Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu uh, User

Announcements and News >> Discussion of CN Articles, Reviews, and Reports

Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)
Charlie HeinAdministrator
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 11/02/03

Loc: 26.06.08N, +80.23.08W
Review of AT Paradigm 8mm and Pentax XF 8.5 mm
      #5434071 - 09/22/12 09:16 AM

Review of AT Paradigm 8mm and Pentax XF 8.5 mm

By George Golitzin


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Mark9473
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 07/21/05

Loc: 51N 4E
Re: Review of AT Paradigm 8mm and Pentax XF 8.5 mm new [Re: Charlie Hein]
      #5434830 - 09/22/12 05:56 PM

Like you, I sold my pair of XF 8.5; I found a Siebert SSS 8.4 to be better in almost every respect. The main thing that bugged me about the XF is the stray light just outside the exit pupil. I don't understand how that could even be acceptable for daytime use.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
russell23
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 05/31/09

Loc: Upstate NY
Re: Review of AT Paradigm 8mm and Pentax XF 8.5 mm new [Re: Mark9473]
      #5435823 - 09/23/12 10:19 AM

Quote:

Like you, I sold my pair of XF 8.5; I found a Siebert SSS 8.4 to be better in almost every respect. The main thing that bugged me about the XF is the stray light just outside the exit pupil. I don't understand how that could even be acceptable for daytime use.




Well, one thing to keep in mind is that the obervers exit pupil is smaller in daytime and the objects being observered are fully illuminated in daylight. I've found edge of field brightening to be annoying for certain eyepieces at night, but completely undetectable during the day. Perhaps in daylight the problem is not seen with the XF's.

Dave


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
russell23
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 05/31/09

Loc: Upstate NY
Re: Review of AT Paradigm 8mm and Pentax XF 8.5 mm new [Re: russell23]
      #5435825 - 09/23/12 10:21 AM

This was a very enjoyable review to read! Nice job George!

I do have my doubts that the AT Paradigm is a clone of the XF's. I always thought it was more likely that they are updated Orion Epic ED's - especially based upon the blackout issues you mention which were severe with the Epics.

Dave


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
EXT64
sage
*****

Reged: 12/15/07

Loc: Virginia Tech, VA, USA
Re: Review of AT Paradigm 8mm and Pentax XF 8.5 mm new [Re: russell23]
      #5436475 - 09/23/12 04:26 PM

I just bought the 8mm AT Paradigm, and I am glad to hear that the difficultly during the day is normal. When I first tried it out during the day I was frustrated by how hard it was to use. However sure enough at night it was no problem. My first night was mostly a scope collimation check so I didn't do much observing. I can't wait to try this eyepiece out in some real observing.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Mark9473
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 07/21/05

Loc: 51N 4E
Re: Review of AT Paradigm 8mm and Pentax XF 8.5 mm new [Re: russell23]
      #5436500 - 09/23/12 04:42 PM

Interesting point David. Of course it depends on focal length. In my 80mm apo, the most likely to be used in the daytime, the XF 8.5 would give 65x and 1.2 mm exit pupil. I think you'd need an f/3-f/4 scope or so before the eye pupil is normally smaller than the exit pupil.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
george golitzin
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 02/24/06

Re: Review of AT Paradigm 8mm and Pentax XF 8.5 mm new [Re: Mark9473]
      #5436535 - 09/23/12 05:01 PM

Hi guys--thanks for the good word. It was enjoyable writing my first real review, I hope it went over ok.

Perhaps "clone" was too strong a word--what is clear is that the same overall lens design is used: a two-element barlow, followed by a 1-2-1 arrangement. But clearly some tweaking is going on, because the two eyepieces have very different characteristics--likewise, the HD-60/Celestron X-cel LX are somewhat different, having apparently greater ER, but I'd be willing to bet they're based on the same lens design as well.

So far, my 8mm is holding up under continued use--I had a good time again on Jupiter and also Uranus, spotting Oberon and Titania in it. What gets me is how nicely it controls scatter on something like Jupiter--I'll go from my 7XW to the 8 Paradigm and seriously, I don't feel like I'm taking a big step down at all, except for the narrower field.

I recently acquired the 18 and 5 mm versions. Unfortunately, the 18 has pretty severe field curvature at f/5, and pretty bad at f/6. I was able to return it to Astronomics because it had some manufacturing flaws, but I would have sold it otherwise. The 5mm is very nice, although I think its field is a little restricted, down around 56 degrees. Unlike the 8 and 12, however, it has a glare issue from out-of-field sources: Jupiter, from outside the field, throws a huge wash of light across the eyepiece. The 8 and 12 do not show this problem. However, the 5 has the same nice control of scatter on the planet once it's in the field, and rich color saturation. These are nice eyepieces, not simply "for the money." Just plain nice. I especially like the 12mm.

Thanks for your comments!

George


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bdcmd
sage
*****

Reged: 03/14/08

Loc: Glen Rose, Texas
Re: Review of AT Paradigm 8mm and Pentax XF 8.5 mm new [Re: george golitzin]
      #5436614 - 09/23/12 05:50 PM

I'll echo the comments of others above: really nice review! I have been hoping someone would review these eyepieces a little more in depth than previously done, because they seem like they would be a really good upgrade over basic plossls. Really enjoyed your review, and hope to see some followup on how they perform in the future.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
zuben122
member
*****

Reged: 07/20/09

Re: Review of AT Paradigm 8mm and Pentax XF 8.5 mm new [Re: bdcmd]
      #5437633 - 09/24/12 08:37 AM

I just sprung for the 15mm, 12mm and 8mm Paradigms and enjoyed first light with them last night examining the moon. I compared the 15mm to the Meade Series 5000, 14mm UWA, the 12mm to a Nagler 11mm and the 8mm to the Meade Series 5000, 8.8mm UWA. In all three cases, detail was found to be a bit crisper in the Paradigms but the biggest difference was that the focus for the Paradigms just popped to an optimal image. The Meade's were a bit mushy in focus with the Nagler less so. I am very pleased with the Paradigm performance so far and can't wait to try it out on some DSO's and Jupiter and Saturn later this year.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
banatop
member


Reged: 05/06/07

Re: Review of AT Paradigm 8mm and Pentax XF 8.5 mm new [Re: george golitzin]
      #5439868 - 09/25/12 01:32 PM

Hi George, very interesting review. I recently bought a pair of the 8mm paradigms ( An identical version sold in the UK )based on good reports by Carlos in the planetary forum. I have found them to be very impressive on M13 : very sharp and bright, but most of all on Jupiter. During excellent seeing, using a Meade 178ed f/9 coupled with a Baader 60 degree bino viewer (200x), they gave a very sharp and highly detailed view (one of the best ever). The most impressive thing however was the colour balance. For some reason the Paradigms seem to be very good at bringing out the colours on Jupiter, I have no idea why this should be but I'm very happy with the results. I also use University optics Volcano top orthos and Zeiss Jena .96 Orthos and the Paradigms fit right in, with no drop in quality. Thanks again for an excellent review. Clear skies, John

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
george golitzin
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 02/24/06

Re: Review of AT Paradigm 8mm and Pentax XF 8.5 mm new [Re: banatop]
      #5440302 - 09/25/12 05:22 PM

John--very interesting comments, particularly the comparison to the quality orthos and considering that your scope is a 7-inch ED refractor. Jupiter is a demanding target; I really liked the color (and detail) the 8mm brought out on the planet. So I'm just a little surprised at how good this eyepiece seems to be!

Zuben--hope you enjoy the eyepieces. They do vary over focal lengths. I'll be interested in hearing from you and others what lengths are preferred.

Bruce--thank you. I'll probably post some follow ups in the eyepiece forum, particularly if, down the road, anyone inquires about this line. I'm also interested in seeing how these eyepieces hold up in my estimation--I've not had them very long yet. But so far, I like the 8 and 12 quite a bit.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Doug Culbertson
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 01/06/05

Re: Review of AT Paradigm 8mm and Pentax XF 8.5 mm new [Re: george golitzin]
      #5440327 - 09/25/12 05:33 PM

George,

Excellent review! I can't believe that I missed it for so lomg.

I used to have bino pairs of 12mm and 18mm Paradigms and my experience was quite similar to yours with both focal lengths. I sold them when I got rid of my bino, but now that I have picked up another bino, I do believe that I need another 12mm pair.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
CollinofAlabama
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 11/24/03

Loc: Lubbock, Texas, USA
Re: Review of AT Paradigm 8mm and Pentax XF 8.5 mm new [Re: Charlie Hein]
      #5440880 - 09/25/12 11:52 PM

George, don't know if you have access to one, but I'd like to see how the 8mm Paradigm and 8.5XF compare to a good 2x barlowed 17mm Sterling Plossl? The Sterlings have at least a 55* AFOV (Paolini has measured it at closer to 58*). They're dirt cheap and available from our sponsor as the AstroTech High Grade Plossl line. Would be interesting to know.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
george golitzin
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 02/24/06

Re: Review of AT Paradigm 8mm and Pentax XF 8.5 mm new [Re: CollinofAlabama]
      #5440981 - 09/26/12 01:53 AM

Thanks Doug!--But, are you unhappy with your 12.5 Ultimas?
I assume the Leicas are too wide for binoviewing (or did you send Tammy's back already?) Now that would be interesting...

Collin--I'm afraid I can't help with the Sterling plossl question. Perhaps someone else can oblige.

-g


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Doug Culbertson
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 01/06/05

Re: Review of AT Paradigm 8mm and Pentax XF 8.5 mm new [Re: george golitzin]
      #5441238 - 09/26/12 09:03 AM

George,

Nothing wrong with the 12.5mm Ultimas at all but, with my monoviewing eyepiece kit whittled down to three eyepieces, I am out of things to compare.

I keep thinking about a pair of 8mm Paradigms, but I always go back to what Roland Christen said about anything under 10mm magnifying the flaws in the binoviewer's prisms. I really wish that there was a 10mm Paradigm.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Sarkikos
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 12/18/07

Loc: Suburban Maryland, USA
Re: Review of AT Paradigm 8mm and Pentax XF 8.5 mm new [Re: george golitzin]
      #5441374 - 09/26/12 10:23 AM

George,

Great review. I've known that the Paradigm are very nice eyepieces for quite awhile now. I really don't understand why they haven't caught on, especially for binoviewing, at which they excel. Some great eyepieces seem to fly under the radar, while others that I consider not-so-good are overly praised. (Need I name names?) Maybe the low prices have kept away some of the high-flying amateurs? Low prices have never kept me away.

Quote:

So far, my 8mm is holding up under continued use--I had a good time again on Jupiter and also Uranus, spotting Oberon and Titania in it. What gets me is how nicely it controls scatter on something like Jupiter--I'll go from my 7XW to the 8 Paradigm and seriously, I don't feel like I'm taking a big step down at all, except for the narrower field.




Yes, scatter control is very good for the 8mm, as well as for the 12. I have pairs of both for binoviewing the planets and Moon. I'm happy to hear that the Paradigm 8 compared well against the XW 7. Another reason for me to put off buying more XW's.

Quote:

The 5mm is very nice, although I think its field is a little restricted, down around 56 degrees. Unlike the 8 and 12, however, it has a glare issue from out-of-field sources: Jupiter, from outside the field, throws a huge wash of light across the eyepiece. The 8 and 12 do not show this problem. However, the 5 has the same nice control of scatter on the planet once it's in the field, and rich color saturation. These are nice eyepieces, not simply "for the money." Just plain nice. I especially like the 12mm.




I don't have the 5, but I'm tempted to get a pair for binoviewing. Since I need an OCA to come to focus in my Newts, though, the effective focal length would be around 2.6mm, maybe a little too much.

The Paradigms do yield a richly-colored image of Jupiter. This surprises me, because I didn't get the idea that they have a "coffee" tone like the TV Plossls. If anything, they are relatively neutral. I'll have to pay more attention to this next time I view Jupiter.

Mike


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Sarkikos
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 12/18/07

Loc: Suburban Maryland, USA
Re: Review of AT Paradigm 8mm and Pentax XF 8.5 mm new [Re: Doug Culbertson]
      #5441407 - 09/26/12 10:46 AM

Doug,

Quote:

I keep thinking about a pair of 8mm Paradigms, but I always go back to what Roland Christen said about anything under 10mm magnifying the flaws in the binoviewer's prisms.




Yes, I've read that pronouncement from Rolandus Magnus, also. I don't want to contradict the Great Man, but my own experience has cast doubts on this one opinion of his.

My first suspicion that there may be exceptions to the 10mm Rule was roused when I used a pair of humble LER 6mm to binoview Mars through my 10" f/4.8 Dob. Since I needed a 1.9x OCA to come to focus, the effective focal length was about 3.2x, and the magnification around 375x.

The image was still surprisingly crisp and detailed. And this was with my old-style Burgess Binoviewer. I notice, though, that with lower-focal length eyepieces, it's necessary to seat both eyepieces just right in the focusers. A little fiddling is often required to merge the images and align everything correctly.

Now I have pairs of Paradigm 8, TV Plossl Smoothie 7.4, and Meade 5k UWA 6.7 for binoviewing. I will try them all soon for binoviewing Jupiter. You don't know what will work until you try it. Received knowledge is not always correct.

Mike


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Sarkikos
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 12/18/07

Loc: Suburban Maryland, USA
Re: Review of AT Paradigm 8mm and Pentax XF 8.5 mm new [Re: Doug Culbertson]
      #5441411 - 09/26/12 10:48 AM

Doug,

Quote:

I really wish that there was a 10mm Paradigm.




So do I. There does seem to be a dearth of good eyepieces - that I can afford - at 10mm. I have a pair of BCO 10mm on backorder that may fit the bill, whenever they arrive. I'm putting off buying an XW 10mm for now.

Mike


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Doug Culbertson
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 01/06/05

Re: Review of AT Paradigm 8mm and Pentax XF 8.5 mm new [Re: Sarkikos]
      #5441416 - 09/26/12 10:51 AM

Mike,

Due to Roland's advice, I always stuck to 10mm or longer eyepieces and, also due to his advice, relied on barlows/OCAs/Powerswitches to put the magnification ahead of the binoviewer. It does seem that there are a lot of folks happily binoviewing with higher power eyepieces though, if one reads through the Binoviewer Forum, in spite of Rolando's pronouncement!

I really hope that you will post your results with the various 8mm and shorter eyepiece pairs that you are trying! My bino is with Harry Siebert for the supercharge, so I have time to read other people's opinions for awhile.

George, sorry to hijack your thread, but I am really interested in how the 8mm Paradigm will perform in a bino. Shoot, I should just go order a pair.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Sarkikos
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 12/18/07

Loc: Suburban Maryland, USA
Re: Review of AT Paradigm 8mm and Pentax XF 8.5 mm new [Re: Doug Culbertson]
      #5441439 - 09/26/12 11:08 AM

Doug,

Quote:

I really hope that you will post your results with the various 8mm and shorter eyepiece pairs that you are trying! My bino is with Harry Siebert for the supercharge, so I have time to read other people's opinions for awhile.




Yes, I'm interested in finding out the results, too. Mars and Saturn would probably be better objects for a test rather than Jupiter. They seem to take higher power better than Jupiter does. The Moon is out of the question, because at those higher powers my eye floaters would be sheer torture for me.

In any case, the two TV Plossl 7.4 Smoothies should show a good image of Jupiter, you know, what with the "coffee" tone and all. But I do intend to test all these pairs on Jupiter soon, weather permitting.

I also intend to compare my Paradigm 12mm pair with my Brandon 12mm pair. I don't really want to sell either of these pairs, but if one gives me a better image ... who knows?

Whatever comparisons I make, though, will be in terms of planet surface detail and perceived contrast, not necessarily optical aberrations per se, unless they disturb my observations, such as field curvature.

Mike


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)


Extra information
0 registered and 6 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  iceblaze 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 3189

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics