Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Mounts

Pages: 1
coz
sage


Reged: 08/25/10

Astro-Physics vs. ASA mounts
      #4468772 - 03/23/11 02:26 PM

I'm having trouble on deciding on a mount for my AP 130GT scope. I'm a rookie who wants a premium goto mount which I won't need to upgrade for a long time. I have a dslr and want to get into astro photography slowly maybe get a ccd down the road. Here are the pros and cons as I see them. Please correct me if I'm wrong or pls share opinions. I'm using the mount in the field and will be set up in different locations. I have a mac. Thanks

ASA
new direct drive technology. no gear parts to wear out?
Solid engineering very stable.
will not need to use autoguider up to 20min exposures
building pointing models takes 30 mins
software is windows only? can run in parallels on mac.
Price is 30+% higher than AP.
ASA fairly new company. Will support measure up to AP? Is it bulletproof and would I never need support!

AP Mach 1
proven reliable performance
fantastic support from company and others
price is less than ASA
Much faster set up time
Hand controller can eliminate computer if desired
New APCC software realeased soon will have pointing models if I even need it.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
coz
sage


Reged: 08/25/10

Re: Astro-Physics vs. ASA mounts new [Re: coz]
      #4468807 - 03/23/11 02:39 PM

It really helped me right all of this down. I'm now very much leaning towards the Mach 1. For my style I think setting up pointing models each session will discourage me from using the mount. Perhaps if it was in a permanent location it would be a tougher choice. Add to that the cost difference and I think I have my answer.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
skybsd
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 02/01/08

Re: Astro-Physics vs. ASA mounts new [Re: coz]
      #4468826 - 03/23/11 02:46 PM

Very pragmatic of you..,

Regards,

skybsd


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
t.r.
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 02/14/08

Loc: Upstate NY
Re: Astro-Physics vs. ASA mounts new [Re: skybsd]
      #4468833 - 03/23/11 02:50 PM

You have answered your own question...correctly I might add!

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
drksky
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 09/01/09

Loc: Bloomington, IL
Re: Astro-Physics vs. ASA mounts new [Re: t.r.]
      #4468847 - 03/23/11 02:56 PM

I've passed up several used Tak mounts simply because I think it'd be a royal pain to get it fixed if something ever broke.

If I buy an AP, I could conceivably drive to AP and drop it at Roland's feet.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
coz
sage


Reged: 08/25/10

Re: Astro-Physics vs. ASA mounts new [Re: drksky]
      #4468864 - 03/23/11 03:06 PM

Yes, I've dealt with their customer service a few times in the past and it was a positive & unique experience in this day and age!

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
LLEEGE
True Blue
*****

Reged: 03/03/05

Loc: Cloud-chester,NY
Re: Astro-Physics vs. ASA mounts new [Re: coz]
      #4468977 - 03/23/11 03:56 PM

The Mach1 was designed to image with a 160EDF. The amount of "wear" on the gears would take several life times to be an issue. AP mounts are simple to set up, have a good support group backed up by the owner and the people who built them.
From what I understand, the ASA mounts are a bit of a challenge to get them tuned, but once they are they perform well too. I don't think they are as portable but I could be wrong.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Alph
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 11/23/06

Loc: Melmac
Re: Astro-Physics vs. ASA mounts new [Re: coz]
      #4469093 - 03/23/11 04:47 PM

Quote:

For my style I think setting up pointing models each session will discourage me from using the mount.



Well, if that's the only reason then it is the wrong reason. The pointing model can be built using 2 or 3 stars. You need to find another reason


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
RAKing
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 12/28/07

Loc: West of the D.C. Nebula
Re: Astro-Physics vs. ASA mounts new [Re: drksky]
      #4469123 - 03/23/11 05:07 PM

Quote:

If I buy an AP, I could conceivably drive to AP and drop it at Roland's feet.




That's IF it ever broke. Calling A-P is a pleasant experience. Everyone is familiar with the gear and cares very much about how well it works for you.

OT - You have some nice scopes in your sig; I have a great mount to use them on. Too bad you don't live closer to DC.....

Cheers,

Ron


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
drksky
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 09/01/09

Loc: Bloomington, IL
Re: Astro-Physics vs. ASA mounts new [Re: RAKing]
      #4469327 - 03/23/11 06:41 PM

Quote:


OT - You have some nice scopes in your sig; I have a great mount to use them on. Too bad you don't live closer to DC.....





Hmmm....I guess I should update that. No longer have the 106LE. Saving up for a TMB or AT130, if I don't buy the Mach-1. If I do, that's my astro budget for the year so I guess I'll have to suffer with using the TMB80 and AT8RC


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
David PavlichAdministrator
Transmographied
*****

Reged: 05/18/05

Loc: Mandeville, LA USA
Re: Astro-Physics vs. ASA mounts new [Re: drksky]
      #4469718 - 03/23/11 09:31 PM

Permanent setup...ASA. Anything else would be the Mach 1.

David


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Starhawk
Space Ranger
*****

Reged: 09/16/08

Loc: Tucson, Arizona
Re: Astro-Physics vs. ASA mounts new [Re: David Pavlich]
      #4470500 - 03/24/11 09:36 AM

There are a building number of write-ups online which seem to indicate the ASA is a never-ending science project in and of itself. Universally the feedback on the APs has been they work so well, you don't have to think about it.

Not sure when I'll have the cash to support one as Roland has just cleaned me out with an AP130EDFGT.

-Rich


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1


Extra information
22 registered and 34 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Dave M, richard7, bilgebay 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 1408

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics