rsraney
member
Reged: 09/16/07
Posts: 68
Loc: Sunnyvale, CA
|
|
I am looking for a quick review of the Tele Vue Radian 10mm eyepiece. Is it just as good as the 14mm?
|
helpwanted
Carpal Tunnel
   
Reged: 07/04/07
Posts: 1745
Loc: Phoenix, AZ
|
|
i would think all Radians would equally be of the same quality... but, not to go off your question, but i bought a 10mm Axiom (for less than a Radian) that i am very happy with.
--------------------
|
kaaikop
sage
   
Reged: 07/13/08
Posts: 460
Loc: Ste-Therese, Canada
|
|
There ya go! Didn't I tell you they get addictive? 
With the Radians, it seems like you either love 'em or hate' em... I started with a 12mm, now I've got 6 of them... (yes, ouch my cr.card!) and I find them all excellent (not only because of eye relief...) I have TV Plossls, Nags, Radians, Vixen LVW's and UO Orthos, the Radians are my favorite eyepieces, and they get a "Wow!" everytime I use them, on any kind of subject.
Anybody know of "bad" TV eyepiece anyway?
-------------------- Benoit, RASC Montreal
-C 9.25XLT on EQ6 Pro / ED80SF on Portamount
-Plossls, Radians, Naglers, LVW's & Orthos.
-a pair of 7x50's
|
BillP
Carpal Tunnel
   
Reged: 11/26/06
Posts: 2209
Loc: Vienna, VA
|
|
I consider the 10mm better than the 14mm. The 14mm is great, but I see a little less aberration control off-axis than I do in any of the other shorter focal lengths up to 4mm (I don't have the 3mm). So the 14 is not quite as "tight" as the others for me. That being said, if you like your 14mm, then you will really like the 10mm 
Actually, I think the 10mm is really quite excellent. Although I use the 6mm and 8mm most, whenever I put the 10mm in the slot I always say "wow" and am just really please with the view it shows.
-------------------- 250mm f/4.7 Orion XT10i Dobsonian
102mm f/8.0 Tak TSA Super-APO
66mm f/5.9 WO ZenithStar SD APO
40mm f/10 Coronado P.S.T.
|
khoferer
member
Reged: 11/03/04
Posts: 97
Loc: Mansfield, PA
|
|
I would agree with the other posters - if you like the 14mm you should like the 10mm. I use both regularly and find them excellent for deep sky and solar system observing.
kaaikop also makes a good point. Personal preferences aside, I have yet to see a TeleVue product I wouldn't mind using.
Clear skies, Kevin
-------------------- C8D
6" f/8 homebuilt dob
Celestron 10x50
|
Phil Frederick
professor emeritus
   
Reged: 12/19/05
Posts: 616
Loc: Seattle, WA & La Paz MX
|
|
The 10mm Radian is one of my favorite med-high power EPs. Very comfortable ER and super-sharp. I also have some shorter Radians and they are also equally nice to use.
-------------------- Phil
Intes M603 6" Mak
Intes M500 5" Mak
Astro-Tech 80LE CF
Orion 127 Mak
Orion ST120 f/5
Orion ST80 f/5
SV F50 Sparrowhawk
SV F60 Biggerhawk
Tak Teeguls, SV Stableock, Bogen475s, Oberwerk Jarrah, and a rebuilt Astroview tripod with Walnut/Oak legs.
...Naglers, Radians, LVWs, BO/TMBs, Stratus', 32 & 38 SWA's
|
coopman
Pooh-Bah
   
Reged: 04/23/06
Posts: 1205
Loc: South Louisiana
|
|
I have the 6mm & 12mm and they're keepers.
-------------------- Regards,
Clay
"The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands." Psalms 19:1
|
David E
Carpal Tunnel
   
Reged: 05/25/06
Posts: 1729
Loc: North Carolina
|
|
The only Radian I have is the 10. I love it. Wonderfull image and comfortable to use. I bought mine years ago. When Televue had their sale a while back I bought a second for my binoviewers. They're a little on the heavy side, but they make great binoviewer eyepieces.
-------------------- David E
So when at times the mob is swayed
To carry praise or blame too far,
We may choose something like a star
To stay our minds on and be staid.
-Robert Frost
|
BillP
Carpal Tunnel
   
Reged: 11/26/06
Posts: 2209
Loc: Vienna, VA
|
|
Listening (i.e., reading) to the comments pretty consistently made regarding how heavy Radians are, it often makes me wonder why they did this. If you examine them, all this weight comes from the milling (or lack of milling down) the chromed brass barrel. I often wonder if this was done to convey quality (since lightness often conveys less quality for small packages to many consumers), or if it was done for some thermal considerations within the eyepiece, or if it was just plain less costly to do it this way vs using some other material for the chromed barrel.
-------------------- 250mm f/4.7 Orion XT10i Dobsonian
102mm f/8.0 Tak TSA Super-APO
66mm f/5.9 WO ZenithStar SD APO
40mm f/10 Coronado P.S.T.
|
pennyandchris
professor emeritus
Reged: 01/30/07
Posts: 500
Loc: Horsham, England
|
|
I had a 10mm Radian and the views were excellent in my Mak. I just couldn't get on with the instajust eyeguard thhough. If you can, go for it.
-------------------- Orion UK OMC140 Mak Cass
TeleVue Ranger
Coronado Ha and CaK PSTs
Meade LXD75 mount
Ambermile alt-az mount on wooden surveyors tripod
Manfrotto 074 photo tripod with 501 head
+ various binocs
|
BillP
Carpal Tunnel
   
Reged: 11/26/06
Posts: 2209
Loc: Vienna, VA
|
|
Agree with you on that Insadjust thing. For a while I took the eyeguards completely off of my Radians. Recently though put them back on but tightened up the spring in them so now they don't slide up anywhere near as easily as before. So now don't mind the Instadjust.
-------------------- 250mm f/4.7 Orion XT10i Dobsonian
102mm f/8.0 Tak TSA Super-APO
66mm f/5.9 WO ZenithStar SD APO
40mm f/10 Coronado P.S.T.
|
5u4
member
Reged: 04/27/06
Posts: 41
|
|
Owned the 12mm & 10mm Radians at one time.
A friend has the 14mm, but only looked through it a couple times through his scope. It looked good, but can't really comment further.
Thought the 12mm gave a crisper image than the 10mm, maybe (maybe not) just because of it's lower power? I found the most comfortable position of the Instajust was to pull it fully up & roll the rubber eyeguard down. Stars remain sharp to the edge, but the image seems a little dim for some reason? & didn't care for the color on bright objects at the edge of FOV. Overall very nice eyepieces though.
|