sullij1
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 11/08/08
|
CalK Homebrew From Last Sunday
#5357426 - 08/08/12 12:30 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Done on the AT65 with Baader photographic, QHY5/SSAG and my homebrew CalK
 42 purple by Sullij1, on Flickr
|
frolinmod
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 08/06/10
|
Re: CalK Homebrew From Last Sunday
[Re: sullij1]
#5357510 - 08/08/12 02:51 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Wow, that's good!
|
Peter Molnar
member
Reged: 01/23/08
Loc: Budapest, Hungary
|
Re: CalK Homebrew From Last Sunday
[Re: frolinmod]
#5357556 - 08/08/12 04:33 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Hi,
great picture! Can we get some more info on this homebrew CaK filter?
Thanks Peter
|
raylal
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 04/19/10
Loc: Cornwall, Ont., Canada
|
Re: CalK Homebrew From Last Sunday
[Re: Peter Molnar]
#5357597 - 08/08/12 06:51 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Very interesting, huge spots.
Ray
|
sullij1
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 11/08/08
|
Re: CalK Homebrew From Last Sunday
[Re: Peter Molnar]
#5357820 - 08/08/12 10:59 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Quote:
Hi,
great picture!
Can we get some more info on this homebrew CaK filter?
Thanks
Peter
Thanks everyone. Been working with others searching for a homebrew that is decent for a while. This one is ok.
Peter I am a work but will post more on the combo when I get home and try and add the links to the filters. This is a stack of 3 different inexpesive filters to reach a bandpass close to the required Calk bandpass. This one is still wide in the violet wing at ~3-4nm FWHM. Stilll much better than the Baader version at 10nm FWHM.
Edited by sullij1 (08/08/12 11:00 AM)
|
Awesomelenny
Post Laureate
   
Reged: 05/02/04
Loc: Long: 81.42 W Lat: 41.21 N
|
Re: CalK Homebrew From Last Sunday
[Re: sullij1]
#5357910 - 08/08/12 11:57 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Now you did it! Now I GOTTA know just how you did this. come on, share with us! What filters did you combine for this superb shot?
|
Peter Molnar
member
Reged: 01/23/08
Loc: Budapest, Hungary
|
Re: CalK Homebrew From Last Sunday
[Re: Awesomelenny]
#5358421 - 08/08/12 04:51 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Thanks, I'm waiting for the info.
I was also experimenting with combining filters: found that an UV/IR cut + UHC-S + visual red (all from Baader) performs like a ~40nm wide H-alpha filter (will try on some nebulae with my mono cam).
|
Jesus Munoz
sage
Reged: 03/09/07
Loc: Querétaro, México
|
Re: CalK Homebrew From Last Sunday
[Re: Peter Molnar]
#5358739 - 08/08/12 08:17 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Very interesting result! I'll be following your topic.
|
sullij1
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 11/08/08
|
Re: CalK Homebrew From Last Sunday
[Re: Jesus Munoz]
#5358908 - 08/08/12 10:25 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Here is the 411 on the filters. They are all sourced from Ebays Omega filters. You want 25mm rounds for best results. Looks like many of these got bought up. You can ask on the web site about availability. They will accommodate you if they can.
The filter closest to the camera is a 410BP10 at 18 USD. No longer available on the site, you can ask.
Next filter moving toward objective is a 395DF10 34.50 USD. No longer available on the site, you can ask.
First toward objective is the 390ALP at 24.50 USD. Still available here:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Optical-Interference-Filter-390ALP-25mm-Barrier-UVB-Bl-/310324057290?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item4840c154ca
This was a 77 USD total. This got the bandpass cut down to ~4nm CalK. This does not include parts to build an axial tilter. One can be constructed of copper plumbing tubing or Agena Blue fireball spacers (which I used + copper tubing). Probably another 30-50 dollars. Soo 107 – 127 USD complete.
The filters have to be tilted against each other to cut the passband. So this is necessary to get things done REALITIVELY inexpensively.
You can just buy the Omega 394NB4 for 160 usd Here:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Optical-Filter-Astronomy-394NB4-CaK-filter-1-25-Eyepiece-/150811106688?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item231d0add80
and try and cut the pass deeper. That is my next experiment.
The stack I name here cut the passband down to ~equal to that of the 394DF4 (I did do a literal comparison). The DF4 is more convenient cuz it just screws in. A less expensive axial tilter can be constructed to help cut this one closer to the actual 393.4 <1 nm passband. If you want to save money wait till I conduct that experiment and repost.
Why not just buy a CaK. I think you know the answer to this. THEY ARE EXPENSIVE! If you can get one! The Lunt and Coronado’s are a 700 USD buy in. The wait times for these items are 1-6months.
The other big outlet is Chroma and they want waaaay to much for their filter.
The stack I used for the shot you see is done with a 407BP2 in place of the 410BP10. It was donated to me by a colleague helping in the search for POBOYS CalK device.
Clear Skies,
Sullij
Edited by sullij1 (08/08/12 11:12 PM)
|
sullij1
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 11/08/08
|
Re: CalK Homebrew From Last Sunday
[Re: sullij1]
#5358922 - 08/08/12 10:41 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
BTW, this is photography only! Not tested for visual! CalK is not really visible to most of us anyway. Remember be safe, Photography only if you try this.
|
mbucky
Post Laureate
Reged: 10/21/07
Loc: San Diego
|
Re: CalK Homebrew From Last Sunday
[Re: sullij1]
#5361260 - 08/10/12 08:24 AM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
nice work and excellent post.
|
sullij1
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 11/08/08
|
Re: CalK Homebrew From Last Sunday
[Re: mbucky]
#5361951 - 08/10/12 03:21 PM
|
Edit
|
Reply
|
Quote |
Quick Reply
|
|
|
Thanks Ocean Beach (SD Rules)
It has been a fun and ongoing project.
Cheers
Edited by sullij1 (08/10/12 03:27 PM)
|