Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Binoculars

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | (show all)
BillC
on a new path
*****

Reged: 06/04/04

Loc: Lake Stevens, WA, USA
Re: Super deal right now on Celestron 15x70 bins.. new [Re: doctordub]
      #3527922 - 12/29/09 03:02 PM

Even though I have said many times that I have and enjoy several of my cheaper instruments, I feel being called an elitist soon to be on me.

Who belives that a newbie is going to know about:

Flex in the hinge,
Wedge in one or both EPs,
Collimation springs that aren't strong enough to do the job,
A sharp field that starts to go south 24% off-axis,

and the list could go on! I have just been on the front line watching these people try to talk their FRIEND out of buying a decent bino because it actually cost more than a good meal.

Guys, I'm not a bad guy. But I have seen over and over what a misguided ego can do. They say ignorance is bliss. Well, if that is so, some folks are blisters and proud to be.

Let's take our friend with only $50 to spend on an instrument. He gets sucked into the advice of a well-meaning but optically challenged person, and he buys an even cheaper bino, along with a Big Mac.

Nightfall comes and he realizes that he could have had a better image looking through the Big Mac! Our friend is now hopelessly broke and his mentor is off to see who else he can screw up before the next setting sun.

No, I'm not an elitist. But I have seen, for example, many people with their "perfectly collimated" bino that was, in reality, off by more THAN TWO DEGREES! Not MINUTES . . . DEGREES.

If I seem harsh, I don't MEAN to be. I just want to be sure that a VALUE is, in fact, just that.

Cheers,

Bill


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
GregLee
member


Reged: 12/07/09

Loc: Waimanalo, HI
Re: Super deal right now on Celestron 15x70 bins.. new [Re: RichD]
      #3528051 - 12/29/09 04:25 PM

Quote:

... how about 10 years time? My guess is that they will be sitting in a landfill somewhere while the fujinons will be - barring serious abuse - still performing well.

Viewed like this over time, value takes on a different perspective.



It does? If I choose the $50 Skymasters over the $650 Fujinon, I can invest the $600 difference and make, say $30 a year for those 10 years. If the Skymasters got sand in them or something after 10 years, the $900 extra I've got will make me feel a little better about having to replace them.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
raz
member


Reged: 11/19/09

Re: Super deal right now on Celestron 15x70 bins.. new [Re: RichD]
      #3528066 - 12/29/09 04:34 PM

Exactly, you have to start somewhere. A few months ago I was looking at Jupiter with a pair of cheap Bushnells, got curious, and found this site. I've learned a lot since then, didn't even know what a DSO was let alone know I could see one. Not sure if it is a lifetime hobby yet or a phase, but it has been fun!

CN is the best astronomy/optics resource I've found on the web. That being said it is going to attract the best experts and newest beginners. I appreciate when someone more experienced shares an informative viewpoint, gives me an angle I may not have considered. I can totally respect desiring quality when you can afford and appreciate it. If I continue to enjoy optics I'll be right there too. On the otherhand I do not understand why someone would post saying these bins are a piece of $&!# that should be tossed. Like anything in life you have to start out somewhere and advance and that kind of attitude just discourages beginners.

I'm no expert, but from what tests I have learned here and applied to the skymasters and bushnells is the skymasters are a decent place to start and one heck of a value. The bushnells, well...

We are fortunate to have an entry level bin that is basically sound. Imagine if the only option were ruby coated plastic lens or fujinon? There would not be many new people taking up the hobby.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BillC
on a new path
*****

Reged: 06/04/04

Loc: Lake Stevens, WA, USA
Re: Super deal right now on Celestron 15x70 bins.. new [Re: GregLee]
      #3528225 - 12/29/09 06:19 PM

Quote:

Quote:

... how about 10 years time? My guess is that they will be sitting in a landfill somewhere while the fujinons will be - barring serious abuse - still performing well.

Viewed like this over time, value takes on a different perspective.



It does? If I choose the $50 Skymasters over the $650 Fujinon, I can invest the $600 difference and make, say $30 a year for those 10 years. If the Skymasters got sand in them or something after 10 years, the $900 extra I've got will make me feel a little better about having to replace them.




10 years of looking through your bank statements--wonder what that image would be like?

Cheers,

Bill

Edited by BillC (12/29/09 06:23 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
raz
member


Reged: 11/19/09

Re: Super deal right now on Celestron 15x70 bins.. new [Re: BillC]
      #3528285 - 12/29/09 06:51 PM

Bill,
I would not call you an elitist. I have read many of your posts, and not only are you knowledgeable, but indeed have admitted to enjoying some cheaper instruments.

But, I would like to put you on the spot! Please offer a recommendation of what would be a good VALUE for a newbie. Please have some consideration to budget, if money were no object we'd all own the best.

Thanks,
Ron


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BillC
on a new path
*****

Reged: 06/04/04

Loc: Lake Stevens, WA, USA
Re: Super deal right now on Celestron 15x70 bins.. new [Re: BillC]
      #3528295 - 12/29/09 06:56 PM

"Like anything in life you have to start out somewhere and advance and that kind of attitude just discourages beginners."

I have spent much of my life ENCOURAGING beginners! However, teaching them how to enjoy walking through the swamp is not helping them.

The Ruger s-100 (a .22 auto) is a beautiful weapon--especially in stainless. It's robast, well balanced, easy to work with, and holds its value well. Now, I encourage anyone to buy one and go bear hunting. I would like to know whether or not the concept of "we all have to start somewhere" would hold true, there. And if not, why not.

A good binocular is NOT out of the reach of anyone! I KNOW POVERTY!!!!! Been there; done that--a lot! But I also know garage sales, pawn shops, eBay, newspapers, etc. In this country, if we are left to inferior equipment, it is because we have little or no motivation.

Edited by BillC (12/29/09 06:59 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BillC
on a new path
*****

Reged: 06/04/04

Loc: Lake Stevens, WA, USA
Re: Super deal right now on Celestron 15x70 bins.. new [Re: raz]
      #3528310 - 12/29/09 07:05 PM

Quote:

Bill,
I would not call you an elitist. I have read many of your posts, and not only are you knowledgeable, but indeed have admitted to enjoying some cheaper instruments.

But, I would like to put you on the spot! Please offer a recommendation of what would be a good VALUE for a newbie. Please have some consideration to budget, if money were no object we'd all own the best.

Thanks,
Ron




Thank you Ron. With good judgement, $200 will buy a good entry level bino. And for some IT'S ALL THEY WILL EVER WANT OR NEED. But folks need to learn "all that glitter is not gold." And all that comes in the shape of a bino is not!

More later,

Bill


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
RichD
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 11/08/07

Loc: Derbyshire, UK
Re: Super deal right now on Celestron 15x70 bins.. new [Re: BillC]
      #3528316 - 12/29/09 07:07 PM

Quote:


A good binocular is NOT out of the reach of anyone! I KNOW POVERTY!!!!! Been there; done that--a lot! But I also know garage sales, pawn shops, eBay, newspapers, etc. In this country, if we are left to inferior equipment, it is because we have little or no motivation.




Very true, I'm no big earner but saved a while and picked up a used fuji 16x70 for a fair price. I don't know anyone who couldn't afford what I paid, if, as you say, the motivation is there.

We


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
raz
member


Reged: 11/19/09

Re: Super deal right now on Celestron 15x70 bins.. new [Re: BillC]
      #3528461 - 12/29/09 08:36 PM

Quote:

"Like anything in life you have to start out somewhere and advance and that kind of attitude just discourages beginners."

I have spent much of my life ENCOURAGING beginners! However, teaching them how to enjoy walking through the swamp is not helping them.

The Ruger s-100 (a .22 auto) is a beautiful weapon--especially in stainless. It's robast, well balanced, easy to work with, and holds its value well. Now, I encourage anyone to buy one and go bear hunting. I would like to know whether or not the concept of "we all have to start somewhere" would hold true, there. And if not, why not.

A good binocular is NOT out of the reach of anyone! I KNOW POVERTY!!!!! Been there; done that--a lot! But I also know garage sales, pawn shops, eBay, newspapers, etc. In this country, if we are left to inferior equipment, it is because we have little or no motivation.




OK Bill, a few things here. First you took my quote out of context, talking down a equipment a beginner has and is happy with IS discouraging. Educating them can be done without calling their current gear a piece of $&!#.

I'd disagree with your statement about the Ruger. If you never shot a gun before it would be a great place to start. The caliber of your gun won't matter much if you don't know how to handle it so I'd say the analogy holds true.

So you are directing me toward the used market. Fair enough, and good advice. I have been combing Craigslist and local papers to no avail and will continue to. But, I would question spending $200 on used equipment from e-bay because you can't try it out first.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Mateyhv
sage
*****

Reged: 10/10/09

Loc: 43°N
Re: Super deal right now on Celestron 15x70 bins.. new [Re: RichD]
      #3528470 - 12/29/09 08:40 PM

I am lost, what is been discussed here?? 10 year investments, poverty, skymasters vs fujis, weapons...?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
raz
member


Reged: 11/19/09

Re: Super deal right now on Celestron 15x70 bins.. new [Re: BillC]
      #3528515 - 12/29/09 09:05 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Bill,
I would not call you an elitist. I have read many of your posts, and not only are you knowledgeable, but indeed have admitted to enjoying some cheaper instruments.

But, I would like to put you on the spot! Please offer a recommendation of what would be a good VALUE for a newbie. Please have some consideration to budget, if money were no object we'd all own the best.

Thanks,
Ron




Thank you Ron. With good judgement, $200 will buy a good entry level bino. And for some IT'S ALL THEY WILL EVER WANT OR NEED. But folks need to learn "all that glitter is not gold." And all that comes in the shape of a bino is not!

More later,

Bill




Bill, I look forward your advice. You refer to judgment, without experience are there specific qualities one can recognize or do we have to rely on brand. Would you recommend anything new in the $200 range or only used?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rouseyfire
sage


Reged: 11/09/04

Loc: loveland,colorado
Re: Super deal right now on Celestron 15x70 bins.. new [Re: raz]
      #3528571 - 12/29/09 09:56 PM

Raz: Glad you found CN...lots of good information here...but beauty is in the eye of the beholder...so I guess I agree with you and Bill.

For me I want to have the best resolution and contrast in a binocular I can afford, that's why I ordered the Vortex Kaibabs for $1,200.00 (never looked through one so I hope there are as advertised). If I had more money I would have purcahsed a couple of swarovski binos.

So each one of us has a certain level of desire but not always the required level of income.

I've had and used binoculars since a kid..an I'm old now. So, lots of binoculars. Most of which are long gone and new ones being purchased.

In the $200 range, I would look at the Nikon AE series, easy to find at most stores and you can look through them before buying. I've had several and think that for the money, they are good and enjoyable binoculars.

Also, take a look at some the Pentax models. Again, these should be able to be found at a lot of stores and offer good optic quality.

Some of the lower-end Leupolds also offer good optics for the money but a little harder to find and try out first.

The Oberwerks are good deals and although not easy to find in a local store, there is plenty of information and reviews listed on CN.

One of the best, in my opinion, that was a very good binocular was the Pentax 16x60's, which I no longer have but only paid around $200.00 for. I just got outbid on Ebay for one of these used that sold for around $145.00. I wish I had been on my computer when the listing expired.

I would also find a vendor with a 30 day return policy for a full refund (not an exchange). You'll have to pay shipping costs but I think you'll end up with a pair that you're happy with.

So yes raz, there are, I believe, some decent quality binoculars that can be had for the $200.00 range...some I've had and liked.

But as long as I can afford a higher end pair of binoculars, I will purchase one. There is a difference, however slight in some cases, that to me is important.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Erik D
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 04/28/03

Loc: Central New Jersey, USA
Re: Super deal right now on Celestron 15x70 bins.. new [Re: raz]
      #3528635 - 12/29/09 10:44 PM

Quote:


So you are directing me toward the used market. Fair enough, and good advice. I have been combing Craigslist and local papers to no avail and will continue to.

But, I would question spending $200 on used equipment from e-bay because you can't try it out first.




Raz,

You are right about the risk of spending $200 on eBay with nothing much to go by except photos. I have seen people bid hundreds of $ on used Zeiss or Leica binoculars.(32-50mm) It's not something I would do. The me the better buys off auction are vintage Japanese binoculars. I purchased 4 or 5 pairs in 2009. I usually set a limit of ~ $50. Some retailers do put old stock, new in the box up for bids. I recently bid over$100 for a pair of Celestron 11X80s, new in a worn box. Lost by ~$2 with 10 sec left. It was just as well. I have three pairs of 80 mm binocular already.

My only lousy auction purchase was a pair of vintage Tasco 16X50s. I went a little higher than usual because they came with a nice hard leather case in excellent with original lens caps. I thought they would not go thru the trouble of housing subpar optics in a nice leather case. I was wrong! The binoculars are in very good condition but the resolution was poor and eye relief very tight. It was a condition from day one.

I exchanged email with an experienced vintage binocular buyer on CN. He told me the better value in vintage wide angle binoculars are usually in the 7X35 to 10X50 size. The higher X you move up to the less likely to get a good pair. Also keep in mind many Japanese binoculars made prior to the mid 1980s do not make allowance for sufficient eye relief if you need glasses to observe.

I do trust sellers who have an established record posting on CN. I spend $275 on a pair of Celestron Regal LX 10X42s last year knowing the seller(CN member) paid $100 less for them a few month prior. They were like new in the box. I had read EdZ's review carefully. I knew they were discontinued. To get a pair of like quality Eagle Optics Ranger SRT or Leupold Olympic would cost me $350+.

I think the $200 binocular Bill C has in mind is for hand hold porro binos up to 50 mm size. Nikon Action EX, Pentax PCF etc. For roof prisms you may want to raise that by ~$50.

If you are looking for a pair of new bino to give you the real Big binocular experience for around $200 I suggest considering the Oberwerk 20X80 LW or Standard. I have had my 20X80 LW since 2003. They arrived in collimation, are treated with care and have stayed that way without me ever having to do conditional alignment. If you are looking for something smaller but with a bit of extra reach consider the Nikon Action EX 12X50. They cost a little more than my Oberwerk 12X60 LW but can probably see just as deep.

There are many choices out there in the $100-$250 price range. Rick from Tokyo posted this morning that the Bushnell Legend Ultra HD can be had for $200. He ordered two pairs. Rick is VERY astute about binoculars. He has bought and sold 25X80 Steiners, Fujinon FMT SX and Nikon Astroluxe 70 mm binos. If you are looking for quality hand held bino I would wait a few days for his first light report.

Instead of posing a general question about which bino is best for ~$200 it's better to state your desired configuration, (magnification and objective size, Porro vs. Roof prism) and your intended usage. (day, night, low light, nature observing or astro). That way the responses will be closer to the mark. ;-))

ERik D


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jay_Bird
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 01/04/06

Loc: USA
Re: Super deal right now on Celestron 15x70 bins.. new [Re: raz]
      #3528656 - 12/29/09 10:51 PM

raz, after The Sound of Music just aired again Sunday night it's only appropriate to point you to "some of Bill Cook's favorite (binocular) things": go to the 'best of the binocular forum' pinned threads at the top of the binocular forum list, to see recommendations from Bill C, as well as Holger Merlitz (who has an outstanding binocular review and information web page of his own), Chris (Charen) and many other notables on the forum. As I recall Bill's favorites list included some used models that would allow for 2 or maybe even 3 different sizes within a $200 budget, for example, I liked the Minolta Standards (used) that he listed and there are many other $200 ballpark or less models on the list, many secondhand now but some still available new.

Glenn and others gave good advice too. Another new option I'd add for you to consider at this price point are the Bushnell Legend roof or Porro models. Good luck!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
94bamf
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 12/15/08

Loc: Kansas City,Mo
Re: Super deal right now on Celestron 15x70 bins.. new [Re: Jay_Bird]
      #3528786 - 12/30/09 12:07 AM

I have to admit, this thread has been interesting. I do find it curious that so many who don't like these binoculars seem to feel the need to repetitively come in this thread and tell everybody how much they dislike them, what a waste of money they are, etc, etc. They are $50 people. This isn't somebodies life savings. If it is, they certainly couldn't afford something better/more expensive anyway. I get the feeling that some people here with better equipment almost seem to be offended that somebody could enjoy these binoculars. I guess I could understand the disdain if these Skymasters were half the price of "good" binoculars, heck even if they were a quarter of the price I could understand it. But $50? Are you kidding me? I am sorry but I don't believe ANYBODY thinks they are getting premium binoculars for $50. If they do believe you can buy high end, premium, top class, super duper, binoculars for $50, then they are beyond helping in the first place.

Obviously the Skymaster 15x70 is the redheaded stepchild of the binocular world by CN standards, but let me add this.

I have paid MORE than $50 for every single pair of binoculars I own, check the sig. Which handheld ones do I like more than the Skymasters?

Pentax 12x50's, Celestron Noble 10x50's and Celestron Noble 10x42's. That is it. I had to send the Zen Rays back once for poor image/prism diffraction spikes, new ones still have that problem. I would skip both Nikon Actions if I had to do again. I would also skip the Orion Scenix. I don't care for the Oberwerk 20x60's at all, they have the worst image quality of ANY binocular I own. I certainly don't have the knowledge, expertise, experience, etc of some of the binocular experts that have posted in this and many other threads, expressing thier dislike for these binoculars. That is fine, I never claimed, nor will I ever claim, that these are great binoculars. But through MY eyes, compared to several other binoculars that I own (but obviously not nearly as despised as these skymasters), they perform quite well. In my humble opinion there are many worse ways you could spend your $50, I have several examples, and they all cost more than $50.. YMMV...

Now back to your regularly scheduled Celestron Skymaster 15x70 bashing.....

Ken


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
raz
member


Reged: 11/19/09

Re: Super deal right now on Celestron 15x70 bins.. new [Re: Erik D]
      #3528791 - 12/30/09 12:14 AM

Wow, thanks guys. I seem to have inadvertently turned on the good advice tap on this thread!

Something I noticed being new, often the links in the pinned threads don't work... I tried referencing some of the threads Jay_Bird mentioned but the links are broke, I think from when the original was archived? This has happened to me a bit in the past few months, hopefully it can be fixed so this info can be easily found again.

I also must guiltily admit that although I won't spend $200 on bins at e-bay I have been running a bit wild there... 3 of you have mentioned Pentax as quality so that makes me feel good about the pair of 10x50 PCF I won at $31 for bird watching. But, I also wound up with something I really could use advice about...

You see there were these Celestron Giant 20x80... Before anyone says I'm a glutton for punishment I noticed a hazy Japan stamped on them in the photo. Apparently I was the only one because my winning bid was 20 bucks more than I paid for the 15x70 skymasters a few days earlier.

Now I have them. They are stout, seem well built, are very sharp, and I feel they are Japanese era Celestrons, but sure enough out of collimation vertically. Enough so that a newbie like me can notice. I can use them, but feel a little eyestrain and when backing off and relaxing my eyes the right side is a little lower than the left. I'm gonna take the high road here and say it must have been handled rough by UPS.

So here is my dilemma, from what I read these cannot be aligned externally. The prisms are mounted on a platform that can only be adjusted by removing the eyepiece. So should I:
A) Do nothing and deal with a little eyestrain
B) Remove the eyepiece and try to align it myself
C) Try to get them professionally collimated

Notice D) off them on e-bay with Japan in the description at 2x the price is not an option. Ethically I can't do that. It is a lesson learn on buying equipment unseen, but I am hoping this can come out OK. Any thoughts?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Erik D
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 04/28/03

Loc: Central New Jersey, USA
Re condition vintage 20X80s? new [Re: raz]
      #3528910 - 12/30/09 02:13 AM

I recently purchased a pair of vintage Japanese 11X80s. They were from the mid 1970s with original purchase receipt. The seller said he found them in a thrift store, had them professionally restored by Cory S. Selling price was $150, including shipping. The photos show even the hard leather case( again) was in near pristine condition. So I went for them.


A) I would NOT live the eye strain. Binoculars are for viewing pleasure. A pair out of collimation is useless unless you want to cover one objective and use them as 20X spotting scope,

B) I have never attempt binocular conditional alignment myself. I may take a chance on a pair of $50 10X50s binocular if I am stuck with them but I have little inclination to try it with a pair of 20X80s.

C) From the posting I have read professional collimation can cost $90 and up. I gather you paid ~$70 for them plus shipping. For reference, My Japanese Orion 20X80 purchased in 2001 was priced over $400. I got them on sale for $340 including free shipping. They are only sharp to about 60% from center. I prefer using my 20X80 LWs purchased in 2003 for $150 most of the time. The 80 mm LWs are nearly 2 lbs lighter. Have more comfortable eye relief for me and wider Afov.

I suggest looking over your 20X80 carefully. Other than the collimation issue, how is everything else? Are they in good condition or look a bit beat up? Are you satisfied with the edge sharpness? Is the eye relief comfortable?

Cap one objective and use one barrel as a spotting scope for at least 10 min. Then try the other side. Consider having them professionally collimated if you are completely satisfied with them in the mono mode.

Do keep in mind you will be paying for shipping both ways to have them professional serviced. Would you be better off getting that pair of Oberwerk 20X80 Std 2nd for $179 instead for investing $100+ to recondition a pair of vintage 20X80s?

IIRC, I paid a bit over $50 with shipping for my vintage Tasco 16X50s. I am not using them at all. Can't be bothered to list them for sale either. It's a lesson learned for me. I think of buying used optics off auction as a recreation. It's like going to my local outdoor flea market. I rarely spend more than $20 for any item. More often that not it's $5 or under. I have gotten some exceptional deals over the years. Some Sundays I came back without making a purchase. That's fine too. I got to spend time outdoors by the river. Chat with vendors I have known for almost 20 years. I have other gear costing a lot more than $50 not getting much use.... Any one with more than 3 or 4 pairs have binos not getting much use either.



ERik D


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rich V.
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 01/02/05

Loc: Lake Tahoe area, Nevada, USA
Re: Re condition vintage 20X80s? new [Re: Erik D]
      #3528926 - 12/30/09 02:51 AM

Raz, sorry to read your dilemma; I'd contact Cory Suddarth; he'll know how these Vixen-made Celestron 20x80s are collimated and give you a heads up on what it would cost you to have him service them. He does Garrett Optical's binocular repair work but I think he still does independent work as well.

http://suddarthoptical.com/index.html

Many binoculars from that era have the objectives mounted into cells with eccentric rings that can be turned to align the binocular. You may be able to tackle it yourself. He'll give you good advice.

J.W. Seyfried's book "Choosing, Using & Reparing Binoculars" shows you the basics-- good stuff to know about binoculars and their workings. $20. well spent.

http://www.universityoptics.com/books.html

Good luck with your binocular,

Rich V


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Erik D
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 04/28/03

Loc: Central New Jersey, USA
Re: Super deal right now on Celestron 15x70 bins.. new [Re: 94bamf]
      #3529156 - 12/30/09 09:13 AM

Quote:



Obviously the Skymaster 15x70 is the redheaded stepchild of the binocular world by CN standards, but let me add this.


Pentax 12x50's, Celestron Noble 10x50's and Celestron Noble 10x42's. That is it. I had to send the Zen Rays back once for poor image/prism diffraction spikes, new ones still have that problem. I would skip both Nikon Actions if I had to do again. I would also skip the Orion Scenix. I don't care for the Oberwerk 20x60's at all, they have the worst image quality of ANY binocular I own..

I certainly don't have the knowledge, expertise, experience, etc of some of the binocular experts that have posted in this and many other threads, expressing thier dislike for these binoculars. That is fine, I never claimed, nor will I ever claim, that these are great binoculars. But through MY eyes, compared to several other binoculars that I own (but obviously not nearly as despised as these skymasters), they perform quite well. In my humble opinion there are many worse ways you could spend your $50, I have several examples, and they all cost more than $50.. YMMV...

Ken




My own first hand experience with the Celestron Skymaster 15X70 was at the NEAF show several years ago. I think back then they were in the $69-$79 range. I was skeptical about what to expect. IIRC at that time the Burgess version was priced at $99, already pretty low compared to the Oberwerk brand.

As I walked up to the Celestron stand I was prepared to find something wrong: Evidence of poor fit and finish, collmiation errors, spikes and flares, poor resolution etc. To my surprise I could not find any. I spend a good 10 to 15 min checking out the pair as closely as I could inside the exhibit hall. Looking at signs and small details requiring sharp optics to resolve, checking for gross CA. I could not find any fault at all.

After a detailed exam of the Celestron I walked over to the Oberwerk stand to check out their 15X70. I could not find any difference , (based on the sample of one each). My eyes could not tell if the Oberwerk had 5 or 7% better light transmission; I did not think of doing a flashlight test. If EdZ was in the hall that day he may be able to conduct a field test and point out the deficiencies. He wasn't.

I already had a pair of Burgess 20X80 LW and a pair of Oberwerk 12X60s. I was please with both. I know what to expect from these lower cost, light wt Chinese Giants. They do not have the same heft and mechanical construction of classic Japanese binos but the optics were quite good to my eyes. I wasn't shopping for 15X70 LWs that day, If I were, I would have had a tough deciding to go for the pricier Oberwerk.

I was searching for a pair of 12X50 roof prisms at the time. Checked out a pair of Celestron Outland WP 12X50 roofs. ($ 69). They were no better than $25 flea market binos, image dim, resolution poor. Just as I remembered from the year before. I left the Outland to checked out a pair of Pentax 12.5X50 DCF SPs. I think they were selling for over $500 at mail order discount. I decided I wanted something closer to the DCF SP quality level.

Over the years the Celestron 15X70 topic seems to come up on weekly basis. I have read reports from someone who has gone thru 3 or 5 pairs at a retail store to find a good pair. Others who have to return two pairs. Also many positive reports from members like CESD and doctordub, those who own and enjoy premium binoculars.

I can only surmise there must be considerable sample to sample variation. I also feel at the $100-$150 price point the importer have sufficient margin to conduct inspection and screen out obvious defects if they indeed go thru the inspection; at the $50 price point it's pretty much luck of the draw.

If a friend or relative insists $50 is all they want to spend on a pair of 15X70s I would suggest going to a retail store and check out a pair first hand. I myself am not inclined to return multiple pairs via UPS to find a good pair. The effort of boxing and printing labels, tracking the return, and wait for the replacement is not worth the savings to me.

I ordered a pair of Eagle Optics 10X42 Denali roof prisms for $169 a few years back. I was very pleased with a pair of EO Ranger 8X32 roofs for $360. Decided to give their lower priced cousin a try. The Denalis were no better than the $69 Celestron Outland. Image dimmer than my 32 mm and resolution poor. I retuned them for a refund. Saw no point in trying another pair. ~$200 seems to be the threshold for quality roofs a few years ago.

I have not used my Oberwerk 12X60 much since getting the Leupold 12X50 roofs in late 2004. They Obwerks are good binoculars for $109. The $350 Leupolds gives me much more viewing pleasure. I can do away with 1/2 of my two dozen+ binos and be quite happy. I am a binocular addict, don't mind going thru the process. I share my experience here so that some members who really want quality optics AND save a few dollars can skip a few steps in between if they choose.

I used to provide links to less than favorable reports of the Celeston as a caution to fellow CN members. There were so numerous over the years I stopped. There are enough data points in this thread for those interested to make informed decisions.

Bill C's $300-$600 price range is a good guide. I'll say it's quite possible to find quality optics under $400 these days. It may be worthwhile for some to consider a $300 pair instead of having 3-5 lower cost pairs. None of us can look thru more than one pair at a time. ;-))

ERik D


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
raz
member


Reged: 11/19/09

Re: Super deal right now on Celestron 15x70 bins.. new [Re: Erik D]
      #3529469 - 12/30/09 12:35 PM

Thanks for the advice everyone. I've been leaning toward having the 20x80 professionally collimated, they are fine instruments and for what I paid for them still a deal. I have the misfortune of traveling throughout North America for work so hopefully can get them fixed without shipping...

I also appreciate the positive turn the thread has taken over the last few posts. Equipment bashing is just wrong, even if bashing a pair of drug store Vivitar's with a built in digital camera. To the person who owns them they are valued. Pointing out ways we can do better though is well received.
-Ron


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | (show all)


Extra information
2 registered and 10 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  knuklhdastnmr, panhard 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 12954

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics