leexeen
scholastic sledgehammer
Reged: 08/08/07
Loc: Beijing, China
|
Delta Cygni, is it a very difficult object?
#3146152 - 06/04/09 06:55 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I have tried this one for some time. I guess I pointed my 130mm socpe to it for no less than 4 times. But I didn't see any sign of the 8-shaped figue or even the elongated Airy disk. I have splitted some doubles that are supposed to be closer than this one according to some double star list.
Is it coming to a very close seperation or I just ignored something? Would like to hear your experience.
Kurt
|
Bonco
Post Laureate
   
Reged: 04/17/06
Loc: Florida
|
Re: Delta Cygni, is it a very difficult object?
[Re: leexeen]
#3146171 - 06/04/09 07:09 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Kurt... Just like many other interesting doubles, while not easy it's a beautiful pair. Takes steady skies but I've viewed it several times with my 4 inch f/5. I think my notes will show I viewed it last year with my Polarex 75mm. Cheers, Bill
|
edl
professor emeritus
Reged: 06/24/04
|
Re: Delta Cygni, is it a very difficult object?
[Re: leexeen]
#3146556 - 06/04/09 11:36 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I find you need plenty of magnification with smaller scopes to resolve the this double for the first time. Not only because of the unequal brightness of the stars, but also due to the fact that the fainter companion often sits on or near the first diffraction ring of the primary. Once spotted, it becomes easy to split using lower power. The smallest instrument I've used for a clean split on Delta Cygni is an Orion ED80. The companion looked like a tiny faint blue ball attached to the primary's diffraction ring.
Best, Ed L.
|
Erik Bakker
Carpal Tunnel
   
Reged: 08/10/06
Loc: The Netherlands, Europe
|
Re: Delta Cygni, is it a very difficult object?
[Re: leexeen]
#3146791 - 06/05/09 05:29 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Hi Kurt,
You are looking for the wrong figure of the two stars. It is an unequal double with a bright primary and dim secondary star, like Rigel but tighter. I recommend 200- 240x to see it easy. Once you know what to look for, you can do with less magnification. Just wait for a night with stable skies and look out for a tiny pinprick next to the bigger and brighter Airy disk / first ring of the primary (it is wider then a figure eight or elongated disk). It really is a gem!
Clear and steady skies,
Erik
|
leexeen
scholastic sledgehammer
Reged: 08/08/07
Loc: Beijing, China
|
Re: Delta Cygni, is it a very difficult object?
[Re: Erik Bakker]
#3146797 - 06/05/09 05:52 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Thanks for all your good suggestion. I will try tonight and report back. Kurt
|
Clive Gibbons
Mostly Harmless
   
Reged: 05/26/05
Loc: Oort Cloud
|
Re: Delta Cygni, is it a very difficult object?
[Re: leexeen]
#3147043 - 06/05/09 10:39 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Spotting the companion star is greatly helped by two things-- Very good seeing. Minimal diffraction rings from the primary star.
Since you're using a 130mm APO of excellent quality, the brightness of the diffraction ring(s) shouldn't be an issue. However, if the air is rather unsteady, you might have better luck by stopping down the scope a bit. Knock it down to 110mm with a mask. Keep the magnification at 150x or greater.
Once you pick out the companion star, it'll be much easier the next time.
|
walt r
Post Laureate
Reged: 02/13/07
Loc: Doylestown, PA
|
Re: Delta Cygni, is it a very difficult object?
[Re: Clive Gibbons]
#3147365 - 06/05/09 02:34 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I have found that it can be better to use a neutral density, variable polarizer or Moon filter to reduce the brightness of doubles rather than loosing resolution by stopping down the aperture.
|
John Fitzgerald
In Focus
   
Reged: 01/04/04
Loc: AR
|
Re: Delta Cygni, is it a very difficult object?
[Re: walt r]
#3148651 - 06/06/09 10:25 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
It's an easy target in moderate seeing with my 6" achro. The secondary is near the second diffraction ring of the primary, and is much fainter than the primary. Keep trying, you should not stop down the aperture IMO. I can see it in my 4" f/10 achro also. Use about 200x.
|
PJ Anway
Carpal Tunnel
   
Reged: 06/04/03
Loc: North Coast
|
Re: Delta Cygni, is it a very difficult object?
[Re: John Fitzgerald]
#3149280 - 06/06/09 05:19 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
As others have said, good seeing is required. It splits nicely in my 4" on night of excellent seeing, one of my favorites.
|
EdZ
Professor EdZ
   
Reged: 02/15/02
Loc: Cumberland, R I , USA42N71.4W
|
Re: Delta Cygni, is it a very difficult object?
[Re: PJ Anway]
#3152292 - 06/08/09 12:59 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
with a 130mm scope the secondary of d Cyg should be well outside the first diffraction ring or perhaps just barely grazing its outside edge.
edz
|
Clive Gibbons
Mostly Harmless
   
Reged: 05/26/05
Loc: Oort Cloud
|
Re: Delta Cygni, is it a very difficult object?
[Re: John Fitzgerald]
#3152338 - 06/08/09 01:23 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Stopping down the aperture somewhat can help mitigate the effects of bad seeing. You'll end up with a "tidier" looking diffraction image and have a better chance of seeing a faint companion in the primary's rings.
|
leexeen
scholastic sledgehammer
Reged: 08/08/07
Loc: Beijing, China
|
Re: Delta Cygni, is it a very difficult object?
[Re: Clive Gibbons]
#3153062 - 06/08/09 08:58 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
These nights are either rainy or cloudy and I even found the rain leakage on my ceiling. Too bad! Fortunately my scope is put far away from where the rain leaked in. It is turning clear now and hopefully I can give it a try.
|
leexeen
scholastic sledgehammer
Reged: 08/08/07
Loc: Beijing, China
|
Re: Delta Cygni, is it a very difficult object?
[Re: leexeen]
#3154762 - 06/09/09 08:54 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Here I have the latest update. Thanks to the suggestions and comments of kind people here, I was able too see the companion yesterday. It turned out that I had already seen it before but I just didn't think what I saw was the companion. The companion under bad seeing is just like a faint blue patch, not a tough Airy disk beside the first diffraction ring and could easily be ignored. Last night I was just very cautious of this and so instantly located the companion.
I will keep checking it on nights of good seeing.
|