|
Sunspot
Post Laureate
   
Reged: 03/15/05
Loc: Surprise, AZ
|
Saturn March 29, 2009
#3014933 - 03/30/09 09:41 PM Attachment (91 downloads)
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Hi all,
I had some decent seeing on the evening of March 28 and got the following Saturn image. It was shot at about 350UT (March 29) with the 10" at F/32. I resized the image by 1.2x during Registax processing. The moon, Rhea, is seen at about 2 o'clock. A bright spot can be seen in the middle of the disk just under the shadow of the rings.
Paul
|
Freddy WILLEMS
Postmaster
   
Reged: 11/13/05
Loc: Hawaii, Honolulu
|
Re: Saturn March 29, 2009
[Re: Sunspot]
#3016112 - 03/31/09 01:47 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Nice big one Paul ! Colorfull banding. Freddy
|
Mert
Post Laureate
   
Reged: 08/31/05
Loc: Spain, Pamplona
|
Re: Saturn March 29, 2009
[Re: Freddy WILLEMS]
#3016126 - 03/31/09 01:55 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Now that's a really nice image Paul, lot's of detail and very sharp. I'd like to have half of the seeing you had, for me that would be great seeing  Yesterday night I tried with the 6" Mak @F36, but the seeing was aprox. 0.1 / 7, very blurry result and the blue channel straight into the waist bin  Oh well, the next time ......
|
Mike Phillips
Carpal Tunnel
   
Reged: 02/21/06
Loc: Swift Creek, NC - 35.682 N, 78...
|
Re: Saturn March 29, 2009
[Re: Mert]
#3017057 - 04/01/09 12:02 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Well done! Did you change your processing routine at all?? Chris Go's recent challenge has me thinking differently. Or maybe just my eyes...
Great work,
Mike
|
Sunspot
Post Laureate
   
Reged: 03/15/05
Loc: Surprise, AZ
|
Re: Saturn March 29, 2009
[Re: Mike Phillips]
#3017631 - 04/01/09 10:24 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Mike,
Thanks!! I don't think I adjusted my processing procedure on this image from normal, but I have made a major adjustment on my capture process. With the Skynyx and LuCam Recorder, I would typically set contrast at 1.2-1.4. While it gave better disk detail, it took away from the overall picture. Now I set contrast no higher than 1.05, normally leave it at 1.0. Now I get the crepe ring and better images of moons. Also, I went from 17fps to 10 fps so I can increase exposure time. This allows me to get about 50-60% on the brightness rather than the 30-40% before. Always something to try, huh? **grin**
Paul
|
|
8 registered and 18 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
Moderator: Boot, bilgebay
Print Thread
|
Forum Permissions
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled
UBBCode is enabled
|
Thread views: 806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|