Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home page


Observing >> Double Star Observing

Pages: 1
Patricko
professor emeritus
*****

Reged: 01/30/07
Posts: 714
Loc: around the corner
Cygni 16
      #2587746 - 08/18/08 01:32 AM

Hi everyone, I've looked at this double everytime its out with my 10X50s. Very nice binocular double to observe. Anyone else like to observe it?

--------------------
Clear skies,
Patrick
"Life is too short, go collect some photons!" - Me, myself, and I


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
SaberScorpX
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 01/12/05
Posts: 4120
Loc: illinois, usa
Re: Cygni 16 new [Re: Patricko]
      #2587848 - 08/18/08 05:45 AM

Sure do.
The easy pair of 6th mag G-type suns (sep 40.0")
also shine just a half degree west of the Blinking Planetary
(ngc6826). A nice counterpart to 61 Cyg decorating the Swan's
eastern wing.


Saber Does The Stars at
www.astronomyblogs.com/member/saberscorpx/


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
VanJan
super member


Reged: 07/09/08
Posts: 111
Re: Cygni 16 new [Re: Patricko]
      #2587863 - 08/18/08 06:09 AM

A very nice cpm pair in my 8x42's as well. Some perspective to ponder the next time you view 16 Cygni. According to the distances for the components listed in MSA, that little gap between the stars you see in your binoculars is at least one light-year across.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Patricko
professor emeritus
*****

Reged: 01/30/07
Posts: 714
Loc: around the corner
Re: Cygni 16 new [Re: VanJan]
      #2588277 - 08/18/08 11:48 AM

Wow! One light year!

--------------------
Clear skies,
Patrick
"Life is too short, go collect some photons!" - Me, myself, and I


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
tigerroach
sage


Reged: 08/13/08
Posts: 292
Loc: Houston, TX
Re: Cygni 16 new [Re: Patricko]
      #2588425 - 08/18/08 01:05 PM

I just snagged 16 Cygni for the first time a couple weeks ago in my 10x30s.

--------------------
Brian

TeleVue TV-102, Gibralter alt-az mount
Webster 14.5" f/4.3 truss dob *under construction*
Canon 10x30 IS binocs



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Patricko
professor emeritus
*****

Reged: 01/30/07
Posts: 714
Loc: around the corner
Re: Cygni 16 new [Re: tigerroach]
      #2589803 - 08/19/08 01:07 AM

Excellent!

--------------------
Clear skies,
Patrick
"Life is too short, go collect some photons!" - Me, myself, and I


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
GlennLeDrew
professor emeritus


Reged: 06/18/08
Posts: 564
Loc: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Re: Cygni 16 new [Re: Patricko]
      #2603754 - 08/25/08 10:56 PM

Where did this figure of 1 light-year come from?... At a distance of 70 l-y and with an angular separation of 40 arcseconds, the projected separation works out to 0.014 l-y, or 860 A-U. Of course, this would be the minimum separation if both stars lay at *exactly* the same distance from us, which of course isn't too likely from a statistical consideration.

If the components of 16 Cyg were actually separated by 1 l-y in the plane of the sky, their angular separation would be 0.82 degrees. And here's the thing. Such stars could indeed be in bound orbits of this size! In such case, their binarity would only be betrayed by their common proper motion (coupled with other indicators such as parallax and spectral classification, to seal the case.)

--------------------
Home-made 11X50 right angle bino, 8.1 deg. FOV
Modified 26X100 bino, 3.5 deg. FOV

Mediocre minds discuss people. Good minds discuss events. Great minds discuss ideas.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
VanJan
super member


Reged: 07/09/08
Posts: 111
Re: Cygni 16 new [Re: GlennLeDrew]
      #2604130 - 08/26/08 06:03 AM

Yes, my "one light-year across" is a simplification of the distances given in MSA of the two components of 70 and 71 light-years as it ignores the "depth" of the view as opposed to a planar projection. Across was a terrible choice of word on my part. Down and through would have been more accurate. Thanks for doing the math behind my poor choice of vocabulary. But, as you note, as a cpm pair, still pretty impressive.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
GlennLeDrew
professor emeritus


Reged: 06/18/08
Posts: 564
Loc: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Re: Cygni 16 new [Re: VanJan]
      #2606032 - 08/26/08 10:20 PM

Those distances of 70 and 71 l-y... the errors on the measurements are large enough that one can't rely on the reported difference of 1 l-y at all.

It's actually much safer to assume that the members of a binary or multiple system which doesn't yet have an orbit solution to lie at *exactly* the same distance from us. Then, considering all possible relative positions on the orbit and the inclination of the orbital plane, it probably turns out that the projected separation would be fairly representative of the actual space separation, from a statistical consideration.

--------------------
Home-made 11X50 right angle bino, 8.1 deg. FOV
Modified 26X100 bino, 3.5 deg. FOV

Mediocre minds discuss people. Good minds discuss events. Great minds discuss ideas.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1


Extra information
0 registered and 3 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  EdZ, RLTYS 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 266

Jump to

Home



Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics