Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home page
   ˇ Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt ˇ Submit a Review / Article   

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu.... uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Classic Telescopes

Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)
Protheus
Vaguely offended
*****

Reged: 09/01/07
Posts: 5067
Loc: Illinois, US
Re: Celestron C90 Astro questions new [Re: memento]
      #2620445 - 09/03/08 01:08 AM

Quote:


@ Chris - if I just throw in a .5x focal reducer, that would not improve the maximum field of view? I think I would again see the black corners with the wider eyepieces....




It wouldn't (couldn't) do much, but I suspect it might do something. If you had one, it would be worth a try. If you don't (and don't want one), I'm not sure I can really recommend just running out and buying one with the hope that it will fix this particular problem...

Chris

--------------------
"To tread the sharp edge of a sword;
to run on smooth-frozen ice,
one needs no footsteps to follow..."

"Well, people sometimes ask me 'how did you get involved in astronomy?' I said 'I got born, what's your problem?'" -- John Dobson

"In discussing the large-scale structure of the cosmos, astronomers sometimes say that space is curved, or that the universe is finite but unbounded. Whatever are they talking about?" -- Carl Sagan


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
memento
member


Reged: 08/19/08
Posts: 27
Loc: 51N 7E
Re: Celestron C90 Astro questions new [Re: Protheus]
      #2625900 - 09/05/08 04:28 PM Attachment (18 downloads)

no, I haven't got a reducer on hand... sadly.

Judging on what I've seen through the various eyepieces, I think I'll either get a good 25 mm Plössl or a Baader eudiascopic eyepiece (the Baader is supposedly identical to the Celestron Ultima ED) with 25 or 30 mm for low magnification.

In the meantime, I've designed a platform that mounts under the C90 Astro base so I can attach it with my Manfrotto tripod. It will be machined in CNC from 8 mm (1/3") aluminum. The grey area in the drawing is where the scope will go, the holes are either to save weight or to put 1 1/4" eyepieces in.

I hope it will turn out well

--------------------
Celestron C90 Astro
Meade 2080 LX3


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Protheus
Vaguely offended
*****

Reged: 09/01/07
Posts: 5067
Loc: Illinois, US
Re: Celestron C90 Astro questions new [Re: memento]
      #2626046 - 09/05/08 05:46 PM

Good luck with it. The dovetail adapter I had to cook up for my similar Meade (which has a single 1/4" 20 camera-tripod style attachment point) was not nearly so complicated, and I was able to just get some parts from the hardware store for it. This should be cool.

Chris

--------------------
"To tread the sharp edge of a sword;
to run on smooth-frozen ice,
one needs no footsteps to follow..."

"Well, people sometimes ask me 'how did you get involved in astronomy?' I said 'I got born, what's your problem?'" -- John Dobson

"In discussing the large-scale structure of the cosmos, astronomers sometimes say that space is curved, or that the universe is finite but unbounded. Whatever are they talking about?" -- Carl Sagan


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
memento
member


Reged: 08/19/08
Posts: 27
Loc: 51N 7E
Re: Celestron C90 Astro questions new [Re: Protheus]
      #2626058 - 09/05/08 05:57 PM

I admit I got a bit away with it when I designed this adapter .... but the guy who does the CNC work said it would be good this way

I just sold my Meade ETX, the buyer will collect it tomorrow locally. Also a little 76 mm Newton that I once got from a friend will go these days.

Could be just the right time to start thinking for the next scope to complement the C90 Astro ...

--------------------
Celestron C90 Astro
Meade 2080 LX3


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
memento
member


Reged: 08/19/08
Posts: 27
Loc: 51N 7E
Re: Celestron C90 Astro questions new [Re: memento]
      #2647160 - 09/17/08 08:37 AM

Hi everyone,

now I got a Televue Plössl 25 mm ep. The trouble is, even with this moderate eyepiece (approx. 50deg apparent fov) the scope exhibits vignetting at the edge. The rest of the image is superb but the vignetting somehow just disturbs the viewing experience.

25 mm means approx. 40x magnification, with 50deg this is a true fov of about 1.25deg which really shouldn't be too much for this type of scope?

Did anyone ever successfully solve this?

Second question: The front tube of the scope is secured with three allen screws. What size are they? 1/16" ? I am asking because I have to mail order inch-sized allen tools over here, as we have everything with metric measures, and I don't waht to order any tool that wouldn't fit.

Thanks,
Thomas

--------------------
Celestron C90 Astro
Meade 2080 LX3


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
memento
member


Reged: 08/19/08
Posts: 27
Loc: 51N 7E
Re: Celestron C90 Astro questions new [Re: memento]
      #3416716 - 10/28/09 06:55 PM

Hi everyone,

it's been a year after that last post and I just want to update this thread because in the last days, I've fallen in love with the C90 again

I find myself enjoying it much more in its "original" form, that is with an old quality 0.96" star diagonal and the old eyepieces, than with the 1 1/4" newer eyepieces that I thought so much of in this thread.

The 1 1/4" eyepieces are still there and accompany my newer toy that I bought in the meantime (Meade 2080). Probably having a second, much bigger and somewhat more "state-of-the-art" scope also made me see the C90 with clearer eyes, as what it is:

It is a little vintage telescope that works best with its vintage eyepieces. For whatever reason there might be (I did not take the scope ever apart to find out), the view through the original Celestron 40 mm 0.96" eyepiece (30 deg apparent fov - approx. 1.2 deg true fow) is absolutely perfect right to the edge, while all my trials with those 1 1/4" eyepieces that should give the same true fow turned out to be somewhat compromised at the very edge of the image. So be it...!

The small apparent fov of the longer eyepieces is just something that adds this certain "classic" atmosphere to any viewing experience with the C90 - while I found it even somewhat boring to use newer 1 1/4" eyepieces with it! It's a bit like having a classic car with a tuned engine and modern seats and at some day to realise that you've somehow spoiled the purity of the original.... (of course no pun intended to people who modify their scopes and their cars - its just that for me and the C90, this didn't work out !)

Probably that sounds strange and no one can understand what I mean! But probably it just shows I should think of another quirky old little telescope to accompany the C90. Now if these Zeiss Telementors would not be that freaking expensive....

regards,
Thomas


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mwedel
super member
*****

Reged: 12/16/07
Posts: 183
Loc: Claremont, CA
Re: Celestron C90 Astro questions new [Re: memento]
      #3416748 - 10/28/09 07:10 PM

Cool! I think it's awesome that you're loving the scope and that you rehabilitated the thread.

I've always been curious about the C90 and I'm pleased to say that I've got one coming in the mail, thanks to CNC. The new scope curse has already struck--last night our club had a moon party and got totally clouded out. I hope that's all the weather gods have to throw at me, but I've been doing this long enough to be cautious!

I have come to terms with the fact that I am a nut for small Maks. I've owned four between 70mm and 105mm. My favorite of the lot, and probably my favorite telescope of all time, is my Orion Apex 90. I got it to serve as a grab-n-go and travel scope, and it does, but it also fills a larger and even more important role: it's my no excuses telescope. It is so small and so trivially easy to set up and gives such good views that I don't stop and think about whether I should take it along on a trip or whether I should haul it out to look at the moon on a nice evening. I just do. No excuses!

I have bigger scopes and use them, too. They just don't have the same indefinable appeal. Sounds like you feel something similar for your C90.

--------------------
Orion XT6 "Shaft"
Little Maks: Orion Apex 90, Celestron orange tube C90, Synta MC90
Edmund Astroscan "Baby Red"
76mm ongoing ATM experiment
Celestron UpClose 10x50
Celestron SkyMaster 15x70

10 Minute Astronomy


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Erik Bakker
professor emeritus


Reged: 08/10/06
Posts: 532
Loc: Haren, The Netherlands, Europe
Re: Celestron C90 Astro questions new [Re: dougspeterson]
      #3416757 - 10/28/09 07:15 PM

Quote:

Watch out for vignetting with a 2" diagonal, I already learned that the F6.3 compressor for the bigger SCTs stops down the aperture. You can check for this by focusing a high powered eyepiece, then look thru the front end and see if the tiny exit pupil disappears off axis before your line of site moves off the edge of the corrector.




Agreed. The C90 cannot possibly illumimate a 2" ocular. Stick to 1 1/4' and try what suits your needs best: something around 25mm or 32mm, both of which may show some vignetting depending on the particular design of the eyepiece. In most cases, a Plossl or Ortho will work best.

CS,

Erik

--------------------
Visual astronomer, main instruments:

Fully mounted Questar 7 P-BB

Celestron C 102F f/8.8 fluorite
Vixen FL 70S f/8 fluorite
Celestron C 55F f/8 fluorite

Sets of Zeiss, TeleVue and Brandon eyepieces

Zeiss 7x50 Marine B/GA

Zeiss TM german equatorial
Gitzo 224 with Manfrotto 501 fluid head
Unitron alt-az mount



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
memento
member


Reged: 08/19/08
Posts: 27
Loc: 51N 7E
Re: Celestron C90 Astro questions new [Re: Erik Bakker]
      #3417658 - 10/29/09 06:21 AM

Quote:

Agreed. The C90 cannot possibly illumimate a 2" ocular. Stick to 1 1/4' and try what suits your needs best: something around 25mm or 32mm, both of which may show some vignetting depending on the particular design of the eyepiece. In most cases, a Plossl or Ortho will work best.




Hi Erik,

yes 2" is not possible at all with the C90. (BTW, the russian MTO 10/1000 Maksutovs work fairly well with some 2" eyepieces, there are even some commercial 2" adapters available. The MTO also can be used with a full-size 35mm camera while the C90 will not cover the corners of the 35mm frame.)

My C90 would not 100% illuminate even the TeleVue 25 mm Plössl. And although it's not exactly a "big" eyepiece, even this and the 1 1/4" diagonal already spoil the counterbalance of this small scope.

As I said, I have stopped using any 1 1/4" eyepieces with it anyway and now enjoy it much more with the original 0.96s

CS
Thomas

--------------------
Celestron C90 Astro
Meade 2080 LX3


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
memento
member


Reged: 08/19/08
Posts: 27
Loc: 51N 7E
Re: Celestron C90 Astro questions new [Re: mwedel]
      #3417690 - 10/29/09 06:57 AM Attachment (8 downloads)

Hello,

Quote:

I have come to terms with the fact that I am a nut for small Maks. I've owned four between 70mm and 105mm. My favorite of the lot, and probably my favorite telescope of all time, is my Orion Apex 90. I got it to serve as a grab-n-go and travel scope, and it does, but it also fills a larger and even more important role: it's my no excuses telescope. It is so small and so trivially easy to set up and gives such good views that I don't stop and think about whether I should take it along on a trip or whether I should haul it out to look at the moon on a nice evening. I just do. No excuses!

I have bigger scopes and use them, too. They just don't have the same indefinable appeal. Sounds like you feel something similar for your C90.




yes, you sum up everything that I like of my C90. It was a youth's dream anyway. Back in the 80s all these scopes were totally out of reach for me, at the time I had a small (also nice, of course) 60/800 Vixen refractor. I also always liked the Meade 2044 when it came out - but later I learned that the optics have a rather mixed reputation, anyway the C90 is even smaller and more classic in design and operation. I LOVE that C90 fork mount, its a beautiful design and offers very smooth operation, there is really nothing I find to complain about after one year ownershop.

The whole scope just feels like it is a quality scale model of a real big classic observatory. It takes you back to the 70s or even 60s in apperance and operation. This is totally different to the Meade ETX90 that I owned previously. The ETX hat rather better optics (but does that really matter? I'm not using it above 80x or so anyway...) and the ETX worked also much better with 1 1/4" eyepieces as it was designed for that in the first place. But the feel of the whole assembly was - to me - not "quality" at all. I might end up buying another ETX90 when I find a computerised version for a real bargain price at some time - the ETX is then such a different experience to the C90, and in my opinion it is a future 1990s classic in it's own right, that I might give it a second try.

What I now like so much about the old little eyepieces, is their quality feel: It's not the "wow, this is the best you can ever have, cost no object at all" quality of a Nagler. But it's more a "we know it's small, it has limited technical data, but still we want to make it high quality" approach that shines through with these old eyepieces.

Now I have the original (i.e. Vixen or Celestron) 25 mm, 20 mm, 18 mm eyepieces, after some time I now also sourced the 40 mm Celestron, I will then need the 30 and 12 mm, probably the 9 mm as well, to have a complete collection. The even higher magnifications I personally find not so important with this scope. Also, classic feelings aside, the eye relief with say a 6 mm ortho is really not so nice for me. We have a 6 mm and 9 mm Vixen ortho (1 1/4") and I really dislike using the 6 mm, no matter how classic it might be while the 9 mm is still somewhat okay.

The photo attached shows both my 90s, back when I still owned the ETX.

CS
Thomas


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mwedel
super member
*****

Reged: 12/16/07
Posts: 183
Loc: Claremont, CA
Re: Celestron C90 Astro questions new [Re: memento]
      #3419625 - 10/30/09 05:49 AM

Nice photo!

My C90 arrived today, and I got in a little driveway birding with it this afternoon, and then the moon, Jupiter, and Pleiades this evening. It's a lovely little scope. I see what you mean about the old-fashioned feel of the thing. It's small but dense, almost all metal. Optics are great. Charm is unquantifiable.

My Apex 90 will now have a run for its money as my grab-n-go and travel scope. The C90 beats it in two important areas: it's even smaller (and I don't have to explain the appeal of that, right? ), and at f/11 it has a slightly larger field of view than the f/13.9 Apex. Doesn't sound like much, but I can get all of the Pleiades together in the C90, which I've never managed with the Apex.

So glad I finally got one!

--------------------
Orion XT6 "Shaft"
Little Maks: Orion Apex 90, Celestron orange tube C90, Synta MC90
Edmund Astroscan "Baby Red"
76mm ongoing ATM experiment
Celestron UpClose 10x50
Celestron SkyMaster 15x70

10 Minute Astronomy


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
memento
member


Reged: 08/19/08
Posts: 27
Loc: 51N 7E
Re: Celestron C90 Astro questions new [Re: mwedel]
      #3419667 - 10/30/09 06:50 AM

Congratulations to your new toy and great to hear that you already had the initial first looks through it! But, as you said, having a scope SO portable there is no excuse at all to NOT using it

Sometimes I even use the C90 from my bedside table, when the moon is visible through the window. I personally find it even aesthetically nice in that place but not everyone would agree to this, I fear

What kind of eyepieces did yours come with, especially which one is the one where the whole pleiades would fit in?

--------------------
Celestron C90 Astro
Meade 2080 LX3


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mwedel
super member
*****

Reged: 12/16/07
Posts: 183
Loc: Claremont, CA
Re: Celestron C90 Astro questions new [Re: memento]
      #3420240 - 10/30/09 01:44 PM

Quote:

What kind of eyepieces did yours come with, especially which one is the one where the whole pleiades would fit in?




Mine came with a mirror star diagonal and 30mm and 18mm Kellners. I'm pretty sure they were part of the original kit, because all three fit in a box with a styrofoam insert. The whole rig came in a nice foam-lined hardcase...gone are the days when something like that was included gratis!

With the 30mm EP I can just barely get all of the Pleiades in. I like both of the little eyepieces, they are a bit dated by today's standards but like you said, the quality is evident. Time to hunt down some more focal lengths, methinks.

I like the idea of a telescope on the bedside table. With the whole mini-observatory vibe the C90 gives off, I'm sure it looks great. Unfortunately all I can see out my bedroom window is trees. But trees have birds and squirrels, and I'm having fun with the C90 as a daytime spotter, too. Not from the bed, though!

As you might have guessed from my comments above, I have been on a quest to find the smallest, most portable telescope with good optics and mechanics. I like long f/l scopes and I've always been drawn to Maks. I started out with an Orion 102mm, then got the 90mm (as Ed Ting wrote, "because it was there") and decided I liked it better. In exchange for giving up 10% of the aperture I also got rid of 10% of the length and close to 20% of the weight.

For a long time the Apex 90 has been my optimum. I tried a Celestron C70 spotting scope, but the views were too dim and the mechanics were rough (other samples may be better). I tried a Synta MC90, a weird little f/5 Mak also sold by Omcon and Orion, but the views were soft. The C90 was about the only thing smaller (well, shorter, anyway) than the Apex 90 that I hadn't tried.

One of my fellow club members has a fully equipped Questar 3.5 that he brings to public outreach events. It's a sweet scope for sure, but going head-to-head against the Apex 90 I didn't see any differences. Saying so might bring down fire and brimstone from Questar devotees , and I happily admit that other samples of both scopes might have yielded different results. The point is that optically I don't feel like I am giving anything up with the Apex 90. I'll be curious to compare things over the long haul, but so far the C90 seems the equal of the Apex. The shorter f/l gives a wider field but doesn't seem to affect image quality, which I guess makes sense: f/11 is still pretty darn long.

Nice to chat with someone who shares my obsession!

--------------------
Orion XT6 "Shaft"
Little Maks: Orion Apex 90, Celestron orange tube C90, Synta MC90
Edmund Astroscan "Baby Red"
76mm ongoing ATM experiment
Celestron UpClose 10x50
Celestron SkyMaster 15x70

10 Minute Astronomy


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
GlennLeDrew
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 06/18/08
Posts: 1267
Loc: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Re: Celestron C90 Astro questions new [Re: mwedel]
      #3421077 - 10/30/09 10:40 PM

How to minimize vignetting, and other concerns.

Install the available adapter collar which allows to use 1-1/4" accessories. If a 0.965" diagonal is used (commonly inserted directly into the baffle tube), the even sub-24.5mm diameter barrel only further restricts the available field.

The adapter ring also places the now-larger diagonal *farther* back behind the baffle opening. This further de-focuses this small opening, thus making the resulting vignetting less sharp and concomitantly less obtrusive.

About the approx. 15mm diameter plastic baffle on the innermost end of the baffle tube. It is there to block non-image forming light which would otherwise directly fall on the image surface. Even so, if you remove any accessories and look into the rear baffle opening at an extreme angle, you may see a small sliver of light passing directly through the front corrector. This light can actually reach the corners of a 35mm film frame. But in normal use, where the diagonal and eyepiece field stop diameters are more restricted, this is not a problem. That plastic part is there only because the C90 doesn't use a *tapered* baffle tube as is found on high-end Mak-cass 'scopes--it's a cheap 'n easy alternative.

--------------------
Home-made 11X50 right angle bino, 8.1 deg. FOV
Modified 26X100 bino, 3.5 deg. FOV
Home-made Mk II RA bino, using interchangeable objectives and eyepieces

My Gallery

Mediocre minds discuss people. Good minds discuss events. Great minds discuss ideas.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
memento
member


Reged: 08/19/08
Posts: 27
Loc: 51N 7E
Re: Celestron C90 Astro questions new [Re: GlennLeDrew]
      #3421746 - 10/31/09 12:03 PM

Hello Glenn,

thanks for your information. This is very valuable for me.

Probably I will, at some point, also collect a glossy black C90 as they were sold in the later 80s which as far as I know came standard with 1 1/4" eyepieces? And then try again the 1 1/4" eyepieces.

regards
Thomas

--------------------
Celestron C90 Astro
Meade 2080 LX3


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
memento
member


Reged: 08/19/08
Posts: 27
Loc: 51N 7E
Re: Celestron C90 Astro questions [Re: mwedel]
      #3425304 - 11/02/09 11:08 AM

Quote:

Mine came with a mirror star diagonal and 30mm and 18mm Kellners. I'm pretty sure they were part of the original kit, because all three fit in a box with a styrofoam insert. The whole rig came in a nice foam-lined hardcase...gone are the days when something like that was included gratis!




now you mention it: My C90 also came with a black hardcase. I don't know for sure that it's original.

I am now offered a pair of 18 mm 0.96" Vixen orthoscopic eyepieces. (The Celestron 18 mm that came with my scope is a Kellner.)

As I now could have *two* identical 18 mm Orthos, I'm wondering how the C90 would do with a binoviewer....... ?

--------------------
Celestron C90 Astro
Meade 2080 LX3


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DiffractionRings
newbie


Reged: 08/06/09
Posts: 2
Re: Celestron C90 Astro questions new [Re: memento]
      #3463600 - 11/23/09 09:44 AM

Another C90 appreciater here(rummage sale find). This one is black, all metal except big rubber focusing ring. I think it has a .965" to 1.25" mirror diagonal, and came with a Olympus stereo microscope eyepiece 10x that does surprisingly well, someone said it would be a 25mm equivalent ('tho it had a "23" engraved on it, along with the 10x) so mag. would be about 40x.

I didn't notice vignetting, but don't know how to identify it in a telescope (I am familiar with it in photography).

So, I want it as a birding spotting scope and very informal astronomy scope - two young and interested daughters (mags of about 35 and 60 or so, 2 different eyepieces), so can the experts here suggest what other eyepieces I should consider? I only have $35.00 into it, but its in very good shape, so used market, and a good match to the older C90 with the 1000mm f11 focal length?

Should I really try to track down the large aperture adapter collar, a true 1.25" mirror diagonal to replace the hybrid diagonal, to avoid vignetting? Thanks!

Bruce


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
RLTYSModerator
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 12/18/04
Posts: 2149
Loc: New York (Long Island)
Re: Celestron C90 Astro questions new [Re: DiffractionRings]
      #3465246 - 11/24/09 06:41 AM

DiffractionRings

Welcome to the Cloudy Nights Classic Telescope Forum. I'm sure you'll get the info you need here.

Rich (RLTYS)

--------------------
10" F4.8 Refl.
4" F5 Refr. (Genesis)
3" F4 Celestron FirstScope
50mm F12 Refr. (Tasco #6TE-5)
12x63 and 10x50 Binoculars.

"I want to do more then just look."


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
albert1
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 01/01/07
Posts: 1369
Loc: Northern New Jersey
Re: Celestron C90 Astro questions new [Re: RLTYS]
      #3465548 - 11/24/09 10:31 AM Attachment (0 downloads)

C-90 on the juice. Just couldn't enjoy the helical focuser so I added a SCT focuser and now I'm getting much more use out of this little guy. I almost had to bottom-out the helical focus ring but was happily surprised it comes to focus on all EP's I've used. It's nice to see other folks are still enjoying this vintage "built like a tank" scope.

--------------------
Albert

1 Great 'ole Newt
4 Good 'ole Newts
2 Great 'ole Cats
1 Lousy 'ole Newt
One of these days I'll try a Refractor better than my 90mm finderscope



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)


Extra information
9 registered and 7 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  RLTYS, Glassthrower, Clive Gibbons 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 1666

Jump to

CN Forums Home



Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics