Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Mounts

Pages: 1
moynihan
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 07/22/03

Loc: Lake Michigan Watershed
New legs for the Voyager alt-azm new
      #5353402 - 08/05/12 04:10 PM

One of the arms of the spreader bar broke loose from a leg on my Astro-tech Voyager mount. Any suggestions on sources of new legs?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mclewis1
Thread Killer
*****

Reged: 02/25/06

Loc: New Brunswick, Canada
Re: New legs for the Voyager alt-azm new [Re: moynihan]
      #5353760 - 08/05/12 08:34 PM

I don't know about a source for just the legs but if you want to replace the whole tripod the mounting point is the same as for any CG-4/5/Orion SVP type of mount. The Voyager becomes a whole new mount when it's mounted on a heavier tripod.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Hermie
sage
*****

Reged: 04/20/05

Loc: Cloudy HKG
Re: New legs for the Voyager alt-azm new [Re: mclewis1]
      #5353932 - 08/05/12 10:49 PM

I never upgraded my voyager while I had it, but I believe Hands On Optics sell wooden replacement legs. This was discussed ages ago somewhere here.

Hermie


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
moynihan
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 07/22/03

Loc: Lake Michigan Watershed
Re: New legs for the Voyager alt-azm new [Re: Hermie]
      #5356525 - 08/07/12 01:53 PM

Thanks!

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Lane
Post Laureate


Reged: 11/19/07

Loc: Frisco, Texas
Re: New legs for the Voyager alt-azm new [Re: moynihan]
      #5357444 - 08/08/12 01:02 AM

I purchased this adapter and put it on this tripod. The tall version. That combination works well with the voyager, the mount fits perfectly in this adapter. I did remove the tripod spreader and remounted it up about 6". Where they put it made the tripod unstable.

This tripod is definitely better than the original voyager tripod but not as much as I wanted. I think one of the heavy duty Berlbach tripods would be much better if they didn't cost so much.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Edwin
member


Reged: 05/16/07

Loc: The Netherlands
Re: New legs for the Voyager alt-azm new [Re: Lane]
      #5357817 - 08/08/12 10:55 AM

I had the same problem and bought a TAL tripod (http://www.grootven.be/productdetails.asp?PID=418). A very sturdy solution for only EUR 64 ! It is much and much more stable then the original tripod.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
moynihan
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 07/22/03

Loc: Lake Michigan Watershed
Re: New legs for the Voyager alt-azm new [Re: Edwin]
      #5367307 - 08/13/12 08:53 PM

I just took delivery of the Hands on Optics wooden legs. The part of the voyager mount that the a leg screws onto appears a tad (imperceptibly) to wide to slide between the two wood sides of the tripod leg.
Any advice is welcome.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
simpleisbetter
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 04/18/11

Re: New legs for the Voyager alt-azm new [Re: moynihan]
      #5367474 - 08/13/12 10:30 PM

Sandpaper would be my first thought.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
moynihan
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 07/22/03

Loc: Lake Michigan Watershed
Re: New legs for the Voyager alt-azm new [Re: simpleisbetter]
      #5374436 - 08/18/12 10:22 AM

Got the legs on. Turned out it took a combination of Saturday a.m., patience, my morning espresso and the angle of attack.
BTW: these legs can raise the center of the Voyager head/saddle about 58" above the ground.

It is always funny the difference the legs make. I put my Wegat-Meade 5" Mak on it. It was very nice on it with the old legs. Now it is "over-mounted" (which is the way i like it )


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Kfrank
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 12/20/08

Loc: Northern Colorado
Re: New legs for the Voyager alt-azm new [Re: moynihan]
      #5374519 - 08/18/12 11:24 AM

Yep, overmounting is the way to go. Much more enjoyable to use a scope that has no jitter when focusing and damps out immediately when bumped.

I've never quite understood, though, why so many folks are willing to mess with the Voyager when it is marginal for so many common scopes out there. Sure, you can upgrade the legs and accomplish what you want, but why not just consider a better (and more expensive) mount/tripod combo to begin with?

I suspect that for many, it feels like your spending less money if you buy the mount and then buy a better tripod. The old "I have a $300 mount that works great" with no mention made of the $100-200 spent upgrading the tripod.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
moynihan
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 07/22/03

Loc: Lake Michigan Watershed
Re: New legs for the Voyager alt-azm new [Re: Kfrank]
      #5374566 - 08/18/12 11:56 AM

I had been using the voyager for awhile when the leg failed. Actually like the performance and ergonomics. Very smooth slo-mo controls for planets etc.
I have used it with Refractors (66mm -80mm), the 5" mak, and with a "L" accessory, my PST & ETX 90 OTA.

I do see a Disc Mount in my future though for my larger stuff


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
OldManInHawaii
member


Reged: 03/12/12

Re: New legs for the Voyager alt-azm new [Re: Kfrank]
      #5374734 - 08/18/12 01:45 PM

Quote:

Yep, overmounting is the way to go. Much more enjoyable to use a scope that has no jitter when focusing and damps out immediately when bumped.

I've never quite understood, though, why so many folks are willing to mess with the Voyager when it is marginal for so many common scopes out there. Sure, you can upgrade the legs and accomplish what you want, but why not just consider a better (and more expensive) mount/tripod combo to begin with?

I suspect that for many, it feels like your spending less money if you buy the mount and then buy a better tripod. The old "I have a $300 mount that works great" with no mention made of the $100-200 spent upgrading the tripod.




In defense of those like myself who bought a $300 mount, let me say that this was the first alt-az mount that I've ever purchased, and I didn't know what to expect in terms of vibration levels. After buying my first one, I now have a better idea of what to expect. Also, I'm not as serious in this hobby as the majority of those who frequent this forum, so cost is a more important consideration than for many of those here who spend over $500 for a mount.

I originally came to this forum seeking info on buying a portable replacement for my aged Meade 2080 SCT which could also be used for some terrestrial photography. Since reading these forums, I've gone quite a bit farther into my pocketbook than what I had originally expected and that includes my new $300 mount.

I'd certainly consider buying a heftier mount in the future if I were more serious about this hobby, but I don't think my skeletal system would be too obliging in this respect. What I have now is a compromise that I can live with.

Sorry for getting carried away here.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Goodchild
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 12/31/08

Re: New legs for the Voyager alt-azm new [Re: OldManInHawaii]
      #5374814 - 08/18/12 02:45 PM

I, too, use the Oberwerk wood tripod with my Voyager mount to hold my WO Megrez 90. It is both functional and attractive. I wouldn't hesitate to purchase this setup a second time.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
slack
sage
*****

Reged: 05/02/12

Re: New legs for the Voyager alt-azm new [Re: Kfrank]
      #5374931 - 08/18/12 04:26 PM

Quote:

I've never quite understood, though, why so many folks are willing to mess with the Voyager when it is marginal for so many common scopes out there. Sure, you can upgrade the legs and accomplish what you want, but why not just consider a better (and more expensive) mount/tripod combo to begin with?

I suspect that for many, it feels like your spending less money if you buy the mount and then buy a better tripod. The old "I have a $300 mount that works great" with no mention made of the $100-200 spent upgrading the tripod.




Then it might freak you out that I use my Voyager on a tripod that is 9x the cost of the head.



But what similar type of head comes with a great tripod, even at a higher price? None have sticks that I would choose to use, thus I appreciate that many heads are sold without them. I'd pass on most astro tripods. I only care about the head; I'll adapt it to use with tripods I already have.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
JimMo
I'd Rather Do It Myself


Reged: 01/08/07

Loc: Under the SE Michigan lightdom...
Re: New legs for the Voyager alt-azm new [Re: slack]
      #5374980 - 08/18/12 05:24 PM

My Voyager sits on a CG5 tripod that I bought for $99 bucks when OPT was blowing them out a few years ago. I sold the OEM tripod on astromart for $55 bucks so for net $44 bucks I have a nice sturdy tripod for it and it's taller than the original to boot.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Starman81
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 03/06/08

Loc: Metro Detroit, MI, USA
Re: New legs for the Voyager alt-azm [Re: Kfrank]
      #5375390 - 08/19/12 12:39 AM

Quote:

Yep, overmounting is the way to go. Much more enjoyable to use a scope that has no jitter when focusing and damps out immediately when bumped.

I've never quite understood, though, why so many folks are willing to mess with the Voyager when it is marginal for so many common scopes out there. Sure, you can upgrade the legs and accomplish what you want, but why not just consider a better (and more expensive) mount/tripod combo to begin with?

I suspect that for many, it feels like your spending less money if you buy the mount and then buy a better tripod. The old "I have a $300 mount that works great" with no mention made of the $100-200 spent upgrading the tripod.




I have a AT Voyager coming in the mail early next week and it is probable that I would have to upgrade the tripod sometime in the future and that's just what I think based on reading comments--I've never used or seen the mount in use before. When you are unable to see equipment in use or 'try before you buy', you end up buying a piece of equipment and upgrading it later. You kind of just have to know for yourself to see if it's something you can live with or that it just won't work out.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1


Extra information
22 registered and 39 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Dave M, richard7, bilgebay 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 926

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics