Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums
Privacy Policy |
Please read our Terms
of Service | Signup and
Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User
AlienRatDog
Carpal Tunnel
   
Reged: 07/15/05
Loc: Ann Arbor
|
iOptron iEQ45 and mewlon 250
#4459584 - 03/19/11 10:34 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
For purely visual work, would this mount be adequate?
|
Trev
scholastic sledgehammer
Reged: 12/18/05
Loc: Fort McMurray, AB
|
Re: iOptron iEQ45 and mewlon 250
[Re: AlienRatDog]
#4460180 - 03/19/11 03:33 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Well the Mewlon wieghts 27lbs and the EQ45 is rated for 45lbs I don't see a problem with it.
|
mak7
sage
   
Reged: 09/29/07
Loc: light polluted Phoenix AZ
|
Re: iOptron iEQ45 and mewlon 250
[Re: AlienRatDog]
#4460320 - 03/19/11 04:57 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
My Mewlon 250s with rings, dovetail, diagonal and EP comes close to 38 lbs. With proper balance on my HyperTuned CGEM, I seem to be acceptable for visual. Run it at reduced slew rate to help save motors and gears.
Biggest problem I had on the CGEM was the spindly CG5 tripod. Fixed that with a TPI leg spreader and damping time is about 1.5 seconds, from 5 or 6 seconds before the spreader.
The iOptron has 5 lbs more rated capacity than the CGEM.
Toss a coin, but I want a bigger mount.
Brad
|
|
4 registered and 19 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
Moderator: Bowmoreman, bilgebay, iceblaze
Print Thread
|
Forum Permissions
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled
UBBCode is enabled
|
Thread views: 582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|