Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums
Privacy Policy |
Please read our Terms
of Service | Signup and
Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu.... uh, User
Highland Sky
newbie
Reged: 11/05/09
Posts: 3
Loc: SW WA.state
|
|
Hi, I'm new to Astronomy. I got a cheap department store reflector and took it back! It was too long for me and shook like it was ill! Now I'm trying to educate myself before buying again. After allot of reading & learning my limits & wants, I've decided on a Catadioptric and I've narrowed my search down to two scopes. The AT8RC or Vixens VMC200L. I would appreciate any one weighing in on the AT8RC vs/ the VMC200L. Seems like the more I learn the less I know! I don't want a motorized goto mount yet. Thought about getting Vixens Porta 11. I want to invest in a scope I can do upgrades to and later get into astro photography & a motorized mount. I also need something light, around 20lbs a componet. Thanks!
|
RonBurgundy
sage
Reged: 06/16/09
Posts: 252
Loc: Philadelphia
|
|
I have never seen the VMC before. I would advise against the RC for visual purposes based on the really BIG obstruction. The VMC should be great for visuals; I like the open-tubed design for better cooling down. However, I would first recommend trying to find a club or visiting a star party or something since you're starting to learn about all this stuff. Ask around, take a look through some telescopes... You'll see what I mean. I'm not really into AP, but if you're looking into it for the future, I would be more concerned about a kickin' mount right now. It might look goofy, but a small newt or cat or apo on a really nice mount will give you some great views. You can upgrade later on the telescope. An 80mm APO would be nice; you could use it later as your first imaging scope. I would suggest taking a look at different mounts. There is even a forum dedicated to this! Ask the mount experts and check out the begginers forum and the beginning imaging forum for more advice. Best of luck to you! BTW--What kind of price range? I see your telescope Ideas are in the $1000-$1500 range, but how about the mount?
-------------------- Kipp Ginsburg
8" LX200-ACF
Orion 120mm F/5.0 Piggybacked Refractor
Meade UWA Set [4.7mm-30mm]
DSI-II
|
Brian L
super member
Reged: 11/17/08
Posts: 118
Loc: The garden paradise of Pittsbu...
|
|
I recommended the VMC-200L/Sphinx to a friend of mine looking to get into the hobby, and it was a great choice if you have the budget for it. Stunning views and an excellent quality GEM that is beginner friendly and also high-performance for advanced users and for AP. The starbook control is really a great interface, particularly for beginners. Also, light and easily portable. I've heard that Vixen customer service is not all that great, but in my experience Meade and Celestron have gone that way too.
I don't know if the porta mount will take the VMC-200L OTA, but you can certainly research that. Keep in mind that a long focal length f/10 scope like the VMC-200L will make it difficult to find things on an alt-az mount with no Goto or setting circles.
AT8RC is an astrograph...not intended as a visual instrument. Sure you can look through it, but it is designed for a CCD array and not the pupil of your eye...It has a large central obstruction.
-------------------- WO FLT-110 f/6.5, TEC optics
Losmandy G-11 Gemini
Meade 10" LX200 GPS/UHTC
Questar 3.5" Standard
Vixen VMC-110L
Canon 450D, unmodified
Assortment of TV Panoptic, TV Radian, Vixen LVW, and WO eyepieces
Edited by Brian L (11/06/09 12:12 PM)
|
sang33ta
scholastic sledgehammer
Reged: 07/08/08
Posts: 767
Loc: UK
|
|
Vixen stuff is quality but pricey.
I'd recommend it but bung it on a cheapish Celestron CG5-AGT or Meade LXD75 mount to get started. Astronomy is no fun without goto
-------------------- Hioptic 152mm f12.5 Maksutov, CG5-AGT, Meade Super Plossl Set, Casio QV-2900UX
|
Highland Sky
newbie
Reged: 11/05/09
Posts: 3
Loc: SW WA.state
|
|
Hey, Thanks to you all for the input on the tubes & mounts! I have been leaning towards the Vixen VMC200L. Vixen ran a package deal $1200 that included the VMC200L and a free Porta 11 mount. Vixen doesn't have it anymore, but a few retailers still have the packages in stock. I need to stay in that price range for now, that's why the free porta 11 mount sounded like a easy on the wallet way to get started. I'd love the Vixen goto mounts, but have to save more $! I would love to look thru a few scopes. I'm not having any luck hooking up with some of the local clubs. My bino's are sustaining me for now, sorta, it's really bugging me not having a scope though! I've been reading up for 6 months now, my little brain is kinda ready to explode!
|
Fomalhaut
sage
Reged: 08/16/08
Posts: 241
Loc: Switzerland
|
|
Quote:
Vixen stuff is quality but pricey...
=> Real quality is always pricey.
Chris
-------------------- Currently:
Tak FS-60c (guidescope for:)
Tak FCT-100/640 on Tak EM-10
Tak Mewlon-180 on same
IntesMicro-M500
Zeiss 7X42-T*P-Dialyt + Nikon 18x70 Binoculars
Coronado Maxscope 40
|
rmollise
Post Laureate
   
Reged: 07/06/07
Posts: 4566
|
|
Quote:
Hi, I'm new to Astronomy. I got a cheap department store reflector and took it back! It was too long for me and shook like it was ill! Now I'm trying to educate myself before buying again. After allot of reading & learning my limits & wants, I've decided on a Catadioptric and I've narrowed my search down to two scopes. The AT8RC or Vixens VMC200L. I would appreciate any one weighing in on the AT8RC vs/ the VMC200L. Seems like the more I learn the less I know! I don't want a motorized goto mount yet. Thought about getting Vixens Porta 11. I want to invest in a scope I can do upgrades to and later get into astro photography & a motorized mount. I also need something light, around 20lbs a componet. Thanks!
Don't get the RC for visual use. It's not overly good at that. The Vixen is a nice enough scope, but not really very suited for deep sky imaging. If you want a Vixen for imaging, I'd look at the VC, not the VMC. IOW, if you plan to do visual observing and then move on to picture taking, neither of these is a good choice.
I'd STRONGLY recommend you look at the Celestron Edge or Meade ACF OTAs instead.
Not sure why you don't want a computerized mount, but I'd forget the Portamount, too. It is not at all well suited for telescopes in these aperture/focal length ranges.
-------------------- Uncle Rod
Rod's New Book:
Choosing and Using a New CAT
Available now!
|
GaryML
sage
   
Reged: 02/16/09
Posts: 322
Loc: San Diego, California
|
|
Quote:
Hey, Thanks to you all for the input on the tubes & mounts!
I have been leaning towards the Vixen VMC200L. Vixen ran a package deal $1200 that included the VMC200L and a free Porta 11 mount. Vixen doesn't have it anymore, but a few retailers still have the packages in stock. I need to stay in that price range for now, that's why the free porta 11 mount sounded like a easy on the wallet way to get started. I'd love the Vixen goto mounts, but have to save more $! I would love to look thru a few scopes. I'm not having any luck hooking up with some of the local clubs. My bino's are sustaining me for now, sorta, it's really bugging me not having a scope though! I've been reading up for 6 months now, my little brain is kinda ready to explode!
I have a VMC200L and I like it a lot. I'm strictly visual for now but might dabble in AP down the road. The open tube allows for fast cool-down and good dew resistance. The fixed mirror eliminates mirror shift and flop. And there is no grease inside the tube to contaminate the optics. Be sure to learn how the collimate the scope for best results.
I haven't had the chance to look through the AT8RC. It seems like a fine scope but it is aimed at AP and may not be the best choice for strictly visual use.
I used to own a Vixen Porta mount and it was inadequate with a 4" refractor. I doubt that it would give very good results with the VMC200L. I don't know why Vixen was selling the VMC200L-Porta II combo as the scope would be seriously undermounted. You would be repeating the unhappy experience with the wobbly department store scope.
For a simple manual mount I used a William Optics EZ Touch and it worked great with the VMC200L. But for not very much more money you could get a Celestron CG-5 ASGT, which is probably the best buy in an inexpensive goto mount. I can tell you from extensive personal experience that it works well with the VMC200L. With the CG-5 you can also get started with a little AP without having to buy a new mount.
If you're on a tight budget, then perhaps consider a Celestron C8 on the CG-5 ASGT (although I prefer the VMC200L for the reasons stated above, plus the better build quality of the Vixen).
As for checking out the scope at a club star party, you may have difficulty as you do not see the VMC200L out in the field that often. But there are some of us using them. Oddly enough, I was at at my club's dark sky site one evening and there was just two of us there -- and we both had VMC200L telescopes! Rather an unlikely coincidence. The other fellow's VMC200L was mounted on a Losmandy G11 and he was fully rigged for some serious astrophotography.
EDIT: BTW, you will need to buy a few eyepieces as the Vixen doesn't include any. It is sometimes sold as just a bare tube so you would need to add a finder and diagonal. It is also sold as a package with a finder, finder bracket and diagonal. Personally, I would recommend the bare OTA and add a good finder (I use a Stellarvue 9x50 and a Red Dot finder) and a good diagonal.
-------------------- Sky conditions in San Diego, California:
Vixen VMC200L 8" corrected Cassegrain telescope on a Celestron CG-5 Advanced Series GT mount
Pentax eyepieces and Televue eyepieces & diagonal
Fujinon 16x70 Binoculars on a Manfrotto 028B/501HDV tripod
Celestron SkyScout
______________________________________________________
Avatar: Gemini North on Mauna Kea, November, 2008.
Edited by GaryML (11/08/09 12:10 AM)
|
Phil Cowell
sage
Reged: 05/24/07
Posts: 376
Loc: Southern Tier NY
|
|
You might want to ask Blueman. If I remember he had one of the Vixen's first and then replaced it with the AT8RC. I'm not sure which model Vixen but he might be able to provide you some input on a comparison.
-------------------- If it'll fit on a sig you don't have enough
|
Brian L
super member
Reged: 11/17/08
Posts: 118
Loc: The garden paradise of Pittsbu...
|
|
The VMC200 or VC200 on a portamount is asking for headaches. I don't think the portamount is really designed for a scope this size around f/10. I don't think that the porta mount has slow motion controls- which will make it hard to observe anything under medium to high magnifications. If you can't spring for the Sphinx mount, the GPDX mount might be worth a look.
The VC-200 an aspheric which is very highly corrected and intended for serious imaging...it's a bit more $$ than the VMC-200 however. The Meade ACF systems are optically on par, but if you don't want a fork mount the Celestron HD systems are in the same league and are GEM mounted.
-------------------- WO FLT-110 f/6.5, TEC optics
Losmandy G-11 Gemini
Meade 10" LX200 GPS/UHTC
Questar 3.5" Standard
Vixen VMC-110L
Canon 450D, unmodified
Assortment of TV Panoptic, TV Radian, Vixen LVW, and WO eyepieces
|
Tony Bonanno
member
Reged: 04/03/07
Posts: 29
Loc: Santa Fe, New Mexico
|
|
I have the 10" version of the VMC-200L (the VMC-260L) and it is a fine quality instrument well suited for visual and some A/P. The RC's design is not optimized for visual work, so I'd avoid it. I use to have a VC-200L (the Vixen VISAC) which is similar to the VMC-200L, but it also is optimized for photography and the lower contrast was evident for visual use, especially on planets. Also have had (and still have) various 8" SCT's from Meade and Celestron.. I'd go with the VMC-200L, although, as Rod Mollise suggested, the new EDGE HD and ACF system may be worthy options.
As far as mounts go, you may want to consider the ASGT from Celestron. A little noisy and some cheap plastic fittings, but overall pretty solid where it counts, especially the tripod legs and GOTO is refined and works well. Should handle the VMC-200L well.
-------------------- Mewlon 210
Vixen VMC-260L
Intes MN61 Mak-Newt
CGE
Atlas
Edited by Tony Bonanno (11/09/09 12:24 AM)
|
WOBentley
member
Reged: 09/16/09
Posts: 56
Loc: Pacific Northwest USA
|
|
Highland Sky...Where in SW Washington State are you? If you are Close to Portland there is the Rose City Astronomers...large club with a little something for everyone. Next Meeting is on the 16th at OMSI... Check out the website: http://rosecityastronomers.org/index.htm There are many Star Parties etc where you can look through different scopes, the club even has loaner scopes for members (Telescope Library). Unfortunately as you know we are past our prime observing months here in the NW, but you never know!
-------------------- My Sky; Where being blue is good...
|
Highland Sky
newbie
Reged: 11/05/09
Posts: 3
Loc: SW WA.state
|
|
Hey,
I'm so happy to receive all these tips from everyone!
Gary,
Did your VMC 200L come with a 2" rack & pinion focuser or was it a 1.25". I find the descriptions on many suppliers sites to be contradictory. Also, was the porta mount you owned actually a Porta mount II? They have a few different kinds of Porta mounts. I emailed Vixen and asked then about the Porta II with VMC 200L and why they no longer do that package and if they had decided the 8" VMC needed a bigger mount. I'll let you know what they say. I agree with buying a OTA only and getting a different finder & diagonal. I was wondering what mm eyepieces have you found to work well with this tube? Sure nice to hear from someone who actually uses the Vixen VMC 200L !
WOBentley,
Thanks for the link to the RoseCity Astronomers! From there I also found a club in Battle Ground, Washington and signed up with thier online club and will go to one of their meetings this Friday! They have a Telescope library too and bring scopes to the meetings if the weather is good for viewing. I'm getting excited now! I'm crossing my fingers for a break in the Clouds. I do live about 40 minutes North of Portland,Oregon. I'm out in the country side. Thanks again everyone! Kathy in the Highland Sky.
I just received the reply from Vixen on the package VMC200L with Porta II mount and my question about it possibly being under mounted.
Vixen QUOTE;
"Thank you for your inquiry on the VMC200L / Porta II promotion.
The promotion ended when we began our current fall rebate program. The VMC200L / Porta II sale was one of our best ever. We have no complaints about its stability. Frankly, the idea came from the fact that it’s the grab and go combination that I use myself.
One nice thing about the Porta II mount is that the head is removable and can be mounted on a half pillar on the Sphinx SX tripod. So when you move up to a motorized / GoTo mount you can just switch mount heads depending on what kind of observing you want to do that evening." END OF QUOTE.
FYI: There is a review of the Astro Tech 6" & 8" Richey Chretien in the Sky & Telescope December issue. The 6" has a 50% obstruction and the 8" a 47% obstruction compromised its use at low magnifications, thereby not being a very good visual scope.
Edited by Highland Sky (11/10/09 08:03 PM)
|
GaryML
sage
   
Reged: 02/16/09
Posts: 322
Loc: San Diego, California
|
|
Quote:
Hey, I'm so happy to receive all these tips from everyone! Gary, Did your VMC 200L come with a 2" rack & pinion focuser or was it a 1.25". I find the descriptions on many suppliers sites to be contradictory. Also, was the porta mount you owned actually a Porta mount II? They have a few different kinds of Porta mounts. I emailed Vixen and asked then about the Porta II with VMC 200L and why they no longer do that package and if they had decided the 8" VMC needed a bigger mount. I'll let you know what they say. I agree with buying a OTA only and getting a different finder & diagonal. I was wondering what mm eyepieces have you found to work well with this tube? Sure nice to hear from someone who actually uses the Vixen VMC 200L !
...
I just received the reply from Vixen on the package VMC200L with Porta II mount and my question about it possibly being under mounted.
Vixen QUOTE; "Thank you for your inquiry on the VMC200L / Porta II promotion.
The promotion ended when we began our current fall rebate program. The VMC200L / Porta II sale was one of our best ever. We have no complaints about its stability. Frankly, the idea came from the fact that it’s the grab and go combination that I use myself.
One nice thing about the Porta II mount is that the head is removable and can be mounted on a half pillar on the Sphinx SX tripod. So when you move up to a motorized / GoTo mount you can just switch mount heads depending on what kind of observing you want to do that evening." END OF QUOTE.
...
Sorry for the slow response to your question.
The VMC200L comes with a rack and pinion focuser that accepts 2" diagonals & eyepieces. I have a Televue 2" diagonal and a bunch of eyepieces and everything works fine. I also have a 2" to Nikon F mount adapter with a 2" long extension tube and I can bring my Nikon D300 to focus without getting close to the stops.
My Porta mount was the original version on the supplied tripod. I used it for a while with a 100mm f/7 refractor (a Vixen ED100sf) and it works ok but it was more vibration than I liked with settle times >4 seconds. The VMC200L is a couple of pounds heavier than the 100mm but better balanced. Still, with the stock tripod that would be pushing. But putting it on a sturdier tripod is an interesting idea, and perhaps that would be stable enough.
As for eyepieces, the scope is fairly slow at f/9.75, so it does not stress the eyepieces. Right now I use a Pentax XW 40mm for widest field of view with this telescope (about 1.34 degrees) at 50X. It works great with no vignetting and just a beautiful view edge to edge. I also use a TV Panoptic 24mm for about 80X for dimmer DSOs (using 1.235" filters), a TV Nagler 16mm for 122X, and a Pentax XW 10mm for 195X, which is usually the limit that the seeing will permit. On rare occasions I use a Pentax XW 7mm for about 295X, but usually the seeing in my location results in a fuzzy image with this much magnification.
This set takes me from the widest TFOV at 50X to the highest I can get away with (300X) in fairly even steps. These eyepieces are probably overkill but I like fine optics so I splurged. You could easily cover you needs with a 40mm wide, 20mm medium power, and a 10mm high power.
Collimation is important with this scope. Vixen suggests using the alignment screws on the primary mirror for fine adjustment, but I've had better luck just leaving the primary alone and doing the fine adjustment with the alignment screws on the secondary mirror. It can be a bit frustrating the first time, but once you get the idea it only takes a minute to get it perfect at high power. I have only had to adjust it twice in a year -- once to touch it up when I first got it (and I made it a whole lot worse before I figured it out) and one more small adjustment a few months back.
-------------------- Sky conditions in San Diego, California:
Vixen VMC200L 8" corrected Cassegrain telescope on a Celestron CG-5 Advanced Series GT mount
Pentax eyepieces and Televue eyepieces & diagonal
Fujinon 16x70 Binoculars on a Manfrotto 028B/501HDV tripod
Celestron SkyScout
______________________________________________________
Avatar: Gemini North on Mauna Kea, November, 2008.
|
|
6 registered and 9 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
Moderator: Jason B, rick rian, LLEEGE
Print Thread
|
Forum Permissions
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled
UBBCode is enabled
|
Thread views: 544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|