Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green GuÖ uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Mounts

Pages: 1
SanDiegoPaul
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/22/05

Loc: San Diego
Using the CG5-GT for imaging
      #3589435 - 01/28/10 01:09 PM

I am currently using my refractor on top of my SCT/Wedge combo for imaging. It is unweildy, hard to balance & train and time consuming every time I move the setup from home to the dark sky site.

I am prepared to buy the above mount to use the refractor on. The question is, will it be as good at guiding the imaging scope as the Lx200 is currently?

I am very used to my existing setup and most days, the Lx200 guides well. Certainly enough for imaging up to 8 to 10 minute subframes.

If I spend $600 or so on this CG5 GT mount am I going to be happy or disappointed with it's tracking abilities while I image?

Should I stick with what I have until I can afford a better EQ platform?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jrcrillyAdministrator
Refractor wienie no more
*****

Reged: 04/30/03

Loc: NE Ohio
Re: Using the CG5-GT for imaging new [Re: SanDiegoPaul]
      #3589442 - 01/28/10 01:15 PM

Quote:

The question is, will it be as good at guiding the imaging scope as the Lx200 is currently?




Not likely. Moving down in quality just to have the German EQ configuration won't keep you at the same performance level. I used a wedgemounted LX200 for years as an imaging mount and I know what it can do. You'd need something along the lines of a CGE to match the quality and performance of the LX200.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rmollise
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 07/06/07

Re: Using the CG5-GT for imaging new [Re: jrcrilly]
      #3589559 - 01/28/10 02:17 PM

Quote:

Quote:

The question is, will it be as good at guiding the imaging scope as the Lx200 is currently?




Not likely. Moving down in quality just to have the German EQ configuration won't keep you at the same performance level.




Not all LX200s are created equal, however. Some GPS models I've used absolutely HAD to have Pempro applied before they'd autoguide at all. As long as focal length is kept reasonable, 1000mm or less, the CG5 can do just fine.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
waassaabee
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 11/26/07

Loc: Central California Coast
Re: Using the CG5-GT for imaging new [Re: rmollise]
      #3589647 - 01/28/10 03:02 PM

With that 90mm Raptor weighing in at a whopping 6 lbs., I'd say the CG5 would do fine! I image with my Megrez 90 on a CG5 and have shot 10 minute frames guided.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
SanDiegoPaul
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/22/05

Loc: San Diego
Re: Using the CG5-GT for imaging new [Re: rmollise]
      #3589658 - 01/28/10 03:05 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

The question is, will it be as good at guiding the imaging scope as the Lx200 is currently?




Not likely. Moving down in quality just to have the German EQ configuration won't keep you at the same performance level.




Not all LX200s are created equal, however. Some GPS models I've used absolutely HAD to have Pempro applied before they'd autoguide at all. As long as focal length is kept reasonable, 1000mm or less, the CG5 can do just fine.




Yep I know taht's true. My 8" Lx200GPS never would really guide ~properly~ if I wanted to go deep. This 10" Lx200-R does a much better job but that being said, 10 minutes is about it's limit for subs.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
SanDiegoPaul
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/22/05

Loc: San Diego
Re: Using the CG5-GT for imaging new [Re: waassaabee]
      #3589661 - 01/28/10 03:06 PM

Quote:

With that 90mm Raptor weighing in at a whopping 6 lbs., I'd say the CG5 would do fine! I image with my Megrez 90 on a CG5 and have shot 10 minute frames guided.




That's what I'm hoping. The Raptor-90 actually weighs LESS than the 80mm Meade APO (doublet) that it replaced


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
galacticphoto
super member


Reged: 11/12/09

Loc: Huntsville, AL and Atlanta, Ga
Re: Using the CG5-GT for imaging new [Re: SanDiegoPaul]
      #3589894 - 01/28/10 05:09 PM

Quote:

This 10" Lx200-R does a much better job but that being said, 10 minutes is about it's limit for subs.




Having used only GEMs, I'm curious why the LX200 won't guide "forever" if it guides at all? I turn guiding on the MI or CGE at the beginning of a session, and may not turn it off until hours later. The same could be said about the ASGT (CG5), that I used to use, once it was setup properly.

Are Alt/Az mounts "peculiar", or are you saying that star enlongation gets out of hand at 10minutes on individual subs? Maybe just polar alignment, not the LX200?

Robert


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rmollise
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 07/06/07

Re: Using the CG5-GT for imaging new [Re: galacticphoto]
      #3589971 - 01/28/10 05:47 PM

Quote:



Having used only GEMs, I'm curious why the LX200 won't guide "forever" if it guides at all? I turn guiding on the MI or CGE at the beginning of a session, and may not turn it off until hours later. The same could be said about the ASGT (CG5), that I used to use, once it was setup properly.

Are Alt/Az mounts "peculiar", or are you saying that star enlongation gets out of hand at 10minutes on individual subs? Maybe just polar alignment, not the LX200?

Robert




First of all, for longer exposures a _fork mount_ telescope can't be set up in alt-az mode. It must be equatorially aligned on a wedge. Why can't it "guide forever"? Various reasons, but quite a few of these drives display some large non random excursions in addition to perodic error. Eventually you'll get trailed images due to misguiding.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
galacticphoto
super member


Reged: 11/12/09

Loc: Huntsville, AL and Atlanta, Ga
Re: Using the CG5-GT for imaging new [Re: rmollise]
      #3590162 - 01/28/10 07:38 PM

Quote:

Quote:



Having used only GEMs, I'm curious why the LX200 won't guide "forever" if it guides at all?
Robert



First of all, for longer exposures a _fork mount_ telescope can't be set up in alt-az mode. It must be equatorially aligned on a wedge. Why can't it "guide forever"? Various reasons, but quite a few of these drives display some large non random excursions in addition to perodic error. Eventually you'll get trailed images due to misguiding.




So are you saying that "some" of these wedge mounted alt/az mounts are no good in general? I have no intention of giving up my GEMS, but I see that there are some, seemingly, excellent eq aligned/mounted alt/az mounts. If fact,some of the biggest, most accurate mounts available today are eq aligned alt/az mounts, so is it just the specific "amateur" mounts under discussion that are deficient?

Robert

Edited by galacticphoto (01/28/10 07:42 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
guyroch
Vendor (BackyardEOS)
*****

Reged: 01/22/08

Loc: Under the clouds!
Re: Using the CG5-GT for imaging new [Re: galacticphoto]
      #3590369 - 01/28/10 09:35 PM

Maybe I'm the black sheep here but I've never been satisfied with my cg5-gt for imaging, guiding also has issues. It's a very finicky mount and balance is most important with a cg5-gt. But for a grab and go I love it... as long as I'm willing to accept that I'll have to throw away 30% of the frames then I'm fine. Again, not all cg5-gt are created equal but I'm on the fence with this one.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
SanDiegoPaul
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/22/05

Loc: San Diego
Re: Using the CG5-GT for imaging new [Re: guyroch]
      #3590691 - 01/29/10 01:17 AM

I didn't get the smaller one as I was expecting - picked up a CGEM instead. Now I have room to grow to get a larger refractor if I decide to sell the Lx200-R

But I can't get the new CGEM to connect to The SKy Pro. Does the serial-to-handbox adapter cable (included) not allow this?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rmollise
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 07/06/07

Re: Using the CG5-GT for imaging new [Re: galacticphoto]
      #3590983 - 01/29/10 08:53 AM

Quote:




So are you saying that "some" of these wedge mounted alt/az mounts are no good in general? I have no intention of giving up my GEMS, but I see that there are some, seemingly, excellent eq aligned/mounted alt/az mounts. If fact,some of the biggest, most accurate mounts available today are eq aligned alt/az mounts, so is it just the specific "amateur" mounts under discussion that are deficient?

Robert




Not necessarily. I am saying that:

1. You will be limited in exposure in alt-az setup due to field rotatation.

2. Almost any mount will top out on exposure length due to gear noise, wind, need to do a meridian flip, etc.

3. Some Meade fork mounts are not as easy to autoguide as they should be.



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rmollise
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 07/06/07

Re: Using the CG5-GT for imaging new [Re: guyroch]
      #3590986 - 01/29/10 08:55 AM

Quote:

Maybe I'm the black sheep here but I've never been satisfied with my cg5-gt for imaging, guiding also has issues. It's a very finicky mount and balance is most important with a cg5-gt. But for a grab and go I love it... as long as I'm willing to accept that I'll have to throw away 30% of the frames then I'm fine. Again, not all cg5-gt are created equal but I'm on the fence with this one.




Balance _is_ important with these mounts...but if that's watched, then they are pretty effective for imaging (don't go out imaging if there are gale force winds). My own CG5 will do 10 - 20 minute subs without complaint autoguided by my ST2000 at about 800 - 1000mm.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rmollise
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 07/06/07

Re: Using the CG5-GT for imaging new [Re: SanDiegoPaul]
      #3590989 - 01/29/10 08:57 AM

Quote:

I didn't get the smaller one as I was expecting - picked up a CGEM instead. Now I have room to grow to get a larger refractor if I decide to sell the Lx200-R

But I can't get the new CGEM to connect to The SKy Pro. Does the serial-to-handbox adapter cable (included) not allow this?




It should.

Make sure your comm ports are right, that you have plugged the cable into the base of the hand controller, and have the appropriate driver selected in TheSky.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
waassaabee
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 11/26/07

Loc: Central California Coast
Re: Using the CG5-GT for imaging new [Re: rmollise]
      #3591110 - 01/29/10 10:03 AM

Atta boy Paul!! You're going to like the CGEM!!

ASCOM driver?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
SanDiegoPaul
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/22/05

Loc: San Diego
Re: Using the CG5-GT for imaging new [Re: rmollise]
      #3591128 - 01/29/10 10:18 AM

Quote:

Quote:

I didn't get the smaller one as I was expecting - picked up a CGEM instead. Now I have room to grow to get a larger refractor if I decide to sell the Lx200-R

But I can't get the new CGEM to connect to The SKy Pro. Does the serial-to-handbox adapter cable (included) not allow this?




It should.

Make sure your comm ports are right, that you have plugged the cable into the base of the hand controller, and have the appropriate driver selected in TheSky.




That is one of the problems - the docs don't tell you which driver to choose. I tried three different ones and all failed. I do know the port is #3 - but that's all I know right now.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Richard Scott
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 07/25/06

Loc: Tampa FL
Re: Using the CG5-GT for imaging new [Re: SanDiegoPaul]
      #3593510 - 01/30/10 01:45 PM Attachment (43 downloads)

I started out imaging with my trusty CG5
And I had a C11 and an ED80 mounted on it at the same time
It required 5 11lbs counterweights, but I balanced carefully and if the wind was not blowing it could track for 2 to 4 minutes with most subs usable.
One issue I ran into more than a few times was a failure of PHD to successfully complete itís calibration, and it was always the north/south half of the calibration that failed.
I think it was excessive dec backlash coupled to grossly overloading that poor mount.
But my point is, I and lots of other guys, have made that mount work for them

Clear Skies to all
Richard


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mclewis1
Thread Killer
*****

Reged: 02/25/06

Loc: New Brunswick, Canada
Re: Using the CG5-GT for imaging new [Re: Richard Scott]
      #3593688 - 01/30/10 03:14 PM

A C11 AND an ED80. Oh that poor CG-5 ... and that poor dovetail bar. Richard you were a braver man than I relying on that CG-5 saddle bolt. I'll bet you're glad you've got an EQ-6 now.

Oh and very nice shots too.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
clydet
member


Reged: 01/24/10

Loc: Hawaii
Re: Using the CG5-GT for imaging new [Re: Richard Scott]
      #3594006 - 01/30/10 05:45 PM

Quote:

I started out imaging with my trusty CG5
And I had a C11 and an ED80 mounted on it at the same time
It required 5 11lbs counterweights, but I balanced carefully and if the wind was not blowing it could track for 2 to 4 minutes with most subs usable.
One issue I ran into more than a few times was a failure of PHD to successfully complete itís calibration, and it was always the north/south half of the calibration that failed.
I think it was excessive dec backlash coupled to grossly overloading that poor mount.
But my point is, I and lots of other guys, have made that mount work for them

Clear Skies to all
Richard



Hi Richard
How much did your C11 and an ED80 total assembly weigh, to require 5 11#?
Oh, were those 4 shots with your old CG5 or new NEQ-6 Pro?
clyde

Edited by clydet (01/30/10 05:54 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Richard Scott
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 07/25/06

Loc: Tampa FL
Re: Using the CG5-GT for imaging new [Re: clydet]
      #3594183 - 01/30/10 07:14 PM

The total OTA weight was a shade over 43 lbs. Dew heaters, electric focusers etc
And those 4 shots were acquired auto guiding my CG-5

With a bit of patients and a good balance, that mount works quite well at itís price point
Particularly when you think that the next step up in mounts is twice the money

Clear Skies to all
Richard


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1


Extra information
19 registered and 32 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Dave M, richard7, bilgebay 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 883

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics