Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums
Privacy Policy |
Please read our Terms
of Service | Signup and
Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User
MAURITS
professor emeritus
Reged: 09/22/09
Loc: Diksmuide (Belgium)
|
Saddle plate......?
#4404050 - 02/22/11 03:31 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Is it difficult to mount a rather heavy telescope (refractor TOA150) on a mount (EM400) with saddle plate, and the rings on a dove tail (the rings remain on the scope)?
Or is it better to use the original heavy plate with the craddle on the mount (always open and close the rings)?
Thanks!
|
walt99
super member
   
Reged: 08/23/08
Loc: Kentucky
|
Re: Saddle plate......?
[Re: MAURITS]
#4404074 - 02/22/11 03:41 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I found it much easier to leave the clamshell on the mount and put my TOA in that. Still a PIA tho.
|
mclewis1
Thread Killer
   
Reged: 02/25/06
Loc: New Brunswick, Canada
|
Re: Saddle plate......?
[Re: MAURITS]
#4404077 - 02/22/11 03:42 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
To some degree the answer depends on the type of saddle on the mount. If the saddle is a full moving side plate design and allows a dovetail plate to be inserted from the side (rather than being slid in from the end) then it will likely be easier to keep the rings and the dovetail plate on the scope. If the saddle is not of that design and only loads from the end then you'll likely find it easier to leave the plate and rings on the mount and load the scope into the open split rings.
With a lighter weight scope this difference likely doesn't matter as it will be easier to manipulate the angle of the dovetail plate as it enters the rear of the saddle but with a heavier scope this is much more difficult. With a heavier scope the side loading technique tends to work better.
|
MAURITS
professor emeritus
Reged: 09/22/09
Loc: Diksmuide (Belgium)
|
Re: Saddle plate......?
[Re: MAURITS]
#4405100 - 02/23/11 12:30 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Thanks for the clear answers!
|
LLEEGE
True Blue
   
Reged: 03/03/05
Loc: Cloud-chester,NY
|
Re: Saddle plate......?
[Re: MAURITS]
#4405112 - 02/23/11 12:40 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I find it easier to put my rings on the mount first (on a dovetail plate) and then put the scope in the rings.
|
Starhawk
Post Laureate
Reged: 09/16/08
Loc: Tucson, Arizona
|
Re: Saddle plate......?
[Re: LLEEGE]
#4405486 - 02/23/11 08:38 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
At least through 15lbs, I have had no trouble leaving them on a dovetail with an end-loading setup. But I made my own dovetail clamps where they have a lead-in feature just so they could do this.
-Rich
|
AntarcticDave
sage
Reged: 02/03/09
Loc: Denver, CO
|
Re: Saddle plate......?
[Re: Starhawk]
#4405922 - 02/23/11 12:30 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I scratched up my saddle sliding my 6" refractor with rings and dovetail in. I agree with LLEEGE, I now mount the dovetail and rings to the saddle first, then mount the scope in the rings - much easier and secure.
|
|
15 registered and 43 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
Moderator: Bowmoreman, bilgebay, iceblaze
Print Thread
|
Forum Permissions
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled
UBBCode is enabled
|
Thread views: 599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|