Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums
Privacy Policy |
Please read our Terms
of Service | Signup and
Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User
AFN
journeyman
Reged: 10/31/07
|
MCT - Tripod and Ball Mount suitable?
#4345928 - 01/28/11 10:10 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I was thinking that I have always loved a ball mount for photography, and wondered if anyone has found a suitable tripod and ball head combo for a midsized MCT? I have an new MCT (6", 13lbs)on the way that needs a mount. Thanks in advance for all replies.
|
bykhed
scholastic sledgehammer
   
Reged: 10/22/07
Loc: Westminster, CO
|
Re: MCT - Tripod and Ball Mount suitable?
[Re: AFN]
#4346461 - 01/28/11 01:39 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
You could give it a try, but any fairly heavy scope mounted upright on an alt-az will have balance issues as it is tipped. This is why alt-az mounts have the scope sideways or in a fork (like the Televue mounts) to center the weight on the point of rotation. The UA Macrostar would be a good lightweight alternative.
-Matt
|
TONGKW
scholastic sledgehammer
Reged: 01/16/07
|
Re: MCT - Tripod and Ball Mount suitable?
[Re: AFN]
#4347425 - 01/28/11 09:00 PM Attachment (31 downloads)
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
In my experience, a ball mount/ball head is not suitable for mounting a 6” MCT of 13 lb for astronomical observation because it would be difficult to position and track the sky object at middle to high magnifications. If you prefer to use photo equipment, then I consider a Manfrotto 405 gear head to be quite suitable though nowadays it is very costly. The picture below shows a C8 (12.5 lb) on a Manfrotto gear head and a Gitzo 1415 photo tripod.
K W TONG C8+CG5 GT, TSA102+HEQ5 PRO, MK67+Voyager, NexStar 6SE, C5+Mizar K, WO ZS80FD+Kenko NES, Megrez 72FD+Kenko KDS, Mini Borg 50, PST
|
williamichang
super member
Reged: 02/13/06
Loc: Beijing, China
|
Re: MCT - Tripod and Ball Mount suitable?
[Re: TONGKW]
#4347466 - 01/28/11 09:38 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Using a ballhead you can also mount the scope side-saddle, the "lip" of the ballhead casing supporting the ball stalk, so to speak, acting as altitude bearing.
This has worked well for me a couples sizes down but perhaps at a similar weight ratio: 80mm spotter, pretty small ballhead. For smoother altitude motion I wrapped the stalk with plumber's teflon tape.
-- William
(Pentax PF-80EDA, small ballhead, Hakuba CF tripod 6lb total)
|
AFN
journeyman
Reged: 10/31/07
|
Re: MCT - Tripod and Ball Mount suitable?
[Re: williamichang]
#4352914 - 01/31/11 12:08 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Thanks for the feedback - and the pics. Exactly where i was headed.
|
Wes James
Postmaster
   
Reged: 04/12/06
|
Re: MCT - Tripod and Ball Mount suitable?
[Re: AFN]
#4352947 - 01/31/11 12:16 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
The requirements for a telescope and camera are different. You'd have to work to track an object at any kind of magnification with a scope on a ball head mount. You'll have to fight the tendency for it to want to tip over. It's that ol' "Right tool for the right job" thing!
|
|
18 registered and 33 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
Moderator: Bowmoreman, bilgebay, iceblaze
Print Thread
|
Forum Permissions
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled
UBBCode is enabled
|
Thread views: 530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|