Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

The long-awaited conversion to CN 3.0 is in progress. Please see this thread for important information.

See update on outage timing here.

Equipment Discussions >> Mounts

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | (show all)
Peter in Reno
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 07/15/08

Loc: Reno, NV
Re: Meaning of this drift during a run? new [Re: dawziecat]
      #5490334 - 10/26/12 02:24 PM

Thanks for creating a new image. The star trails look straight and it looks like flexure to me.

This setup might be more stable:

http://www.teleskop-express.de/shop/product_info.php/info/p2836_Geoptik-T2-Adaptor-for-CANON-EOS-Lens-with-1-4--Phototripod.html

Peter


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
SMigol
sage


Reged: 07/30/10

Loc: California, USA
Re: Meaning of this drift during a run? new [Re: dawziecat]
      #5490406 - 10/26/12 03:08 PM

Very interesting that the lower left has nearly no movement but the rest of the frame features arcs around that lower point. Was your guide star in the lower left? If so, I'm still thinking field rotation which is polar alignment.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Peter in Reno
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 07/15/08

Loc: Reno, NV
Re: Meaning of this drift during a run? new [Re: SMigol]
      #5490472 - 10/26/12 03:56 PM

Yeah, you are correct. I had a hard time seeing the image since it's highly compressed. Now you mention it, I do notice stars are longer and slightly curved relative to lower left. It does look like field rotation.

Try align guide scope with main scope so the same guide star is at the center in both guide and main scopes. Assuming your mount is well polar aligned, choosing a guide star away from target DSO can artificially mimic bad polar alignment. Once both guide and main scopes are aligned, pick a guide star right at the center.

Peter


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
dawziecat
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 10/20/10

Loc: Rural Nova Scotia
Re: Meaning of this drift during a run? new [Re: Peter in Reno]
      #5490560 - 10/26/12 05:08 PM

I have mounted the guider onto the Canon taking lens. I hope rigidly enough to preclude flex but it's hard to feel certain about that. If I get good 15 minute subs over a wide swathe of sky, it will be absolute proof of flex to my mind.

It it doesn't, it might just mean I was not able to attach the guider to the lens with sufficient rigidity, in which case, nothing will be proved.

I will also check the alignment by turning off dec guiding and seeing what PHD indicates. I have done that in the past and there was no dec deviation in a 10 minute interval. That was some time ago though and the mount head has been removed and replaced since although the tripod was not moved.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Peter in Reno
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 07/15/08

Loc: Reno, NV
Re: Meaning of this drift during a run? new [Re: dawziecat]
      #5490582 - 10/26/12 05:21 PM

If you are responding to my latest post, I was not implying flexure. I was incorrect the first time I saw your latest image without alignment. Your polar alignment may be fine but if the guide star is quite a bit away from the center of your main camera, it could artificially mimic bad polar alignment. I mentioned to align (or sync) your guide scope with main scope and try to find a guide star at dead center of guide scope. This same guide star should also be dead center of main scope as well.

Peter


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
blueman
Photon Catcher
*****

Reged: 07/20/07

Loc: California
Re: Meaning of this drift during a run? new [Re: Peter in Reno]
      #5490627 - 10/26/12 05:54 PM

Oh, maybe I misunderstood the question?
Yes, I guide, but I thought it was being stated that with guiding you will still get drift.
Blueman
Quote:

Quote:

So 9 hours of tracking (without guiding)can be done with a careful drift alignment.




I am not sure if this is possible without modeling. The stars move at different rates at different parts of the sky due to refraction. Stars track at sideral rate at the Meridian. So without modeling the sky with modeling software like The Sky, I am not sure it is possible to track perfectly even with perfect polar alignment.

For example in my case. One night before the sky got dark, I polar aligned my mount and slew the mount to a bright star near target DSO for imaging. I centered the star with my imaging camera and the sky was still not dark. I went inside the house to watch TV until the sky got dark. 30 minutes later I went outside to check if the star is still centered of my camera. It drifted in RA direction. I wondered why it drifted in RA and later I found out about refraction.

I believe autoguiding is necessary even with perfect polar alignment and without modeling.

Peter




Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Peter in Reno
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 07/15/08

Loc: Reno, NV
Re: Meaning of this drift during a run? new [Re: blueman]
      #5490654 - 10/26/12 06:10 PM

Yes, but it's not yet clear what caused the drift during guiding. That's what this thread is about.

Other stated that with perfect polar alignment you can image for 9 hours unguided and I assumed that modeling of the sky was not included so I don't think it's possible due to refraction in the sky.

Peter


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
blueman
Photon Catcher
*****

Reged: 07/20/07

Loc: California
Re: Meaning of this drift during a run? new [Re: Peter in Reno]
      #5490903 - 10/26/12 09:33 PM

I do not use a model, I polar align and synch to one star and the AP-900 is ready to take 9 hours of images with no decernable drift.
Blueman
Quote:

Yes, but it's not yet clear what caused the drift during guiding. That's what this thread is about.

Other stated that with perfect polar alignment you can image for 9 hours unguided and I assumed that modeling of the sky was not included so I don't think it's possible due to refraction in the sky.

Peter




Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Peter in Reno
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 07/15/08

Loc: Reno, NV
Re: Meaning of this drift during a run? new [Re: blueman]
      #5490939 - 10/26/12 10:03 PM

That's probably because you always use autoguiding to correct any refraction. I also have A-P mount and do the same thing you do. Without modeling and perfect polar alignment, I don't think I can trust unguided imaging for 9 hours unsupervised.

Peter


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
blueman
Photon Catcher
*****

Reged: 07/20/07

Loc: California
Re: Meaning of this drift during a run? new [Re: Peter in Reno]
      #5491000 - 10/26/12 10:51 PM

As I stated twice, I do not do unguided 9 hour images. I was under the impression that the question was, can you guide for 9 hours without drift.
Blueman
Quote:

That's probably because you always use autoguiding to correct any refraction. I also have A-P mount and do the same thing you do. Without modeling and perfect polar alignment, I don't think I can trust unguided imaging for 9 hours unsupervised.

Peter




Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | (show all)


Extra information
7 registered and 30 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Dave M, richard7, bilgebay 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 4817

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics