’t perfect (what is?) and I can already think of some very slight improvements (some of which may already be incorporated into the full production version) but I think it represents a big leap forward in a small Alt/Az mount.
The Half-Hitch is not cheap relative to other Alt/Az mounts targeting the 3-4” refractor market. The DM-4 is likely its only serious competition in terms of performance/price but the design concept is quite different and arguably, the DM-4 will handle a wider range of OTAs. But if you are passionate about using a mount that is optimized for the small refractor in an almost impossibly light and compact form – you should check out the Half-Hitch. As is often the case, you get what you pay for. In my case with the pre-production version – I feel like I got a real bargain.
I am compelled to add that I have no interest in Half-Hitch other than as a happy customer and do not know Charles beyond the few e-mails we exchanged about the mount. He is clearly passionate about observing and quality (a perfectionist it seems) and I am happy to own one of his mounts (soon to be two of his mounts)!
-------------------- Refractors mostly.... solar and dark sky.
Charlottesville
|
Doug D.
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 08/23/05
Posts: 1327
Loc: Virginia
|
|
closer view....
-------------------- Refractors mostly.... solar and dark sky.
Charlottesville
|
Doug D.
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 08/23/05
Posts: 1327
Loc: Virginia
|
|
alternate view...
-------------------- Refractors mostly.... solar and dark sky.
Charlottesville
|
JJS
member
Reged: 10/13/06
Posts: 24
Loc: Verona, WI
|
|
Doug, you're absolutely correct in your assessment of Charles. I've had both versions, the pre-production and the production version with DSC. Had a couple of situations where a few back & forth emails helped clear some issues up for me, at the time there wasn't an owners manual yet published so most things were due to my own ignorance or not understanding something.
I always think back afterwards how patient and helpful he is. In this day and age it's becoming rarer and rarer to get that kind of support. There's a few out there, but not many. That in my mind is another important reason that this is such a great buy.
After using it, I know I won't be replacing it with anything else, there's no need to. It does everything I want a mount to do and then some. I’m enjoying the hobby now instead of fiddling with equipment all the time.
I have a Stellarvue SV90T on mine and to me I consider this setup to be the ultimate in grab 'n go. Less than a minute and I’m outside and ready to go. I find it interesting that people will spend so much money on their scopes and then compromise their viewing experience with an inadequate mount.
Great review, it's always exciting to read someone else’s and know that you agree with them 100% - half the time I can't tell the truth from the fiction reading peoples reviews on some products, maybe it explains why so many people are constantly upgrading their equipment. Buy right to begin with and you don't have that problem.
Clear skies… JJS in Madison
-------------------- Stellarvue SV90TBV
Production Half Hitch Mount w/Sky Commander
|
Doug D.
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 08/23/05
Posts: 1327
Loc: Virginia
|
|
Quote:
Great review, it's always exciting to read someone else’s and know that you agree with them 100% - half the time I can't tell the truth from the fiction reading peoples reviews on some products, maybe it explains why so many people are constantly upgrading their equipment. Buy right to begin with and you don't have that problem.
Clear skies… JJS in Madison
Thanks JJS - I really appreciate your comments and insights. And I'm really liking those pictures of your set-up! It looks like the perfect combination. How have the DSCs worked out for you? Do you still have the pre-production version? I'm thinking I may keep mine even after getting the production version (e.g., to dedicate it to the SV50).
I kind of went on a bit in my post but rarely have I felt so motivated to say something positive about a piece of equipment and my experience with a "vendor". I guess I'm just enthusiastic about the Half-Hitch because of its innovative design and attention to detail - I can only hope Charles has a few more ideas up his sleeve.
-------------------- Refractors mostly.... solar and dark sky.
Charlottesville
|
donsinger1
member
Reged: 10/28/07
Posts: 97
|
|
Totally agree with your post. I have been wanting to write a review myself, having had similar experiences with various Alt/Az "grab and go" mounts, including the DM4 with DSCs; Portamount; Telepod; etc...And, as you point out, all do really well with regard to their designs, but not one does everything I want in such a mount.
To me, the distinguishing aspects of the Half Hitch mimic your experiences. I have mine on a heavy duty Bogen tripod (light but sturdy) carrying my SV102ED with 2" Dia and Pentax XW eyepieces (which are not necessarily light). Total weight, including clamshell, dia., eyepiece and ota = 12.5 lbs.
It is very stable with less than 1 sec dampening time, which in part is due to the fact that the mount puts the weight over the center of the tripod.
All of the Alt/Az mounts I have experienced have one annoying trait, and that is backlash. The Half Hitch has none. As you described, I too was surprised at how smooth and innovative Charles approach to engineering these cam drives is - there is no way to describe it. And, it needs to be mentioned that it is very, very light.
I have the production model with DSC cabling. The cable draws are clean and out of the way, which is nice. And, Charles is one of those rare vendors who bend over backwards to make sure you enjoy your mount!.
Good review...I agree with everything you said...can you tell:).
-------------------- WO 66mm APO
ATLE 80/480 F6 Doublet APO
WO FLT98mm F6.3 Triplet
Obsession 12.5" with Servocat and Argo Navis
Takahashi EM11 Mount
Half Hitch Alt Az with Sky Commander
Astrotrac
Various Pentax XW Eyepieces
|
Doug D.
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 08/23/05
Posts: 1327
Loc: Virginia
|
|
Thanks Don. I guess a lot of us share a similar experience with the Half-Hitch.
I figure my Traveler in typical configuration will be 15 lbs - it will be interesting to see how well it does on the production mount (too much for pre-pro) but I'm really thinking about it more in terms of my TV76, which of course should be fine. Have you used the DSCs and SkyCommander much? Any issues or concerns? My DM-6 is set up with the SkyComander, which I plan to share with the Half-Hitch. I think both mounts are using encoders of same resolution (~4000 TIC) so even better.
You've got a great line-up of gear. Carefully thought out I'll wager. I too owned the TMB 80/480 (in a Megrez tube), what a great optic. Have you also used that scope on your Half-Hitch? I assume it usually rides on the GM-8 (which I also own) for imaging?
-------------------- Refractors mostly.... solar and dark sky.
Charlottesville
|
maino
member
   
Reged: 11/09/07
Posts: 46
|
|
Doug, very well done ! Do you know the max load for it ?
maino
-------------------- Fatti non foste a viver come bruti,
ma per seguir virtute e conoscenza.
|
Doug D.
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 08/23/05
Posts: 1327
Loc: Virginia
|
|
Maino,
I suggest you go to the Half-Hitch site (and Half Hitch Yahoo group) for current information on capacity. Aside from the pre-production and full production versions, Charles has announced a Mark II version (and modification to existing full production versions) that he is confident will handle most 4" refractors (maybe even up to an SV115 or comparable).
I plan to get a Mark II for my 105 (~15 lbs fully loaded). My pre-production mount handles my 3" (TV76) and smaller scopes like the SV50. I haven't tried a 4" with it yet but it isn't designed for that size scope (unlike the curent production and Mark II versions).
It isn't just weight capacity but also the length of the OTA that may determine how well the mount works. I recommend you e-mail Charles with specific questions. He is very helpful.
Doug
-------------------- Refractors mostly.... solar and dark sky.
Charlottesville
|
maino
member
   
Reged: 11/09/07
Posts: 46
|
|
Yes Doug, I've already seen the web site of H-H , but I didn't notice the data about capacity. Because it's not urgent for me (maybe next year) I'll be waiting for the new MarkII (and the new data)
Thanks again
maino
-------------------- Fatti non foste a viver come bruti,
ma per seguir virtute e conoscenza.
|
|
12 registered and 12 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
Moderator: Charlie Hein, FAB
Print Thread
|
Forum Permissions
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled
UBBCode is enabled
|
Thread views: 428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|