Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home page

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu.... uh, User

Other >> Science of Astronomy & Space Exploration

Pages: 1
Mike Casey

****

Reged: 11/11/04
Posts: 6262
Loc: Duh...
Back to the Moon new
      #3170627 - 06/18/09 10:46 PM

NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter and Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Spacecraft are on their way to the moon atop an Atlas V rocket.

Finally, we go back to the Moon.

--------------------
Mike (tVA)


Is the question “What is an example of a question which is not its own answer?” its own answer?



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Mike Casey

****

Reged: 11/11/04
Posts: 6262
Loc: Duh...
Re: Back to the Moon [Re: Mike Casey]
      #3197016 - 07/03/09 12:26 PM

Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has transmitted its first images since reaching the moon on June 23.

--------------------
Mike (tVA)


Is the question “What is an example of a question which is not its own answer?” its own answer?



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Dr Morbius
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 02/06/07
Posts: 1717
Re: Back to the Moon new [Re: Mike Casey]
      #3221704 - 07/16/09 03:02 PM

I envisioned back in 1968 that space research and exploration would keep up like the movie 2001 A Space Odyssey and we would have a few moon bases by now, at least. I've always blamed the politicians for being shortsighted, but I wonder if there's another reason we've become stagnated in manned space exploration?

--------------------
Meade ETX-125
NightFire 6" f/8 Refractor with Moonlite focuser
Meade 14" LX200 S/C
D&G 10" f/15 Refractor with Parallax Mount
Little Giant 11x70mm Binos
I'm afraid of dying, but I've learned to live with it. ......Steve Perry


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Matthew Ota
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 04/30/05
Posts: 970
Loc: New England
Re: Back to the Moon new [Re: Dr Morbius]
      #3222308 - 07/16/09 08:37 PM

Jim Oberg has a great take on the reason here Jim Oberg MSNBC. There is just a lack of political will.

Edited by Matthew Ota (07/16/09 08:38 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rick Woods
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/27/05
Posts: 5572
Loc: Inner Solar System
Re: Back to the Moon new [Re: Dr Morbius]
      #3227979 - 07/20/09 08:44 AM

Quote:

I envisioned back in 1968 that space research and exploration would keep up like the movie 2001 A Space Odyssey and we would have a few moon bases by now, at least. I've always blamed the politicians for being shortsighted, but I wonder if there's another reason we've become stagnated in manned space exploration?



What are you suggesting?

--------------------
- Rick
14" LX200GPS
83% of all statistics are meaningless.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Charl
member


Reged: 02/08/07
Posts: 81
Loc: Hants, UK
Re: Back to the Moon new [Re: Rick Woods]
      #3233067 - 07/22/09 08:00 PM

Manned space exploration is as pointless now as it was forty years ago. I hope the new administration puts a quick end to it and redirects the funds towards unmanned exploration of the solar system. I really don't want to look at pictures of footprints in the dust for the rest of my life.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Scott Horstman
Vendor- Backyard Observatories
*****

Reged: 03/11/04
Posts: 8053
Loc: Lodi, Ohio, USA
Re: Back to the Moon new [Re: Charl]
      #3245159 - 07/29/09 04:31 PM

True we can't afford to go. Worse than that, we can't afford not to.
I'd like to see a resurgence of the "can do" attitude that we once had.

--------------------
Scott.

My Gallery
www.backyardobservatories.com
www.m1OASYS.com



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ColoHank
sage
*****

Reged: 06/07/07
Posts: 481
Loc: western Colorado
Re: Back to the Moon new [Re: Scott Horstman]
      #3245209 - 07/29/09 04:59 PM

Space exploration is just one of many things that machines can do better, cheaper and more safely than humans. Using imagination to identify research needs and designing and building machines to address those needs is an area where humans excel. Let's do what we do best and let our machines accept the risks involved in visiting hostile lunar and planetary environments.

--------------------
---------------------
Questar 3.5 standard - pyrex and BB coatings
Powerguide II
8mm, 12mm, 16mm, 24mm and 32mm Brandons
modified Bogen 3030 w/ homebuilt wedge
Homebuilt Galileo scope
other odds and ends, including iPod Touch with StarMap Pro (what a marvelous combo)...
---------------------
"Nothing exists but atoms and empty space. Everything else is opinion."
Titus Lucretius Carus 99-55 B.C.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rick Woods
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 01/27/05
Posts: 5572
Loc: Inner Solar System
Re: Back to the Moon new [Re: Charl]
      #3245213 - 07/29/09 05:03 PM

Quote:

Manned space exploration is as pointless now as it was forty years ago. I hope the new administration puts a quick end to it and redirects the funds towards unmanned exploration of the solar system. I really don't want to look at pictures of footprints in the dust for the rest of my life.



While I suspect you're just trying to stir things up, I'd like to reply anyway.
The "pointlessness" is really subjective: on one hand, our lives won't really change that much in a tangible way simply because of manned space shots; but on the other hand, a man on Mars or the Moon would accomplish far more in a month than any possible robotic craft could in its longest conceivable lifetime. Why? Flexibility and on-the-spot decision making capability. This is an obvious point.

The slightly less obvious one is, the advances in technology that are forced by such extreme enterprises. These always produce new products that end up in the consumer market, making life a little better for us all. In addition, there are the tens of thousands of people in the aerospace industry who are gainfully employed, paying taxes, supporting their communities, and educating their children, as a result of these projects.

So yes, there's not much point in another footprints-and-flags mission to the Moon in and of itself. But it could be the start of something much bigger and better. That's what I'm hoping for.

And finally, nobody's actually insisting that you look at pictures of footprints. You can look at anything you like.

--------------------
- Rick
14" LX200GPS
83% of all statistics are meaningless.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Scott Horstman
Vendor- Backyard Observatories
*****

Reged: 03/11/04
Posts: 8053
Loc: Lodi, Ohio, USA
Re: Back to the Moon new [Re: ColoHank]
      #3245215 - 07/29/09 05:05 PM

A combination of the two is needed.

--------------------
Scott.

My Gallery
www.backyardobservatories.com
www.m1OASYS.com



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Mike Casey

****

Reged: 11/11/04
Posts: 6262
Loc: Duh...
Re: Back to the Moon new [Re: Scott Horstman]
      #3249854 - 08/01/09 01:05 AM

And finding and making a new home for the human race somewhere out there just might save our bacon someday, too.

--------------------
Mike (tVA)


Is the question “What is an example of a question which is not its own answer?” its own answer?



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Scott Horstman
Vendor- Backyard Observatories
*****

Reged: 03/11/04
Posts: 8053
Loc: Lodi, Ohio, USA
Re: Back to the Moon new [Re: Mike Casey]
      #3250031 - 08/01/09 05:38 AM

Quote:

And finding and making a new home for the human race somewhere out there just might save our bacon someday, too.




When we agree we agree Mike. web page

--------------------
Scott.

My Gallery
www.backyardobservatories.com
www.m1OASYS.com



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
llanitedaveModerator
Humble Megalomaniac
*****

Reged: 09/26/05
Posts: 12885
Loc: Amargosa Valley, NV, USA
Re: Back to the Moon new [Re: Scott Horstman]
      #3250913 - 08/01/09 06:17 PM

Efficiency and cost-effectiveness may be the best way to exploit current resources, but that value will never procure abundant new resources for us.

I'm all for robotic space exploration, but that is best used as a prelude and a compliment to the human presence, not a substitute for it.

--------------------
"Since the process of science generates more mysteries than it solves, I predict that we'll never learn everything: and we'll continue to generate new ignorance at the speed of knowledge."



"S.O.E." (Sauron's Other Eye), with 16" Royce conical mirror: A permanent work in progress.
10" Homebuilt dob, old Coulter mirror

Under Construction: The "Eye of Sauron" Observatory!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
MMICKELSAdministrator
Aluminum Knight
*****

Reged: 01/20/04
Posts: 27614
Loc: The Land of Shake and Bake
Re: Back to the Moon new [Re: llanitedave]
      #3252701 - 08/02/09 05:15 PM

We are already planning for a manned Moon mission. Hopefully we will learn a thing or two while we're there and be able to build on that knowledge. I recently met the head propulsion engineer for the first stage of the manned rocket for the project. I wish I could have spent more time with him and picked his brain a bit more. Nice guy Jaime.

--------------------
Mark

"Never eat more than you can lift"

Miss Piggy






Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Scott Horstman
Vendor- Backyard Observatories
*****

Reged: 03/11/04
Posts: 8053
Loc: Lodi, Ohio, USA
Re: Back to the Moon new [Re: llanitedave]
      #3260615 - 08/08/09 02:41 AM

Spot on Dave. If it's not a pre curser for us going there then why bother.

Mark that sounds like a cool gathering. Wish you got to talk more to Jaime.

We had a chance to have some beers wih Jack Shaw, who headed up the last Hubble mission, at NEAF a couple years ago. Man did he have some great tales about when he was on the Apollo team too.

We just built an observatory for a fellow in NH who was a mathematician doing orbital mechanics for the Apollo missions and had a pretty big roll in getting Apollo 13 home.

He was pretty mad still that the tank that blew out was a reject from Apollo 8 that they new they had problems with.

Go figure.

--------------------
Scott.

My Gallery
www.backyardobservatories.com
www.m1OASYS.com



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1


Extra information
2 registered and 0 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  LivingNDixie, llanitedave 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 501

Jump to

CN Forums Home



Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics