Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home page
   · Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article   

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Reflectors

Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)
Tad S.
super member
*****

Reged: 08/28/06

Loc: SW Virginia
First Light with a Zambuto drop-in replacement
      #4541181 - 04/24/11 02:46 PM

I finally got under the stars last night with a new 200mm Zambuto replacement primary, mounted in my Orion XT8i. To summarize: The weather conditions were only intermittently decent, and I had house guests to entertain, but I did get the chance to do a little viewing. Even under the sketchy seeing conditions, I had moments of atmospheric stability that showed the best views of Saturn, more detail in galaxies, and better double-splitting abilities than I have I ever had with this scope. The most overt difference is the contrast. The background is much darker, with targets popping out with more detail.

There has been a lot of talk in another thread about this option from Zambuto Optical Company (ZOC) lately, so I’ll first describe why I decided to go this route. If you are not interested in that, you can skip the next three or four paragraphs.

Though I don't think this program is for everyone, I am very happy with it. I have had my XT8i for about seven years. I've done several of the tweaks and tricks others have outlined, and the scope has served me pretty well. However, a few years after I got it, the Chinese 80mm ED refractors became hot items and I got a smokin' deal on one. The contrast and sharp views in that little scope eventually relegated the XT8i to the closet. Actually, before it went in the closet, I did most of the tweaks like flocking, motion adjustments, and closer attention to collimation (I became proficient with the Tectron kit). I spent many nights comparing the two scopes. The dob was better able to reveal faint fuzzies, but for planets and double splitting, the little 80mm scope was still cleaner with darker background.

So, not long ago, when I was researching what I could do to bring my 8" up to the performance level that I felt it should have, I joined the Zambuto mirror group. At the time, there was a thread on that group about the viability of a drop-in replacement program. I talked to Carl Z about it, but did not make a decision right away. I strongly considered getting a completely different scope, or buying good optics and building something myself. My observing habits and preferences dictate that something in the 8-10" range would be best for me. As I continued to talk with Carl about the progress of the first mirrors he was making to get the replacement program going, he seemed quite impressed with the way he was able to smooth the BK7 glass. I finally decided to pull the trigger. Comparing all my options, the $695 Zambuto mirror came out on top. It would be the simplest to implement, satisfaction was guaranteed by Carl, and I would have spent more (even in the used market, including shipping) to replace my current scope with a premium optic tool. My drop-in is not a pyrex mirror (although that is an option now), but in the 8" range, that did not concern me too much. If I already had something bigger (particularly in pyrex with a satisfactory anneal), I may have gone for a refigure.

I am not sure if this will be the case as this ZOC offer evolves, but since I was the guinea pig for this, Carl was able to send me some info about the mirrors that I sent in. He said that my primary appeared to be well-corrected in the center, but with an outer zone that was about 1/4-wave overcorrected. He said that the surface was rough and zoney, and that there was a TDE. On the other hand, my secondary mirror was better than the replacement that he had originally suggested. Mine was 1/20th wave P-V with a smooth surface, so he changed his suggestion to keep the secondary I already had.

After coating, ZOC center-marked the primary mirror and shipped it to me. My secondary mirror was also recoated and it finally found its way to my mailbox a few days ago. I went through the simple process of siliconing my secondary back on the spider, and “dropping in” the replacement primary. Because my original mirror was a 203mm (Synta) mirror, and the replacement is 200mm, I had to make a make a minor modification to the way the mirror is held in the cell. I simply replaced the thin felt tape tabs that came in the cell to hold the mirror with thicker, adhesive-backed, 2”-long, felt strips from my hardware store. This felt comes in 1/2”-wide strips and is sold for mounting under furniture to be used on hardwood floors. It worked perfectly; the mirror dropped perfectly into the cell without any slop, and without being pushed or forced to fit. I should also mention that I re-positioned the cork tabs on which the mirror rests. From PLOP analysis, Carl Z suggested that I move the tabs to a position closer to the center of the cell.

Then, last night arrived! I got the scope collimated, and I set it up (along with my 80mm refractor for comparison) in my driveway, where I have viewed from 100’s of times before. There was some upper level turbulence and about 25% cloud cover. Using the refractor as my standard, the seeing conditions were a bit swirly, but with intermittent periods of calm. I let the Dobsonian equilibrate for about 20 minutes, dropped in a 24mm EP, and then lined it up on Regulus. I was immediately struck by the blackness of the background and pinpoint size of the stars. The high contrast actually made the spider spikes more noticeable on this bright star. However, its companion was more easily seen than ever. Both in- and out-of-focus, the rings were mostly swirly due to the atmosphere, but occasionally cleared into perfect concentric circles.

The Leo Trio was easy, and the galaxies displayed some definition, compared to the three (and often only two) blurbs I used to see with the original mirror. I had out-of-town guests visiting so I was unable to spend too much time tracking down more challenging targets. But I got them to view some highlights. They were most interested in the crowd pleaser, Saturn. Most of that viewing was through an 8mm Radian (150x) where the views blew my little refractor (also at 150x) away. The difference was significant. This XT8i had never shown better views on planets than my little refractor had shown. When the sky was calm, banding on the globe and the Cassini division were obvious. I barlowed up the Radian to 300x and got the best view of Saturn I have ever had from my house.

I put in an 18mm Radian and took a stroll through Virgo. I did not take time to ID specific galaxies, but several were evident on the black background. Other targets that we turned the scope to included M51 (where I glimpsed arm structure), M63, M81, and M82, all of which showed the most shape I have ever seen from them. Some clouds began to roll through, and my guests were ready to retire. Later, when I went back out to break down the equipment, the summer triangle was low in the east. Despite the low altitude and the ensuing dew, I got a great split on the double-double at 150x, beautiful color in Alberio, and I topped off the night with a view M57. This morning, I realized that I did not target any globulars. This gives me something to look forward to.

I can’t wait to take the scope to my dark sky location where I imagine the contrast difference should be even more pronounced. For me, the increased contrast has made this upgrade very much worth it. Even though I did not gain any aperture, I am able to detect fainter objects better now that they stand out from the blackness of the background. The sharpness of the views is as though a veil has been lifted from between the skies and my scope.

--Tad

Edited by Tad S. (04/26/11 12:25 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
GeneT
Ely Kid
*****

Reged: 11/07/08

Loc: South Texas
Re: First Light with a Zambuto drop-in replacement new [Re: Tad S.]
      #4541333 - 04/24/11 03:56 PM

Great report. Please do a follow up from dark skies.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
sabir
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 06/23/07

Loc: Pune (India)
Re: First Light with a Zambuto drop-in replacement new [Re: Tad S.]
      #4541365 - 04/24/11 04:15 PM

Hi Tad

Great first light report!

Really glad to hear that the ZOC mirror has made such a pronounced improvement to the views!

Please do post updates/follow-ups as and when you get the time! Globs are one of my favorite objects. I’d be really interested in reading the improvements they show with your supercharged scope

Reading your report has now got me even more excited about receiving my ZOC mirror!

Sabir


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Mary B
Vendor - Echo Astronomy and Electronics
*****

Reged: 05/21/10

Loc: Minnesota
Re: First Light with a Zambuto drop-in replacement new [Re: sabir]
      #4541422 - 04/24/11 04:49 PM

Something to think about for my Z10.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Don Allen
professor emeritus


Reged: 07/07/05

Loc: Charleston, SC
Re: First Light with a Zambuto drop-in replacement new [Re: Mary B]
      #4541437 - 04/24/11 04:57 PM

I think the ZOC will be doing quite a bit of business with this idea.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
pstarr
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 09/17/04

Loc: NE Ohio
Re: First Light with a Zambuto drop-in replacement new [Re: Tad S.]
      #4541652 - 04/24/11 06:52 PM

Great report. I'm glad your happy with your new mirror. Get ready for some really great lunar and planetary views when you get some steady air. I never though of a reflector as a scope that would consistently split tight doubles until I got my mirror.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bill Jensen
sage
*****

Reged: 10/23/04

Loc: Springfield VA
Re: First Light with a Zambuto drop-in replacement new [Re: pstarr]
      #4541760 - 04/24/11 07:45 PM

Tad, great to hear your first light report. Please share more. It is amazing what a smooth mirror can do with planetary views, isn't it?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
cliff mygatt
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 01/27/09

Loc: Kitsap County, WA
Re: First Light with a Zambuto drop-in replacement new [Re: Bill Jensen]
      #4541986 - 04/24/11 09:33 PM

Tad, thanks for the report, my ZOC mirror was sent to coating last week! It will go back to Carl for center spotting and then to me. I have a Protostar secondary to glue in and then pad the sides of the mirror as you have as my current mirror is 305mm and my new one is 300mm. I am excited to hear your comments as that is why I am updgrading. It is all about the contrast!

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mark cowan
Vendor (Veritas Optics)
*****

Reged: 06/03/05

Loc: salem, OR
Re: First Light with a Zambuto drop-in replacement new [Re: Tad S.]
      #4542335 - 04/25/11 12:59 AM

Quote:

The sharpness of the views is as though a veil has been lifted between the skies and my scope.




Glad Carl is doing these, as it can only spread the experience more widely of "lifting the veil" - a favorite phrase of his as well and quite apt.

Best,
Mark


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Tad S.
super member
*****

Reged: 08/28/06

Loc: SW Virginia
Re: First Light with a Zambuto drop-in replacement new [Re: mark cowan]
      #4542886 - 04/25/11 11:01 AM

Hi All—

Thanks, for all the comments. It looks like this may indeed become a popular program for ZOC. If my Synta mirror was typical of the quality of mass produced Dobs, then I think that the upgrade is good route for those who are generally happy with the scope but want to take the optics to the next level. I don’t think the figure on my old mirror was all that bad, but without a smooth surface, I found that my little 80mm refractor (with 1/6th the light grasp) gave better views for most targets. The Zambuto mirror transformed my scope, making it more like my refractor with a blacker background and more pinpoint stars.

@Sabir: Globulars! I actually love them, too. I don’t know why I did not take a look at M3 or M5, both would have been well-placed the other night. I guess I was excited by what I did see, and somewhat distracted by conversation with my visitors. I tried again last night, but had a coating of high clouds. Everything I could see in the sky had an annoying halo. M5 was a glowy spot at best. DSOs were not detectable at all.

Going to my dark sky location along the Blue Ridge Parkway is a weekend evening trip for me, but I’ll be sure to report back after I have gotten out there and had some more time with the scope. I am hoping to find another astro buff around here who has a commercial 8” dob so we can do some A-B comparison. The local university (Virginia Tech) has an astronomy club that I was part of for few years. I think they have some Dobs that they use for teaching/outreach, so that may be a source. As I gain more experience with the new mirror, I will post any findings that I make.

@Paul: In a sense, I was happy that there was no moon to contend with the other night, but you are right, it is a great target in its own right. I have done lots of lunar comparisons of my old mirror vs my little refractor, so that will be a good target to compare new mirror vs the refractor. Since I don’t still have the old mirror, I can’t directly compare the upgraded scope with what it was before. However, having the refractor as a standard against which both scopes can be compared allows some comparison of the upgrade with the original. As far as other planets go, it was my washed out views of Jupiter earlier this year that escalated the idea of an upgrade in my head. I can’t wait until Jupiter comes back in the morning over the next few weeks.

@Cliff: I am anticipating your report. If your experience parallels mine, you will have a giant smile on your face. Like you, I have done a fair amount of customizing my scope. I have fully flocked my tube and recently installed a shrouded fan to pull air across the mirror. Except for my R&P focuser (which is just okay), I am happy with the mechanics of the scope. It just needed a smooth optical train to darken the background.

@Mark: My use of CZ’s phrase “lifting the veil” was accidental, but truly fitting. I may have heard it from him, but I don’t remember. Another phrase he has used that comes to mind is that a good 8” reflector is comparable to a 6” apo refractor, plus diffraction spikes. I don’t have a 6” apo refractor to do that comparison, but I don’t doubt that it’s true. The only differences that I see between my 80ED refractor and my reflector are spikes on bright objects and all the targets are much brighter!

Happy gazing,
--Tad

Edited by Tad S. (04/25/11 11:57 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Mike B
Starstruck
*****

Reged: 04/06/05

Loc: shake, rattle, & roll, CA
Re: First Light with a Zambuto drop-in replacement new [Re: Tad S.]
      #4543013 - 04/25/11 12:04 PM

Great report, Tad! Really nice to see this ZOC-replacement idea go from concept to reality, and in such a fine way.
mike b


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
WaterMaster
Moat Keeper
*****

Reged: 02/17/10

Loc: Southeast Idaho, USA
Re: First Light with a Zambuto drop-in replacement new [Re: Mike B]
      #4552722 - 04/30/11 12:19 AM

I accidentally moved Tad S's last post and can't move it back (I know, rookie mistake).

Following is his post:
Quote:

just saw this message on the Zambuto mirror group site today. Carl Z. has posted a comparison between the mirror I submitted, and the mirror that he sent to me as part of his replacement program. He describes in terms that even I can understand how relative transverse aberration (RTA) and micro-surface roughness affect miror quality. He talks about how the mirror I sent in--which is respectable in its wavefront error (1/4-wave PV)--has two flaws (RTA and roughness) that contribute to the differences that I pointed out in this first light report: compared to my new mirror, the old mirror had (a) less pinpoint star images and (b) the contrast in the old one was unmistakeably worse due to its brighter background. Despite the passable rating that my stock mirror had, the surface roughness and RTA, in addition to the turned edge, caused it to have excessive scatter and therefore background brightness. And as CZ describes below, RTA can explain a big part of the reason for the less-than-pinpoint stars that my stock mirror had.

I am posting this as part of this first-light thread instead of starting a new one because it offers an explanation of the differences I am seeing. But also, it addresses some of the questions that have been tossed around about what are differences between stock optics (at least mine) and these ZOC replacements. Additionally, it provides an understandable description of an optical quality (RTA) that is not often talked about, but that strongly affects the views through the telescope.

His post included two diagrams that I have uploaded to my gallery and linked to them in the post. I have included his captions for the diagrams with the pictures in my gallery.

--Tad

--------------------
Orion XT8i, Vixen ED80Sf, Oberwerk BT-80/45
20x80 Oberwerk Std., 15x70 Garrett WP-CF, 12x50 Nikon AE,
42mm Celestron Regal LX (8x & 10x), 8x40 Pentax PCF WP


Edited by WaterMaster (04/29/11 10:09 PM)






My apologies.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Mark Harry
Vendor
*****

Reged: 09/05/05

Loc: Northeast USA
Re: First Light with a Zambuto drop-in replacement new [Re: WaterMaster]
      #4554643 - 05/01/11 07:26 AM

I made the same change to my XT8I several years ago with one of my mirrors. I can split the double-double rather easily below 100x.
As you note, contrast is significantly improved, and I think you'll enjoy globulars far more as well.
*******
The biggest thing- the scope is only limited by prevailing conditions, and the observer now!
Enjoy,
Mark


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
telenewbie
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 09/06/10

Loc: always cloudy, washington
Re: First Light with a Zambuto drop-in replacement new [Re: Mark Harry]
      #4555277 - 05/01/11 02:37 PM

how long did it take to get the mirror? from order to shipping. it isn't much more than a refigure from some companies. i am just wondering if you still have to wait multiple months for it.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Tad S.
super member
*****

Reged: 08/28/06

Loc: SW Virginia
Re: First Light with a Zambuto drop-in replacement new [Re: telenewbie]
      #4555330 - 05/01/11 03:13 PM

The idea with this program is that there is no waiting. ZOC keeps a stock of a few of these mirrors ready to go. When you get a mirror from them, you send back your original. When ZOC has a few returned mirrors, they precision anneal the returned mirrors, then they grind new ones in these standard sizes to have on hand for the next customer. So, you should keep in mind that this is not just a re-figure. The mirrors that are returned get an in-house precision anneal. Plus, the price includes a check of the secondary mirror, too.

Now, it did take me a little longer because I entered into this before the program actually got started. It took about one month, but part of that time was my own decision making process. Ideally, you should be able to contact ZOC, make an order, and within days the new mirror will be in your hands. If you want them to check your secondary mirror, you will need to send it in and it may take them a couple days to get it checked out.

--Tad


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jason D
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 10/21/06

Loc: California
Re: First Light with a Zambuto drop-in replacement new [Re: Mark Harry]
      #4555381 - 05/01/11 03:50 PM

Quote:

I made the same change to my XT8I several years ago with one of my mirrors. I can split the double-double rather easily below 100x.



But isn't that more of a function of seeing and thermal stability than optics quality?
Besides, spherical aberration which seems to the common imperfection across mass produced optics should not prevent you from splitting stars. My understanding is that it will make it little easier since transferring energy from the airy disc to the diffraction rings will reduce the size of the airy disc.
I do not claim to be an expert on optics. I am just sharing my understanding.
Jason


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Tad S.
super member
*****

Reged: 08/28/06

Loc: SW Virginia
Re: First Light with a Zambuto drop-in replacement new [Re: WaterMaster]
      #4555405 - 05/01/11 04:07 PM

Quote:

I accidentally moved Tad S's last post and can't move it back (I know, rookie mistake).

Following is his post:
Quote:

just saw this message on the Zambuto mirror group site today. Carl Z. has posted a comparison between the mirror I submitted, and the mirror that he sent to me as part of his replacement program. He describes in terms that even I can understand how relative transverse aberration (RTA) and micro-surface roughness affect miror quality. He talks about how the mirror I sent in--which is respectable in its wavefront error (1/4-wave PV)--has two flaws (RTA and roughness) that contribute to the differences that I pointed out in this first light report: compared to my new mirror, the old mirror had (a) less pinpoint star images and (b) the contrast in the old one was unmistakeably worse due to its brighter background. Despite the passable rating that my stock mirror had, the surface roughness and RTA, in addition to the turned edge, caused it to have excessive scatter and therefore background brightness. And as CZ describes below, RTA can explain a big part of the reason for the less-than-pinpoint stars that my stock mirror had.

I am posting this as part of this first-light thread instead of starting a new one because it offers an explanation of the differences I am seeing. But also, it addresses some of the questions that have been tossed around about what are differences between stock optics (at least mine) and these ZOC replacements. Additionally, it provides an understandable description of an optical quality (RTA) that is not often talked about, but that strongly affects the views through the telescope.

His post included two diagrams that I have uploaded to my gallery and linked to them in the post. I have included his captions for the diagrams with the pictures in my gallery.

--Tad


Edited by WaterMaster (04/29/11 10:09 PM)






My apologies.




Not a problem, Steve. You were just doing your job!

I failed to include a statement that indicated that I did have permission from Mr. Zambuto to post his report on CN. In a message to me, our moderator, Steve (WaterMaster), suggested that I post a link to the report that was referenced in that deleted post. This is the report that talks about physical differences between the two mirrors. Those differences offer an explanation for the the particular improvements that I noted in my first light report, namely increased contrast (darker background), and more pinpoint star images.
Here are a few links relating to what was posted:

Carl Zambuto's post regarding RTA qualities of my original mirror and his replacements

Within the report, Mr. Zambuto references two diagrams that are stored in the photo section of the yahoo user-group, zambutomirrorgroup. With his permission, I put a copy of those diagrams in my gallery. The links below can be used to see the pictures that are referenced at the following lines in his report:

"Photos > Import scope replacement mirror project> Original mirror.RTA."
"Photos > Import scope replacement mirror project> Replacement mirror RTA."

I hope that this works properly and that I am complying with the rules. I don't want to spend any time in the pokey, especially if the inghts are clear.

--Tad


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Tad S.
super member
*****

Reged: 08/28/06

Loc: SW Virginia
Re: First Light with a Zambuto drop-in replacement new [Re: Jason D]
      #4555457 - 05/01/11 04:49 PM

Quote:

Quote:

I made the same change to my XT8I several years ago with one of my mirrors. I can split the double-double rather easily below 100x.



But isn't that more of a function of seeing and thermal stability than optics quality?
Besides, spherical aberration which seems to the common imperfection across mass produced optics should not prevent you from splitting stars. My understanding is that it will make it little easier since transferring energy from the airy disc to the diffraction rings will reduce the size of the airy disc.
I do not claim to be an expert on optics. I am just sharing my understanding.
Jason




@Mark: I am finding the same thing with this one. I was out again last night and was using a 12mm EP (100x) when I happened upon the double-double. No problem, you could "drive a truck" between the stars in each pair. The stars were much more bloated in the original mirror.

@Jason: I am even less knowledgeable about optics, but from what I understand from the recent link by CZ (referenced in my previous post in this thread) about relative transverse aberration, the airy disc appears larger since different zones of the mirror are are focusing the photons less precisely within the airy disc. Regardless, I agree with you that seeing and thermal currents can have major effects on star-splitting ability. I may have mentioned this before, but my 80mm refractor was a much more adept star splitter than my 8" dob was with the original mirror. With the new mirror, stars are similarly-sized pinpoints in the reflector and refractor, and maybe even slightly tighter in the dob. It could be that the brighter star images contribute to the "tighter" appearance.

--Tad

Edited by Tad S. (05/01/11 04:51 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
sabir
scholastic sledgehammer


Reged: 06/23/07

Loc: Pune (India)
Re: First Light with a Zambuto drop-in replacement new [Re: Tad S.]
      #4555529 - 05/01/11 05:40 PM

Hi Tad

I have just posted CZ's post in it's entirety on my thread discussing replacement ZOC mirrors.

I have a lot of time to pokey as I am currently scopeless

Sabir


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Tad S.
super member
*****

Reged: 08/28/06

Loc: SW Virginia
Re: First Light with a Zambuto drop-in replacement new [Re: sabir]
      #4555621 - 05/01/11 06:31 PM

Sabir--

Funny! I should be careful using slang on an international forum. As a noun, "pokey" is another word for jail.

--Tad


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)


Extra information
4 registered and 2 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  ssatko, David Pavlich 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 2505

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics