M111
scholastic sledgehammer
Reged: 06/28/06
Posts: 790
Loc: Western MA
|
|
Hi everyone,
I lurk here quite a bit but don't often have much to post as I work mostly with another kind of camera which I won't mention here.  But for general photography I actually still shoot film quite a bit, maybe more than ever before since learning to develop my own slides and negatives. It was only a matter of time before I would revisit film AP which I have not practiced since the late 90s.
At a recent trip to a dark site I brought along a roll of E200 and shot some simple, unguided wide fields. The camera is a Canon A2, and the lens a 35mm F1.2L working at F2. My exposures were around 5 minutes. I push-processed the slides 2 stops in a Jobo CPE2. To be honest, I did not expect much, but I was pleased with the results. I definitely hope I can get out to a dark site with a roll of film a little more often.
Thanks for looking. 
35mm Milky Way
~5 min, unguided, E200
Canon 35mm F1.2L @ F/2
LXD-75
Canon A2
Boddington's Ale
+2 push processed
See it larger HERE.
--------------------
Brendan
WO ZS80FD 10th-Anniversary
Meade SN-6
Meade 2080 F/6.3 SCT
Meade LXD-75
Vixen Polaris
A bunch of cameras and lenses
Burnham's Celestial Handbook
Gallery
|
Nightfly
sage
Reged: 06/20/07
Posts: 441
Loc: Sullivan, Maine
|
|
Looks fine. Pushed E200 captures allot. You'll have about half a dozen guys here wanting you to process their E-6! 
Thanks for posting.
--------------------
Nightfly Astrophotography
Sullivan, Maine, USA
Pentax 67 with 55, 75, 105, 165, 200, and 300mm lenses
Pentax Spotmatic II with 35, 50, and 300mm lenses
Kodak E200 acetate based chemical sensor
Flickr - Nightfly Photography
|
shark-bait
super member
Reged: 06/01/09
Posts: 158
Loc: New Port Richey, FL USA
|
|
Fantastic photo M111. How do you attach your Canon to the LXD-75 mount? Nightfly had suggested that I give piggy backing a try but haven't found an adapter for that mount yet.
--------------------
The telescope... man's second best invention.
--------------------------------------------------
Meade LXD75 SN10 f/4(JMI focuser; EV-3n)
Orion 80 f/11.4
Meade DS2114-LNT f/8.8
Oberwerk 11x70mm binocs
Olympus OM1(1-8 screen)
Canon 10D
Naglers/Pentax XW/Meade 5000 EPs
|
shark-bait
super member
Reged: 06/01/09
Posts: 158
Loc: New Port Richey, FL USA
|
|
Also, is it always recommended to push E200 2 stops?
--------------------
The telescope... man's second best invention.
--------------------------------------------------
Meade LXD75 SN10 f/4(JMI focuser; EV-3n)
Orion 80 f/11.4
Meade DS2114-LNT f/8.8
Oberwerk 11x70mm binocs
Olympus OM1(1-8 screen)
Canon 10D
Naglers/Pentax XW/Meade 5000 EPs
|
calder
super member
Reged: 12/13/05
Posts: 113
Loc: Schuylkill County, PA
|
|
Hi there M111,
Nice shot. There's a lot of detail in that photo for such a short exposure. Too bad about the planes nav lights. I hate when that happens. The next time your out there, perhaps you could pay off, in advance, the air traffic controllers to direct traffic away from your vicinity. 
I wouldn't worry too much about your unmentionable camera. Though most of us die-hards feel that you'll have to pry our film cameras from our cold dead hands, we also realize that at some point each of us will have to make the switch.
How do you like that Jobo CPE2? I've been looking at those for a few years and with the price of film processing getting so high in these parts, I might finally bite the bullet. How long does it take to get the temperatures stabilized?
shark-bait, there is really no set in stone recommendation for pushing the processing of film. Generally speaking the more you push process the film the greater the grain will be. If you want shorter exposures and the amount of grain doesn't bother you you can push E200 to an EI of 800. If your imaging very faint fuzzies then you might also want to push it that far. I've been pushing it one to an EI of 320 to give me a in increase of speed and to minimize the amount of increase in grain. Pushing twice gives you an EI of 640 and 3x push will give you a 800 EI. It's a matter of personal choice. Perhaps someone here has negatives shot at each of these speeds and could show you how much the grain increases with each increase in speed.
Bob
--------------------
Bob's Astrophotography
Meade 295 (dust collector)
B&L Criterion 4000 (grab & go)
Celestron 9.25 CGE (work in progress)
Stellarview 102ED FT focuser (sweet)
Stellarview 70ED (Waiting for first light)
Canon F1
Mamiya 645
Stiletto
Edited by calder (07/02/09 12:48 AM)
|
Nightfly
sage
Reged: 06/20/07
Posts: 441
Loc: Sullivan, Maine
|
|
I push E200 1 stop with no noticeable increase in grain. It also increases the contrast of the film. E200 is a low contrast film to begin with so pushing increases speed and contrast. When I shoot very long exposures, pushing really pulls out detail I would not otherwise record. I've exposed the constellation orion (wide-field) for 1 hour at f/4 with E200 pushed 2 stops and revealed the faint detail that normally is associated with CCD work.
The downside is that the cherry red nebulae of normally processed E200 turn pink and highlighted areas can get blown out. Contrast is very high at 2 stops. I've never tried 3 stops.
--------------------
Nightfly Astrophotography
Sullivan, Maine, USA
Pentax 67 with 55, 75, 105, 165, 200, and 300mm lenses
Pentax Spotmatic II with 35, 50, and 300mm lenses
Kodak E200 acetate based chemical sensor
Flickr - Nightfly Photography
|
Nightfly
sage
Reged: 06/20/07
Posts: 441
Loc: Sullivan, Maine
|
|
That being said, here is an example of E200 pushed +2 stops. M8 is blown out but the high contrast is good for all those dark nebulae!
40 minutes 165mm f/4 (medium format)
http://tinyurl.com/m8xoj5
--------------------
Nightfly Astrophotography
Sullivan, Maine, USA
Pentax 67 with 55, 75, 105, 165, 200, and 300mm lenses
Pentax Spotmatic II with 35, 50, and 300mm lenses
Kodak E200 acetate based chemical sensor
Flickr - Nightfly Photography
|
Jimmy2K63
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 04/26/09
Posts: 1188
Loc: Kentucky
|
|
Quote:
Fantastic photo M111. How do you attach your Canon to the LXD-75 mount? Nightfly had suggested that I give piggy backing a try but haven't found an adapter for that mount yet.
Sorry for the off-topic post. I just ordered an accessory bracket for my LXD-75 SN-6 yesterday from Raul at Desert Sky Astro Products that will let me mount my camera to the cradle. He may have to custom build it for the SN-10 like he did for mine, but visit his website and see the one for the SN-8 and if it will suit your purpose.
--------------------
http://astronomyguy63.blogspot.com/
LXD75 SN6-UHTC
Cave Astrola 10" f/5
Garrett 15x70/FarSight
Canon XS (1000D)
|
shark-bait
super member
Reged: 06/01/09
Posts: 158
Loc: New Port Richey, FL USA
|
|
So should you only push process wide field APs with a lot of color contrast or is it O.K. to push a normal prime focus target, for example M13?
--------------------
The telescope... man's second best invention.
--------------------------------------------------
Meade LXD75 SN10 f/4(JMI focuser; EV-3n)
Orion 80 f/11.4
Meade DS2114-LNT f/8.8
Oberwerk 11x70mm binocs
Olympus OM1(1-8 screen)
Canon 10D
Naglers/Pentax XW/Meade 5000 EPs
|
shark-bait
super member
Reged: 06/01/09
Posts: 158
Loc: New Port Richey, FL USA
|
|
Jimmy,
Thanks for the link for the accessory bracket. I like your blog too. I'm proud to say I'm your first follower.
--------------------
The telescope... man's second best invention.
--------------------------------------------------
Meade LXD75 SN10 f/4(JMI focuser; EV-3n)
Orion 80 f/11.4
Meade DS2114-LNT f/8.8
Oberwerk 11x70mm binocs
Olympus OM1(1-8 screen)
Canon 10D
Naglers/Pentax XW/Meade 5000 EPs
|
M111
scholastic sledgehammer
Reged: 06/28/06
Posts: 790
Loc: Western MA
|
|
Quote:
How do you like that Jobo CPE2?
Hi Bob, a few years ago I was under the mistaken impression that color processing at home was too complicated to even consider. While the CPE2 is Jobo's bottom of the line unit I find it does a great job and is easy to use. I run mine next to the kitchen sink so I fill it with water close to my working temperature. The chemistry itself will reach temp in about 20 minutes.
Quote:
How do you attach your Canon to the LXD-75 mount?
Hi shark Bait, I have a few extra dovetails I got from ScopeStuff and I usually bolt the camera right to it. This time though I borrowed a long dove tail that has two ball heads mounted on each end. I was running a DSLR simultaneously.
Quote:
is it always recommended to push E200 2 stops?
My decision to push 2 stops was based on what I thought were short exposures. I wanted to make up a little gain. I was a bit afraid though that the grain might be a little much, especially with 35mm film, but was very surprised how smooth they came out. There is some grain but far less than I expected. E200 is a wonderful, versatile AP film.
Quote:
You'll have about half a dozen guys here wanting you to process their E-6!
You mean there are a half-dozen people who actually shoot film AP??? 
--------------------
Brendan
WO ZS80FD 10th-Anniversary
Meade SN-6
Meade 2080 F/6.3 SCT
Meade LXD-75
Vixen Polaris
A bunch of cameras and lenses
Burnham's Celestial Handbook
Gallery
|
M111
scholastic sledgehammer
Reged: 06/28/06
Posts: 790
Loc: Western MA
|
|
Here's another... the area around Cygnus. Same shooting info as above.
Larger HERE.
--------------------
Brendan
WO ZS80FD 10th-Anniversary
Meade SN-6
Meade 2080 F/6.3 SCT
Meade LXD-75
Vixen Polaris
A bunch of cameras and lenses
Burnham's Celestial Handbook
Gallery
|
Nightfly
sage
Reged: 06/20/07
Posts: 441
Loc: Sullivan, Maine
|
|
That's a very nice shot of Cygnus. Very glad to see your contribution to the forum. Keep shooting film! I'll be wanting to discuss your E-6 work as a few of us might like to go down this road ourselves.
--------------------
Nightfly Astrophotography
Sullivan, Maine, USA
Pentax 67 with 55, 75, 105, 165, 200, and 300mm lenses
Pentax Spotmatic II with 35, 50, and 300mm lenses
Kodak E200 acetate based chemical sensor
Flickr - Nightfly Photography
|
M111
scholastic sledgehammer
Reged: 06/28/06
Posts: 790
Loc: Western MA
|
|
Thanks, Nightfly. This really brought back a lot of fond memories, but with better results. In the 90s I was shooting with a Ricoh KR-10 and yard sale glass. The film of choice was Fuji SuperG800. Let's just say I shot a lot of murky green photos!
The weather during my trip was terrible(as those of you in New England are all too familiar with) and I had planned on shooting some MF as well. I have an RZ67 with a 140/4.5 lens but the extra time required was not available. One thing on my shopping list is a Mamiya-Sekor 110/2.8 which is probably the most suitable AP lens available for that camera.
I've got another from this session that I'll post later, one that really made me appreciate the power of E200.
--------------------
Brendan
WO ZS80FD 10th-Anniversary
Meade SN-6
Meade 2080 F/6.3 SCT
Meade LXD-75
Vixen Polaris
A bunch of cameras and lenses
Burnham's Celestial Handbook
Gallery
|
Nebhunter
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 10/04/03
Posts: 1259
Loc: Frostbite Falls
|
|
Well I'm impressed. Great stuff for a tripod and 5 minutes. Hopefully the results will encourage you to continue on with the film. E200 is our mainstay film.
I'm with Nightfly on the film processing. If it's simple enough, and cost is reasonable to get the basic equipment - then I'm all for it. It removes the fear I have - and others about film lost in the mail - or in my case the photo store *BLEEP* it up with crud and tractor marks because they don't maintain the E6 machine.
When you have a number of frames with exposures in the 100 minute range - it soon becomes a different story. I would imaging that there is no real difference in processing E200 in 35 or 120 format other than the equipment side?
It might be worth starting a new thread on this subject, and let those that know discuss the subject. There are enough "listeners" to make it worth while. I would suspect we would save some money over developing at the lab costs - and that is a consideration. Having total control over the quality and end result - I like it. What say you Jim?
The other side is - everyone sends their film to you for processing? Lots to discuss if you are willing?
Firefly
--------------------
The StarGeezer
Those who trade liberty for security have neither. ~John Adams
TEC 140 (Katyusha) & F/F - Equinox 80 - Losmandy G11/Gemini - ST-4 guider. PENTAX 67ii - 400(EDif) & siblings. I shoot FILM.
|
M111
scholastic sledgehammer
Reged: 06/28/06
Posts: 790
Loc: Western MA
|
|
Thanks, Nebhunter
If someone would like to start a separate thread about home processing I would be happy to contribute what I can.
--------------------
Brendan
WO ZS80FD 10th-Anniversary
Meade SN-6
Meade 2080 F/6.3 SCT
Meade LXD-75
Vixen Polaris
A bunch of cameras and lenses
Burnham's Celestial Handbook
Gallery
|
M111
scholastic sledgehammer
Reged: 06/28/06
Posts: 790
Loc: Western MA
|
|
When I was hanging the film up to dry I noticed the red blob over Antares in this one and thought it was some kind of artifact. After consulting an atlas I realized it was Sharpless 2-27. That this appears in a 5 minute exposure amazes me. This is an object that would be detectable only after many hours of exposure with my unmodded DSLR. I am very impressed with E200.
Larger HERE.
--------------------
Brendan
WO ZS80FD 10th-Anniversary
Meade SN-6
Meade 2080 F/6.3 SCT
Meade LXD-75
Vixen Polaris
A bunch of cameras and lenses
Burnham's Celestial Handbook
Gallery
|
Nightfly
sage
Reged: 06/20/07
Posts: 441
Loc: Sullivan, Maine
|
|
This is very nice work Brendan. I love this last shot. I must admit to being partial to wide-field work. Your results have warmed me up after this third week of rain in Maine. It's nice to have another New Englander onboard!
Sharpless 2-27 is very faint and seldom talked about. I have been photographing it for years with E200.
http://tinyurl.com/mepfms
E200 is very very sensitive to Hydrogen Alpha. I know it does better than unmodded dslr's.
As for Super G 800, that was a good film at the time. The green cast had to be carefully controlled with exposure and light pollution. It was very sensitive and had good reciprocity. I got good shots of Comet Hale-Bopp with that film.
Again, so glad to see your posts. Wonderful work. Good luck with your MF. That I got to see!
Jim
--------------------
Nightfly Astrophotography
Sullivan, Maine, USA
Pentax 67 with 55, 75, 105, 165, 200, and 300mm lenses
Pentax Spotmatic II with 35, 50, and 300mm lenses
Kodak E200 acetate based chemical sensor
Flickr - Nightfly Photography
|
M111
scholastic sledgehammer
Reged: 06/28/06
Posts: 790
Loc: Western MA
|
|
Thanks again, Jim!
Indeed, Sh2-27 is hiding in plain site. When I googled Sharpless 2-27 guess who's site came up first? I think you are the current world expert on this imaging this object.
Yes, the SuperG 800 was the top fast film of the time and most of my green shots were due to the operator erroneously operating under suburban LP. But I did manage some decent shots of HB with that film as well. I posted one in my first post to this group...
Hale-Bopp
I'm in full agreement of the impact of film wide fields. They print really well too. Can't wait to do more.
--------------------
Brendan
WO ZS80FD 10th-Anniversary
Meade SN-6
Meade 2080 F/6.3 SCT
Meade LXD-75
Vixen Polaris
A bunch of cameras and lenses
Burnham's Celestial Handbook
Gallery
|
Kona
journeyman
Reged: 10/22/08
Posts: 7
|
|
What flatbed are you using to scan those 35mm frames Brendan? My old Minolta 5400 is getting creaky and my Epson 3200 is just underwhelming.
|
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
Edit
Reply
Quote
[Re: 