Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home pageAstronomics discounts for Cloudy Nights members
· Get a Cloudy Nights T-Shirt · Submit a Review / Article

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu… uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Cats & Casses

Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)
Grandpa Jim
old fogey
*****

Reged: 08/04/12

Loc: GREAT AMERICAN DESERT
Celestron C-6 SCT vs Orion Apex 127mm (??)
      #5506875 - 11/06/12 01:08 PM

I am in the process of shopping for an SCT scope, and *besides* aperture, is there a quality difference between these two:
Celestron C-6 SCT vs Orion Apex 127mm (??) (price is identical)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rmollise
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 07/06/07

Re: Celestron C-6 SCT vs Orion Apex 127mm (??) new [Re: Grandpa Jim]
      #5507050 - 11/06/12 03:11 PM

The Orion is NOT an SCT, it is an MCT. In addition to the larger aperture, the Celestron is a much more versatile scope. Get the C6. The Mak is a nice scope but this is not a hard call.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Grandpa Jim
old fogey
*****

Reged: 08/04/12

Loc: GREAT AMERICAN DESERT
Re: Celestron C-6 SCT vs Orion Apex 127mm (??) new [Re: rmollise]
      #5507052 - 11/06/12 03:12 PM

That's what I needed........an informed opinion. Thanks.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
orion61

*****

Reged: 10/20/07

Loc: Birthplace James T Kirk
Re: Celestron C-6 SCT vs Orion Apex 127mm (??) new [Re: Grandpa Jim]
      #5507235 - 11/06/12 04:59 PM

If you wanted Primarily Lunar/Planetary/Doubles,
The MCT is hard to beat,
everybody else, C6


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
rg55
scholastic sledgehammer
*****

Reged: 08/02/08

Loc: western US
Re: Celestron C-6 SCT vs Orion Apex 127mm (??) new [Re: Grandpa Jim]
      #5507278 - 11/06/12 05:32 PM

If you are often at dark sky sites, get the SCT. If you live in a light polluted city/suburb, the MCT fills the bill for the solar system stuff. They're both sweet grab and go's, you won't be sorry.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
GlennLeDrew
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 06/18/08

Loc: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Re: Celestron C-6 SCT vs Orion Apex 127mm (??) new [Re: rg55]
      #5507314 - 11/06/12 06:00 PM

The Apex might be working at an effective aperture more like 118-121mm, instead of the stated 127mm. The C-6, as long as you don't push the focus far outside the back end, will work at its specified aperture of 152mm.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Patrick
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 05/16/03

Loc: Franklin, Ohio
Re: Celestron C-6 SCT vs Orion Apex 127mm (??) new [Re: Grandpa Jim]
      #5507864 - 11/07/12 02:26 AM

They're both the same price (you can pick up the C6 OTA from High Point Scientific for $400). I've never used an Apex 127, but from all reports it's a decent scope. However, the C6 is one of those scopes that's very versatile for both deep sky and planetary viewing. The C6 will provide a wider field of view, yet takes power well.

Patrick


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
t.r.
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 02/14/08

Loc: Upstate NY
Re: Celestron C-6 SCT vs Orion Apex 127mm (??) new [Re: Patrick]
      #5508137 - 11/07/12 10:12 AM

The C6's have a good track record of having very good optics.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Eddgie
Postmaster
*****

Reged: 02/01/06

Re: Celestron C-6 SCT vs Orion Apex 127mm (??) new [Re: orion61]
      #5508319 - 11/07/12 12:46 PM

Quote:

If you wanted Primarily Lunar/Planetary/Doubles,
The MCT is hard to beat,
everybody else, C6




That would not be my advice. The C6 has more resolving power, and more clear aperture, so it will have better contrast transfer.

The quality of the C6s appears to be uniformly very good to excellent.

The Orion 127 has a bigger obseruction (by percentage) than the C6.

For must about anything one would want to do with them, including planets and doubles, the C6 would be a better choice.

Many people believe that somehow an MCT can outperform a larger SCT on planets. If the optical quality is equal, the only way it can outperform a larger SCT on planets is if it has more clear aperture (very small central obstruction) and most small MCTs simply don't have the tiny obstruction needed to allow this.

A good example would be the Orion 180mm MCT vs the C8. In this case, the clear aperture of the Orion is about 140mm but the obstruction is only 23%.

The C8 has an obstrucion that is about 133mm. This is a great example of how a smaller MCT can beat a larger SCT on planets. It has a small obstruction (by percentage) and more clear aperture than the C8.

But this is not at all the case for the Orion 127 vs the C6.

And if I am not mistaken, these are both made by the same company, so it is a fair assumption that the quality will be more or less the same.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Paco_Grande
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 07/14/12

Loc: Banana Republic of California
Re: Celestron C-6 SCT vs Orion Apex 127mm (??) new [Re: Eddgie]
      #5508525 - 11/07/12 03:11 PM

Jim, I have both of those and honestly, regardless of the stats and numbers, and the sizes of the obstruction, et al, unless you sit down with both at the same time and compare views on different objects, you'll never know which is "better" because they're both really very good and very similar. Perhaps an astrophile might make hay over this or that, but even if you can see the differences, would they really matter? Overall I'd say no.

If I had to choose just one, I'd pick the C6. Why? Because it's a bit faster (slightly wider field) and a bit more aperture. I view the Mak as a bit more specialized and the C6 a tad bit more versatile. You're not giving up a single thing by going with the C6 - it's that good!

I bought the C6 new from HighPoint and the Mak used. Why both? Because the Mak was very nice used and, well, just because.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Mkofski
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 07/19/11

Loc: Greenfield, Indiana, USA
Re: Celestron C-6 SCT vs Orion Apex 127mm (??) new [Re: Paco_Grande]
      #5508572 - 11/07/12 03:39 PM

Yea... You need both. But then you'll need a second mount... And some more eyepices and maybe field flatner..., etc. See how this becomes an expensive hobby? For just 1, I'd go with the C6.9

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Grandpa Jim
old fogey
*****

Reged: 08/04/12

Loc: GREAT AMERICAN DESERT
Re: Celestron C-6 SCT vs Orion Apex 127mm (??) new [Re: Paco_Grande]
      #5508733 - 11/07/12 05:07 PM

Quote:

Jim, I have both of those and honestly, regardless of the stats and numbers, and the sizes of the obstruction, et al, unless you sit down with both at the same time and compare views on different objects, you'll never know which is "better" because they're both really very good and very similar. Perhaps an astrophile might make hay over this or that, but even if you can see the differences, would they really matter? Overall I'd say no.

If I had to choose just one, I'd pick the C6. Why? Because it's a bit faster (slightly wider field) and a bit more aperture. I view the Mak as a bit more specialized and the C6 a tad bit more versatile. You're not giving up a single thing by going with the C6 - it's that good!

I bought the C6 new from HighPoint and the Mak used. Why both? Because the Mak was very nice used and, well, just because.




Pretty much decided on the C-6, now I just need to butter up "Santa"


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Mary
sage


Reged: 01/29/08

Loc: Highlands Ranch, CO
Re: Celestron C-6 SCT vs Orion Apex 127mm (??) new [Re: Grandpa Jim]
      #5511792 - 11/09/12 02:48 PM

I'm chiming in a bit late here, but FWIW I have an Orion Apex 127 and I have been quite happy with it. Have not observed through a C6 though, so unfortunately I am not able to give a comparision.

Mary


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
sqrlman
member
*****

Reged: 01/02/08

Re: Celestron C-6 SCT vs Orion Apex 127mm (??) *DELETED* new [Re: Eddgie]
      #5511863 - 11/09/12 03:30 PM

Post deleted by sqrlman

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Chris_H
Post Laureate
*****

Reged: 11/24/03

Loc: Norway
Re: Celestron C-6 SCT vs Orion Apex 127mm (??) new [Re: sqrlman]
      #5511928 - 11/09/12 04:17 PM

I believe the CO on the 180MAK is 29%. The 127MAK is actually one of my favorite telescopes but as people say, it's not really 127mm but 121mm. That plus the improved coatings on the C6 just makes the SCT a better telescope to buy.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Grandpa Jim
old fogey
*****

Reged: 08/04/12

Loc: GREAT AMERICAN DESERT
Re: Celestron C-6 SCT vs Orion Apex 127mm (??) new [Re: Chris_H]
      #5511971 - 11/09/12 04:50 PM

Well......found out today that is to be even more bureaucratic BS with my Veterans disability benefits, so I won't be buying any new scopes for awhile..............

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Keith
sage
*****

Reged: 05/14/05

Loc: Costa Mesa, CA USA
Re: Celestron C-6 SCT vs Orion Apex 127mm (??) new [Re: Grandpa Jim]
      #5512705 - 11/10/12 05:24 AM

I had a skyview pro version 127 years ago, and I found it to be pretty awesome, it beat most C5's on sharpness and contrast on planetary, but this was before the c6 came out. If I was to fill that hole again (I have nothing inbetween 4" and 8" since I sold the mak and my 6" reflectors), I would choose the C6 over the 127 for many of the same reasons others have stated. Specials have had them on sale as little as $299 in the past (wish I grabbed one), but $399 seems to be the going rate, could probably find one used under $300.

Easier adaptablility to 2" accessories and better compatibility with 6.3 reducer, along with it being a shorter tube (and I don't think it is any heavier, since the mak corrector is much thicker) gets my vote, not to mention the aperture.

That being said, the new SLT127 has exactly the same tube as the apex but with a celestron paint job, is a pretty nice portable goto setup, cheaper than nexstar 5 or 6.

When I sold my 127, it had a scopestuff SCT rear cell thread adpater, 2" OPT dielectric diagonal, and I threw in a 42mm superview in addition to the 25mm and 10mm sirius plossls, dewsheild, and it went with my baader bracket modified 80GT mount on a 1.5" steel wedgepod (tasco, but same as N4/5), it was quite a custom setup. I let it all go for $500 to a former bandmate. Despite naysayers, the 127 actually worked fine with the 2" 42mm superview.

I still say c6 regardless, if it was C5 vs the Mak I would lean towards the mak.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
orion61

*****

Reged: 10/20/07

Loc: Birthplace James T Kirk
Re: Celestron C-6 SCT vs Orion Apex 127mm (??) new [Re: Grandpa Jim]
      #5516411 - 11/12/12 05:56 PM

PM sent Jim..

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ken hubal
Pooh-Bah
*****

Reged: 05/01/07

Re: Celestron C-6 SCT vs Orion Apex 127mm (??) new [Re: orion61]
      #5521450 - 11/15/12 03:41 PM

When doing a direct comparison between the Orion 127 Mak and the C6, the Mak won out on sharpness and contrast with the C6 showing little to recommend it.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Darren Drake
Carpal Tunnel
*****

Reged: 10/09/02

Loc: Chicagoland
Re: Celestron C-6 SCT vs Orion Apex 127mm (??) new [Re: ken hubal]
      #5521477 - 11/15/12 04:00 PM

That's an interesting result. Was the C6 collimated and cooled? What objects were viewed and what types of differences were seen?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)


Extra information
19 registered and 27 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Cotts, Starman27, kkokkolis 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled


Thread views: 2569

Jump to

CN Forums Home


Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics