Charles
Post Laureate
Reged: 06/12/03
Posts: 4111
Loc: Enterprise, AL
|
|
Tonight I must have edited and reduce a dozen images. Some of you are new, some have forgotten and some don't seem to care. The rules for posting images are 60k or less and CN has made a new rule for less than 800x600 in the forums. Gallaries do not apply, but if you force your website to load a image it does count.
Some come on everyone it takes a lot of my personal time to edit these images. Images I edited tonight ran from 79k to 143k. I will start deleting images from people who do not pay attention. 
The only reason for these rules is modem users, so please be considerate of others.
Thank You
Charles
|
Chris_H
Carpal Tunnel
Reged: 11/24/03
Posts: 2859
Loc: Norway
|
|
Charles,
At least you will have something to do on those rainy days! 
--------------------
Chris
"Big Papa Smurf" (254mm f/4.7 Sky-Watcher Newt)
Custom Orion Optics 150mm f/8 reflektor "Planet Killer" (On its way!!!)
SPC900
Canon Powershot A610 (CHDK modded)
Canon 10D (modded)
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 USM L
My Website
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Just a thought: When trying to upload an image it reads: "You may attach a file if you like (no bigger than 200000 bytes please)." Why not change this to 60000 (or 60 x 1024??). HTML allows you to define that limit. Why make it hard for yourself (and confusing for others) when there is a simple sollution??
|
sienarot
professor emeritus
Reged: 10/18/03
Posts: 708
Loc: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
|
|
That's actually a good point. You could add extra checks upon upload to prevent files larger than 60K. That could save you same hassle. The downside is if someone was uploading something that wasn't an image (ie: spreadsheets, documents, etc...) Of course, it's not too difficult to add those extra checks.
--------------------
Derrick
Sky-Watcher 80ED f/7.5 Refractor
Celestron C8 SCT f/10 SCT
Canon EOS 20D
Logitech Quickcam Pro 4000
|
Charles
Post Laureate
Reged: 06/12/03
Posts: 4111
Loc: Enterprise, AL
|
|
Different forums have different rules. It is a mess, but it is the best we have to go on. This forum and the CCD forum were the first two I believe that imposed file sizes, because the modem people were complaining. There is talk among the Kings about increasing the size to 100k, but I have not heard whether it is a final decision, or again, just guidelines.
It doesn't take much effort to bring a file down to under 60k. I do it all the time with files as big as 20+ megs.
Go download IrfanView. It makes resizing easy as pie. That is what I use to bring down your files to under 60k. If you turn off all the attributes that are save with a jpeg it will cut the size by almost half again. You have that option with this program. BTW IrfanView is free.
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Nevertheless, whenever you find yourself in a situation where you are doing a mindless, repetitive task on a computer, you should ask yourself how you can let the computer do this work for you. That's why they are built for! Anyway you must admit that the 200000 bytes upload limit is confusing, especially when you're new! That's the real problem, unless you assume we're all pure evil  . If it's too difficult to adjust the file size limit per forum, then maybe there is a way to resize it automatically after upload?
Edit: Hint: Imagemagick
Edited by Hansvi (01/11/05 10:38 PM)
|
gazerjim
Postmaster
Reged: 02/12/04
Posts: 7728
Loc: About where I thought I was......
|
|
Charles: An automated system would be preferable, but I try to remember that I am basically a guest here. To be sure I am not running over limits, I usually right click to check image file size under "properties". Is this a reliable way to prevent oversize files?
Thanks,
Jim
--------------------
Jim Fisher
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
Henry J. Tillman
Edited by gazerjim (01/11/05 10:41 PM)
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Sorry Charles,
Am sure we all appreciate the effort/time/frustration it encompasses.
Bill
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
The file size in properties is most definitely correct, but when resizing an image, should I aim at 60000 bytes or 61440 (= 60 x 1024 bytes = 60 x 1kb). Or am I getting too pedantic? 
|
chris go
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 04/06/04
Posts: 1184
Loc: Cebu City, Philippines
|
|
Hello Charles,
I apologize for posting the large file.  Will try to get is smaller next time.
BTW what is the limit 60k or 60000 bytes?
Thanks for reminding..
Regards,
Chris
--------------------
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
A thankless job for sure, Charles.
Keep up the good work.
I sometimes forget the size limit myself (and have been spanked by other moderators when I was still new here).
|
Festus
sage
Reged: 01/07/04
Posts: 205
|
|
There are a few avatars that exceed the picture limit...or do they count?
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
If the avatars don't load in the "change my profile" page there is a problem.
If they load, no problem.
I've seen people with movies in their avatars
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Charles, just post a thread line title above that reads:
Keep all images to 60k or less and 800x600!!!
kind of what Suk does in the other imaging forum.
|
Bird
Carpal Tunnel
Reged: 08/07/03
Posts: 2621
Loc: Canberra, Australia
|
|
Sorry Charles - I'll try and be a good boy :-)
Bird
--------------------
Deep Sky Optics 13.1" f/5.5 newtonian,
PGR Dragonfly Express, PGR Dragonfly 2
RedHat Linux + Coriander
http://www.acquerra.com.au/astro/
|
David Rivas
Carpal Tunnel
Reged: 05/29/04
Posts: 2004
Loc: Lima, Peru
|
|
Hi Charles,
I am sorry! I'll check my next shots out before posting. In case of exceeding I'll resize them.
Regards,
David
|
Thick_asa_Planck
Dark Sky Hunter
Reged: 09/04/04
Posts: 3341
Loc: UK
|
|
Hi Charles,
Sorry about that, i always thought the limit was 200000K as shown on the "Attach a File" option. I didn't realise it was 60K.
I will keep images under 60K.
Alex
--------------------
It is often commonplace to leave the notation ambiguous - Anonymous
|
Ricky
Carpal Tunnel
Reged: 09/09/03
Posts: 2173
Loc: Nor Cal
|
|
I know I try to remind folks as I see images posted that are greater than 60k. I think we can all help Charles out by posting peer reminders. Keep up the good work Charles!
--------------------
Regards Ricky
_______________
Astro-Tech 6" RC (wait list)
ADM Mount (on the way!)
QHY 8 ccd (wait list)
66-80mm apo (deciding)
|
litespeed
scholastic sledgehammer
Reged: 10/31/03
Posts: 956
Loc: Treasure Coast, FL
|
|
I was wonering about that?
I thought the rules for sizes had changed......
It is not that hard to reduce the size?
AJ
--------------------
AJ
Orion 127 SVP
TouCam
Canon 20D
|
riverpoet
sage
Reged: 11/03/03
Posts: 230
Loc: Slovenia, Europe
|
|
But do you even know the percentage of modem users here?
Why don't you do a poll?
--------------------
C9.25 XLT, WO Megrez 90 FD, WO Megrez 72 FD
IS DMK31AU03.AS, LU075C, Canon EOS 350D (mod)
Astrotrac TT320, Vixen Sphinx SXD, Celestron SLT, EQ1
--------------------------------------------
FINDASTRONOMY - Astronomy Search engine
Astronom.si - Slovenian Astro Community
|
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
Edit
Reply
Quote
[Re: 