Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums
Privacy Policy |
Please read our Terms
of Service | Signup and
Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User
dyslexic nam
Pooh-Bah
   
Reged: 01/28/08
Loc: PEI, Canada
|
Baader M&SG vs. other neodymium filters?
#5179830 - 04/19/12 08:15 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I am wondering if anyone has compared the Baader Moon and Skyglow (neodymium) filter to other neodymium filters?
I have always recommended neo filters to folks on CN as the best single filter for Mars and Jupiter. While I routinely try other filters on these two targets, I inevitably ‘settle in’ with my neo filter for any extended viewing of my two favourite planets. I currently use a 1.25” Zhumell ‘Crystalview’ neo filter in my filter slide, and in 2” format have used the glass from 49mm photographic neo filters (“didymium filters” – I have tried the Tiffen Enhancing filter and a Hoya Intensifier filter). Yet despite my affinity for these filters, I have never tried the Baader Moon and Skyglow – possibly the highest quality iteration of the available neo filters.
I am curious if there is a noticeable difference in terms of performance between the Baader and its more generic cousins. I enjoy the views through the three versions I mentioned above, but I am always wondering if the Baader would be superior in terms of optical ‘flatness’, quality of coatings, and/or the strength of filtration, and if so, if these improvements would make much difference at the eyepiece.
|
dyslexic nam
Pooh-Bah
   
Reged: 01/28/08
Loc: PEI, Canada
|
Re: Baader M&SG vs. other neodymium filters?
[Re: dyslexic nam]
#5180965 - 04/19/12 10:30 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Guess not. I thought it was a bit of a shot in the dark...
|
dpwoos
Pooh-Bah
   
Reged: 10/18/06
|
Re: Baader M&SG vs. other neodymium filters?
[Re: dyslexic nam]
#5180985 - 04/19/12 10:38 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Let's not give up yet - I too am interested in some answers!
|
csa/montana
Den Mama
   
Reged: 05/14/05
Loc: montana
|
Re: Baader M&SG vs. other neodymium filters?
[Re: dyslexic nam]
#5181048 - 04/19/12 11:31 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Perhaps our filter guru David will drop in and offer some insight in this.
|
David Knisely
Postmaster
   
Reged: 04/19/04
Loc: southeastern Nebraska
|
Re: Baader M&SG vs. other neodymium filters?
[Re: csa/montana]
#5181151 - 04/20/12 01:29 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
The only one I have ever used is the old Sirius Optics NPC Neodymium filter. It is a fairly decent minus-violet filter that keeps down the chromatic aberration of small fast achromats while at least halfway preserving the color balance. I reviewed it about nine years ago (the filter is no longer made):
Sirius Optics NPC Neodymium Filter
Clear skies to you.
|
Loren Toole
sage
   
Reged: 03/23/04
Loc: New Mexico USA
|
Re: Baader M&SG vs. other neodymium filters?
[Re: David Knisely]
#5181373 - 04/20/12 08:33 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
I've used the Baader 1.25" M&SG for at least five years, then I purchased a Garrett 2.00" MS&G this winter. Based on the limited testing I've done, my impression is that these filters are functionally equivalent, however the filter coatings are obviously different and Garrett's cell construction is a little less refined. Garrett publishes a bandpass diagram for their MS&G which I overlaid with Baader's.... also identical to my eye.
Considering that I paid around $65 for the Garrett, it's a decent alternative to Baader's higher priced filter.
|
|
9 registered and 15 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
Moderator: Jarad, tecmage
Print Thread
|
Forum Permissions
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled
UBBCode is enabled
|
Thread views: 544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|