Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums
Privacy Policy |
Please read our Terms
of Service | Signup and
Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu.... uh, User
NGC 4565
member
Reged: 09/11/07
Posts: 81
Loc: Oakland, Ca
|
|
As has been previosly written here, a small group of us headed to Deep Sky Ranch last Saturday, August 15. I decided to work on Hickson Compact Galaxy groups this night as I've snagged just about all the Herschel 2500's that were in a good position.
I was armed with an 18" old school Obsession, a Tom O. eq platform, Alvin Huey's Hickson book and clear dark skies. I managed four new Hickson groups along with the obligatory eye candy. Most groups were observed at 412x.
Hickson 72 in Bootes. There are 6 members to this group and I managed 3. MCG +3-38-17 is labeled as Hickson A and it was just a dim round glow. MCG +3-38-20 is part of a double galaxy. These two are VERY close together and I never managed to split them. 72C is MCG +3-38-22 and is the brightest at mag 15.8.
Hickson 73 also in Bootes. I managed two members. NGC 5829 at mag 13.9 was large, round and dim. Near a mag 12 star. IC 4526 is mag 16.6 and was a small round glow that popped in and out. There are three other members that are dimmer than mag. 17.5.
Hickson 84 in Ursa Minor was a challenge. I saw two members clearly CGCG 355-20a and PGC 58873 at mags 15.4 and 16.5. PGC 58884 and PGC 58861 popped in a out. They were mags 16.2 and 17.2. Components E and F were not seen.
Hickson 100 is in Pegasus. I managed good sightings of NGC 7803 mag. 14.1 and Mkn 934 at 15.3. 7803 was bright for a Hickson and was large and a bit elongated. Mkn 934 was a large ghostly glow. I caught glimpses of MCG +2-1-9 at 15.9 and MCG +2-1-10 at 16.6, but never was able to hold them.
One highlight of the night was the Egg nebulae. It doesn't look anything like the CCD images I've seen on the web, but it showed a rectangular shape bisected by a dark lane. One side was definitely brighter than the other. It took magnification well and I put in a 2x barlow and a 5mm Nagler for 824x. You can do that when you're using a driven scope.
The other highlight was NGC 246 in Cetus. We first observed it in Dobzilla, the 33" scope that lives at Deep Sky Ranch, and then I found it in my scope. I used an NPB filter and a 12 Nagler for a great view. The last time I observed this object was about 10 years ago in a 10" scope. It's a planetary nebulae imbedded in a group of stars. It's very large, fairly bright and shows rings similar to the Helix. Put this one on your list for the next time you're out.
Heading out tomorrow for two more nights of observing at Plettstone.
Richard Navarrete
-------------------- Richard Navarrete
18" Obsession
TV 101
|
Dain
Carpal Tunnel
   
Reged: 03/24/05
Posts: 1596
Loc: N.Y. Adirondack Mnts. NGC 4565...
|
|
Richard,
Excellent observing right there! Imma-get me-summa-dem sometime too! I'll be on the look-out for NGC 246. There is alot of EG to explore down there in Cetus as well. Thanks for the good reading.
Clear Skies to you All!
-------------------- Best,
Dain
Adirondack Mountains (my true dark sky site)
@ Cedar River Flow
Local Site
Clear Skies?
|
NGC 4565
member
Reged: 09/11/07
Posts: 81
Loc: Oakland, Ca
|
|
Thanks, Dain. I forgot to mention that at about 100x you can also get NGC 255 in the field with NGC 246. 255 is a mag 12.4 galaxy. Here's an image from the Hawaiian Astronomical society web page that shows both.
http://www.hawastsoc.org/deepsky/images/cet/ngc246.jpg
-------------------- Richard Navarrete
18" Obsession
TV 101
|
Jeff Young
Post Laureate
   
Reged: 08/04/05
Posts: 4112
Loc: Ireland
|
|
Nice report, Richard.
I've logged a few of the brighter Hicksons (44, 68 and 92), but I have yet to go for any of the more challenging ones. (You know you're in trouble when the group doesn't have any IC members, much less NGC ones. )
I have fond memories of the PN though:
Quote:
NGC246 10/17/2007 22:21 UT; Pickering 7, NELM 5.5, SQM 20.5 16" SCT
Large, with very low surface brightness (in fact, completely invisible without filtration). Doesn't respond well to anything above 175x, and best down at 125x. Pretty much requires at least UHC, but OIII even better.
Shape a bit oblong on E-W axis. Outside edge brighter, most notably to W, but also to a lesser (and thicker) extent to N through NE. Prominent central star, with a second foreground star to SW, a bit over 1/2 way to the rim. Another foreground star just outside outer rim to NW.
Cheers, -- Jeff.
-------------------- Nikon 18x70s / UA Millennium Colorado:
Solarscope SF70 / TV Pronto / AP400QMD Coronado SolarMax40 DS / Bogen 055+3130
APM MC1610 / Tak FC-100 / AP1200GTO Tak Mewlon 250 / AP600EGTO
|
|
2 registered and 1 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
Moderator: Olivier Biot
Print Thread
|
Forum Permissions
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled
UBBCode is enabled
|
Thread views: 165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|