Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Mounts

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | (show all)
Starhawk
Space Ranger
*****

Reged: 09/16/08

Loc: Tucson, Arizona
Re: 1/8 " LX80 Play in AZ axis acceptable? new [Re: Jack Huerkamp]
      #5535396 - 11/23/12 12:30 PM

It just sounds like a whole lot of the guts would have to be replaced to make this perform well. I can't see anything in the photos of the internals to say "you know, if a bushing took the place of that part, all would be well." It's like it would need entirely new gears- the sort of thing people do to upgrade a CGEM, and then because their alternative is a Mach 1. But that's a very different machine.

Just for the sake of discussion, if I were trying to design something for the LX 80 role, I think I would start with something like the Vixen Great Polaris DX and give it a tilting wedge block so the mount would center correctly in both modes and could remember your latitude setting.

I'm of two minds about the left/right scope arrangements. I have long imagined that would be the cat's pajamas, but seeing how it works in real life on the LX 80 has made me start thinking that may not be such a great idea, with one scope on the end of a bouncy arm with what is already a bouncy mount.

Someone had to do the experiment. It's just one of those things where you don't know at the outset if you are going to wind up with a Mustang or an Edsel. Maybe the Synta version will have magic- we'll have to see. The Nexstar SE's EQ performance is poor enough to make me wonder if this will turn out to be one of those ideas you just can't make work well.

-Rich


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Lee Jay
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 02/27/08

Loc: Westminster, CO
Re: 1/8 " LX80 Play in AZ axis acceptable? new [Re: Starhawk]
      #5535879 - 11/23/12 05:13 PM

Quote:

Someone had to do the experiment. It's just one of those things where you don't know at the outset if you are going to wind up with a Mustang or an Edsel. Maybe the Synta version will have magic- we'll have to see.
-Rich




Looks good to me.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DuiA1
super member


Reged: 05/07/12

Loc: Ontario, Canada
Re: 1/8 " LX80 Play in AZ axis acceptable? new [Re: Jack Huerkamp]
      #5536732 - 11/24/12 07:48 AM

I agree with you Jack. Was out last night and can confirm that it is mostly the mount az axis. Tapping the tripod only yielded 3-4 seconds damping time but tapping the diagonal on my AR6 was still at 8 seconds. Looks like it will be the norm unless Meade or someone else figures out how to stop the play in this axis.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
joeastro
newbie


Reged: 08/14/08

Loc: california city, ca 93505
Re: 1/8 " LX80 Play in AZ axis acceptable? new [Re: brokenwave]
      #5538591 - 11/25/12 11:47 AM

i JUST RECEVIED

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
joeastro
newbie


Reged: 08/14/08

Loc: california city, ca 93505
Re: 1/8 " LX80 Play in AZ axis acceptable? new [Re: brokenwave]
      #5538595 - 11/25/12 11:51 AM

i JUST RECEVIED MY LX80.. just sitting here there is 1mm or 1/8" AZ rotation slop. i tried to take some pictures of jupiter but the shutter just wiggles the mount.

i will call meade next week. see what they say. does any one have a picture of how to access the main az worm drive? and adjust the worm tension or position?

thanks joeastro


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DuiA1
super member


Reged: 05/07/12

Loc: Ontario, Canada
Re: 1/8 " LX80 Play in AZ axis acceptable? new [Re: joeastro]
      #5538613 - 11/25/12 12:04 PM

The yahoo group for the lx80 has the best pictures I've seen so far. What was your damping time when tapping your eyepiece. What scope are you using and it's weight?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
joeastro
newbie


Reged: 08/14/08

Loc: california city, ca 93505
Re: 1/8 " LX80 Play in AZ axis acceptable? new [Re: brokenwave]
      #5539132 - 11/25/12 05:29 PM

lx80 lower part to main part fix.
remove the whole lx80/90 head from the tripod.
look at the bottom.. there are 4 set screws
that are about 1/8"... loosen the north locking arm.
this has a plugin the middle of the bottom of the
bottom plate of this mount. now the bottom plate
should be free to wiggle..

tighten each of the 4 set screws about 1/4 turn, not too
tight, just touching pressure. I think they have some
spherical balls that these 4 screws push to make friction
with the UPPER base of the real mount.

now, push the north locking arm to lock position. you
should now have positive contact from the upper plate and
this lower plate.

bolt it back to the tripod and the 1mm type slop is gone.

you should have no slop in the upper mount when
you tighten the rear AZ locking arm.

joeastro


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DuiA1
super member


Reged: 05/07/12

Loc: Ontario, Canada
Re: 1/8 " LX80 Play in AZ axis acceptable? new [Re: joeastro]
      #5542597 - 11/27/12 06:32 PM

Joe I think what you're describing is not the same as the slop I'm experiencing. Neilson and jack have described the azimuth slop in the mount as being a result of the spring in the az mount is not stiff enough. Do you have the slop in the mount in equatorial mode if you grasp the cw bar and wiggle it? What scope are you using with your mount.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DuiA1
super member


Reged: 05/07/12

Loc: Ontario, Canada
Re: 1/8 " LX80 Play in AZ axis acceptable? new [Re: DuiA1]
      #5552439 - 12/03/12 05:16 PM

Well folks, finally made the decision to send the mount back for repair. Was tough but I cannot continue to use the mount with 10 second damp time and the az slop. Got the info to Meade today and awaiting their return email with the details on the process . Made it clear that I need two things fixed. Slop in the azimuth and update to my hc to the latest firmware. Any other advice?

Edited by DuiA1 (12/03/12 05:30 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Starhawk
Space Ranger
*****

Reged: 09/16/08

Loc: Tucson, Arizona
Re: 1/8 " LX80 Play in AZ axis acceptable? new [Re: DuiA1]
      #5552448 - 12/03/12 05:20 PM

Are you saying you are returning it, or you want them to attempt a repair?

-Rich


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DuiA1
super member


Reged: 05/07/12

Loc: Ontario, Canada
Re: 1/8 " LX80 Play in AZ axis acceptable? new [Re: Starhawk]
      #5552476 - 12/03/12 05:36 PM

Sorry, edited my post. Want them to attempt a repair. Some users are experiencing better damping times so I am hoping for better results with the repair. I am trying really hard to love this mount and will see if Meade can make it right.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Starhawk
Space Ranger
*****

Reged: 09/16/08

Loc: Tucson, Arizona
Re: 1/8 " LX80 Play in AZ axis acceptable? new [Re: DuiA1]
      #5552491 - 12/03/12 05:44 PM

The better reports appear to reflect low usage time.

-Rich


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jack Huerkamp
Vendor - Waning Moon


Reged: 10/13/05

Loc: Louisiana
Re: 1/8 " LX80 Play in AZ axis acceptable? new [Re: DuiA1]
      #5553505 - 12/04/12 08:04 AM

After I received my LX80 back from Meade Service it still had the same level of slop and damping time as your mount. They said that due to the spring loading of the worm/worm gear, this play is normal and they refused to authorize a second return for servicing.

I hope Meade has figured out how to eliminate the slope and control the damping time on the mount. If so, I will pursue having Meade "fix" mine.

In the interim, I am ordering a SkyWatcher Az EQ-6. It is more than twice the price of the LX80, but it is capable of handling a C9.25 without vibrating.

Jack


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jack Huerkamp
Vendor - Waning Moon


Reged: 10/13/05

Loc: Louisiana
Re: 1/8 " LX80 Play in AZ axis acceptable? new [Re: Starhawk]
      #5553507 - 12/04/12 08:07 AM

In my case, good results with short damping time and minimal slop occurred when I was using my C6 OTA - about 15# with the 11# counterweight. With the 21# C9.25 and 22# counterweight, the slop and vibrations got so high that MallinCam use was not possible even in A/A mode.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mega256
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 05/10/07

Loc: N of Tampa
Re: 1/8 " LX80 Play in AZ axis acceptable? new [Re: Jack Huerkamp]
      #5554240 - 12/04/12 04:26 PM

I think the EQ6 alt/az will be a good choice Jack.
Looks to be a great mount!

Too bad ,I too wantted a LX80 to use in dual mode.But
from what I read,it wont work for me..If you guys are having problems with a single scope on the mount,going to
2 scopes will just make it tougher! (IMHO)...
I will just use my 6se mount and lunt 60THa and C6 for that
alt az setup,,
Most of my video is over or about 30-60 seconds,so an EQ is nice...And for DSLR its needed...The Ieq45 will suite me for
that,,,it allso has springs(on the worm gears) ,but they seam to work.
BTW the LX80 is priced on ebay and hayneadle at 899 for
the last few days..
Looking forward to the new EQ6 alt/az test.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jack Huerkamp
Vendor - Waning Moon


Reged: 10/13/05

Loc: Louisiana
Re: 1/8 " LX80 Play in AZ axis acceptable? new [Re: mega256]
      #5554734 - 12/04/12 10:06 PM

Brian,

I spoke to Brian at KWTelescopes today and placed the order for the SkyWatcher Az EQ-6.

I will be able to do a side by side comparison with the LX80 and will report back to the group.

Jack


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DuiA1
super member


Reged: 05/07/12

Loc: Ontario, Canada
Re: 1/8 " LX80 Play in AZ axis acceptable? new [Re: Jack Huerkamp]
      #5556369 - 12/05/12 08:28 PM

Jack, are they shipping in January and did they give you a date for yours? Looking forward to your review.
Btw, Meade has been good and offered return shipping on this repair. Will be shipping it hopefully tomorrow. Will let you know how things work out. I'm hoping for the better.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jack Huerkamp
Vendor - Waning Moon


Reged: 10/13/05

Loc: Louisiana
Re: 1/8 " LX80 Play in AZ axis acceptable? new [Re: DuiA1]
      #5556570 - 12/05/12 10:29 PM

KWTelescopes in Kitchener Waterloo has them in stock. That is who I ordered mine from.

Jack


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DuiA1
super member


Reged: 05/07/12

Loc: Ontario, Canada
Re: 1/8 " LX80 Play in AZ axis acceptable? new [Re: Jack Huerkamp]
      #5563267 - 12/09/12 10:33 PM

I am just wondering why the variability with this mount on this issue. Mike is using his and he has not much slop in his az axis . Also some have reported no slop. Others have issues as I have (Jack). My question is could tweaking any mechanical parts of the mount by Meade address this issue permanently? I mean some have posted no slop with 20 lb scopes so there must be some hope right? I am anxiously waiting for the return of mine...

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jack Huerkamp
Vendor - Waning Moon


Reged: 10/13/05

Loc: Louisiana
Re: 1/8 " LX80 Play in AZ axis acceptable? new [Re: DuiA1]
      #5563706 - 12/10/12 08:17 AM

I had hoped that when Meade receved my mount for servicing in September, they would/could eliminate the Az play. When it returned from servicing, the play was the same. When I called back to complain, I was told by the head of Meade's service department that the play is normal.

So to minimize the effects of movement caused by spring loaded gears, I have had to use shorter and lighter OTA's than I purchased the mount for.

The only way to eliminate the play is to eliminate the spring loaded worm and keep the gears meshed. The sping is used instead to eliminate gear damage. It is possible to fix the worm/worm gear and add a slip clutch to prevent gear damage. But that inceases the complexity of the drive system and its cost. If given the option, I would have opted for the later.

Jack Huerkamp


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | (show all)


Extra information
14 registered and 36 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Dave M, richard7, bilgebay 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 7481

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics