|
Konihlav
super member
Reged: 03/05/09
Posts: 103
|
|
Hello again, it's me :-)
this time I have finished the HST version of my Ced214. Again, it's 17hours and 28minutes of SII, Ha and OIII data.
click to see in full resolution:
HST palette version
|
J.P.M
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 11/14/06
Posts: 1323
Loc: 65"01'N25"47'E
|
|
Great work and good balance between lines.
I like the color scheme a lot, not too vivid, as I tend to have.
--------------------
PER ASPERA AD ASTRA
J-P Metsavainio, Finland
LX200 GPS 12", SkyWatcher ED80, Canon 200mm EF f1.8L, Tokina 300mm AX f2.8, SXV-AO, QHY9, QHY8, QHY5, Lodestar
BLOG:http://astroanarchy.blogspot.com/
IMAGE PORTFOLIO:http://astroanarchy.zenfolio.com/
|
ZMass
sage
Reged: 11/07/07
Posts: 269
|
|
Very nice! That squirly dust lane in the upper left is awesome. It looks like the nebula was signed by the artist.
--------------------
-Zeke Mass
Encinitas, CA
6" Custom Newt on CG5
CCD Labs Q285M (Qhy2 Pro)
ST-80 guide-scope with DSI Pro
|
David Pavlich
Postmaster
Reged: 05/18/05
Posts: 8655
Loc: Mandeville, LA USA 30.22 X 90....
|
|
Very nice image!!
David
--------------------
Proud Member; PAS NOLA,
"If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research..."
A. Einstein
|
bill w
Postmaster
Reged: 03/26/05
Posts: 6584
Loc: southern california
|
|
are both of these HST palette
just with different processing?
--------------------
-bill w
nexstar 8 GPS
canon 300D, Toucam Pro II
SXV-H9C, H9, SX Exview autoguider, SX-AO
FS 102 (OLV), FS60 CSV, 8" LX200R, G 11
http://astro.whwiii.net/
image processing monitor calibrated to just differentiate darkest boxes:
|
Konihlav
super member
Reged: 03/05/09
Posts: 103
|
|
yes, both HST but the polite version (this one) has proper combine weights (that was hard to estimate from different lenght subexpositions - data captured over 6 nights with/out Moon and on different places)
|
Malcolm Park
sage
Reged: 04/27/08
Posts: 392
Loc: London, UK
|
|
Great image, lovely detail.
regards
Malcolm
--------------------
www.malcolmpark.com
http://urbanimager.smugmug.com
|
AlexN
scholastic sledgehammer
Reged: 08/09/08
Posts: 978
Loc: Brisbane - Australia
|
|
Fantastic! Especially considering the fact that you captured it from different sites.. Doing a 6 night exposure is tough, even from a fixed observatory... Doing it from different sites must be a real mission!
Great payoff for the dedication!
--------------------
Apogee Ortho-Star LOMO 80/480 APO
WO ZS70ED
HEQ5 Pro + EQMOD
Astrodon NB Filters
Orion SS Pro 2
SBIG ST-8300M on order.
QHY5
|
budguinn
Post Laureate
Reged: 11/24/04
Posts: 4472
Loc: Gold Beach, Or
|
|
nicely done
--------------------
Warmest regards,
bud guinn
http://www.budguinn.com
|
bill w
Postmaster
Reged: 03/26/05
Posts: 6584
Loc: southern california
|
|
Quote:
yes, both HST but the polite version (this one) has proper combine weights (that was hard to estimate from different lenght subexpositions - data captured over 6 nights with/out Moon and on different places)
i'd always thought the hst weighting was someone arbitrary
how do you determine the proper combine weights?
--------------------
-bill w
nexstar 8 GPS
canon 300D, Toucam Pro II
SXV-H9C, H9, SX Exview autoguider, SX-AO
FS 102 (OLV), FS60 CSV, 8" LX200R, G 11
http://astro.whwiii.net/
image processing monitor calibrated to just differentiate darkest boxes:
|
Konihlav
super member
Reged: 03/05/09
Posts: 103
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
yes, both HST but the polite version (this one) has proper combine weights (that was hard to estimate from different lenght subexpositions - data captured over 6 nights with/out Moon and on different places)
i'd always thought the hst weighting was someone arbitrary
how do you determine the proper combine weights?
Trial and see :-) If I ever knew. Every image needs different processing :-/
|
|
|
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
Edit
Reply
Quote
