Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home page

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu.... uh, User

Astrophotography and Sketching >> Beginning Imaging

Pages: 1
Chris Graham
mmmm...Haggis


Reged: 04/01/04
Posts: 4869
Loc: Stirling, Scotland
ToUcam Pro question (again) :) new
      #420186 - 04/27/05 03:51 AM

Well i'm hoping to ge ta ToUcam Pro in the next few months but as i know you need to push your scope to the high f/ratios.

My scope is a short 120mm refractor woring at f/5 so to get a decent size i would need to 4x the f/ratio or more.

Problem is would my scope still be able to focus on the object?

--------------------
-Skywatcher 8" Reflector on HEQ5 with Skyscan
-Orion ED80 Refractor
-70mm Guidescope/grab and go scope
-Canon EOS 350D
-Toucam Pro 2

Astronomy & Veggies


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
description
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 11/09/04
Posts: 2159
Loc: Estonia, Tallinn
Re: ToUcam Pro question (again) :) new [Re: Chris Graham]
      #420516 - 04/27/05 11:49 AM

Im pretty sure that you will get the things into focus. actually you don't need to push the scope to higher f/ratio but if you want to get a larger image scale it is needed. I use a 3x barlow for my 110mm f/7.3 scope and i have no problems with it..

--------------------



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Blueshark928
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 02/19/04
Posts: 2853
Loc: Crownsville, MD
Re: ToUcam Pro question (again) :) new [Re: description]
      #420563 - 04/27/05 12:40 PM

You will most likely need to use your diagonal and/or extention tubes.

--------------------
John
SV-102APO
SV-80/9d
Losmandy G11
HX-916


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Hoser
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 02/10/05
Posts: 1104
Loc: Boston, MA
Re: ToUcam Pro question (again) :) new [Re: Blueshark928]
      #420826 - 04/27/05 04:36 PM

You'll need to get an extension tube to replace your diagonal in the optical chain.

I have a 660mm focal length refractor, at F 5.2

I use one of either a 2.5x or 5x PowerMate. You want to end up in the F20/30 range. Mind you, you'll need a good mount at that degree of magnification!

--------------------
www.flemingastrophotography.com
Brilliant diamonds in pea soup


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rat8bug
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 01/07/05
Posts: 1350
Loc: Michigan
Re: ToUcam Pro question (again) :) new [Re: Hoser]
      #420842 - 04/27/05 05:02 PM

You will need to have VG seeing (or take and stack a lot of shots) also. With your 120mm x 5= 600mm focal length, your prime focus magnification will be 600/4.5 = 133x. This derived from the Sony ICX098BQ CCD that is used in the ToUCam pro, that has a 4.5mm diagonal. Using the 50x/inch rule, you will be under 236x. But since you have a short focus acromat, you'll need to use a filter for the CA. So the max barlow mag would be 2x, and I recommend the Celestron Ultima 2x barlow if you don't have one.

http://www.barrie-tao.com/astro_photo.html

Ciao...Barry

--------------------
Nikon D40/D50/D70 DSLR
WO 105mm Triplet APO
WO Zenithstar 66SD APO (Black 'n Blue)
WO 8 x 45mm APO Bino
UO 20 x 80mm Bino
Vixen 80SS Refractor
Orion 127mm Apex Maksutov
Vixen GP-DX with Skysensor 2000
SBIG STV and e-finder


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Rushwind
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 03/11/04
Posts: 2133
Loc: Newark, CA
Re: ToUcam Pro question (again) :) new [Re: Rat8bug]
      #421253 - 04/27/05 11:00 PM

You can usually push the "magnification" higher for planetary photography than you would for visual use. My best Jupiter shots have been at f/30 on my 8" f/4.9, effective focal length 6000mm for effective magnification over 1300x. Yes, the seeing was pretty good the nights I was able to go that high, but using the 50x/inch rule, I should have gotten nothing more than a big fuzzy blob.

I don't know why photos hold up to higher magnification. Perhaps someone can explain that part. But they do.

The 5" refractor will probably take a lot of magnification before the light loss gets too bad; take it out for a spin and see what you get!

The suggestion of an Ultima barlow (or Orion Shorty Plus) is a good one; mine basically lives on the nosepiece of my planetcam.

Jimbo

--------------------
Order of the Unblinking Eye

G-11 D70 ST4 8"f/5 AT66ED (Rig)

I used to shoot film.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Chris Graham
mmmm...Haggis


Reged: 04/01/04
Posts: 4869
Loc: Stirling, Scotland
Re: ToUcam Pro question (again) :) new [Re: Rushwind]
      #421449 - 04/28/05 03:40 AM

I have been taking to some other folk and they say that i should have no problems with focus.

I suppose i just gotta try it out.

--------------------
-Skywatcher 8" Reflector on HEQ5 with Skyscan
-Orion ED80 Refractor
-70mm Guidescope/grab and go scope
-Canon EOS 350D
-Toucam Pro 2

Astronomy & Veggies


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Paul Rix
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 11/06/04
Posts: 2910
Loc: Zanesville, Ohio,USA
Re: ToUcam Pro question (again) :) [Re: Chris Graham]
      #430390 - 05/06/05 08:04 AM

I took a nnumber of images with our ETX70, NexImage and stacked 3x and 2x barlows. I was very pleased with the resulting images. With a 120mm scope you should get even better results.

--------------------
Climbing the Learning Curve

Meade 10" LX200 Classic: WO 66SD.
Philips SPC900NC, DMK21AU04.AS, Meade DSI Pro and DSI Pro II.



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1


Extra information
9 registered and 4 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Charlie Hein, knuklhdastnmr 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 426

Jump to

Home



Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics