Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums
Privacy Policy |
Please read our Terms
of Service | Signup and
Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu.... uh, User
Mark9473
Post Laureate
   
Reged: 07/21/05
Posts: 3204
Loc: 51°N 4°E
|
|
What to expect from a 55 euro binocular that's right at the minimum spec for astronomy use - some would even say below spec. Well, not that much really, let's be honest. If that is your mind-set - and it certainly is mine - then you would be very pleased with the Nikon Action 7x35.
First impressions count as much as anything, and the Action certainly scores in this regard. Good solid build quality, nice to look at as well as through, good feel in the hands (though rather small). In daylight, colours are vibrant, contrast is good, depth of field is phenomenal, center sharpness is impeccable.
In twilight I thought the image was perhaps not as bright as I was expecting, so possibly the light transmission is not top notch. But without actually comparing to a better binocular, I can't know for sure. When it got dark I didn't notice this anymore.
The real bonus of a 7x35 binocular is of course the large TFOV. It spans from gamma to delta Aquila (9°06') or from epsilon to gamma UMa (8°56'), in both cases with a slight margin. The Lyra stick figure entirely fits in the FOV, and with Corona Borealis there's even a nice margin around it. I can just get the 4 stars making up the center Keystone of Hercules, into one view.
For starhopping or for finding things you can't precisely pinpoint, the wide FOV is great. For example, this evening we had three Iridium flares within 20 minutes, all "a bit to the lower right" of Arcturus, less than 10° above the horizon so with very few field stars. The Action 7x35 did admirably on this task.
Stars in the center of the FOV are nice and sharp, without gross aberrations. Jupiter's moons were easily seen (even one that was less than a jovian diameter away from the planet) and the planet itself was a relatively tight clean disk - of course, small. The nearly full Moon was also impressively sharp, and showed very good contrast. Towards the edges it deteriorates pretty quickly, but I did get nu Draconis (63" separation, or 440" apparent) resolved out to about 75% from the center. That's pretty good really. Only in the outer 10% or so do you get significant "seagull" stars. The Moon isn't sharp in the outer 2° of the FOV, and when it touches the edge it is significantly flattened and shows a lot of chromatic aberration.
There's a relatively large area of sky around streetlights that can't be accessed due to flare or glare, and a have a lot of streetlights near my house, but other than that I am toally happy with the Nikon Action 7x35. I bought two, for my kids, but I guess they can manage to get by on sharing one between them.
-------------------- Mark
Leica 8x20; Vixen 8x42; Swift 8.5x44, 10x50 and 20x80; TS 7x50; Orion 15x63; Docter 15x60
WO Megrez II 80 FD + Baader 90° T2 Amici
|
KennyJ
   
Reged: 04/27/03
Posts: 12885
Loc: Lancashire UK
|
|
Thanks for that encouraging report , Mark .
My brother has used a Nikon Action 7 x 35 for watching cricket and occasional star gazing for over 20 years now and is in no great rush to upgrade it , even though when I once loaned him my Zeiss 7 x 42 " to watch a game of cricket " it was several weeks before he reluctantly handed it back ! :-)
I'm sure the model has been through a few changes in the 20 years since he bought his , but as you say , for the price they cost , one feels they are getting a lot !
Clear Skies Kenny
-------------------- If everyone is thinking the same thing , no-one is thinking - General George S.Patton
Zeiss 7 x 42 BGAT
Captain's Helmsman 7 x 50
Nikon 10 x 42 Superior E
Swift Audubon Kestrel 10 x 50
Helios 15 x 70 Observation
Strathspey 20 x 90
Televue 76 APO
Zeiss 85 Diascope
Helios 102 f5 refractor
Various eyepieces barlows tripods mounts etc.
Panasonic Lumix DMC - TZ5 digital camera
|
Mark9473
Post Laureate
   
Reged: 07/21/05
Posts: 3204
Loc: 51°N 4°E
|
|
Thanks Kenny. With clouds rushing in to cover the Moon, they created a colourful halo, which was very nicely framed in the 9+° FOV. My wife took a look through the binoculars and confirmed that "they are good", which for her is pretty high praise. Anyway, it's raining now, so no more playing with the new toy for now.
-------------------- Mark
Leica 8x20; Vixen 8x42; Swift 8.5x44, 10x50 and 20x80; TS 7x50; Orion 15x63; Docter 15x60
WO Megrez II 80 FD + Baader 90° T2 Amici
|
OpalescentNebula
super member
Reged: 01/11/07
Posts: 113
Loc: Calgary, Alberta, Observing so...
|
|
I also have the 7x35’s Nikon Action EX and enjoy them for sports. I also bought 2. For the daughter and my grandchildren. The 2 grandchildren use them beside me for viewing the night sky. For the price I feel the Nikon’s are worth it for the views that young eyes can see.
-------------------- Yours truly,
Bill
"Good friends are like stars...you don't always see them, but you know that they are always there" - unknown
Binos : various binos, Zeiss 10x42 FL, Garrett Optical 20x110
telescope: WO Megrez 110 ED
Eyepieces: 13mm Ethos, 5mm Pentax XO, 28mm WO & 2x Powermate
|
|
11 registered and 14 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
Moderator: EdZ
Print Thread
|
Forum Permissions
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled
UBBCode is enabled
|
Thread views: 154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|